Is SCHD a Good ETF to Buy?
With around $65.7 billion in net assets, Schwab’s US Dividend…
Sell
47
CS.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$9.00
Seasonality move
:
13.22%
Day range:
$8.91 - $9.32
52-week range:
$5.97 - $11.51
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
3.44x
P/B ratio:
1.92x
Volume:
1.7M
Avg. volume:
2.1M
1-year change:
40.03%
Market cap:
$6.8B
Revenue:
$1.8B
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper
|
$803.6M | $0.12 | 4.17% | -- | $12.45 |
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals
|
$1.6B | $0.05 | -7.13% | -99.51% | $22.09 |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals
|
$885.4M | $0.39 | 8.01% | 307.04% | $16.41 |
|
III.TO
Imperial Metals
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining
|
$1.8B | $0.27 | 23.45% | 311.31% | $17.45 |
|
NGEX.TO
NGEx Minerals
|
-- | -$0.08 | -- | -100.72% | $15.72 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper
|
$8.99 | $12.45 | $6.8B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 3.44x |
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals
|
$19.83 | $22.09 | $16.5B | -- | $0.08 | 0% | 2.38x |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals
|
$12.36 | $16.41 | $4.9B | 40.72x | $0.01 | 0.16% | 1.64x |
|
III.TO
Imperial Metals
|
$1.87 | -- | $264.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.94x |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining
|
$12.58 | $17.45 | $9.8B | 25.60x | $0.09 | 2.86% | 1.73x |
|
NGEX.TO
NGEx Minerals
|
$13.75 | $15.72 | $2.8B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper
|
-- | 0.436 | -- | -- |
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals
|
36.07% | -0.322 | 54.35% | 0.79x |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals
|
30.41% | 0.119 | 29.76% | 1.45x |
|
III.TO
Imperial Metals
|
-- | -0.255 | -- | -- |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining
|
26.68% | 0.458 | 19.72% | 0.89x |
|
NGEX.TO
NGEx Minerals
|
-- | 0.672 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals
|
$622.2M | $502.1M | -8.49% | -13.33% | 26.35% | -$94.8M |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals
|
$190.7M | $143.1M | 2.41% | 3.68% | 19.75% | $64.8M |
|
III.TO
Imperial Metals
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining
|
$398.1M | $351.1M | 3.58% | 4.37% | 24.07% | -$91.2M |
|
NGEX.TO
NGEx Minerals
|
-- | -$12.3M | -- | -- | -- | -$7.7M |
Capstone Copper vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CS.TO or FM.TO?
First Quantum Minerals has a net margin of -- compared to Capstone Copper's net margin of 8.44%. Capstone Copper's return on equity of -- beat First Quantum Minerals's return on equity of -13.33%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CS.TOCapstone Copper-- -- -- FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals35.65% $0.18 $24.3B -
What do Analysts Say About CS.TO or FM.TO?
Capstone Copper has a consensus price target of $12.45, signalling upside risk potential of 38.52%. On the other hand First Quantum Minerals has an analysts' consensus of $22.09 which suggests that it could grow by 11.39%. Given that Capstone Copper has higher upside potential than First Quantum Minerals, analysts believe Capstone Copper is more attractive than First Quantum Minerals.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CS.TOCapstone Copper8 0 0 FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals5 12 0 -
Is CS.TO or FM.TO More Risky?
Capstone Copper has a beta of 2.106, which suggesting that the stock is 110.573% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Quantum Minerals has a beta of 1.680, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 68%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CS.TO or FM.TO?
Capstone Copper has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. First Quantum Minerals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Capstone Copper pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Quantum Minerals pays out -9.75% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CS.TO or FM.TO?
Capstone Copper quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Quantum Minerals quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Capstone Copper's net income of -- is lower than First Quantum Minerals's net income of $147.4M. Notably, Capstone Copper's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Quantum Minerals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capstone Copper is 3.44x versus 2.38x for First Quantum Minerals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CS.TOCapstone Copper3.44x -- -- -- FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals2.38x -- $1.7B $147.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns CS.TO or HBM.TO?
Hudbay Minerals has a net margin of -- compared to Capstone Copper's net margin of 10.24%. Capstone Copper's return on equity of -- beat Hudbay Minerals's return on equity of 3.68%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CS.TOCapstone Copper-- -- -- HBM.TOHudbay Minerals28.78% $0.18 $5.1B -
What do Analysts Say About CS.TO or HBM.TO?
Capstone Copper has a consensus price target of $12.45, signalling upside risk potential of 38.52%. On the other hand Hudbay Minerals has an analysts' consensus of $16.41 which suggests that it could grow by 32.79%. Given that Capstone Copper has higher upside potential than Hudbay Minerals, analysts believe Capstone Copper is more attractive than Hudbay Minerals.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CS.TOCapstone Copper8 0 0 HBM.TOHudbay Minerals9 0 0 -
Is CS.TO or HBM.TO More Risky?
Capstone Copper has a beta of 2.106, which suggesting that the stock is 110.573% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hudbay Minerals has a beta of 1.857, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.744%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CS.TO or HBM.TO?
Capstone Copper has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hudbay Minerals offers a yield of 0.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Capstone Copper pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals pays out 6.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CS.TO or HBM.TO?
