MARI.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Marimaca Copper Corp.'s net margin of -5.8%. Marimaca Copper Corp.'s return on equity of -18.21% beat First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.17%.

Marimaca Copper Corp. has a consensus price target of $7.74, signalling downside risk potential of -33.35%. On the other hand First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $22.37 which suggests that it could fall by -42.24%. Given that First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has more downside risk than Marimaca Copper Corp., analysts believe Marimaca Copper Corp. is more attractive than First Quantum Minerals Ltd..

Marimaca Copper Corp. has a beta of 0.902, which suggesting that the stock is 9.77% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.860, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.031%.

Marimaca Copper Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Marimaca Copper Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Marimaca Copper Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Marimaca Copper Corp.'s net income of -$14.7M is higher than First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$107.4M. Notably, Marimaca Copper Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s PE ratio is 502.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marimaca Copper Corp. is -- versus 4.60x for First Quantum Minerals Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Marimaca Copper Corp.'s net margin of 65.8%. Marimaca Copper Corp.'s return on equity of -18.21% beat Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.25%.

Marimaca Copper Corp. has a consensus price target of $7.74, signalling downside risk potential of -33.35%. On the other hand Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $19.30 which suggests that it could fall by -45.1%. Given that Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has more downside risk than Marimaca Copper Corp., analysts believe Marimaca Copper Corp. is more attractive than Hudbay Minerals, Inc..

Marimaca Copper Corp. has a beta of 0.902, which suggesting that the stock is 9.77% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a beta of 1.874, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.423%.

Marimaca Copper Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. offers a yield of 0.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Marimaca Copper Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. pays out 7.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marimaca Copper Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hudbay Minerals, Inc. quarterly revenues of $465.5M. Marimaca Copper Corp.'s net income of -$14.7M is lower than Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s net income of $306.3M. Notably, Marimaca Copper Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s PE ratio is 21.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marimaca Copper Corp. is -- versus 4.98x for Hudbay Minerals, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lundin Mining Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Marimaca Copper Corp.'s net margin of 19.16%. Marimaca Copper Corp.'s return on equity of -18.21% beat Lundin Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 5.26%.

Marimaca Copper Corp. has a consensus price target of $7.74, signalling downside risk potential of -33.35%. On the other hand Lundin Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $18.43 which suggests that it could fall by -46.77%. Given that Lundin Mining Corp. has more downside risk than Marimaca Copper Corp., analysts believe Marimaca Copper Corp. is more attractive than Lundin Mining Corp..

Marimaca Copper Corp. has a beta of 0.902, which suggesting that the stock is 9.77% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lundin Mining Corp. has a beta of 1.692, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.211%.

Marimaca Copper Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lundin Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Marimaca Copper Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lundin Mining Corp. pays out -132.05% of its earnings as a dividend.

Marimaca Copper Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lundin Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Marimaca Copper Corp.'s net income of -$14.7M is lower than Lundin Mining Corp.'s net income of $254.3M. Notably, Marimaca Copper Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lundin Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is 755.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marimaca Copper Corp. is -- versus 6.50x for Lundin Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solaris Resources, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Marimaca Copper Corp.'s net margin of --. Marimaca Copper Corp.'s return on equity of -18.21% beat Solaris Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Marimaca Copper Corp. has a consensus price target of $7.74, signalling downside risk potential of -33.35%. On the other hand Solaris Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $20.30 which suggests that it could grow by 43.16%. Given that Solaris Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than Marimaca Copper Corp., analysts believe Solaris Resources, Inc. is more attractive than Marimaca Copper Corp..

Marimaca Copper Corp. has a beta of 0.902, which suggesting that the stock is 9.77% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solaris Resources, Inc. has a beta of 2.229, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 122.925%.

Marimaca Copper Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solaris Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marimaca Copper Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solaris Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Marimaca Copper Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Solaris Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Marimaca Copper Corp.'s net income of -$14.7M is higher than Solaris Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$16.8M. Notably, Marimaca Copper Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Solaris Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marimaca Copper Corp. is -- versus -- for Solaris Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.