Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Buy
78
CS.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$13.85
Seasonality move
:
10.68%
Day range:
$14.62 - $14.92
52-week range:
$4.98 - $14.92
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
26.39x
P/S ratio:
3.82x
P/B ratio:
2.45x
Volume:
4.8M
Avg. volume:
4.3M
1-year change:
64.23%
Market cap:
$11.3B
Revenue:
$2.2B
EPS (TTM):
$0.56
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
|
$895.2M | $0.14 | 43.24% | 69.38% | $15.42 |
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
|
$1.8B | $0.08 | 3.22% | -52.22% | $35.78 |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
$971M | $0.52 | 16.57% | 638.54% | $27.73 |
|
III.TO
Imperial Metals Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
|
$1.6B | $0.35 | 9.37% | 13.67% | $28.15 |
|
NGEX.TO
NGEx Minerals Ltd.
|
-- | -$0.16 | -- | -22.05% | $28.78 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
|
$14.83 | $15.42 | $11.3B | 26.39x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.82x |
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
|
$39.00 | $35.78 | $32.5B | 505.84x | $0.08 | 0% | 4.63x |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
$29.59 | $27.73 | $11.7B | 18.30x | $0.01 | 0.07% | 4.19x |
|
III.TO
Imperial Metals Corp.
|
$11.03 | -- | $2B | 9.99x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.82x |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
|
$31.68 | $28.15 | $27.1B | 693.22x | $0.03 | 0.55% | 5.95x |
|
NGEX.TO
NGEx Minerals Ltd.
|
$27.87 | $28.78 | $6B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
|
31.04% | 3.078 | 21.68% | 0.70x |
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
|
38.13% | 1.784 | 36.48% | 0.72x |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
26.46% | 4.010 | 18.47% | 0.72x |
|
III.TO
Imperial Metals Corp.
|
19.68% | 0.427 | 23.17% | 0.38x |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
|
9.6% | 2.364 | 4.71% | 0.79x |
|
NGEX.TO
NGEx Minerals Ltd.
|
0.7% | 3.378 | 0.02% | 12.35x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
|
$176M | $153.3M | 6.75% | 9.51% | 18.6% | -$29.7M |
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
|
$477.9M | $433.9M | 0.1% | 0.17% | 23.4% | $1.1B |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
$57.3M | $6.1M | 11.49% | 16.25% | 1.3% | $4.7M |
|
III.TO
Imperial Metals Corp.
|
$69.7M | $65M | 15.38% | 21.06% | 38.52% | $31.7M |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
|
$401.4M | $381.2M | 4.26% | 5.26% | 28.74% | $138.3M |
|
NGEX.TO
NGEx Minerals Ltd.
|
-$17.1K | -$31M | -81.49% | -81.71% | -- | -$11.1M |
Capstone Copper Corp. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CS.TO or FM.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a net margin of 43.86% compared to Capstone Copper Corp.'s net margin of -5.8%. Capstone Copper Corp.'s return on equity of 9.51% beat First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.17%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CS.TOCapstone Copper Corp.21.36% $0.45 $7.3B FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.25.78% -$0.08 $25.9B -
What do Analysts Say About CS.TO or FM.TO?
Capstone Copper Corp. has a consensus price target of $15.42, signalling upside risk potential of 4%. On the other hand First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $35.78 which suggests that it could fall by -8.26%. Given that Capstone Copper Corp. has higher upside potential than First Quantum Minerals Ltd., analysts believe Capstone Copper Corp. is more attractive than First Quantum Minerals Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CS.TOCapstone Copper Corp.10 1 0 FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.7 10 0 -
Is CS.TO or FM.TO More Risky?
Capstone Copper Corp. has a beta of 2.261, which suggesting that the stock is 126.134% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.885, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.515%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CS.TO or FM.TO?
Capstone Copper Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Capstone Copper Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CS.TO or FM.TO?