Capstone Copper quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hudbay Minerals quarterly revenues of $662.8M. Capstone Copper's net income of -- is lower than Hudbay Minerals's net income of $67.9M. Notably, Capstone Copper's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hudbay Minerals's PE ratio is 40.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capstone Copper is 3.44x versus 1.64x for Hudbay Minerals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CS.TOCapstone Copper3.44x -- -- -- HBM.TOHudbay Minerals1.64x 40.72x $662.8M $67.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns CS.TO or III.TO?
Imperial Metals has a net margin of -- compared to Capstone Copper's net margin of --. Capstone Copper's return on equity of -- beat Imperial Metals's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CS.TOCapstone Copper-- -- -- III.TOImperial Metals-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CS.TO or III.TO?
Capstone Copper has a consensus price target of $12.45, signalling upside risk potential of 38.52%. On the other hand Imperial Metals has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 394.65%. Given that Imperial Metals has higher upside potential than Capstone Copper, analysts believe Imperial Metals is more attractive than Capstone Copper.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CS.TOCapstone Copper8 0 0 III.TOImperial Metals0 0 0 -
Is CS.TO or III.TO More Risky?
Capstone Copper has a beta of 2.106, which suggesting that the stock is 110.573% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Imperial Metals has a beta of 1.154, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.419%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CS.TO or III.TO?
Capstone Copper has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Imperial Metals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Capstone Copper pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Imperial Metals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CS.TO or III.TO?
Capstone Copper quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Imperial Metals quarterly revenues of --. Capstone Copper's net income of -- is lower than Imperial Metals's net income of --. Notably, Capstone Copper's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Imperial Metals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capstone Copper is 3.44x versus 1.94x for Imperial Metals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CS.TOCapstone Copper3.44x -- -- -- III.TOImperial Metals1.94x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CS.TO or LUN.TO?
Lundin Mining has a net margin of -- compared to Capstone Copper's net margin of 9.43%. Capstone Copper's return on equity of -- beat Lundin Mining's return on equity of 4.37%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CS.TOCapstone Copper-- -- -- LUN.TOLundin Mining27.2% $0.18 $10.8B -
What do Analysts Say About CS.TO or LUN.TO?
Capstone Copper has a consensus price target of $12.45, signalling upside risk potential of 38.52%. On the other hand Lundin Mining has an analysts' consensus of $17.45 which suggests that it could grow by 38.7%. Given that Lundin Mining has higher upside potential than Capstone Copper, analysts believe Lundin Mining is more attractive than Capstone Copper.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CS.TOCapstone Copper8 0 0 LUN.TOLundin Mining7 7 0 -
Is CS.TO or LUN.TO More Risky?
Capstone Copper has a beta of 2.106, which suggesting that the stock is 110.573% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lundin Mining has a beta of 1.649, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.91%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CS.TO or LUN.TO?
Capstone Copper has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lundin Mining offers a yield of 2.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Capstone Copper pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lundin Mining pays out 85.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Lundin Mining's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CS.TO or LUN.TO?
Capstone Copper quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lundin Mining quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Capstone Copper's net income of -- is lower than Lundin Mining's net income of $138M. Notably, Capstone Copper's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lundin Mining's PE ratio is 25.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capstone Copper is 3.44x versus 1.73x for Lundin Mining. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CS.TOCapstone Copper3.44x -- -- -- LUN.TOLundin Mining1.73x 25.60x $1.5B $138M
-
Which has Higher Returns CS.TO or NGEX.TO?
NGEx Minerals has a net margin of -- compared to Capstone Copper's net margin of --. Capstone Copper's return on equity of -- beat NGEx Minerals's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CS.TOCapstone Copper-- -- -- NGEX.TONGEx Minerals-- -$0.05 -- -
What do Analysts Say About CS.TO or NGEX.TO?
Capstone Copper has a consensus price target of $12.45, signalling upside risk potential of 38.52%. On the other hand NGEx Minerals has an analysts' consensus of $15.72 which suggests that it could grow by 14.31%. Given that Capstone Copper has higher upside potential than NGEx Minerals, analysts believe Capstone Copper is more attractive than NGEx Minerals.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CS.TOCapstone Copper8 0 0 NGEX.TONGEx Minerals4 0 0 -
Is CS.TO or NGEX.TO More Risky?
Capstone Copper has a beta of 2.106, which suggesting that the stock is 110.573% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NGEx Minerals has a beta of 1.895, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.502%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CS.TO or NGEX.TO?
Capstone Copper has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NGEx Minerals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Capstone Copper pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NGEx Minerals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CS.TO or NGEX.TO?
Capstone Copper quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NGEx Minerals quarterly revenues of --. Capstone Copper's net income of -- is lower than NGEx Minerals's net income of -$9.8M. Notably, Capstone Copper's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NGEx Minerals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capstone Copper is 3.44x versus -- for NGEx Minerals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CS.TOCapstone Copper3.44x -- -- -- NGEX.TONGEx Minerals-- -- -- -$9.8M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is NAIL a Good ETF to Buy?
If you’re thinking about buying the NAIL ETF, this article…
3 High Dividend Dow Jones Stocks
Thanks to surging stock prices over the past two years,…
Stock Ideas
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Sell
43
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Buy
57
NARI alert for Jan 8
Inari Medical [NARI] is up 22.25% over the past day.
Buy
69
UNF alert for Jan 8
UniFirst [UNF] is up 20.59% over the past day.
Sell
31
APOG alert for Jan 8
Apogee Enterprises [APOG] is down 19.13% over the past day.
