Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MARI.TO
Marimaca Copper Corp.
|
-- | -$0.03 | -- | -19.08% | $13.32 |
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
|
$751.5M | $0.04 | 43.21% | 69.38% | $15.42 |
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
|
$2B | $0.08 | 3.22% | -52.24% | $35.63 |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
$553.7M | $0.09 | 16.78% | 647.55% | $27.39 |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
|
$1.3B | $0.20 | 165.51% | 13.67% | $27.94 |
|
SLS.TO
Solaris Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -$0.15 | -- | -51.86% | $17.10 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MARI.TO
Marimaca Copper Corp.
|
$11.00 | $13.32 | $1.3B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
|
$13.73 | $15.42 | $10.5B | 24.44x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.53x |
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
|
$36.95 | $35.63 | $30.8B | 479.25x | $0.08 | 0% | 4.39x |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
$27.32 | $27.39 | $10.8B | 16.89x | $0.01 | 0.07% | 3.87x |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
|
$29.30 | $27.94 | $25.1B | 641.14x | $0.03 | 0.59% | 5.50x |
|
SLS.TO
Solaris Resources, Inc.
|
$11.19 | $17.10 | $1.9B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MARI.TO
Marimaca Copper Corp.
|
0% | 0.231 | -- | 20.17x |
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
|
31.04% | 2.868 | 21.68% | 0.70x |
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
|
38.13% | 1.829 | 36.48% | 0.72x |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
26.46% | 3.638 | 18.47% | 0.72x |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
|
9.6% | 2.700 | 4.71% | 0.79x |
|
SLS.TO
Solaris Resources, Inc.
|
-1.13% | 0.697 | 0.05% | 5.90x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MARI.TO
Marimaca Copper Corp.
|
-$26.2K | -$13.9M | -18.2% | -18.21% | -- | -$11.5M |
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
|
$176M | $153.3M | 6.75% | 9.51% | 18.6% | -$29.7M |
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
|
$477.9M | $433.9M | 0.1% | 0.17% | 23.4% | $1.1B |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
$57.3M | $6.1M | 11.49% | 16.25% | 1.3% | $4.7M |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
|
$401.4M | $381.2M | 4.26% | 5.26% | 28.74% | $138.3M |
|
SLS.TO
Solaris Resources, Inc.
|
-$250.7K | -$16.2M | -458.52% | -- | -- | -$18M |
Capstone Copper Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Marimaca Copper Corp.'s net margin of 43.86%. Marimaca Copper Corp.'s return on equity of -18.21% beat Capstone Copper Corp.'s return on equity of 9.51%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
MARI.TO
Marimaca Copper Corp.
|
-- | -$0.12 | $253.7M |
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
|
21.36% | $0.45 | $7.3B |
Marimaca Copper Corp. has a consensus price target of $13.32, signalling upside risk potential of 21.05%. On the other hand Capstone Copper Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $15.42 which suggests that it could grow by 12.34%. Given that Marimaca Copper Corp. has higher upside potential than Capstone Copper Corp., analysts believe Marimaca Copper Corp. is more attractive than Capstone Copper Corp..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
MARI.TO
Marimaca Copper Corp.
|
3 | 1 | 0 |
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
|
10 | 1 | 0 |
Marimaca Copper Corp. has a beta of 0.929, which suggesting that the stock is 7.079% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Capstone Copper Corp. has a beta of 2.264, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 126.395%.
Marimaca Copper Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Capstone Copper Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marimaca Copper Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Capstone Copper Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
Marimaca Copper Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Capstone Copper Corp. quarterly revenues of $824.2M. Marimaca Copper Corp.'s net income of -$14.7M is lower than Capstone Copper Corp.'s net income of $361.5M. Notably, Marimaca Copper Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Capstone Copper Corp.'s PE ratio is 24.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marimaca Copper Corp. is -- versus 3.53x for Capstone Copper Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MARI.TO
Marimaca Copper Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -$14.7M |
|
CS.TO
Capstone Copper Corp.
|
3.53x | 24.44x | $824.2M | $361.5M |
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Marimaca Copper Corp.'s net margin of -5.8%. Marimaca Copper Corp.'s return on equity of -18.21% beat First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.17%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
MARI.TO
Marimaca Copper Corp.
|
-- | -$0.12 | $253.7M |
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
|
25.78% | -$0.08 | $25.9B |
Marimaca Copper Corp. has a consensus price target of $13.32, signalling upside risk potential of 21.05%. On the other hand First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $35.63 which suggests that it could fall by -3.56%. Given that Marimaca Copper Corp. has higher upside potential than First Quantum Minerals Ltd., analysts believe Marimaca Copper Corp. is more attractive than First Quantum Minerals Ltd..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
MARI.TO
Marimaca Copper Corp.
|
3 | 1 | 0 |
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
|
7 | 10 | 0 |
Marimaca Copper Corp. has a beta of 0.929, which suggesting that the stock is 7.079% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.889, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.878%.
