Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
45
HBM.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$34.31
Seasonality move
:
0.98%
Day range:
$32.50 - $34.62
52-week range:
$8.49 - $38.94
Dividend yield:
0.06%
P/E ratio:
17.09x
P/S ratio:
4.47x
P/B ratio:
3.06x
Volume:
2.7M
Avg. volume:
2.5M
1-year change:
240.66%
Market cap:
$13.5B
Revenue:
$3B
EPS (TTM):
$2.00
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
$996.2M | $0.53 | 8.11% | 46.87% | $40.71 |
|
ASCU.TO
Arizona Sonoran Copper Co., Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $8.36 |
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
|
$902.2M | $0.16 | 21.27% | 92.01% | $16.73 |
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
|
$1.9B | $0.10 | 20.91% | -38.42% | $43.53 |
|
III.TO
Imperial Metals Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
|
$1.7B | $0.41 | 24.1% | 106.05% | $37.20 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
$34.10 | $40.71 | $13.5B | 17.09x | $0.01 | 0.06% | 4.47x |
|
ASCU.TO
Arizona Sonoran Copper Co., Inc.
|
$8.22 | $8.36 | $1.7B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
|
$12.29 | $16.73 | $9.4B | 21.87x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.16x |
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
|
$36.68 | $43.53 | $30.4B | 502.72x | $0.08 | 0% | 4.18x |
|
III.TO
Imperial Metals Corp.
|
$9.49 | -- | $1.7B | 8.60x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.42x |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
|
$38.72 | $37.20 | $33.1B | 18.54x | $0.03 | 0.45% | 6.35x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
24.78% | 2.830 | 13.49% | 0.74x |
|
ASCU.TO
Arizona Sonoran Copper Co., Inc.
|
36.58% | -0.199 | 23.29% | 4.45x |
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
|
31.04% | 1.763 | 21.68% | 0.70x |
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
|
38.83% | 1.398 | 31.36% | 0.52x |
|
III.TO
Imperial Metals Corp.
|
19.68% | -1.209 | 23.17% | 0.38x |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
|
6.36% | 2.783 | 2.28% | 0.79x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
$337.7M | $333M | 13.87% | 19.28% | 32.9% | $57.8M |
|
ASCU.TO
Arizona Sonoran Copper Co., Inc.
|
$20.7K | -$1.9M | -5.01% | -5.86% | -- | -$33.8M |
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
|
$176M | $153.3M | 6.75% | 9.51% | 18.6% | -$29.7M |
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
|
$556.3M | $543.8M | -0.35% | -0.56% | 26.44% | -$580.7M |
|
III.TO
Imperial Metals Corp.
|
$69.7M | $65M | 15.38% | 21.06% | 38.52% | $31.7M |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
|
$400.5M | $382.6M | 17.83% | 20.96% | 28.16% | $510.9M |
Hudbay Minerals, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns HBM.TO or ASCU.TO?
Arizona Sonoran Copper Co., Inc. has a net margin of 17.63% compared to Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s net margin of --. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.28% beat Arizona Sonoran Copper Co., Inc.'s return on equity of -5.86%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HBM.TOHudbay Minerals, Inc.33.37% $0.45 $5.9B ASCU.TOArizona Sonoran Copper Co., Inc.-- -$0.02 $350.1M -
What do Analysts Say About HBM.TO or ASCU.TO?
Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a consensus price target of $40.71, signalling upside risk potential of 19.39%. On the other hand Arizona Sonoran Copper Co., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $8.36 which suggests that it could grow by 1.76%. Given that Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Arizona Sonoran Copper Co., Inc., analysts believe Hudbay Minerals, Inc. is more attractive than Arizona Sonoran Copper Co., Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HBM.TOHudbay Minerals, Inc.14 0 0 ASCU.TOArizona Sonoran Copper Co., Inc.2 2 0 -
Is HBM.TO or ASCU.TO More Risky?
Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a beta of 1.850, which suggesting that the stock is 84.991% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Arizona Sonoran Copper Co., Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HBM.TO or ASCU.TO?
Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.06%. Arizona Sonoran Copper Co., Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. pays 1% of its earnings as a dividend. Arizona Sonoran Copper Co., Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HBM.TO or ASCU.TO?
Hudbay Minerals, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Arizona Sonoran Copper Co., Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s net income of $178.5M is higher than Arizona Sonoran Copper Co., Inc.'s net income of -$3.4M. Notably, Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.09x while Arizona Sonoran Copper Co., Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hudbay Minerals, Inc. is 4.47x versus -- for Arizona Sonoran Copper Co., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HBM.TOHudbay Minerals, Inc.4.47x 17.09x $1B $178.5M ASCU.TOArizona Sonoran Copper Co., Inc.-- -- -- -$3.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns HBM.TO or CS.TO?
Capstone Copper Corp. has a net margin of 17.63% compared to Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s net margin of 43.86%. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.28% beat Capstone Copper Corp.'s return on equity of 9.51%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HBM.TOHudbay Minerals, Inc.33.37% $0.45 $5.9B CS.TOCapstone Copper Corp.21.36% $0.45 $7.3B -
What do Analysts Say About HBM.TO or CS.TO?
Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a consensus price target of $40.71, signalling upside risk potential of 19.39%. On the other hand Capstone Copper Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $16.73 which suggests that it could grow by 36.16%. Given that Capstone Copper Corp. has higher upside potential than Hudbay Minerals, Inc., analysts believe Capstone Copper Corp. is more attractive than Hudbay Minerals, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HBM.TOHudbay Minerals, Inc.14 0 0 CS.TOCapstone Copper Corp.10 3 0 -
Is HBM.TO or CS.TO More Risky?
Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a beta of 1.850, which suggesting that the stock is 84.991% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Capstone Copper Corp. has a beta of 1.954, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.354%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HBM.TO or CS.TO?
Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.06%. Capstone Copper Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. pays 1% of its earnings as a dividend. Capstone Copper Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HBM.TO or CS.TO?
Hudbay Minerals, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Capstone Copper Corp. quarterly revenues of $824.2M. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s net income of $178.5M is lower than Capstone Copper Corp.'s net income of $361.5M. Notably, Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.09x while Capstone Copper Corp.'s PE ratio is 21.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hudbay Minerals, Inc. is 4.47x versus 3.16x for Capstone Copper Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HBM.TOHudbay Minerals, Inc.4.47x 17.09x $1B $178.5M CS.TOCapstone Copper Corp.3.16x 21.87x $824.2M $361.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns HBM.TO or FM.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a net margin of 17.63% compared to Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s net margin of 7.12%. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.28% beat First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.56%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HBM.TOHudbay Minerals, Inc.33.37% $0.45 $5.9B FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.27.05% $0.04 $25.5B -
What do Analysts Say About HBM.TO or FM.TO?
Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a consensus price target of $40.71, signalling upside risk potential of 19.39%. On the other hand First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $43.53 which suggests that it could grow by 18.68%. Given that Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has higher upside potential than First Quantum Minerals Ltd., analysts believe Hudbay Minerals, Inc. is more attractive than First Quantum Minerals Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HBM.TOHudbay Minerals, Inc.14 0 0 FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.7 9 0 -
Is HBM.TO or FM.TO More Risky?
Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a beta of 1.850, which suggesting that the stock is 84.991% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.725, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.466%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HBM.TO or FM.TO?
Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.06%. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. pays 1% of its earnings as a dividend. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HBM.TO or FM.TO?
Hudbay Minerals, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s net income of $178.5M is higher than First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of $146.4M. Notably, Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.09x while First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s PE ratio is 502.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hudbay Minerals, Inc. is 4.47x versus 4.18x for First Quantum Minerals Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HBM.TOHudbay Minerals, Inc.4.47x 17.09x $1B $178.5M FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.4.18x 502.72x $2.1B $146.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns HBM.TO or III.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a net margin of 17.63% compared to Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s net margin of 22.84%. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.28% beat Imperial Metals Corp.'s return on equity of 21.06%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HBM.TOHudbay Minerals, Inc.33.37% $0.45 $5.9B III.TOImperial Metals Corp.41.32% $0.22 $1.2B -
What do Analysts Say About HBM.TO or III.TO?
Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a consensus price target of $40.71, signalling upside risk potential of 19.39%. On the other hand Imperial Metals Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -2.53%. Given that Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Imperial Metals Corp., analysts believe Hudbay Minerals, Inc. is more attractive than Imperial Metals Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HBM.TOHudbay Minerals, Inc.14 0 0 III.TOImperial Metals Corp.0 0 0 -
Is HBM.TO or III.TO More Risky?
Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a beta of 1.850, which suggesting that the stock is 84.991% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Imperial Metals Corp. has a beta of 0.598, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.219%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HBM.TO or III.TO?
Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.06%. Imperial Metals Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. pays 1% of its earnings as a dividend. Imperial Metals Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HBM.TO or III.TO?
Hudbay Minerals, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Imperial Metals Corp. quarterly revenues of $168.8M. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s net income of $178.5M is higher than Imperial Metals Corp.'s net income of $38.5M. Notably, Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.09x while Imperial Metals Corp.'s PE ratio is 8.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hudbay Minerals, Inc. is 4.47x versus 2.42x for Imperial Metals Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HBM.TOHudbay Minerals, Inc.4.47x 17.09x $1B $178.5M III.TOImperial Metals Corp.2.42x 8.60x $168.8M $38.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns HBM.TO or LUN.TO?
Lundin Mining Corp. has a net margin of 17.63% compared to Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s net margin of 91.56%. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.28% beat Lundin Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 20.96%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HBM.TOHudbay Minerals, Inc.33.37% $0.45 $5.9B LUN.TOLundin Mining Corp.29.47% $1.25 $11.5B -
What do Analysts Say About HBM.TO or LUN.TO?
Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a consensus price target of $40.71, signalling upside risk potential of 19.39%. On the other hand Lundin Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $37.20 which suggests that it could fall by -3.92%. Given that Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lundin Mining Corp., analysts believe Hudbay Minerals, Inc. is more attractive than Lundin Mining Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HBM.TOHudbay Minerals, Inc.14 0 0 LUN.TOLundin Mining Corp.7 11 0 -
Is HBM.TO or LUN.TO More Risky?
Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a beta of 1.850, which suggesting that the stock is 84.991% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lundin Mining Corp. has a beta of 1.708, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.831%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HBM.TO or LUN.TO?
Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.06%. Lundin Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. pays 1% of its earnings as a dividend. Lundin Mining Corp. pays out 8.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HBM.TO or LUN.TO?
Hudbay Minerals, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Lundin Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s net income of $178.5M is lower than Lundin Mining Corp.'s net income of $1.2B. Notably, Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.09x while Lundin Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is 18.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hudbay Minerals, Inc. is 4.47x versus 6.35x for Lundin Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HBM.TOHudbay Minerals, Inc.4.47x 17.09x $1B $178.5M LUN.TOLundin Mining Corp.6.35x 18.54x $1.4B $1.2B
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
34
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Sell
46
ZD alert for Mar 4
Ziff Davis, Inc. [ZD] is up 0.39% over the past day.
Buy
54
KORU alert for Mar 4
Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares [KORU] is up 4.68% over the past day.
Sell
40
PSIX alert for Mar 4
Power Solutions International, Inc. [PSIX] is up 2.81% over the past day.
