Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Buy
96
III.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$10.77
Seasonality move
:
13.24%
Day range:
$10.56 - $11.14
52-week range:
$1.82 - $11.14
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
9.88x
P/S ratio:
2.78x
P/B ratio:
1.95x
Volume:
284.9K
Avg. volume:
188.5K
1-year change:
482.89%
Market cap:
$1.9B
Revenue:
$494.4M
EPS (TTM):
$1.10
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
III.TO
Imperial Metals Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
|
$895.2M | $0.14 | 43.24% | 69.38% | $15.42 |
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
|
$1.8B | $0.08 | 3.22% | -52.22% | $35.78 |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
$971M | $0.52 | 16.57% | 638.54% | $27.73 |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
|
$1.6B | $0.35 | 9.37% | 13.67% | $28.15 |
|
NGEX.TO
NGEx Minerals Ltd.
|
-- | -$0.16 | -- | -22.05% | $28.78 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
III.TO
Imperial Metals Corp.
|
$10.90 | -- | $1.9B | 9.88x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.78x |
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
|
$13.79 | $15.42 | $10.5B | 24.54x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.55x |
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
|
$38.15 | $35.78 | $31.8B | 494.81x | $0.08 | 0% | 4.53x |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
$29.35 | $27.73 | $11.6B | 18.15x | $0.01 | 0.07% | 4.16x |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
|
$31.11 | $28.15 | $26.6B | 680.74x | $0.03 | 0.56% | 5.84x |
|
NGEX.TO
NGEx Minerals Ltd.
|
$28.82 | $28.78 | $6.2B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
III.TO
Imperial Metals Corp.
|
19.68% | 0.427 | 23.17% | 0.38x |
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
|
31.04% | 3.078 | 21.68% | 0.70x |
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
|
38.13% | 1.784 | 36.48% | 0.72x |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
26.46% | 4.010 | 18.47% | 0.72x |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
|
9.6% | 2.364 | 4.71% | 0.79x |
|
NGEX.TO
NGEx Minerals Ltd.
|
0.7% | 3.378 | 0.02% | 12.35x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
III.TO
Imperial Metals Corp.
|
$69.7M | $65M | 15.38% | 21.06% | 38.52% | $31.7M |
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
|
$176M | $153.3M | 6.75% | 9.51% | 18.6% | -$29.7M |
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
|
$477.9M | $433.9M | 0.1% | 0.17% | 23.4% | $1.1B |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
$57.3M | $6.1M | 11.49% | 16.25% | 1.3% | $4.7M |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
|
$401.4M | $381.2M | 4.26% | 5.26% | 28.74% | $138.3M |
|
NGEX.TO
NGEx Minerals Ltd.
|
-$17.1K | -$31M | -81.49% | -81.71% | -- | -$11.1M |
Imperial Metals Corp. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns III.TO or CS.TO?
Capstone Copper Corp. has a net margin of 22.84% compared to Imperial Metals Corp.'s net margin of 43.86%. Imperial Metals Corp.'s return on equity of 21.06% beat Capstone Copper Corp.'s return on equity of 9.51%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital III.TOImperial Metals Corp.41.32% $0.22 $1.2B CS.TOCapstone Copper Corp.21.36% $0.45 $7.3B -
What do Analysts Say About III.TO or CS.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -15.14%. On the other hand Capstone Copper Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $15.42 which suggests that it could grow by 11.85%. Given that Capstone Copper Corp. has higher upside potential than Imperial Metals Corp., analysts believe Capstone Copper Corp. is more attractive than Imperial Metals Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings III.TOImperial Metals Corp.0 0 0 CS.TOCapstone Copper Corp.10 1 0 -
Is III.TO or CS.TO More Risky?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a beta of 0.820, which suggesting that the stock is 18.03% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Capstone Copper Corp. has a beta of 2.261, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 126.134%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock III.TO or CS.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Capstone Copper Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Imperial Metals Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Capstone Copper Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios III.TO or CS.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. quarterly revenues are $168.8M, which are smaller than Capstone Copper Corp. quarterly revenues of $824.2M. Imperial Metals Corp.'s net income of $38.5M is lower than Capstone Copper Corp.'s net income of $361.5M. Notably, Imperial Metals Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.88x while Capstone Copper Corp.'s PE ratio is 24.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Metals Corp. is 2.78x versus 3.55x for Capstone Copper Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income III.TOImperial Metals Corp.2.78x 9.88x $168.8M $38.5M CS.TOCapstone Copper Corp.3.55x 24.54x $824.2M $361.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns III.TO or FM.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a net margin of 22.84% compared to Imperial Metals Corp.'s net margin of -5.8%. Imperial Metals Corp.'s return on equity of 21.06% beat First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.17%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital III.TOImperial Metals Corp.41.32% $0.22 $1.2B FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.25.78% -$0.08 $25.9B -
What do Analysts Say About III.TO or FM.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -15.14%. On the other hand First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $35.78 which suggests that it could fall by -6.22%. Given that Imperial Metals Corp. has more downside risk than First Quantum Minerals Ltd., analysts believe First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is more attractive than Imperial Metals Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings III.TOImperial Metals Corp.0 0 0 FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.7 10 0 -
Is III.TO or FM.TO More Risky?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a beta of 0.820, which suggesting that the stock is 18.03% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.885, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.515%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock III.TO or FM.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Imperial Metals Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios III.TO or FM.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. quarterly revenues are $168.8M, which are smaller than First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Imperial Metals Corp.'s net income of $38.5M is higher than First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$107.4M. Notably, Imperial Metals Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.88x while First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s PE ratio is 494.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Metals Corp. is 2.78x versus 4.53x for First Quantum Minerals Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income III.TOImperial Metals Corp.2.78x 9.88x $168.8M $38.5M FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.4.53x 494.81x $1.9B -$107.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns III.TO or HBM.TO?
Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a net margin of 22.84% compared to Imperial Metals Corp.'s net margin of 65.8%. Imperial Metals Corp.'s return on equity of 21.06% beat Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.25%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital III.TOImperial Metals Corp.41.32% $0.22 $1.2B HBM.TOHudbay Minerals, Inc.12.31% $0.77 $5.8B -
What do Analysts Say About III.TO or HBM.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -15.14%. On the other hand Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $27.73 which suggests that it could fall by -5.51%. Given that Imperial Metals Corp. has more downside risk than Hudbay Minerals, Inc., analysts believe Hudbay Minerals, Inc. is more attractive than Imperial Metals Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings III.TOImperial Metals Corp.0 0 0 HBM.TOHudbay Minerals, Inc.10 0 0 -
Is III.TO or HBM.TO More Risky?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a beta of 0.820, which suggesting that the stock is 18.03% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a beta of 1.957, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.736%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock III.TO or HBM.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. offers a yield of 0.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Imperial Metals Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. pays out 7.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios III.TO or HBM.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. quarterly revenues are $168.8M, which are smaller than Hudbay Minerals, Inc. quarterly revenues of $465.5M. Imperial Metals Corp.'s net income of $38.5M is lower than Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s net income of $306.3M. Notably, Imperial Metals Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.88x while Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s PE ratio is 18.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Metals Corp. is 2.78x versus 4.16x for Hudbay Minerals, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income III.TOImperial Metals Corp.2.78x 9.88x $168.8M $38.5M HBM.TOHudbay Minerals, Inc.4.16x 18.15x $465.5M $306.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns III.TO or LUN.TO?
Lundin Mining Corp. has a net margin of 22.84% compared to Imperial Metals Corp.'s net margin of 19.16%. Imperial Metals Corp.'s return on equity of 21.06% beat Lundin Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 5.26%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital III.TOImperial Metals Corp.41.32% $0.22 $1.2B LUN.TOLundin Mining Corp.30.25% $0.26 $10.7B -
What do Analysts Say About III.TO or LUN.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -15.14%. On the other hand Lundin Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $28.15 which suggests that it could fall by -9.52%. Given that Imperial Metals Corp. has more downside risk than Lundin Mining Corp., analysts believe Lundin Mining Corp. is more attractive than Imperial Metals Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings III.TOImperial Metals Corp.0 0 0 LUN.TOLundin Mining Corp.11 7 0 -
Is III.TO or LUN.TO More Risky?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a beta of 0.820, which suggesting that the stock is 18.03% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lundin Mining Corp. has a beta of 1.723, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.251%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock III.TO or LUN.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lundin Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Imperial Metals Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lundin Mining Corp. pays out -132.05% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios III.TO or LUN.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. quarterly revenues are $168.8M, which are smaller than Lundin Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Imperial Metals Corp.'s net income of $38.5M is lower than Lundin Mining Corp.'s net income of $254.3M. Notably, Imperial Metals Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.88x while Lundin Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is 680.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Metals Corp. is 2.78x versus 5.84x for Lundin Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income III.TOImperial Metals Corp.2.78x 9.88x $168.8M $38.5M LUN.TOLundin Mining Corp.5.84x 680.74x $1.3B $254.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns III.TO or NGEX.TO?
NGEx Minerals Ltd. has a net margin of 22.84% compared to Imperial Metals Corp.'s net margin of --. Imperial Metals Corp.'s return on equity of 21.06% beat NGEx Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of -81.71%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital III.TOImperial Metals Corp.41.32% $0.22 $1.2B NGEX.TONGEx Minerals Ltd.-- -$0.14 $132.2M -
What do Analysts Say About III.TO or NGEX.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -15.14%. On the other hand NGEx Minerals Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $28.78 which suggests that it could fall by -0.14%. Given that Imperial Metals Corp. has more downside risk than NGEx Minerals Ltd., analysts believe NGEx Minerals Ltd. is more attractive than Imperial Metals Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings III.TOImperial Metals Corp.0 0 0 NGEX.TONGEx Minerals Ltd.3 2 0 -
Is III.TO or NGEX.TO More Risky?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a beta of 0.820, which suggesting that the stock is 18.03% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NGEx Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.711, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.084%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock III.TO or NGEX.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NGEx Minerals Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Imperial Metals Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NGEx Minerals Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios III.TO or NGEX.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. quarterly revenues are $168.8M, which are larger than NGEx Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Imperial Metals Corp.'s net income of $38.5M is higher than NGEx Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$28.7M. Notably, Imperial Metals Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.88x while NGEx Minerals Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Metals Corp. is 2.78x versus -- for NGEx Minerals Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income III.TOImperial Metals Corp.2.78x 9.88x $168.8M $38.5M NGEX.TONGEx Minerals Ltd.-- -- -- -$28.7M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
65
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
51
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
70
RGC alert for Jan 8
Regencell Bioscience Holdings Ltd. [RGC] is down 21.5% over the past day.
Buy
64
RVMD alert for Jan 8
Revolution Medicines, Inc. [RVMD] is up 4.61% over the past day.
Sell
38
CRNX alert for Jan 8
Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [CRNX] is down 0.23% over the past day.
