GM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lucid Group, Inc. has a net margin of 2.66% compared to General Motors Co.'s net margin of -290.7%. General Motors Co.'s return on equity of 4.62% beat Lucid Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -52.42%.

General Motors Co. has a consensus price target of $79.46, signalling downside risk potential of -3.51%. On the other hand Lucid Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $18.06 which suggests that it could grow by 52.75%. Given that Lucid Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than General Motors Co., analysts believe Lucid Group, Inc. is more attractive than General Motors Co..

General Motors Co. has a beta of 1.304, which suggesting that the stock is 30.412% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.865, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.52%.

General Motors Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.69%. Lucid Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. General Motors Co. pays 7.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Motors Co. quarterly revenues are $48.6B, which are larger than Lucid Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $336.6M. General Motors Co.'s net income of $1.3B is higher than Lucid Group, Inc.'s net income of -$978.4M. Notably, General Motors Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.55x while Lucid Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Motors Co. is 0.44x versus 18.01x for Lucid Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mattel, Inc. has a net margin of 2.66% compared to General Motors Co.'s net margin of 16.04%. General Motors Co.'s return on equity of 4.62% beat Mattel, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.4%.

General Motors Co. has a consensus price target of $79.46, signalling downside risk potential of -3.51%. On the other hand Mattel, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $23.92 which suggests that it could grow by 19.17%. Given that Mattel, Inc. has higher upside potential than General Motors Co., analysts believe Mattel, Inc. is more attractive than General Motors Co..

General Motors Co. has a beta of 1.304, which suggesting that the stock is 30.412% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mattel, Inc. has a beta of 0.704, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.629%.

General Motors Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.69%. Mattel, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. General Motors Co. pays 7.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Mattel, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Motors Co. quarterly revenues are $48.6B, which are larger than Mattel, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.7B. General Motors Co.'s net income of $1.3B is higher than Mattel, Inc.'s net income of $278.4M. Notably, General Motors Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.55x while Mattel, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Motors Co. is 0.44x versus 1.26x for Mattel, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive, Inc. has a net margin of 2.66% compared to General Motors Co.'s net margin of -74.84%. General Motors Co.'s return on equity of 4.62% beat Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s return on equity of -59.71%.

General Motors Co. has a consensus price target of $79.46, signalling downside risk potential of -3.51%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $16.58 which suggests that it could fall by -26.13%. Given that Rivian Automotive, Inc. has more downside risk than General Motors Co., analysts believe General Motors Co. is more attractive than Rivian Automotive, Inc..

General Motors Co. has a beta of 1.304, which suggesting that the stock is 30.412% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

General Motors Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.69%. Rivian Automotive, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. General Motors Co. pays 7.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Motors Co. quarterly revenues are $48.6B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. General Motors Co.'s net income of $1.3B is higher than Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s net income of -$1.2B. Notably, General Motors Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.55x while Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Motors Co. is 0.44x versus 4.40x for Rivian Automotive, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla, Inc. has a net margin of 2.66% compared to General Motors Co.'s net margin of 4.94%. General Motors Co.'s return on equity of 4.62% beat Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.04%.

General Motors Co. has a consensus price target of $79.46, signalling downside risk potential of -3.51%. On the other hand Tesla, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $397.43 which suggests that it could fall by -17.61%. Given that Tesla, Inc. has more downside risk than General Motors Co., analysts believe General Motors Co. is more attractive than Tesla, Inc..

General Motors Co. has a beta of 1.304, which suggesting that the stock is 30.412% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.874, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.392%.

General Motors Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.69%. Tesla, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. General Motors Co. pays 7.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Motors Co. quarterly revenues are $48.6B, which are larger than Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues of $28.1B. General Motors Co.'s net income of $1.3B is lower than Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $1.4B. Notably, General Motors Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.55x while Tesla, Inc.'s PE ratio is 321.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Motors Co. is 0.44x versus 17.72x for Tesla, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.