Capstone Copper Corp. quarterly revenues are $824.2M, which are smaller than First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Capstone Copper Corp.'s net income of $361.5M is higher than First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$107.4M. Notably, Capstone Copper Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.39x while First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s PE ratio is 505.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capstone Copper Corp. is 3.82x versus 4.63x for First Quantum Minerals Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CS.TOCapstone Copper Corp.3.82x 26.39x $824.2M $361.5M FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.4.63x 505.84x $1.9B -$107.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns CS.TO or HBM.TO?
Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a net margin of 43.86% compared to Capstone Copper Corp.'s net margin of 65.8%. Capstone Copper Corp.'s return on equity of 9.51% beat Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.25%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CS.TOCapstone Copper Corp.21.36% $0.45 $7.3B HBM.TOHudbay Minerals, Inc.12.31% $0.77 $5.8B -
What do Analysts Say About CS.TO or HBM.TO?
Capstone Copper Corp. has a consensus price target of $15.42, signalling upside risk potential of 4%. On the other hand Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $27.73 which suggests that it could fall by -6.28%. Given that Capstone Copper Corp. has higher upside potential than Hudbay Minerals, Inc., analysts believe Capstone Copper Corp. is more attractive than Hudbay Minerals, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CS.TOCapstone Copper Corp.10 1 0 HBM.TOHudbay Minerals, Inc.10 0 0 -
Is CS.TO or HBM.TO More Risky?
Capstone Copper Corp. has a beta of 2.261, which suggesting that the stock is 126.134% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a beta of 1.957, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.736%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CS.TO or HBM.TO?
Capstone Copper Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. offers a yield of 0.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Capstone Copper Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. pays out 7.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CS.TO or HBM.TO?
Capstone Copper Corp. quarterly revenues are $824.2M, which are larger than Hudbay Minerals, Inc. quarterly revenues of $465.5M. Capstone Copper Corp.'s net income of $361.5M is higher than Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s net income of $306.3M. Notably, Capstone Copper Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.39x while Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s PE ratio is 18.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capstone Copper Corp. is 3.82x versus 4.19x for Hudbay Minerals, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CS.TOCapstone Copper Corp.3.82x 26.39x $824.2M $361.5M HBM.TOHudbay Minerals, Inc.4.19x 18.30x $465.5M $306.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns CS.TO or III.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a net margin of 43.86% compared to Capstone Copper Corp.'s net margin of 22.84%. Capstone Copper Corp.'s return on equity of 9.51% beat Imperial Metals Corp.'s return on equity of 21.06%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CS.TOCapstone Copper Corp.21.36% $0.45 $7.3B III.TOImperial Metals Corp.41.32% $0.22 $1.2B -
What do Analysts Say About CS.TO or III.TO?
Capstone Copper Corp. has a consensus price target of $15.42, signalling upside risk potential of 4%. On the other hand Imperial Metals Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -16.14%. Given that Capstone Copper Corp. has higher upside potential than Imperial Metals Corp., analysts believe Capstone Copper Corp. is more attractive than Imperial Metals Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CS.TOCapstone Copper Corp.10 1 0 III.TOImperial Metals Corp.0 0 0 -
Is CS.TO or III.TO More Risky?
Capstone Copper Corp. has a beta of 2.261, which suggesting that the stock is 126.134% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Imperial Metals Corp. has a beta of 0.820, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.03%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CS.TO or III.TO?
Capstone Copper Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Imperial Metals Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Capstone Copper Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Imperial Metals Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CS.TO or III.TO?
Capstone Copper Corp. quarterly revenues are $824.2M, which are larger than Imperial Metals Corp. quarterly revenues of $168.8M. Capstone Copper Corp.'s net income of $361.5M is higher than Imperial Metals Corp.'s net income of $38.5M. Notably, Capstone Copper Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.39x while Imperial Metals Corp.'s PE ratio is 9.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capstone Copper Corp. is 3.82x versus 2.82x for Imperial Metals Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CS.TOCapstone Copper Corp.3.82x 26.39x $824.2M $361.5M III.TOImperial Metals Corp.2.82x 9.99x $168.8M $38.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns CS.TO or LUN.TO?
