SLS.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Solaris Resources, Inc.'s net margin of -5.8%. Solaris Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.17%.

Solaris Resources, Inc. has a consensus price target of $17.10, signalling upside risk potential of 61.02%. On the other hand First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $35.43 which suggests that it could grow by 4.59%. Given that Solaris Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than First Quantum Minerals Ltd., analysts believe Solaris Resources, Inc. is more attractive than First Quantum Minerals Ltd..

Solaris Resources, Inc. has a beta of 2.260, which suggesting that the stock is 125.966% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.889, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.878%.

Solaris Resources, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Solaris Resources, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Solaris Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Solaris Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$16.8M is higher than First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$107.4M. Notably, Solaris Resources, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s PE ratio is 439.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solaris Resources, Inc. is -- versus 4.02x for First Quantum Minerals Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Solaris Resources, Inc.'s net margin of 65.8%. Solaris Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.25%.

Solaris Resources, Inc. has a consensus price target of $17.10, signalling upside risk potential of 61.02%. On the other hand Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $27.36 which suggests that it could grow by 5.4%. Given that Solaris Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hudbay Minerals, Inc., analysts believe Solaris Resources, Inc. is more attractive than Hudbay Minerals, Inc..

Solaris Resources, Inc. has a beta of 2.260, which suggesting that the stock is 125.966% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a beta of 1.959, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.865%.

Solaris Resources, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. offers a yield of 0.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Solaris Resources, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. pays out 7.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Solaris Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hudbay Minerals, Inc. quarterly revenues of $465.5M. Solaris Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$16.8M is lower than Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s net income of $306.3M. Notably, Solaris Resources, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s PE ratio is 16.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solaris Resources, Inc. is -- versus 3.68x for Hudbay Minerals, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lundin Mining Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Solaris Resources, Inc.'s net margin of 19.16%. Solaris Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Lundin Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 5.26%.

Solaris Resources, Inc. has a consensus price target of $17.10, signalling upside risk potential of 61.02%. On the other hand Lundin Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $26.99 which suggests that it could fall by -2.7%. Given that Solaris Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lundin Mining Corp., analysts believe Solaris Resources, Inc. is more attractive than Lundin Mining Corp..

Solaris Resources, Inc. has a beta of 2.260, which suggesting that the stock is 125.966% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lundin Mining Corp. has a beta of 1.724, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.39%.

Solaris Resources, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lundin Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Solaris Resources, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lundin Mining Corp. pays out -132.05% of its earnings as a dividend.

Solaris Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lundin Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Solaris Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$16.8M is lower than Lundin Mining Corp.'s net income of $254.3M. Notably, Solaris Resources, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lundin Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is 607.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solaris Resources, Inc. is -- versus 5.21x for Lundin Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marimaca Copper Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Solaris Resources, Inc.'s net margin of --. Solaris Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Marimaca Copper Corp.'s return on equity of -18.21%.

Solaris Resources, Inc. has a consensus price target of $17.10, signalling upside risk potential of 61.02%. On the other hand Marimaca Copper Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $13.32 which suggests that it could grow by 17.12%. Given that Solaris Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than Marimaca Copper Corp., analysts believe Solaris Resources, Inc. is more attractive than Marimaca Copper Corp..

Solaris Resources, Inc. has a beta of 2.260, which suggesting that the stock is 125.966% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marimaca Copper Corp. has a beta of 0.929, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.079%.

Solaris Resources, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marimaca Copper Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Solaris Resources, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marimaca Copper Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Solaris Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Marimaca Copper Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Solaris Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$16.8M is lower than Marimaca Copper Corp.'s net income of -$14.7M. Notably, Solaris Resources, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Marimaca Copper Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solaris Resources, Inc. is -- versus -- for Marimaca Copper Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.