Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
35
FM.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$37.49
Seasonality move
:
6.58%
Day range:
$35.95 - $38.00
52-week range:
$14.41 - $45.17
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
502.72x
P/S ratio:
4.18x
P/B ratio:
1.98x
Volume:
3.7M
Avg. volume:
3.1M
1-year change:
113.38%
Market cap:
$30.4B
Revenue:
$7.3B
EPS (TTM):
-$0.05
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
|
$1.9B | $0.10 | 20.91% | -38.42% | $43.53 |
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
|
$902.2M | $0.16 | 21.27% | 92.01% | $16.73 |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
$996.2M | $0.53 | 8.11% | 46.87% | $40.71 |
|
III.TO
Imperial Metals Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
|
$1.7B | $0.41 | 24.1% | 106.05% | $37.20 |
|
TRBC.V
Tribeca Resources Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
|
$36.68 | $43.53 | $30.4B | 502.72x | $0.08 | 0% | 4.18x |
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
|
$12.29 | $16.73 | $9.4B | 21.87x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.16x |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
$34.10 | $40.71 | $13.5B | 17.09x | $0.01 | 0.06% | 4.47x |
|
III.TO
Imperial Metals Corp.
|
$9.49 | -- | $1.7B | 8.60x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.42x |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
|
$38.72 | $37.20 | $33.1B | 18.54x | $0.03 | 0.45% | 6.35x |
|
TRBC.V
Tribeca Resources Corp.
|
$0.26 | -- | $25.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
|
38.83% | 1.398 | 31.36% | 0.52x |
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
|
31.04% | 1.763 | 21.68% | 0.70x |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
24.78% | 2.830 | 13.49% | 0.74x |
|
III.TO
Imperial Metals Corp.
|
19.68% | -1.209 | 23.17% | 0.38x |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
|
6.36% | 2.783 | 2.28% | 0.79x |
|
TRBC.V
Tribeca Resources Corp.
|
-- | -2.398 | -- | 1.01x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
|
$556.3M | $543.8M | -0.35% | -0.56% | 26.44% | -$580.7M |
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
|
$176M | $153.3M | 6.75% | 9.51% | 18.6% | -$29.7M |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
$337.7M | $333M | 13.87% | 19.28% | 32.9% | $57.8M |
|
III.TO
Imperial Metals Corp.
|
$69.7M | $65M | 15.38% | 21.06% | 38.52% | $31.7M |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
|
$400.5M | $382.6M | 17.83% | 20.96% | 28.16% | $510.9M |
|
TRBC.V
Tribeca Resources Corp.
|
-- | -$230.8K | -85.24% | -85.24% | -- | -$81.9K |
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FM.TO or CS.TO?
Capstone Copper Corp. has a net margin of 7.12% compared to First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of 43.86%. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.56% beat Capstone Copper Corp.'s return on equity of 9.51%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.27.05% $0.04 $25.5B CS.TOCapstone Copper Corp.21.36% $0.45 $7.3B -
What do Analysts Say About FM.TO or CS.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of $43.53, signalling upside risk potential of 18.68%. On the other hand Capstone Copper Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $16.73 which suggests that it could grow by 36.16%. Given that Capstone Copper Corp. has higher upside potential than First Quantum Minerals Ltd., analysts believe Capstone Copper Corp. is more attractive than First Quantum Minerals Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.7 9 0 CS.TOCapstone Copper Corp.10 3 0 -
Is FM.TO or CS.TO More Risky?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.725, which suggesting that the stock is 72.466% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Capstone Copper Corp. has a beta of 1.954, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.354%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FM.TO or CS.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Capstone Copper Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Capstone Copper Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FM.TO or CS.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Capstone Copper Corp. quarterly revenues of $824.2M. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of $146.4M is lower than Capstone Copper Corp.'s net income of $361.5M. Notably, First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 502.72x while Capstone Copper Corp.'s PE ratio is 21.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is 4.18x versus 3.16x for Capstone Copper Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.4.18x 502.72x $2.1B $146.4M CS.TOCapstone Copper Corp.3.16x 21.87x $824.2M $361.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns FM.TO or HBM.TO?
Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a net margin of 7.12% compared to First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of 17.63%. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.56% beat Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.28%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.27.05% $0.04 $25.5B HBM.TOHudbay Minerals, Inc.33.37% $0.45 $5.9B -
What do Analysts Say About FM.TO or HBM.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of $43.53, signalling upside risk potential of 18.68%. On the other hand Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $40.71 which suggests that it could grow by 19.39%. Given that Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has higher upside potential than First Quantum Minerals Ltd., analysts believe Hudbay Minerals, Inc. is more attractive than First Quantum Minerals Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.7 9 0 HBM.TOHudbay Minerals, Inc.14 0 0 -
Is FM.TO or HBM.TO More Risky?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.725, which suggesting that the stock is 72.466% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a beta of 1.850, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.991%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FM.TO or HBM.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. offers a yield of 0.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. pays out 1% of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FM.TO or HBM.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Hudbay Minerals, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1B. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of $146.4M is lower than Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s net income of $178.5M. Notably, First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 502.72x while Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is 4.18x versus 4.47x for Hudbay Minerals, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.4.18x 502.72x $2.1B $146.4M HBM.TOHudbay Minerals, Inc.4.47x 17.09x $1B $178.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns FM.TO or III.TO?