Lundin Mining Corp. has a net margin of 43.86% compared to Capstone Copper Corp.'s net margin of 19.16%. Capstone Copper Corp.'s return on equity of 9.51% beat Lundin Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 5.26%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CS.TOCapstone Copper Corp.21.36% $0.45 $7.3B LUN.TOLundin Mining Corp.30.25% $0.26 $10.7B -
What do Analysts Say About CS.TO or LUN.TO?
Capstone Copper Corp. has a consensus price target of $15.42, signalling upside risk potential of 4%. On the other hand Lundin Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $28.15 which suggests that it could fall by -11.15%. Given that Capstone Copper Corp. has higher upside potential than Lundin Mining Corp., analysts believe Capstone Copper Corp. is more attractive than Lundin Mining Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CS.TOCapstone Copper Corp.10 1 0 LUN.TOLundin Mining Corp.11 7 0 -
Is CS.TO or LUN.TO More Risky?
Capstone Copper Corp. has a beta of 2.261, which suggesting that the stock is 126.134% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lundin Mining Corp. has a beta of 1.723, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.251%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CS.TO or LUN.TO?
Capstone Copper Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lundin Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Capstone Copper Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lundin Mining Corp. pays out -132.05% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CS.TO or LUN.TO?
Capstone Copper Corp. quarterly revenues are $824.2M, which are smaller than Lundin Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Capstone Copper Corp.'s net income of $361.5M is higher than Lundin Mining Corp.'s net income of $254.3M. Notably, Capstone Copper Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.39x while Lundin Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is 693.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capstone Copper Corp. is 3.82x versus 5.95x for Lundin Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CS.TOCapstone Copper Corp.3.82x 26.39x $824.2M $361.5M LUN.TOLundin Mining Corp.5.95x 693.22x $1.3B $254.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns CS.TO or NGEX.TO?
NGEx Minerals Ltd. has a net margin of 43.86% compared to Capstone Copper Corp.'s net margin of --. Capstone Copper Corp.'s return on equity of 9.51% beat NGEx Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of -81.71%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CS.TOCapstone Copper Corp.21.36% $0.45 $7.3B NGEX.TONGEx Minerals Ltd.-- -$0.14 $132.2M -
What do Analysts Say About CS.TO or NGEX.TO?
Capstone Copper Corp. has a consensus price target of $15.42, signalling upside risk potential of 4%. On the other hand NGEx Minerals Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $28.78 which suggests that it could grow by 3.26%. Given that Capstone Copper Corp. has higher upside potential than NGEx Minerals Ltd., analysts believe Capstone Copper Corp. is more attractive than NGEx Minerals Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CS.TOCapstone Copper Corp.10 1 0 NGEX.TONGEx Minerals Ltd.3 2 0 -
Is CS.TO or NGEX.TO More Risky?
Capstone Copper Corp. has a beta of 2.261, which suggesting that the stock is 126.134% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NGEx Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.711, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.084%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CS.TO or NGEX.TO?
Capstone Copper Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NGEx Minerals Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Capstone Copper Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NGEx Minerals Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CS.TO or NGEX.TO?
Capstone Copper Corp. quarterly revenues are $824.2M, which are larger than NGEx Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Capstone Copper Corp.'s net income of $361.5M is higher than NGEx Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$28.7M. Notably, Capstone Copper Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.39x while NGEx Minerals Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capstone Copper Corp. is 3.82x versus -- for NGEx Minerals Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CS.TOCapstone Copper Corp.3.82x 26.39x $824.2M $361.5M NGEX.TONGEx Minerals Ltd.-- -- -- -$28.7M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Buy
59
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
69
RGC alert for Jan 7
Regencell Bioscience Holdings Ltd. [RGC] is up 44.69% over the past day.
Buy
69
WDC alert for Jan 7
Western Digital Corp. [WDC] is down 7.83% over the past day.
Buy
75
DRUG alert for Jan 7
Bright Minds Biosciences, Inc. [DRUG] is up 2.78% over the past day.
