Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Buy
64
III.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$9.57
Seasonality move
:
7.84%
Day range:
$9.30 - $9.75
52-week range:
$2.18 - $14.01
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
8.60x
P/S ratio:
2.42x
P/B ratio:
1.70x
Volume:
250.1K
Avg. volume:
410.4K
1-year change:
319.91%
Market cap:
$1.7B
Revenue:
$494.4M
EPS (TTM):
$1.10
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
III.TO
Imperial Metals Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
|
$902.2M | $0.16 | 21.27% | 92.01% | $16.73 |
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
|
$1.9B | $0.10 | 20.91% | -38.42% | $43.53 |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
$996.2M | $0.53 | 8.11% | 46.87% | $40.71 |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
|
$1.7B | $0.41 | 24.1% | 106.05% | $37.20 |
|
TRBC.V
Tribeca Resources Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
III.TO
Imperial Metals Corp.
|
$9.49 | -- | $1.7B | 8.60x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.42x |
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
|
$12.29 | $16.73 | $9.4B | 21.87x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.16x |
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
|
$36.68 | $43.53 | $30.4B | 502.72x | $0.08 | 0% | 4.18x |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
$34.10 | $40.71 | $13.5B | 17.09x | $0.01 | 0.06% | 4.47x |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
|
$38.72 | $37.20 | $33.1B | 18.54x | $0.03 | 0.45% | 6.35x |
|
TRBC.V
Tribeca Resources Corp.
|
$0.26 | -- | $25.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
III.TO
Imperial Metals Corp.
|
19.68% | -1.209 | 23.17% | 0.38x |
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
|
31.04% | 1.763 | 21.68% | 0.70x |
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
|
38.83% | 1.398 | 31.36% | 0.52x |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
24.78% | 2.830 | 13.49% | 0.74x |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
|
6.36% | 2.783 | 2.28% | 0.79x |
|
TRBC.V
Tribeca Resources Corp.
|
-- | -2.398 | -- | 1.01x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
III.TO
Imperial Metals Corp.
|
$69.7M | $65M | 15.38% | 21.06% | 38.52% | $31.7M |
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
|
$176M | $153.3M | 6.75% | 9.51% | 18.6% | -$29.7M |
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
|
$556.3M | $543.8M | -0.35% | -0.56% | 26.44% | -$580.7M |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
$337.7M | $333M | 13.87% | 19.28% | 32.9% | $57.8M |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
|
$400.5M | $382.6M | 17.83% | 20.96% | 28.16% | $510.9M |
|
TRBC.V
Tribeca Resources Corp.
|
-- | -$230.8K | -85.24% | -85.24% | -- | -$81.9K |
Imperial Metals Corp. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns III.TO or CS.TO?
Capstone Copper Corp. has a net margin of 22.84% compared to Imperial Metals Corp.'s net margin of 43.86%. Imperial Metals Corp.'s return on equity of 21.06% beat Capstone Copper Corp.'s return on equity of 9.51%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital III.TOImperial Metals Corp.41.32% $0.22 $1.2B CS.TOCapstone Copper Corp.21.36% $0.45 $7.3B -
What do Analysts Say About III.TO or CS.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -2.53%. On the other hand Capstone Copper Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $16.73 which suggests that it could grow by 36.16%. Given that Capstone Copper Corp. has higher upside potential than Imperial Metals Corp., analysts believe Capstone Copper Corp. is more attractive than Imperial Metals Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings III.TOImperial Metals Corp.0 0 0 CS.TOCapstone Copper Corp.10 3 0 -
Is III.TO or CS.TO More Risky?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a beta of 0.598, which suggesting that the stock is 40.219% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Capstone Copper Corp. has a beta of 1.954, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.354%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock III.TO or CS.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Capstone Copper Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Imperial Metals Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Capstone Copper Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios III.TO or CS.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. quarterly revenues are $168.8M, which are smaller than Capstone Copper Corp. quarterly revenues of $824.2M. Imperial Metals Corp.'s net income of $38.5M is lower than Capstone Copper Corp.'s net income of $361.5M. Notably, Imperial Metals Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.60x while Capstone Copper Corp.'s PE ratio is 21.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Metals Corp. is 2.42x versus 3.16x for Capstone Copper Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income III.TOImperial Metals Corp.2.42x 8.60x $168.8M $38.5M CS.TOCapstone Copper Corp.3.16x 21.87x $824.2M $361.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns III.TO or FM.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a net margin of 22.84% compared to Imperial Metals Corp.'s net margin of 7.12%. Imperial Metals Corp.'s return on equity of 21.06% beat First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.56%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital III.TOImperial Metals Corp.41.32% $0.22 $1.2B FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.27.05% $0.04 $25.5B -
What do Analysts Say About III.TO or FM.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -2.53%. On the other hand First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $43.53 which suggests that it could grow by 18.68%. Given that First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has higher upside potential than Imperial Metals Corp., analysts believe First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is more attractive than Imperial Metals Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings III.TOImperial Metals Corp.0 0 0 FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.7 9 0 -
Is III.TO or FM.TO More Risky?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a beta of 0.598, which suggesting that the stock is 40.219% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.725, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.466%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock III.TO or FM.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Imperial Metals Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios III.TO or FM.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. quarterly revenues are $168.8M, which are smaller than First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Imperial Metals Corp.'s net income of $38.5M is lower than First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of $146.4M. Notably, Imperial Metals Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.60x while First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s PE ratio is 502.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Metals Corp. is 2.42x versus 4.18x for First Quantum Minerals Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income III.TOImperial Metals Corp.2.42x 8.60x $168.8M $38.5M FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.4.18x 502.72x $2.1B $146.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns III.TO or HBM.TO?
Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a net margin of 22.84% compared to Imperial Metals Corp.'s net margin of 17.63%. Imperial Metals Corp.'s return on equity of 21.06% beat Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.28%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital III.TOImperial Metals Corp.41.32% $0.22 $1.2B HBM.TOHudbay Minerals, Inc.33.37% $0.45 $5.9B -
What do Analysts Say About III.TO or HBM.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -2.53%. On the other hand Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $40.71 which suggests that it could grow by 19.39%. Given that Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Imperial Metals Corp., analysts believe Hudbay Minerals, Inc. is more attractive than Imperial Metals Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings III.TOImperial Metals Corp.0 0 0 HBM.TOHudbay Minerals, Inc.14 0 0 -
Is III.TO or HBM.TO More Risky?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a beta of 0.598, which suggesting that the stock is 40.219% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a beta of 1.850, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.991%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock III.TO or HBM.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. offers a yield of 0.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Imperial Metals Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. pays out 1% of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios III.TO or HBM.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. quarterly revenues are $168.8M, which are smaller than Hudbay Minerals, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1B. Imperial Metals Corp.'s net income of $38.5M is lower than Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s net income of $178.5M. Notably, Imperial Metals Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.60x while Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Metals Corp. is 2.42x versus 4.47x for Hudbay Minerals, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income III.TOImperial Metals Corp.2.42x 8.60x $168.8M $38.5M HBM.TOHudbay Minerals, Inc.4.47x 17.09x $1B $178.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns III.TO or LUN.TO?
Lundin Mining Corp. has a net margin of 22.84% compared to Imperial Metals Corp.'s net margin of 91.56%. Imperial Metals Corp.'s return on equity of 21.06% beat Lundin Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 20.96%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital III.TOImperial Metals Corp.41.32% $0.22 $1.2B LUN.TOLundin Mining Corp.29.47% $1.25 $11.5B -
What do Analysts Say About III.TO or LUN.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -2.53%. On the other hand Lundin Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $37.20 which suggests that it could fall by -3.92%. Given that Lundin Mining Corp. has more downside risk than Imperial Metals Corp., analysts believe Imperial Metals Corp. is more attractive than Lundin Mining Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings III.TOImperial Metals Corp.0 0 0 LUN.TOLundin Mining Corp.7 11 0 -
Is III.TO or LUN.TO More Risky?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a beta of 0.598, which suggesting that the stock is 40.219% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lundin Mining Corp. has a beta of 1.708, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.831%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock III.TO or LUN.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lundin Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Imperial Metals Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lundin Mining Corp. pays out 8.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Lundin Mining Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios III.TO or LUN.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. quarterly revenues are $168.8M, which are smaller than Lundin Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Imperial Metals Corp.'s net income of $38.5M is lower than Lundin Mining Corp.'s net income of $1.2B. Notably, Imperial Metals Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.60x while Lundin Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is 18.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Metals Corp. is 2.42x versus 6.35x for Lundin Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income III.TOImperial Metals Corp.2.42x 8.60x $168.8M $38.5M LUN.TOLundin Mining Corp.6.35x 18.54x $1.4B $1.2B
-
Which has Higher Returns III.TO or TRBC.V?
Tribeca Resources Corp. has a net margin of 22.84% compared to Imperial Metals Corp.'s net margin of --. Imperial Metals Corp.'s return on equity of 21.06% beat Tribeca Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -85.24%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital III.TOImperial Metals Corp.41.32% $0.22 $1.2B TRBC.VTribeca Resources Corp.-- -$0.00 $1.6M -
What do Analysts Say About III.TO or TRBC.V?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -2.53%. On the other hand Tribeca Resources Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Imperial Metals Corp. has higher upside potential than Tribeca Resources Corp., analysts believe Imperial Metals Corp. is more attractive than Tribeca Resources Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings III.TOImperial Metals Corp.0 0 0 TRBC.VTribeca Resources Corp.0 0 0 -
Is III.TO or TRBC.V More Risky?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a beta of 0.598, which suggesting that the stock is 40.219% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tribeca Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.394, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.637%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock III.TO or TRBC.V?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tribeca Resources Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Imperial Metals Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tribeca Resources Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios III.TO or TRBC.V?
Imperial Metals Corp. quarterly revenues are $168.8M, which are larger than Tribeca Resources Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Imperial Metals Corp.'s net income of $38.5M is higher than Tribeca Resources Corp.'s net income of -$229.5K. Notably, Imperial Metals Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.60x while Tribeca Resources Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Metals Corp. is 2.42x versus -- for Tribeca Resources Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income III.TOImperial Metals Corp.2.42x 8.60x $168.8M $38.5M TRBC.VTribeca Resources Corp.-- -- -- -$229.5K
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
34
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Sell
46
ZD alert for Mar 4
Ziff Davis, Inc. [ZD] is up 1.28% over the past day.
Buy
54
KORU alert for Mar 4
Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares [KORU] is up 12.36% over the past day.
Sell
40
PSIX alert for Mar 4
Power Solutions International, Inc. [PSIX] is down 0.67% over the past day.
