LUN.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a net margin of 19.16% compared to Lundin Mining Corp.'s net margin of -5.8%. Lundin Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 5.26% beat First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.17%.

Lundin Mining Corp. has a consensus price target of $18.47, signalling downside risk potential of -45.19%. On the other hand First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $22.37 which suggests that it could fall by -42.24%. Given that Lundin Mining Corp. has more downside risk than First Quantum Minerals Ltd., analysts believe First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is more attractive than Lundin Mining Corp..

Lundin Mining Corp. has a beta of 1.692, which suggesting that the stock is 69.211% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.860, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.031%.

Lundin Mining Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.52%. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Lundin Mining Corp. pays -132.05% of its earnings as a dividend. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lundin Mining Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Lundin Mining Corp.'s net income of $254.3M is higher than First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$107.4M. Notably, Lundin Mining Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 730.35x while First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s PE ratio is 502.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lundin Mining Corp. is 6.28x versus 4.60x for First Quantum Minerals Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a net margin of 19.16% compared to Lundin Mining Corp.'s net margin of 65.8%. Lundin Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 5.26% beat Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.25%.

Lundin Mining Corp. has a consensus price target of $18.47, signalling downside risk potential of -45.19%. On the other hand Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $19.49 which suggests that it could fall by -42.85%. Given that Lundin Mining Corp. has more downside risk than Hudbay Minerals, Inc., analysts believe Hudbay Minerals, Inc. is more attractive than Lundin Mining Corp..

Lundin Mining Corp. has a beta of 1.692, which suggesting that the stock is 69.211% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a beta of 1.874, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.423%.

Lundin Mining Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.52%. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. offers a yield of 0.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Lundin Mining Corp. pays -132.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. pays out 7.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lundin Mining Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Hudbay Minerals, Inc. quarterly revenues of $465.5M. Lundin Mining Corp.'s net income of $254.3M is lower than Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s net income of $306.3M. Notably, Lundin Mining Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 730.35x while Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lundin Mining Corp. is 6.28x versus 4.79x for Hudbay Minerals, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Imperial Metals Corp. has a net margin of 19.16% compared to Lundin Mining Corp.'s net margin of 22.84%. Lundin Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 5.26% beat Imperial Metals Corp.'s return on equity of 21.06%.

Lundin Mining Corp. has a consensus price target of $18.47, signalling downside risk potential of -45.19%. On the other hand Imperial Metals Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -19.98%. Given that Lundin Mining Corp. has more downside risk than Imperial Metals Corp., analysts believe Imperial Metals Corp. is more attractive than Lundin Mining Corp..

Lundin Mining Corp. has a beta of 1.692, which suggesting that the stock is 69.211% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Imperial Metals Corp. has a beta of 0.745, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.463%.

Lundin Mining Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.52%. Imperial Metals Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lundin Mining Corp. pays -132.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Imperial Metals Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lundin Mining Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Imperial Metals Corp. quarterly revenues of $168.8M. Lundin Mining Corp.'s net income of $254.3M is higher than Imperial Metals Corp.'s net income of $38.5M. Notably, Lundin Mining Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 730.35x while Imperial Metals Corp.'s PE ratio is 10.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lundin Mining Corp. is 6.28x versus 2.95x for Imperial Metals Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tribeca Resources Corp. has a net margin of 19.16% compared to Lundin Mining Corp.'s net margin of --. Lundin Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 5.26% beat Tribeca Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -85.24%.

Lundin Mining Corp. has a consensus price target of $18.47, signalling downside risk potential of -45.19%. On the other hand Tribeca Resources Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lundin Mining Corp. has higher upside potential than Tribeca Resources Corp., analysts believe Lundin Mining Corp. is more attractive than Tribeca Resources Corp..

Lundin Mining Corp. has a beta of 1.692, which suggesting that the stock is 69.211% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tribeca Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.493, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.721%.

Lundin Mining Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.52%. Tribeca Resources Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lundin Mining Corp. pays -132.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Tribeca Resources Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lundin Mining Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Tribeca Resources Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Lundin Mining Corp.'s net income of $254.3M is higher than Tribeca Resources Corp.'s net income of -$229.5K. Notably, Lundin Mining Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 730.35x while Tribeca Resources Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lundin Mining Corp. is 6.28x versus -- for Tribeca Resources Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.