FM.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a net margin of -5.8% compared to First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of 65.8%. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.17% beat Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.25%.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of $22.37, signalling downside risk potential of -42.24%. On the other hand Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $19.49 which suggests that it could fall by -42.85%. Given that Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has more downside risk than First Quantum Minerals Ltd., analysts believe First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is more attractive than Hudbay Minerals, Inc..

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.860, which suggesting that the stock is 86.031% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a beta of 1.874, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.423%.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. offers a yield of 0.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. pays out 7.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Hudbay Minerals, Inc. quarterly revenues of $465.5M. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$107.4M is lower than Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s net income of $306.3M. Notably, First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 502.33x while Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is 4.60x versus 4.79x for Hudbay Minerals, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Imperial Metals Corp. has a net margin of -5.8% compared to First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of 22.84%. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.17% beat Imperial Metals Corp.'s return on equity of 21.06%.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of $22.37, signalling downside risk potential of -42.24%. On the other hand Imperial Metals Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -20.46%. Given that First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has more downside risk than Imperial Metals Corp., analysts believe Imperial Metals Corp. is more attractive than First Quantum Minerals Ltd..

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.860, which suggesting that the stock is 86.031% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Imperial Metals Corp. has a beta of 0.745, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.463%.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Imperial Metals Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Imperial Metals Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Imperial Metals Corp. quarterly revenues of $168.8M. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$107.4M is lower than Imperial Metals Corp.'s net income of $38.5M. Notably, First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 502.33x while Imperial Metals Corp.'s PE ratio is 10.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is 4.60x versus 2.97x for Imperial Metals Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lundin Mining Corp. has a net margin of -5.8% compared to First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of 19.16%. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.17% beat Lundin Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 5.26%.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of $22.37, signalling downside risk potential of -42.24%. On the other hand Lundin Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $18.47 which suggests that it could fall by -45.19%. Given that Lundin Mining Corp. has more downside risk than First Quantum Minerals Ltd., analysts believe First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is more attractive than Lundin Mining Corp..

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.860, which suggesting that the stock is 86.031% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lundin Mining Corp. has a beta of 1.692, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.211%.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lundin Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lundin Mining Corp. pays out -132.05% of its earnings as a dividend.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Lundin Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$107.4M is lower than Lundin Mining Corp.'s net income of $254.3M. Notably, First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 502.33x while Lundin Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is 730.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is 4.60x versus 6.28x for Lundin Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tribeca Resources Corp. has a net margin of -5.8% compared to First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of --. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.17% beat Tribeca Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -85.24%.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of $22.37, signalling downside risk potential of -42.24%. On the other hand Tribeca Resources Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has higher upside potential than Tribeca Resources Corp., analysts believe First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is more attractive than Tribeca Resources Corp..

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.860, which suggesting that the stock is 86.031% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tribeca Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.493, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.721%.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tribeca Resources Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tribeca Resources Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Tribeca Resources Corp. quarterly revenues of --. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$107.4M is lower than Tribeca Resources Corp.'s net income of -$229.5K. Notably, First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 502.33x while Tribeca Resources Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is 4.60x versus -- for Tribeca Resources Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.