TRBC.V Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Tribeca Resources Corp.'s net margin of -5.8%. Tribeca Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -85.24% beat First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.17%.

Tribeca Resources Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $22.37 which suggests that it could fall by -42.24%. Given that First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has higher upside potential than Tribeca Resources Corp., analysts believe First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is more attractive than Tribeca Resources Corp..

Tribeca Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.493, which suggesting that the stock is 50.721% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.860, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.031%.

Tribeca Resources Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Tribeca Resources Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tribeca Resources Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Tribeca Resources Corp.'s net income of -$229.5K is higher than First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$107.4M. Notably, Tribeca Resources Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s PE ratio is 502.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tribeca Resources Corp. is -- versus 4.60x for First Quantum Minerals Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Tribeca Resources Corp.'s net margin of 65.8%. Tribeca Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -85.24% beat Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.25%.

Tribeca Resources Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $19.30 which suggests that it could fall by -45.1%. Given that Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tribeca Resources Corp., analysts believe Hudbay Minerals, Inc. is more attractive than Tribeca Resources Corp..

Tribeca Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.493, which suggesting that the stock is 50.721% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a beta of 1.874, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.423%.

Tribeca Resources Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. offers a yield of 0.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Tribeca Resources Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. pays out 7.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tribeca Resources Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hudbay Minerals, Inc. quarterly revenues of $465.5M. Tribeca Resources Corp.'s net income of -$229.5K is lower than Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s net income of $306.3M. Notably, Tribeca Resources Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s PE ratio is 21.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tribeca Resources Corp. is -- versus 4.98x for Hudbay Minerals, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Imperial Metals Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Tribeca Resources Corp.'s net margin of 22.84%. Tribeca Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -85.24% beat Imperial Metals Corp.'s return on equity of 21.06%.

Tribeca Resources Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Imperial Metals Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -19.98%. Given that Imperial Metals Corp. has higher upside potential than Tribeca Resources Corp., analysts believe Imperial Metals Corp. is more attractive than Tribeca Resources Corp..

Tribeca Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.493, which suggesting that the stock is 50.721% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Imperial Metals Corp. has a beta of 0.745, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.463%.

Tribeca Resources Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Imperial Metals Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tribeca Resources Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Imperial Metals Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tribeca Resources Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Imperial Metals Corp. quarterly revenues of $168.8M. Tribeca Resources Corp.'s net income of -$229.5K is lower than Imperial Metals Corp.'s net income of $38.5M. Notably, Tribeca Resources Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Imperial Metals Corp.'s PE ratio is 10.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tribeca Resources Corp. is -- versus 2.95x for Imperial Metals Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lundin Mining Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Tribeca Resources Corp.'s net margin of 19.16%. Tribeca Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -85.24% beat Lundin Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 5.26%.

Tribeca Resources Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lundin Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $18.43 which suggests that it could fall by -46.77%. Given that Lundin Mining Corp. has higher upside potential than Tribeca Resources Corp., analysts believe Lundin Mining Corp. is more attractive than Tribeca Resources Corp..

Tribeca Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.493, which suggesting that the stock is 50.721% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lundin Mining Corp. has a beta of 1.692, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.211%.

Tribeca Resources Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lundin Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Tribeca Resources Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lundin Mining Corp. pays out -132.05% of its earnings as a dividend.

Tribeca Resources Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lundin Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Tribeca Resources Corp.'s net income of -$229.5K is lower than Lundin Mining Corp.'s net income of $254.3M. Notably, Tribeca Resources Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lundin Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is 755.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tribeca Resources Corp. is -- versus 6.50x for Lundin Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.