Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Buy
69
FM.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$37.80
Seasonality move
:
14.47%
Day range:
$38.96 - $40.81
52-week range:
$14.41 - $40.81
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
505.84x
P/S ratio:
4.63x
P/B ratio:
2.06x
Volume:
2.4M
Avg. volume:
1.9M
1-year change:
101.13%
Market cap:
$32.5B
Revenue:
$6.6B
EPS (TTM):
$0.08
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
|
$1.8B | $0.08 | 3.22% | -52.22% | $35.78 |
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
|
$895.2M | $0.14 | 43.24% | 69.38% | $15.42 |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
$971M | $0.52 | 16.57% | 638.54% | $27.73 |
|
III.TO
Imperial Metals Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
|
$1.6B | $0.35 | 9.37% | 13.67% | $28.15 |
|
NGEX.TO
NGEx Minerals Ltd.
|
-- | -$0.16 | -- | -22.05% | $28.78 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
|
$39.00 | $35.78 | $32.5B | 505.84x | $0.08 | 0% | 4.63x |
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
|
$14.83 | $15.42 | $11.3B | 26.39x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.82x |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
$29.59 | $27.73 | $11.7B | 18.30x | $0.01 | 0.07% | 4.19x |
|
III.TO
Imperial Metals Corp.
|
$11.03 | -- | $2B | 9.99x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.82x |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
|
$31.68 | $28.15 | $27.1B | 693.22x | $0.03 | 0.55% | 5.95x |
|
NGEX.TO
NGEx Minerals Ltd.
|
$27.87 | $28.78 | $6B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
|
38.13% | 1.784 | 36.48% | 0.72x |
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
|
31.04% | 3.078 | 21.68% | 0.70x |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
26.46% | 4.010 | 18.47% | 0.72x |
|
III.TO
Imperial Metals Corp.
|
19.68% | 0.427 | 23.17% | 0.38x |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
|
9.6% | 2.364 | 4.71% | 0.79x |
|
NGEX.TO
NGEx Minerals Ltd.
|
0.7% | 3.378 | 0.02% | 12.35x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
|
$477.9M | $433.9M | 0.1% | 0.17% | 23.4% | $1.1B |
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
|
$176M | $153.3M | 6.75% | 9.51% | 18.6% | -$29.7M |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
$57.3M | $6.1M | 11.49% | 16.25% | 1.3% | $4.7M |
|
III.TO
Imperial Metals Corp.
|
$69.7M | $65M | 15.38% | 21.06% | 38.52% | $31.7M |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
|
$401.4M | $381.2M | 4.26% | 5.26% | 28.74% | $138.3M |
|
NGEX.TO
NGEx Minerals Ltd.
|
-$17.1K | -$31M | -81.49% | -81.71% | -- | -$11.1M |
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FM.TO or CS.TO?
Capstone Copper Corp. has a net margin of -5.8% compared to First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of 43.86%. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.17% beat Capstone Copper Corp.'s return on equity of 9.51%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.25.78% -$0.08 $25.9B CS.TOCapstone Copper Corp.21.36% $0.45 $7.3B -
What do Analysts Say About FM.TO or CS.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of $35.78, signalling downside risk potential of -8.26%. On the other hand Capstone Copper Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $15.42 which suggests that it could grow by 4%. Given that Capstone Copper Corp. has higher upside potential than First Quantum Minerals Ltd., analysts believe Capstone Copper Corp. is more attractive than First Quantum Minerals Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.7 10 0 CS.TOCapstone Copper Corp.10 1 0 -
Is FM.TO or CS.TO More Risky?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.885, which suggesting that the stock is 88.515% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Capstone Copper Corp. has a beta of 2.261, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 126.134%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FM.TO or CS.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Capstone Copper Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Capstone Copper Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FM.TO or CS.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Capstone Copper Corp. quarterly revenues of $824.2M. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$107.4M is lower than Capstone Copper Corp.'s net income of $361.5M. Notably, First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 505.84x while Capstone Copper Corp.'s PE ratio is 26.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is 4.63x versus 3.82x for Capstone Copper Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.4.63x 505.84x $1.9B -$107.4M CS.TOCapstone Copper Corp.3.82x 26.39x $824.2M $361.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns FM.TO or HBM.TO?
Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a net margin of -5.8% compared to First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of 65.8%. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.17% beat Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.25%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.25.78% -$0.08 $25.9B HBM.TOHudbay Minerals, Inc.12.31% $0.77 $5.8B -
What do Analysts Say About FM.TO or HBM.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of $35.78, signalling downside risk potential of -8.26%. On the other hand Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $27.73 which suggests that it could fall by -6.28%. Given that First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has more downside risk than Hudbay Minerals, Inc., analysts believe Hudbay Minerals, Inc. is more attractive than First Quantum Minerals Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.7 10 0 HBM.TOHudbay Minerals, Inc.10 0 0 -
Is FM.TO or HBM.TO More Risky?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.885, which suggesting that the stock is 88.515% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a beta of 1.957, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.736%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FM.TO or HBM.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. offers a yield of 0.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. pays out 7.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FM.TO or HBM.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Hudbay Minerals, Inc. quarterly revenues of $465.5M. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$107.4M is lower than Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s net income of $306.3M. Notably, First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 505.84x while Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s PE ratio is 18.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is 4.63x versus 4.19x for Hudbay Minerals, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.4.63x 505.84x $1.9B -$107.4M HBM.TOHudbay Minerals, Inc.4.19x 18.30x $465.5M $306.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns FM.TO or III.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a net margin of -5.8% compared to First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of 22.84%. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.17% beat Imperial Metals Corp.'s return on equity of 21.06%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.25.78% -$0.08 $25.9B III.TOImperial Metals Corp.41.32% $0.22 $1.2B -
What do Analysts Say About FM.TO or III.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of $35.78, signalling downside risk potential of -8.26%. On the other hand Imperial Metals Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -16.14%. Given that Imperial Metals Corp. has more downside risk than First Quantum Minerals Ltd., analysts believe First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is more attractive than Imperial Metals Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.7 10 0 III.TOImperial Metals Corp.0 0 0 -
Is FM.TO or III.TO More Risky?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.885, which suggesting that the stock is 88.515% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Imperial Metals Corp. has a beta of 0.820, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.03%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FM.TO or III.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Imperial Metals Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Imperial Metals Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FM.TO or III.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Imperial Metals Corp. quarterly revenues of $168.8M. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$107.4M is lower than Imperial Metals Corp.'s net income of $38.5M. Notably, First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 505.84x while Imperial Metals Corp.'s PE ratio is 9.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is 4.63x versus 2.82x for Imperial Metals Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.4.63x 505.84x $1.9B -$107.4M III.TOImperial Metals Corp.2.82x 9.99x $168.8M $38.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns FM.TO or LUN.TO?
Lundin Mining Corp. has a net margin of -5.8% compared to First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of 19.16%. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.17% beat Lundin Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 5.26%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.25.78% -$0.08 $25.9B LUN.TOLundin Mining Corp.30.25% $0.26 $10.7B -
What do Analysts Say About FM.TO or LUN.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of $35.78, signalling downside risk potential of -8.26%. On the other hand Lundin Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $28.15 which suggests that it could fall by -11.15%. Given that Lundin Mining Corp. has more downside risk than First Quantum Minerals Ltd., analysts believe First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is more attractive than Lundin Mining Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.7 10 0 LUN.TOLundin Mining Corp.11 7 0 -
Is FM.TO or LUN.TO More Risky?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.885, which suggesting that the stock is 88.515% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lundin Mining Corp. has a beta of 1.723, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.251%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FM.TO or LUN.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lundin Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lundin Mining Corp. pays out -132.05% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FM.TO or LUN.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Lundin Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$107.4M is lower than Lundin Mining Corp.'s net income of $254.3M. Notably, First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 505.84x while Lundin Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is 693.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is 4.63x versus 5.95x for Lundin Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.4.63x 505.84x $1.9B -$107.4M LUN.TOLundin Mining Corp.5.95x 693.22x $1.3B $254.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns FM.TO or NGEX.TO?
NGEx Minerals Ltd. has a net margin of -5.8% compared to First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of --. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.17% beat NGEx Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of -81.71%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.25.78% -$0.08 $25.9B NGEX.TONGEx Minerals Ltd.-- -$0.14 $132.2M -
What do Analysts Say About FM.TO or NGEX.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of $35.78, signalling downside risk potential of -8.26%. On the other hand NGEx Minerals Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $28.78 which suggests that it could grow by 3.26%. Given that NGEx Minerals Ltd. has higher upside potential than First Quantum Minerals Ltd., analysts believe NGEx Minerals Ltd. is more attractive than First Quantum Minerals Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.7 10 0 NGEX.TONGEx Minerals Ltd.3 2 0 -
Is FM.TO or NGEX.TO More Risky?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.885, which suggesting that the stock is 88.515% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NGEx Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.711, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.084%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FM.TO or NGEX.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NGEx Minerals Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NGEx Minerals Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FM.TO or NGEX.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than NGEx Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$107.4M is lower than NGEx Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$28.7M. Notably, First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 505.84x while NGEx Minerals Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is 4.63x versus -- for NGEx Minerals Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.4.63x 505.84x $1.9B -$107.4M NGEX.TONGEx Minerals Ltd.-- -- -- -$28.7M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Buy
59
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
69
RGC alert for Jan 7
Regencell Bioscience Holdings Ltd. [RGC] is up 44.69% over the past day.
Buy
69
WDC alert for Jan 7
Western Digital Corp. [WDC] is down 7.83% over the past day.
Buy
75
DRUG alert for Jan 7
Bright Minds Biosciences, Inc. [DRUG] is up 2.78% over the past day.
