Financhill
Sell
46

TRBC.V Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$0.26
Seasonality move :
19.6%
Day range:
$0.25 - $0.28
52-week range:
$0.17 - $0.39
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
15.54x
Volume:
407.4K
Avg. volume:
193.2K
1-year change:
-16.13%
Market cap:
$25.3M
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
-$0.04

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
TRBC.V
Tribeca Resources Corp.
-- -- -- -- --
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
$902.2M $0.16 21.27% 92.01% $16.73
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
$1.9B $0.10 20.91% -38.42% $43.53
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
$996.2M $0.53 8.11% 46.87% $40.71
III.TO
Imperial Metals Corp.
-- -- -- -- --
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
$1.7B $0.41 24.1% 106.05% $37.20
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
TRBC.V
Tribeca Resources Corp.
$0.26 -- $25.3M -- $0.00 0% --
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
$12.29 $16.73 $9.4B 21.87x $0.00 0% 3.16x
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
$36.68 $43.53 $30.4B 502.72x $0.08 0% 4.18x
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
$34.10 $40.71 $13.5B 17.09x $0.01 0.06% 4.47x
III.TO
Imperial Metals Corp.
$9.49 -- $1.7B 8.60x $0.00 0% 2.42x
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
$38.72 $37.20 $33.1B 18.54x $0.03 0.45% 6.35x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
TRBC.V
Tribeca Resources Corp.
-- -2.398 -- 1.01x
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
31.04% 1.763 21.68% 0.70x
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
38.83% 1.398 31.36% 0.52x
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
24.78% 2.830 13.49% 0.74x
III.TO
Imperial Metals Corp.
19.68% -1.209 23.17% 0.38x
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
6.36% 2.783 2.28% 0.79x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
TRBC.V
Tribeca Resources Corp.
-- -$230.8K -85.24% -85.24% -- -$81.9K
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
$176M $153.3M 6.75% 9.51% 18.6% -$29.7M
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
$556.3M $543.8M -0.35% -0.56% 26.44% -$580.7M
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
$337.7M $333M 13.87% 19.28% 32.9% $57.8M
III.TO
Imperial Metals Corp.
$69.7M $65M 15.38% 21.06% 38.52% $31.7M
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
$400.5M $382.6M 17.83% 20.96% 28.16% $510.9M

Tribeca Resources Corp. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns TRBC.V or CS.TO?

    Capstone Copper Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Tribeca Resources Corp.'s net margin of 43.86%. Tribeca Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -85.24% beat Capstone Copper Corp.'s return on equity of 9.51%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    TRBC.V
    Tribeca Resources Corp.
    -- -$0.00 $1.6M
    CS.TO
    Capstone Copper Corp.
    21.36% $0.45 $7.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About TRBC.V or CS.TO?

    Tribeca Resources Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Capstone Copper Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $16.73 which suggests that it could grow by 36.16%. Given that Capstone Copper Corp. has higher upside potential than Tribeca Resources Corp., analysts believe Capstone Copper Corp. is more attractive than Tribeca Resources Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    TRBC.V
    Tribeca Resources Corp.
    0 0 0
    CS.TO
    Capstone Copper Corp.
    10 3 0
  • Is TRBC.V or CS.TO More Risky?

    Tribeca Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.394, which suggesting that the stock is 60.637% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Capstone Copper Corp. has a beta of 1.954, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.354%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock TRBC.V or CS.TO?

    Tribeca Resources Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Capstone Copper Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tribeca Resources Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Capstone Copper Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios TRBC.V or CS.TO?

    Tribeca Resources Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Capstone Copper Corp. quarterly revenues of $824.2M. Tribeca Resources Corp.'s net income of -$229.5K is lower than Capstone Copper Corp.'s net income of $361.5M. Notably, Tribeca Resources Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Capstone Copper Corp.'s PE ratio is 21.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tribeca Resources Corp. is -- versus 3.16x for Capstone Copper Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    TRBC.V
    Tribeca Resources Corp.
    -- -- -- -$229.5K
    CS.TO
    Capstone Copper Corp.
    3.16x 21.87x $824.2M $361.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns TRBC.V or FM.TO?

    First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Tribeca Resources Corp.'s net margin of 7.12%. Tribeca Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -85.24% beat First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.56%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    TRBC.V
    Tribeca Resources Corp.
    -- -$0.00 $1.6M
    FM.TO
    First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
    27.05% $0.04 $25.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About TRBC.V or FM.TO?

    Tribeca Resources Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $43.53 which suggests that it could grow by 18.68%. Given that First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has higher upside potential than Tribeca Resources Corp., analysts believe First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is more attractive than Tribeca Resources Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    TRBC.V
    Tribeca Resources Corp.
    0 0 0
    FM.TO
    First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
    7 9 0
  • Is TRBC.V or FM.TO More Risky?

    Tribeca Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.394, which suggesting that the stock is 60.637% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.725, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.466%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock TRBC.V or FM.TO?

    Tribeca Resources Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Tribeca Resources Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios TRBC.V or FM.TO?

    Tribeca Resources Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Tribeca Resources Corp.'s net income of -$229.5K is lower than First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of $146.4M. Notably, Tribeca Resources Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s PE ratio is 502.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tribeca Resources Corp. is -- versus 4.18x for First Quantum Minerals Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    TRBC.V
    Tribeca Resources Corp.
    -- -- -- -$229.5K
    FM.TO
    First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
    4.18x 502.72x $2.1B $146.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns TRBC.V or HBM.TO?

    Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Tribeca Resources Corp.'s net margin of 17.63%. Tribeca Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -85.24% beat Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.28%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    TRBC.V
    Tribeca Resources Corp.
    -- -$0.00 $1.6M
    HBM.TO
    Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
    33.37% $0.45 $5.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About TRBC.V or HBM.TO?

    Tribeca Resources Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $40.71 which suggests that it could grow by 19.39%. Given that Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tribeca Resources Corp., analysts believe Hudbay Minerals, Inc. is more attractive than Tribeca Resources Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    TRBC.V
    Tribeca Resources Corp.
    0 0 0
    HBM.TO
    Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
    14 0 0
  • Is TRBC.V or HBM.TO More Risky?

    Tribeca Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.394, which suggesting that the stock is 60.637% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a beta of 1.850, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.991%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock TRBC.V or HBM.TO?

    Tribeca Resources Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. offers a yield of 0.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Tribeca Resources Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. pays out 1% of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios TRBC.V or HBM.TO?

    Tribeca Resources Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hudbay Minerals, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1B. Tribeca Resources Corp.'s net income of -$229.5K is lower than Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s net income of $178.5M. Notably, Tribeca Resources Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tribeca Resources Corp. is -- versus 4.47x for Hudbay Minerals, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    TRBC.V
    Tribeca Resources Corp.
    -- -- -- -$229.5K
    HBM.TO
    Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
    4.47x 17.09x $1B $178.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns TRBC.V or III.TO?

    Imperial Metals Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Tribeca Resources Corp.'s net margin of 22.84%. Tribeca Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -85.24% beat Imperial Metals Corp.'s return on equity of 21.06%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    TRBC.V
    Tribeca Resources Corp.
    -- -$0.00 $1.6M
    III.TO
    Imperial Metals Corp.
    41.32% $0.22 $1.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About TRBC.V or III.TO?

    Tribeca Resources Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Imperial Metals Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -2.53%. Given that Imperial Metals Corp. has higher upside potential than Tribeca Resources Corp., analysts believe Imperial Metals Corp. is more attractive than Tribeca Resources Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    TRBC.V
    Tribeca Resources Corp.
    0 0 0
    III.TO
    Imperial Metals Corp.
    0 0 0
  • Is TRBC.V or III.TO More Risky?

    Tribeca Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.394, which suggesting that the stock is 60.637% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Imperial Metals Corp. has a beta of 0.598, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.219%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock TRBC.V or III.TO?

    Tribeca Resources Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Imperial Metals Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tribeca Resources Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Imperial Metals Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios TRBC.V or III.TO?

    Tribeca Resources Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Imperial Metals Corp. quarterly revenues of $168.8M. Tribeca Resources Corp.'s net income of -$229.5K is lower than Imperial Metals Corp.'s net income of $38.5M. Notably, Tribeca Resources Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Imperial Metals Corp.'s PE ratio is 8.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tribeca Resources Corp. is -- versus 2.42x for Imperial Metals Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    TRBC.V
    Tribeca Resources Corp.
    -- -- -- -$229.5K
    III.TO
    Imperial Metals Corp.
    2.42x 8.60x $168.8M $38.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns TRBC.V or LUN.TO?

    Lundin Mining Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Tribeca Resources Corp.'s net margin of 91.56%. Tribeca Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -85.24% beat Lundin Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 20.96%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    TRBC.V
    Tribeca Resources Corp.
    -- -$0.00 $1.6M
    LUN.TO
    Lundin Mining Corp.
    29.47% $1.25 $11.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About TRBC.V or LUN.TO?

    Tribeca Resources Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lundin Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $37.20 which suggests that it could fall by -3.92%. Given that Lundin Mining Corp. has higher upside potential than Tribeca Resources Corp., analysts believe Lundin Mining Corp. is more attractive than Tribeca Resources Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    TRBC.V
    Tribeca Resources Corp.
    0 0 0
    LUN.TO
    Lundin Mining Corp.
    7 11 0
  • Is TRBC.V or LUN.TO More Risky?

    Tribeca Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.394, which suggesting that the stock is 60.637% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lundin Mining Corp. has a beta of 1.708, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.831%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock TRBC.V or LUN.TO?

    Tribeca Resources Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lundin Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Tribeca Resources Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lundin Mining Corp. pays out 8.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Lundin Mining Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios TRBC.V or LUN.TO?

    Tribeca Resources Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lundin Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Tribeca Resources Corp.'s net income of -$229.5K is lower than Lundin Mining Corp.'s net income of $1.2B. Notably, Tribeca Resources Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lundin Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is 18.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tribeca Resources Corp. is -- versus 6.35x for Lundin Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    TRBC.V
    Tribeca Resources Corp.
    -- -- -- -$229.5K
    LUN.TO
    Lundin Mining Corp.
    6.35x 18.54x $1.4B $1.2B

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?

Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…

Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?

Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…

Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?

Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…

Stock Ideas

Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Sell
34
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x

Alerts

Sell
46
ZD alert for Mar 4

Ziff Davis, Inc. [ZD] is up 1.28% over the past day.

Buy
54
KORU alert for Mar 4

Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares [KORU] is up 12.36% over the past day.

Sell
40
PSIX alert for Mar 4

Power Solutions International, Inc. [PSIX] is down 0.67% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock