GM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lucid Group, Inc. has a net margin of 2.66% compared to General Motors Co.'s net margin of -290.7%. General Motors Co.'s return on equity of 4.62% beat Lucid Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -52.42%.

General Motors Co. has a consensus price target of $86.04, signalling upside risk potential of 7.98%. On the other hand Lucid Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $17.06 which suggests that it could grow by 54.21%. Given that Lucid Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than General Motors Co., analysts believe Lucid Group, Inc. is more attractive than General Motors Co..

General Motors Co. has a beta of 1.315, which suggesting that the stock is 31.549% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.888, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.157%.

General Motors Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.72%. Lucid Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. General Motors Co. pays 7.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Motors Co. quarterly revenues are $48.6B, which are larger than Lucid Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $336.6M. General Motors Co.'s net income of $1.3B is higher than Lucid Group, Inc.'s net income of -$978.4M. Notably, General Motors Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.01x while Lucid Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Motors Co. is 0.42x versus 16.85x for Lucid Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive, Inc. has a net margin of 2.66% compared to General Motors Co.'s net margin of -74.84%. General Motors Co.'s return on equity of 4.62% beat Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s return on equity of -59.71%.

General Motors Co. has a consensus price target of $86.04, signalling upside risk potential of 7.98%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $16.96 which suggests that it could grow by 6.33%. Given that General Motors Co. has higher upside potential than Rivian Automotive, Inc., analysts believe General Motors Co. is more attractive than Rivian Automotive, Inc..

General Motors Co. has a beta of 1.315, which suggesting that the stock is 31.549% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

General Motors Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.72%. Rivian Automotive, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. General Motors Co. pays 7.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Motors Co. quarterly revenues are $48.6B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. General Motors Co.'s net income of $1.3B is higher than Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s net income of -$1.2B. Notably, General Motors Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.01x while Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Motors Co. is 0.42x versus 3.12x for Rivian Automotive, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Standard Motor Products, Inc. has a net margin of 2.66% compared to General Motors Co.'s net margin of 6.01%. General Motors Co.'s return on equity of 4.62% beat Standard Motor Products, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.49%.

General Motors Co. has a consensus price target of $86.04, signalling upside risk potential of 7.98%. On the other hand Standard Motor Products, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $47.00 which suggests that it could grow by 19.59%. Given that Standard Motor Products, Inc. has higher upside potential than General Motors Co., analysts believe Standard Motor Products, Inc. is more attractive than General Motors Co..

General Motors Co. has a beta of 1.315, which suggesting that the stock is 31.549% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Standard Motor Products, Inc. has a beta of 0.759, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.065%.

General Motors Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.72%. Standard Motor Products, Inc. offers a yield of 3.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. General Motors Co. pays 7.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Standard Motor Products, Inc. pays out 48.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Motors Co. quarterly revenues are $48.6B, which are larger than Standard Motor Products, Inc. quarterly revenues of $498.8M. General Motors Co.'s net income of $1.3B is higher than Standard Motor Products, Inc.'s net income of $30M. Notably, General Motors Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.01x while Standard Motor Products, Inc.'s PE ratio is 12.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Motors Co. is 0.42x versus 0.50x for Standard Motor Products, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla, Inc. has a net margin of 2.66% compared to General Motors Co.'s net margin of 4.94%. General Motors Co.'s return on equity of 4.62% beat Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.04%.

General Motors Co. has a consensus price target of $86.04, signalling upside risk potential of 7.98%. On the other hand Tesla, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $411.40 which suggests that it could fall by -8.39%. Given that General Motors Co. has higher upside potential than Tesla, Inc., analysts believe General Motors Co. is more attractive than Tesla, Inc..

General Motors Co. has a beta of 1.315, which suggesting that the stock is 31.549% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.831, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.075%.

General Motors Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.72%. Tesla, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. General Motors Co. pays 7.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Motors Co. quarterly revenues are $48.6B, which are larger than Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues of $28.1B. General Motors Co.'s net income of $1.3B is lower than Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $1.4B. Notably, General Motors Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.01x while Tesla, Inc.'s PE ratio is 300.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Motors Co. is 0.42x versus 16.53x for Tesla, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.