Imperial Metals Corp. has a net margin of 7.12% compared to First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of 22.84%. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.56% beat Imperial Metals Corp.'s return on equity of 21.06%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.27.05% $0.04 $25.5B III.TOImperial Metals Corp.41.32% $0.22 $1.2B -
What do Analysts Say About FM.TO or III.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of $43.53, signalling upside risk potential of 18.68%. On the other hand Imperial Metals Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -2.53%. Given that First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has higher upside potential than Imperial Metals Corp., analysts believe First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is more attractive than Imperial Metals Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.7 9 0 III.TOImperial Metals Corp.0 0 0 -
Is FM.TO or III.TO More Risky?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.725, which suggesting that the stock is 72.466% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Imperial Metals Corp. has a beta of 0.598, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.219%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FM.TO or III.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Imperial Metals Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Imperial Metals Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FM.TO or III.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Imperial Metals Corp. quarterly revenues of $168.8M. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of $146.4M is higher than Imperial Metals Corp.'s net income of $38.5M. Notably, First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 502.72x while Imperial Metals Corp.'s PE ratio is 8.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is 4.18x versus 2.42x for Imperial Metals Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.4.18x 502.72x $2.1B $146.4M III.TOImperial Metals Corp.2.42x 8.60x $168.8M $38.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns FM.TO or LUN.TO?
Lundin Mining Corp. has a net margin of 7.12% compared to First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of 91.56%. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.56% beat Lundin Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 20.96%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.27.05% $0.04 $25.5B LUN.TOLundin Mining Corp.29.47% $1.25 $11.5B -
What do Analysts Say About FM.TO or LUN.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of $43.53, signalling upside risk potential of 18.68%. On the other hand Lundin Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $37.20 which suggests that it could fall by -3.92%. Given that First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has higher upside potential than Lundin Mining Corp., analysts believe First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is more attractive than Lundin Mining Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.7 9 0 LUN.TOLundin Mining Corp.7 11 0 -
Is FM.TO or LUN.TO More Risky?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.725, which suggesting that the stock is 72.466% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lundin Mining Corp. has a beta of 1.708, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.831%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FM.TO or LUN.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lundin Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lundin Mining Corp. pays out 8.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Lundin Mining Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FM.TO or LUN.TO?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Lundin Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of $146.4M is lower than Lundin Mining Corp.'s net income of $1.2B. Notably, First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 502.72x while Lundin Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is 18.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is 4.18x versus 6.35x for Lundin Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.4.18x 502.72x $2.1B $146.4M LUN.TOLundin Mining Corp.6.35x 18.54x $1.4B $1.2B
-
Which has Higher Returns FM.TO or TRBC.V?
Tribeca Resources Corp. has a net margin of 7.12% compared to First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of --. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.56% beat Tribeca Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -85.24%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.27.05% $0.04 $25.5B TRBC.VTribeca Resources Corp.-- -$0.00 $1.6M -
What do Analysts Say About FM.TO or TRBC.V?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of $43.53, signalling upside risk potential of 18.68%. On the other hand Tribeca Resources Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has higher upside potential than Tribeca Resources Corp., analysts believe First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is more attractive than Tribeca Resources Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.7 9 0 TRBC.VTribeca Resources Corp.0 0 0 -
Is FM.TO or TRBC.V More Risky?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.725, which suggesting that the stock is 72.466% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tribeca Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.394, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.637%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FM.TO or TRBC.V?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tribeca Resources Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tribeca Resources Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FM.TO or TRBC.V?
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Tribeca Resources Corp. quarterly revenues of --. First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of $146.4M is higher than Tribeca Resources Corp.'s net income of -$229.5K. Notably, First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 502.72x while Tribeca Resources Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is 4.18x versus -- for Tribeca Resources Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FM.TOFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd.4.18x 502.72x $2.1B $146.4M TRBC.VTribeca Resources Corp.-- -- -- -$229.5K
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
34
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Sell
46
ZD alert for Mar 4
Ziff Davis, Inc. [ZD] is up 2.31% over the past day.
Buy
54
KORU alert for Mar 4
Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares [KORU] is up 9.84% over the past day.
Sell
40
PSIX alert for Mar 4
Power Solutions International, Inc. [PSIX] is up 0.76% over the past day.
