Will Tesla Stock Go Up In 2026?
EV giant Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) has, somewhat surprisingly, undershot the broader…
Buy
75
III.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$8.27
Seasonality move
:
13.24%
Day range:
$8.17 - $8.40
52-week range:
$1.70 - $8.40
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
7.49x
P/S ratio:
2.11x
P/B ratio:
1.48x
Volume:
257.6K
Avg. volume:
154.4K
1-year change:
328.5%
Market cap:
$1.5B
Revenue:
$494.4M
EPS (TTM):
$1.10
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
III.TO
Imperial Metals Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
|
$751.5M | $0.04 | 43.16% | 68.65% | $15.43 |
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
|
$2B | $0.08 | 3.58% | -53.03% | $35.43 |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
$553.7M | $0.09 | 16.88% | 632.89% | $27.36 |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
|
$1.3B | $0.20 | 168.99% | 13.67% | $26.99 |
|
NGEX.TO
NGEx Minerals Ltd.
|
-- | -$0.06 | -- | -20.11% | $28.34 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
III.TO
Imperial Metals Corp.
|
$8.27 | -- | $1.5B | 7.49x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.11x |
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
|
$13.39 | $15.43 | $10.2B | 23.83x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.45x |
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
|
$33.88 | $35.43 | $28.3B | 439.43x | $0.08 | 0% | 4.02x |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
$25.96 | $27.36 | $10.3B | 16.05x | $0.01 | 0.08% | 3.68x |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
|
$27.74 | $26.99 | $23.8B | 607.00x | $0.03 | 0.62% | 5.21x |
|
NGEX.TO
NGEx Minerals Ltd.
|
$24.92 | $28.34 | $5.4B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
III.TO
Imperial Metals Corp.
|
19.68% | 2.213 | 23.17% | 0.38x |
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
|
31.04% | 2.868 | 21.68% | 0.70x |
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
|
38.13% | 1.829 | 36.48% | 0.72x |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
26.46% | 3.638 | 18.47% | 0.72x |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
|
9.6% | 2.700 | 4.71% | 0.79x |
|
NGEX.TO
NGEx Minerals Ltd.
|
0.7% | 2.241 | 0.02% | 12.35x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
III.TO
Imperial Metals Corp.
|
$69.7M | $65M | 15.38% | 21.06% | 38.52% | $31.7M |
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
|
$176M | $153.3M | 6.75% | 9.51% | 18.6% | -$29.7M |
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
|
$477.9M | $433.9M | 0.1% | 0.17% | 23.4% | $1.1B |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
$57.3M | $6.1M | 11.49% | 16.25% | 1.3% | $4.7M |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
|
$401.4M | $381.2M | 4.26% | 5.26% | 28.74% | $138.3M |
|
NGEX.TO
NGEx Minerals Ltd.
|
-$17.1K | -$31M | -81.49% | -81.71% | -- | -$11.1M |
Imperial Metals Corp. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns III.TO or CS.TO?
Capstone Copper Corp. has a net margin of 22.84% compared to Imperial Metals Corp.'s net margin of 43.86%. Imperial Metals Corp.'s return on equity of 21.06% beat Capstone Copper Corp.'s return on equity of 9.51%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital III.TOImperial Metals Corp.41.32% $0.22 $1.2B CS.TOCapstone Copper Corp.21.36% $0.45 $7.3B -
What do Analysts Say About III.TO or CS.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 11.85%. On the other hand Capstone Copper Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $15.43 which suggests that it could grow by 15.2%. Given that Capstone Copper Corp. has higher upside potential than Imperial Metals Corp., analysts believe Capstone Copper Corp. is more attractive than Imperial Metals Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings III.TOImperial Metals Corp.0 0 0 CS.TOCapstone Copper Corp.10 1 0 -
Is III.TO or CS.TO More Risky?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a beta of 0.827, which suggesting that the stock is 17.251% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Capstone Copper Corp. has a beta of 2.264, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 126.395%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock III.TO or CS.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Capstone Copper Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Imperial Metals Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Capstone Copper Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios III.TO or CS.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. quarterly revenues are $168.8M, which are smaller than Capstone Copper Corp. quarterly revenues of $824.2M. Imperial Metals Corp.'s net income of $38.5M is lower than Capstone Copper Corp.'s net income of $361.5M. Notably, Imperial Metals Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.49x while Capstone Copper Corp.'s PE ratio is 23.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Metals Corp. is 2.11x versus 3.45x for Capstone Copper Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income III.TOImperial Metals Corp.2.11x 7.49x $168.8M $38.5M CS.TOCapstone Copper Corp.3.45x 23.83x $824.2M $361.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns III.TO or FM.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a net margin of 22.84% compared to Imperial Metals Corp.'s net margin of -5.8%. Imperial Metals Corp.'s return on equity of 21.06% beat First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.17%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital III.TOImperial Metals Corp.41.32% $0.22 $1.2B FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.25.78% -$0.08 $25.9B -
What do Analysts Say About III.TO or FM.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 11.85%. On the other hand First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $35.43 which suggests that it could grow by 4.59%. Given that Imperial Metals Corp. has higher upside potential than First Quantum Minerals Ltd., analysts believe Imperial Metals Corp. is more attractive than First Quantum Minerals Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings III.TOImperial Metals Corp.0 0 0 FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.7 10 0 -
Is III.TO or FM.TO More Risky?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a beta of 0.827, which suggesting that the stock is 17.251% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.889, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.878%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock III.TO or FM.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Imperial Metals Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios III.TO or FM.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. quarterly revenues are $168.8M, which are smaller than First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Imperial Metals Corp.'s net income of $38.5M is higher than First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$107.4M. Notably, Imperial Metals Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.49x while First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s PE ratio is 439.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Metals Corp. is 2.11x versus 4.02x for First Quantum Minerals Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income III.TOImperial Metals Corp.2.11x 7.49x $168.8M $38.5M FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.4.02x 439.43x $1.9B -$107.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns III.TO or HBM.TO?
Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a net margin of 22.84% compared to Imperial Metals Corp.'s net margin of 65.8%. Imperial Metals Corp.'s return on equity of 21.06% beat Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.25%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital III.TOImperial Metals Corp.41.32% $0.22 $1.2B HBM.TOHudbay Minerals, Inc.12.31% $0.77 $5.8B -
What do Analysts Say About III.TO or HBM.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 11.85%. On the other hand Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $27.36 which suggests that it could grow by 5.4%. Given that Imperial Metals Corp. has higher upside potential than Hudbay Minerals, Inc., analysts believe Imperial Metals Corp. is more attractive than Hudbay Minerals, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings III.TOImperial Metals Corp.0 0 0 HBM.TOHudbay Minerals, Inc.10 0 0 -
Is III.TO or HBM.TO More Risky?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a beta of 0.827, which suggesting that the stock is 17.251% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a beta of 1.959, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.865%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock III.TO or HBM.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. offers a yield of 0.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Imperial Metals Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. pays out 7.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios III.TO or HBM.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. quarterly revenues are $168.8M, which are smaller than Hudbay Minerals, Inc. quarterly revenues of $465.5M. Imperial Metals Corp.'s net income of $38.5M is lower than Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s net income of $306.3M. Notably, Imperial Metals Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.49x while Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s PE ratio is 16.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Metals Corp. is 2.11x versus 3.68x for Hudbay Minerals, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income III.TOImperial Metals Corp.2.11x 7.49x $168.8M $38.5M HBM.TOHudbay Minerals, Inc.3.68x 16.05x $465.5M $306.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns III.TO or LUN.TO?
Lundin Mining Corp. has a net margin of 22.84% compared to Imperial Metals Corp.'s net margin of 19.16%. Imperial Metals Corp.'s return on equity of 21.06% beat Lundin Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 5.26%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital III.TOImperial Metals Corp.41.32% $0.22 $1.2B LUN.TOLundin Mining Corp.30.25% $0.26 $10.7B -
What do Analysts Say About III.TO or LUN.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 11.85%. On the other hand Lundin Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $26.99 which suggests that it could fall by -2.7%. Given that Imperial Metals Corp. has higher upside potential than Lundin Mining Corp., analysts believe Imperial Metals Corp. is more attractive than Lundin Mining Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings III.TOImperial Metals Corp.0 0 0 LUN.TOLundin Mining Corp.11 8 0 -
Is III.TO or LUN.TO More Risky?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a beta of 0.827, which suggesting that the stock is 17.251% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lundin Mining Corp. has a beta of 1.724, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.39%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock III.TO or LUN.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lundin Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Imperial Metals Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lundin Mining Corp. pays out -132.05% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios III.TO or LUN.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. quarterly revenues are $168.8M, which are smaller than Lundin Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Imperial Metals Corp.'s net income of $38.5M is lower than Lundin Mining Corp.'s net income of $254.3M. Notably, Imperial Metals Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.49x while Lundin Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is 607.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Metals Corp. is 2.11x versus 5.21x for Lundin Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income III.TOImperial Metals Corp.2.11x 7.49x $168.8M $38.5M LUN.TOLundin Mining Corp.5.21x 607.00x $1.3B $254.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns III.TO or NGEX.TO?
NGEx Minerals Ltd. has a net margin of 22.84% compared to Imperial Metals Corp.'s net margin of --. Imperial Metals Corp.'s return on equity of 21.06% beat NGEx Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of -81.71%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital III.TOImperial Metals Corp.41.32% $0.22 $1.2B NGEX.TONGEx Minerals Ltd.-- -$0.14 $132.2M -
What do Analysts Say About III.TO or NGEX.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 11.85%. On the other hand NGEx Minerals Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $28.34 which suggests that it could grow by 13.71%. Given that NGEx Minerals Ltd. has higher upside potential than Imperial Metals Corp., analysts believe NGEx Minerals Ltd. is more attractive than Imperial Metals Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings III.TOImperial Metals Corp.0 0 0 NGEX.TONGEx Minerals Ltd.3 2 0 -
Is III.TO or NGEX.TO More Risky?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a beta of 0.827, which suggesting that the stock is 17.251% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NGEx Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.709, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.897%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock III.TO or NGEX.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NGEx Minerals Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Imperial Metals Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NGEx Minerals Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios III.TO or NGEX.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. quarterly revenues are $168.8M, which are larger than NGEx Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Imperial Metals Corp.'s net income of $38.5M is higher than NGEx Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$28.7M. Notably, Imperial Metals Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.49x while NGEx Minerals Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Metals Corp. is 2.11x versus -- for NGEx Minerals Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income III.TOImperial Metals Corp.2.11x 7.49x $168.8M $38.5M NGEX.TONGEx Minerals Ltd.-- -- -- -$28.7M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
What Are the Best AI Power Stocks?
As the construction of AI infrastructure accelerates, the gap between…
Is IONQ The Best Quantum Stock to Buy?
Riding a wave of investor enthusiasm for the technology, quantum…
Stock Ideas
Sell
49
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 60x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
71
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
39
SMX alert for Dec 16
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 21.85% over the past day.
Sell
33
ZBIO alert for Dec 16
Zenas BioPharma, Inc. [ZBIO] is down 19.73% over the past day.
Sell
38
HUT alert for Dec 16
Hut 8 Corp. [HUT] is down 14.21% over the past day.
