Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?
Shares of embattled health insurance giant UnitedHealth (NYSE:UNH) plummeted by…
Buy
59
III.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$11.56
Seasonality move
:
6.89%
Day range:
$11.30 - $11.87
52-week range:
$2.14 - $14.01
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
10.47x
P/S ratio:
2.95x
P/B ratio:
2.07x
Volume:
555.6K
Avg. volume:
354.4K
1-year change:
442.72%
Market cap:
$2.1B
Revenue:
$494.4M
EPS (TTM):
$1.10
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
III.TO
Imperial Metals Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
|
$475.8M | $0.16 | -30.36% | 87.77% | $17.47 |
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
|
$999.5M | $0.05 | 20.33% | -38.42% | $22.37 |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
$546.1M | $0.30 | -35.22% | -16.81% | $19.49 |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
|
$867.8M | $0.22 | -36.31% | -18.13% | $18.47 |
|
TRBC.V
Tribeca Resources Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
III.TO
Imperial Metals Corp.
|
$11.56 | -- | $2.1B | 10.47x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.95x |
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
|
$16.03 | $17.47 | $12.2B | 28.53x | $0.00 | 0% | 4.12x |
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
|
$38.73 | $22.37 | $32.3B | 502.33x | $0.08 | 0% | 4.60x |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
$33.79 | $19.49 | $13.4B | 20.89x | $0.01 | 0.06% | 4.79x |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
|
$33.45 | $18.47 | $28.7B | 730.35x | $0.03 | 0.52% | 6.28x |
|
TRBC.V
Tribeca Resources Corp.
|
$0.21 | -- | $20.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
III.TO
Imperial Metals Corp.
|
19.68% | 0.606 | 23.17% | 0.38x |
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
|
31.04% | 3.422 | 21.68% | 0.70x |
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
|
38.13% | 2.180 | 36.48% | 0.72x |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
26.46% | 3.894 | 18.47% | 0.72x |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
|
9.6% | 2.698 | 4.71% | 0.79x |
|
TRBC.V
Tribeca Resources Corp.
|
-- | -3.473 | -- | 1.01x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
III.TO
Imperial Metals Corp.
|
$69.7M | $65M | 15.38% | 21.06% | 38.52% | $31.7M |
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
|
$176M | $153.3M | 6.75% | 9.51% | 18.6% | -$29.7M |
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
|
$477.9M | $433.9M | 0.1% | 0.17% | 23.4% | $1.1B |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
$57.3M | $6.1M | 11.49% | 16.25% | 1.3% | $4.7M |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
|
$401.4M | $381.2M | 4.26% | 5.26% | 28.74% | $138.3M |
|
TRBC.V
Tribeca Resources Corp.
|
-- | -$230.8K | -85.24% | -85.24% | -- | -$81.9K |
Imperial Metals Corp. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns III.TO or CS.TO?
Capstone Copper Corp. has a net margin of 22.84% compared to Imperial Metals Corp.'s net margin of 43.86%. Imperial Metals Corp.'s return on equity of 21.06% beat Capstone Copper Corp.'s return on equity of 9.51%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital III.TOImperial Metals Corp.41.32% $0.22 $1.2B CS.TOCapstone Copper Corp.21.36% $0.45 $7.3B -
What do Analysts Say About III.TO or CS.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -19.98%. On the other hand Capstone Copper Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $17.47 which suggests that it could grow by 8.97%. Given that Capstone Copper Corp. has higher upside potential than Imperial Metals Corp., analysts believe Capstone Copper Corp. is more attractive than Imperial Metals Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings III.TOImperial Metals Corp.0 0 0 CS.TOCapstone Copper Corp.11 1 0 -
Is III.TO or CS.TO More Risky?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a beta of 0.745, which suggesting that the stock is 25.463% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Capstone Copper Corp. has a beta of 2.272, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 127.225%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock III.TO or CS.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Capstone Copper Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Imperial Metals Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Capstone Copper Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios III.TO or CS.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. quarterly revenues are $168.8M, which are smaller than Capstone Copper Corp. quarterly revenues of $824.2M. Imperial Metals Corp.'s net income of $38.5M is lower than Capstone Copper Corp.'s net income of $361.5M. Notably, Imperial Metals Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.47x while Capstone Copper Corp.'s PE ratio is 28.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Metals Corp. is 2.95x versus 4.12x for Capstone Copper Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income III.TOImperial Metals Corp.2.95x 10.47x $168.8M $38.5M CS.TOCapstone Copper Corp.4.12x 28.53x $824.2M $361.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns III.TO or FM.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a net margin of 22.84% compared to Imperial Metals Corp.'s net margin of -5.8%. Imperial Metals Corp.'s return on equity of 21.06% beat First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.17%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital III.TOImperial Metals Corp.41.32% $0.22 $1.2B FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.25.78% -$0.08 $25.9B -
What do Analysts Say About III.TO or FM.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -19.98%. On the other hand First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $22.37 which suggests that it could fall by -42.24%. Given that First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has more downside risk than Imperial Metals Corp., analysts believe Imperial Metals Corp. is more attractive than First Quantum Minerals Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings III.TOImperial Metals Corp.0 0 0 FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.7 10 0 -
Is III.TO or FM.TO More Risky?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a beta of 0.745, which suggesting that the stock is 25.463% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.860, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.031%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock III.TO or FM.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Imperial Metals Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios III.TO or FM.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. quarterly revenues are $168.8M, which are smaller than First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Imperial Metals Corp.'s net income of $38.5M is higher than First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$107.4M. Notably, Imperial Metals Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.47x while First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s PE ratio is 502.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Metals Corp. is 2.95x versus 4.60x for First Quantum Minerals Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income III.TOImperial Metals Corp.2.95x 10.47x $168.8M $38.5M FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.4.60x 502.33x $1.9B -$107.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns III.TO or HBM.TO?
Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a net margin of 22.84% compared to Imperial Metals Corp.'s net margin of 65.8%. Imperial Metals Corp.'s return on equity of 21.06% beat Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.25%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital III.TOImperial Metals Corp.41.32% $0.22 $1.2B HBM.TOHudbay Minerals, Inc.12.31% $0.77 $5.8B -
What do Analysts Say About III.TO or HBM.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -19.98%. On the other hand Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $19.49 which suggests that it could fall by -42.85%. Given that Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has more downside risk than Imperial Metals Corp., analysts believe Imperial Metals Corp. is more attractive than Hudbay Minerals, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings III.TOImperial Metals Corp.0 0 0 HBM.TOHudbay Minerals, Inc.13 1 0 -
Is III.TO or HBM.TO More Risky?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a beta of 0.745, which suggesting that the stock is 25.463% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a beta of 1.874, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.423%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock III.TO or HBM.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. offers a yield of 0.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Imperial Metals Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. pays out 7.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios III.TO or HBM.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. quarterly revenues are $168.8M, which are smaller than Hudbay Minerals, Inc. quarterly revenues of $465.5M. Imperial Metals Corp.'s net income of $38.5M is lower than Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s net income of $306.3M. Notably, Imperial Metals Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.47x while Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Metals Corp. is 2.95x versus 4.79x for Hudbay Minerals, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income III.TOImperial Metals Corp.2.95x 10.47x $168.8M $38.5M HBM.TOHudbay Minerals, Inc.4.79x 20.89x $465.5M $306.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns III.TO or LUN.TO?
Lundin Mining Corp. has a net margin of 22.84% compared to Imperial Metals Corp.'s net margin of 19.16%. Imperial Metals Corp.'s return on equity of 21.06% beat Lundin Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 5.26%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital III.TOImperial Metals Corp.41.32% $0.22 $1.2B LUN.TOLundin Mining Corp.30.25% $0.26 $10.7B -
What do Analysts Say About III.TO or LUN.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -19.98%. On the other hand Lundin Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $18.47 which suggests that it could fall by -45.19%. Given that Lundin Mining Corp. has more downside risk than Imperial Metals Corp., analysts believe Imperial Metals Corp. is more attractive than Lundin Mining Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings III.TOImperial Metals Corp.0 0 0 LUN.TOLundin Mining Corp.8 8 0 -
Is III.TO or LUN.TO More Risky?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a beta of 0.745, which suggesting that the stock is 25.463% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lundin Mining Corp. has a beta of 1.692, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.211%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock III.TO or LUN.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lundin Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Imperial Metals Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lundin Mining Corp. pays out -132.05% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios III.TO or LUN.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. quarterly revenues are $168.8M, which are smaller than Lundin Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Imperial Metals Corp.'s net income of $38.5M is lower than Lundin Mining Corp.'s net income of $254.3M. Notably, Imperial Metals Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.47x while Lundin Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is 730.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Metals Corp. is 2.95x versus 6.28x for Lundin Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income III.TOImperial Metals Corp.2.95x 10.47x $168.8M $38.5M LUN.TOLundin Mining Corp.6.28x 730.35x $1.3B $254.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns III.TO or TRBC.V?
Tribeca Resources Corp. has a net margin of 22.84% compared to Imperial Metals Corp.'s net margin of --. Imperial Metals Corp.'s return on equity of 21.06% beat Tribeca Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -85.24%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital III.TOImperial Metals Corp.41.32% $0.22 $1.2B TRBC.VTribeca Resources Corp.-- -$0.00 $1.6M -
What do Analysts Say About III.TO or TRBC.V?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -19.98%. On the other hand Tribeca Resources Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Imperial Metals Corp. has higher upside potential than Tribeca Resources Corp., analysts believe Imperial Metals Corp. is more attractive than Tribeca Resources Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings III.TOImperial Metals Corp.0 0 0 TRBC.VTribeca Resources Corp.0 0 0 -
Is III.TO or TRBC.V More Risky?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a beta of 0.745, which suggesting that the stock is 25.463% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tribeca Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.493, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.721%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock III.TO or TRBC.V?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tribeca Resources Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Imperial Metals Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tribeca Resources Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios III.TO or TRBC.V?
Imperial Metals Corp. quarterly revenues are $168.8M, which are larger than Tribeca Resources Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Imperial Metals Corp.'s net income of $38.5M is higher than Tribeca Resources Corp.'s net income of -$229.5K. Notably, Imperial Metals Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.47x while Tribeca Resources Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Metals Corp. is 2.95x versus -- for Tribeca Resources Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income III.TOImperial Metals Corp.2.95x 10.47x $168.8M $38.5M TRBC.VTribeca Resources Corp.-- -- -- -$229.5K
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Lumentum The Best Laser Stock to Buy?
Though certainly less well-known than the huge tech businesses that…
Is Planet Fitness Stock Undervalued?
Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) has had a difficult 12 months, retreating…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
51
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 30x
Alerts
Buy
75
PRLB alert for Feb 10
Proto Labs, Inc. [PRLB] is down 2.16% over the past day.
Sell
30
MSTR alert for Feb 10
Strategy, Inc. [MSTR] is up 2.59% over the past day.
Sell
10
MOH alert for Feb 10
Molina Healthcare, Inc. [MOH] is down 3% over the past day.
