GM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Harley-Davidson has a net margin of 6.32% compared to General Motors's net margin of 10.01%. General Motors's return on equity of 8.33% beat Harley-Davidson's return on equity of 10.7%.

General Motors has a consensus price target of $54.39, signalling upside risk potential of 19.85%. On the other hand Harley-Davidson has an analysts' consensus of $28.58 which suggests that it could grow by 20.18%. Given that Harley-Davidson has higher upside potential than General Motors, analysts believe Harley-Davidson is more attractive than General Motors.

General Motors has a beta of 1.361, which suggesting that the stock is 36.127% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harley-Davidson has a beta of 1.303, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.281%.

General Motors has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. Harley-Davidson offers a yield of 2.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. General Motors pays 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Harley-Davidson pays out 20.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Motors quarterly revenues are $44B, which are larger than Harley-Davidson quarterly revenues of $1.3B. General Motors's net income of $2.8B is higher than Harley-Davidson's net income of $133.1M. Notably, General Motors's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.32x while Harley-Davidson's PE ratio is 8.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Motors is 0.26x versus 0.64x for Harley-Davidson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of 6.32% compared to General Motors's net margin of -42.85%. General Motors's return on equity of 8.33% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -65.03%.

General Motors has a consensus price target of $54.39, signalling upside risk potential of 19.85%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $14.23 which suggests that it could grow by 5%. Given that General Motors has higher upside potential than Rivian Automotive, analysts believe General Motors is more attractive than Rivian Automotive.

General Motors has a beta of 1.361, which suggesting that the stock is 36.127% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

General Motors has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. General Motors pays 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Motors quarterly revenues are $44B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $1.7B. General Motors's net income of $2.8B is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$743M. Notably, General Motors's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.32x while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Motors is 0.26x versus 2.76x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 6.32% compared to General Motors's net margin of 2.12%. General Motors's return on equity of 8.33% beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

General Motors has a consensus price target of $54.39, signalling upside risk potential of 19.85%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $289.44 which suggests that it could grow by 3.28%. Given that General Motors has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe General Motors is more attractive than Tesla.

General Motors has a beta of 1.361, which suggesting that the stock is 36.127% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.429, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 142.869%.

General Motors has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. General Motors pays 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Motors quarterly revenues are $44B, which are larger than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. General Motors's net income of $2.8B is higher than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, General Motors's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.32x while Tesla's PE ratio is 153.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Motors is 0.26x versus 10.26x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Winnebago Industries has a net margin of 6.32% compared to General Motors's net margin of -0.07%. General Motors's return on equity of 8.33% beat Winnebago Industries's return on equity of -0.45%.

General Motors has a consensus price target of $54.39, signalling upside risk potential of 19.85%. On the other hand Winnebago Industries has an analysts' consensus of $48.92 which suggests that it could grow by 50.42%. Given that Winnebago Industries has higher upside potential than General Motors, analysts believe Winnebago Industries is more attractive than General Motors.

General Motors has a beta of 1.361, which suggesting that the stock is 36.127% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Winnebago Industries has a beta of 1.120, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.955%.

General Motors has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. Winnebago Industries offers a yield of 4.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. General Motors pays 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Winnebago Industries pays out 283.08% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Winnebago Industries's is not.

General Motors quarterly revenues are $44B, which are larger than Winnebago Industries quarterly revenues of $620.2M. General Motors's net income of $2.8B is higher than Winnebago Industries's net income of -$400K. Notably, General Motors's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.32x while Winnebago Industries's PE ratio is 196.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Motors is 0.26x versus 0.34x for Winnebago Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.