Will Tesla Stock Go Up In 2026?
EV giant Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) has, somewhat surprisingly, undershot the broader…
Buy
63
FM.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$33.88
Seasonality move
:
23.04%
Day range:
$33.23 - $34.00
52-week range:
$14.41 - $34.84
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
439.43x
P/S ratio:
4.02x
P/B ratio:
1.79x
Volume:
1.8M
Avg. volume:
2M
1-year change:
74.64%
Market cap:
$28.3B
Revenue:
$6.6B
EPS (TTM):
$0.08
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
|
$2B | $0.08 | 3.58% | -53.03% | $35.43 |
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
|
$751.5M | $0.04 | 43.16% | 68.65% | $15.43 |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
$553.7M | $0.09 | 16.88% | 632.89% | $27.36 |
|
III.TO
Imperial Metals Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
|
$1.3B | $0.20 | 168.99% | 13.67% | $26.99 |
|
NGEX.TO
NGEx Minerals Ltd.
|
-- | -$0.06 | -- | -20.11% | $28.34 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
|
$33.88 | $35.43 | $28.3B | 439.43x | $0.08 | 0% | 4.02x |
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
|
$13.39 | $15.43 | $10.2B | 23.83x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.45x |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
$25.96 | $27.36 | $10.3B | 16.05x | $0.01 | 0.08% | 3.68x |
|
III.TO
Imperial Metals Corp.
|
$8.27 | -- | $1.5B | 7.49x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.11x |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
|
$27.74 | $26.99 | $23.8B | 607.00x | $0.03 | 0.62% | 5.21x |
|
NGEX.TO
NGEx Minerals Ltd.
|
$24.92 | $28.34 | $5.4B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
|
38.13% | 1.829 | 36.48% | 0.72x |
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
|
31.04% | 2.868 | 21.68% | 0.70x |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
26.46% | 3.638 | 18.47% | 0.72x |
|
III.TO
Imperial Metals Corp.
|
19.68% | 2.213 | 23.17% | 0.38x |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
|
9.6% | 2.700 | 4.71% | 0.79x |
|
NGEX.TO
NGEx Minerals Ltd.
|
0.7% | 2.241 | 0.02% | 12.35x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
|
$477.9M | $433.9M | 0.1% | 0.17% | 23.4% | $1.1B |
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
|
$176M | $153.3M | 6.75% | 9.51% | 18.6% | -$29.7M |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
$57.3M | $6.1M | 11.49% | 16.25% | 1.3% | $4.7M |
|
III.TO
Imperial Metals Corp.
|
$69.7M | $65M | 15.38% | 21.06% | 38.52% | $31.7M |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
|
$401.4M | $381.2M | 4.26% | 5.26% | 28.74% | $138.3M |
|
NGEX.TO
NGEx Minerals Ltd.
|
-$17.1K | -$31M | -81.49% | -81.71% | -- | -$11.1M |
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FM.TO or CS.TO?
Capstone Copper Corp. has a net margin of -5.8% compared to First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of 43.86%. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.17% beat Capstone Copper Corp.'s return on equity of 9.51%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.25.78% -$0.08 $25.9B CS.TOCapstone Copper Corp.21.36% $0.45 $7.3B -
What do Analysts Say About FM.TO or CS.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of $35.43, signalling upside risk potential of 4.59%. On the other hand Capstone Copper Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $15.43 which suggests that it could grow by 15.2%. Given that Capstone Copper Corp. has higher upside potential than First Quantum Minerals Ltd., analysts believe Capstone Copper Corp. is more attractive than First Quantum Minerals Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.7 10 0 CS.TOCapstone Copper Corp.10 1 0 -
Is FM.TO or CS.TO More Risky?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.889, which suggesting that the stock is 88.878% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Capstone Copper Corp. has a beta of 2.264, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 126.395%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FM.TO or CS.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Capstone Copper Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Capstone Copper Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FM.TO or CS.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Capstone Copper Corp. quarterly revenues of $824.2M. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$107.4M is lower than Capstone Copper Corp.'s net income of $361.5M. Notably, First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 439.43x while Capstone Copper Corp.'s PE ratio is 23.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is 4.02x versus 3.45x for Capstone Copper Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.4.02x 439.43x $1.9B -$107.4M CS.TOCapstone Copper Corp.3.45x 23.83x $824.2M $361.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns FM.TO or HBM.TO?
Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a net margin of -5.8% compared to First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of 65.8%. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.17% beat Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.25%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.25.78% -$0.08 $25.9B HBM.TOHudbay Minerals, Inc.12.31% $0.77 $5.8B -
What do Analysts Say About FM.TO or HBM.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of $35.43, signalling upside risk potential of 4.59%. On the other hand Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $27.36 which suggests that it could grow by 5.4%. Given that Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has higher upside potential than First Quantum Minerals Ltd., analysts believe Hudbay Minerals, Inc. is more attractive than First Quantum Minerals Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.7 10 0 HBM.TOHudbay Minerals, Inc.10 0 0 -
Is FM.TO or HBM.TO More Risky?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.889, which suggesting that the stock is 88.878% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a beta of 1.959, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.865%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FM.TO or HBM.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. offers a yield of 0.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. pays out 7.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FM.TO or HBM.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Hudbay Minerals, Inc. quarterly revenues of $465.5M. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$107.4M is lower than Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s net income of $306.3M. Notably, First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 439.43x while Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s PE ratio is 16.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is 4.02x versus 3.68x for Hudbay Minerals, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.4.02x 439.43x $1.9B -$107.4M HBM.TOHudbay Minerals, Inc.3.68x 16.05x $465.5M $306.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns FM.TO or III.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a net margin of -5.8% compared to First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of 22.84%. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.17% beat Imperial Metals Corp.'s return on equity of 21.06%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.25.78% -$0.08 $25.9B III.TOImperial Metals Corp.41.32% $0.22 $1.2B -
What do Analysts Say About FM.TO or III.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of $35.43, signalling upside risk potential of 4.59%. On the other hand Imperial Metals Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 11.85%. Given that Imperial Metals Corp. has higher upside potential than First Quantum Minerals Ltd., analysts believe Imperial Metals Corp. is more attractive than First Quantum Minerals Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.7 10 0 III.TOImperial Metals Corp.0 0 0 -
Is FM.TO or III.TO More Risky?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.889, which suggesting that the stock is 88.878% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Imperial Metals Corp. has a beta of 0.827, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.251%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FM.TO or III.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Imperial Metals Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Imperial Metals Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FM.TO or III.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Imperial Metals Corp. quarterly revenues of $168.8M. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$107.4M is lower than Imperial Metals Corp.'s net income of $38.5M. Notably, First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 439.43x while Imperial Metals Corp.'s PE ratio is 7.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is 4.02x versus 2.11x for Imperial Metals Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.4.02x 439.43x $1.9B -$107.4M III.TOImperial Metals Corp.2.11x 7.49x $168.8M $38.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns FM.TO or LUN.TO?
Lundin Mining Corp. has a net margin of -5.8% compared to First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of 19.16%. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.17% beat Lundin Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 5.26%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.25.78% -$0.08 $25.9B LUN.TOLundin Mining Corp.30.25% $0.26 $10.7B -
What do Analysts Say About FM.TO or LUN.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of $35.43, signalling upside risk potential of 4.59%. On the other hand Lundin Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $26.99 which suggests that it could fall by -2.7%. Given that First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has higher upside potential than Lundin Mining Corp., analysts believe First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is more attractive than Lundin Mining Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.7 10 0 LUN.TOLundin Mining Corp.11 8 0 -
Is FM.TO or LUN.TO More Risky?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.889, which suggesting that the stock is 88.878% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lundin Mining Corp. has a beta of 1.724, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.39%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FM.TO or LUN.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lundin Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lundin Mining Corp. pays out -132.05% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FM.TO or LUN.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Lundin Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$107.4M is lower than Lundin Mining Corp.'s net income of $254.3M. Notably, First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 439.43x while Lundin Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is 607.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is 4.02x versus 5.21x for Lundin Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.4.02x 439.43x $1.9B -$107.4M LUN.TOLundin Mining Corp.5.21x 607.00x $1.3B $254.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns FM.TO or NGEX.TO?
NGEx Minerals Ltd. has a net margin of -5.8% compared to First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of --. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.17% beat NGEx Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of -81.71%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.25.78% -$0.08 $25.9B NGEX.TONGEx Minerals Ltd.-- -$0.14 $132.2M -
What do Analysts Say About FM.TO or NGEX.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of $35.43, signalling upside risk potential of 4.59%. On the other hand NGEx Minerals Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $28.34 which suggests that it could grow by 13.71%. Given that NGEx Minerals Ltd. has higher upside potential than First Quantum Minerals Ltd., analysts believe NGEx Minerals Ltd. is more attractive than First Quantum Minerals Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.7 10 0 NGEX.TONGEx Minerals Ltd.3 2 0 -
Is FM.TO or NGEX.TO More Risky?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.889, which suggesting that the stock is 88.878% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NGEx Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.709, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.897%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FM.TO or NGEX.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NGEx Minerals Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NGEx Minerals Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FM.TO or NGEX.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than NGEx Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$107.4M is lower than NGEx Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$28.7M. Notably, First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 439.43x while NGEx Minerals Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is 4.02x versus -- for NGEx Minerals Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.4.02x 439.43x $1.9B -$107.4M NGEX.TONGEx Minerals Ltd.-- -- -- -$28.7M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
What Are the Best AI Power Stocks?
As the construction of AI infrastructure accelerates, the gap between…
Is IONQ The Best Quantum Stock to Buy?
Riding a wave of investor enthusiasm for the technology, quantum…
Stock Ideas
Sell
49
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 60x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
71
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
39
SMX alert for Dec 16
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 21.85% over the past day.
Sell
33
ZBIO alert for Dec 16
Zenas BioPharma, Inc. [ZBIO] is down 19.73% over the past day.
Sell
38
HUT alert for Dec 16
Hut 8 Corp. [HUT] is down 14.21% over the past day.