Marimaca Copper Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Marimaca Copper Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
Marimaca Copper Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Marimaca Copper Corp.'s net income of -$14.7M is higher than First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$107.4M. Notably, Marimaca Copper Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s PE ratio is 479.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marimaca Copper Corp. is -- versus 4.39x for First Quantum Minerals Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MARI.TO
Marimaca Copper Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -$14.7M |
|
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
|
4.39x | 479.25x | $1.9B | -$107.4M |
Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Marimaca Copper Corp.'s net margin of 65.8%. Marimaca Copper Corp.'s return on equity of -18.21% beat Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.25%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
MARI.TO
Marimaca Copper Corp.
|
-- | -$0.12 | $253.7M |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
12.31% | $0.77 | $5.8B |
Marimaca Copper Corp. has a consensus price target of $13.32, signalling upside risk potential of 21.05%. On the other hand Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $27.39 which suggests that it could grow by 0.24%. Given that Marimaca Copper Corp. has higher upside potential than Hudbay Minerals, Inc., analysts believe Marimaca Copper Corp. is more attractive than Hudbay Minerals, Inc..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
MARI.TO
Marimaca Copper Corp.
|
3 | 1 | 0 |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
10 | 0 | 0 |
Marimaca Copper Corp. has a beta of 0.929, which suggesting that the stock is 7.079% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a beta of 1.959, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.865%.
Marimaca Copper Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. offers a yield of 0.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Marimaca Copper Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. pays out 7.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
Marimaca Copper Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hudbay Minerals, Inc. quarterly revenues of $465.5M. Marimaca Copper Corp.'s net income of -$14.7M is lower than Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s net income of $306.3M. Notably, Marimaca Copper Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s PE ratio is 16.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marimaca Copper Corp. is -- versus 3.87x for Hudbay Minerals, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MARI.TO
Marimaca Copper Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -$14.7M |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
3.87x | 16.89x | $465.5M | $306.3M |
Lundin Mining Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Marimaca Copper Corp.'s net margin of 19.16%. Marimaca Copper Corp.'s return on equity of -18.21% beat Lundin Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 5.26%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
MARI.TO
Marimaca Copper Corp.
|
-- | -$0.12 | $253.7M |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
|
30.25% | $0.26 | $10.7B |
Marimaca Copper Corp. has a consensus price target of $13.32, signalling upside risk potential of 21.05%. On the other hand Lundin Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $27.94 which suggests that it could fall by -4.65%. Given that Marimaca Copper Corp. has higher upside potential than Lundin Mining Corp., analysts believe Marimaca Copper Corp. is more attractive than Lundin Mining Corp..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
MARI.TO
Marimaca Copper Corp.
|
3 | 1 | 0 |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
|
11 | 7 | 0 |
Marimaca Copper Corp. has a beta of 0.929, which suggesting that the stock is 7.079% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lundin Mining Corp. has a beta of 1.724, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.39%.
Marimaca Copper Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lundin Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Marimaca Copper Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lundin Mining Corp. pays out -132.05% of its earnings as a dividend.
Marimaca Copper Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lundin Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Marimaca Copper Corp.'s net income of -$14.7M is lower than Lundin Mining Corp.'s net income of $254.3M. Notably, Marimaca Copper Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lundin Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is 641.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marimaca Copper Corp. is -- versus 5.50x for Lundin Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MARI.TO
Marimaca Copper Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -$14.7M |
|
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
|
5.50x | 641.14x | $1.3B | $254.3M |
Solaris Resources, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Marimaca Copper Corp.'s net margin of --. Marimaca Copper Corp.'s return on equity of -18.21% beat Solaris Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
MARI.TO
Marimaca Copper Corp.
|
-- | -$0.12 | $253.7M |
|
SLS.TO
Solaris Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -$0.10 | -$55.1M |
Marimaca Copper Corp. has a consensus price target of $13.32, signalling upside risk potential of 21.05%. On the other hand Solaris Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $17.10 which suggests that it could grow by 52.82%. Given that Solaris Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than Marimaca Copper Corp., analysts believe Solaris Resources, Inc. is more attractive than Marimaca Copper Corp..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
MARI.TO
Marimaca Copper Corp.
|
3 | 1 | 0 |
|
SLS.TO
Solaris Resources, Inc.
|
3 | 1 | 0 |
Marimaca Copper Corp. has a beta of 0.929, which suggesting that the stock is 7.079% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solaris Resources, Inc. has a beta of 2.260, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 125.966%.
Marimaca Copper Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solaris Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marimaca Copper Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solaris Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
Marimaca Copper Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Solaris Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Marimaca Copper Corp.'s net income of -$14.7M is higher than Solaris Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$16.8M. Notably, Marimaca Copper Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Solaris Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marimaca Copper Corp. is -- versus -- for Solaris Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MARI.TO
Marimaca Copper Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -$14.7M |
|
SLS.TO
Solaris Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -$16.8M |
Signup to receive the latest stock alerts
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Shares of energy startup Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) have advanced by…
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 3.95% over the past day.
Zenas BioPharma, Inc. [ZBIO] is up 1.18% over the past day.
UniFirst Corp. [UNF] is up 0.77% over the past day.