LCID Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. has a net margin of -290.7% compared to Lucid Group, Inc.'s net margin of -600505.41%. Lucid Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -52.42% beat Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.'s return on equity of -553.9%.

Lucid Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $16.67, signalling upside risk potential of 62.13%. On the other hand Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 719.67%. Given that Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lucid Group, Inc., analysts believe Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. is more attractive than Lucid Group, Inc..

Lucid Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.156, which suggesting that the stock is 15.622% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. has a beta of 5.239, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 423.858%.

Lucid Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lucid Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lucid Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $336.6M, which are larger than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. quarterly revenues of $37K. Lucid Group, Inc.'s net income of -$978.4M is lower than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.'s net income of -$222.2M. Notably, Lucid Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lucid Group, Inc. is 15.67x versus 92.30x for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

General Motors Co. has a net margin of -290.7% compared to Lucid Group, Inc.'s net margin of -7.2%. Lucid Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -52.42% beat General Motors Co.'s return on equity of 4.19%.

Lucid Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $16.67, signalling upside risk potential of 62.13%. On the other hand General Motors Co. has an analysts' consensus of $94.17 which suggests that it could grow by 16.14%. Given that Lucid Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than General Motors Co., analysts believe Lucid Group, Inc. is more attractive than General Motors Co..

Lucid Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.156, which suggesting that the stock is 15.622% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Motors Co. has a beta of 1.363, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.25%.

Lucid Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. General Motors Co. offers a yield of 0.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Lucid Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors Co. pays out 17.44% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lucid Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $336.6M, which are smaller than General Motors Co. quarterly revenues of $45.3B. Lucid Group, Inc.'s net income of -$978.4M is higher than General Motors Co.'s net income of -$3.3B. Notably, Lucid Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while General Motors Co.'s PE ratio is 26.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lucid Group, Inc. is 15.67x versus 0.42x for General Motors Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive, Inc. has a net margin of -290.7% compared to Lucid Group, Inc.'s net margin of -62.52%. Lucid Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -52.42% beat Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s return on equity of -63.51%.

Lucid Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $16.67, signalling upside risk potential of 62.13%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $17.60 which suggests that it could fall by -0.73%. Given that Lucid Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Rivian Automotive, Inc., analysts believe Lucid Group, Inc. is more attractive than Rivian Automotive, Inc..

Lucid Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.156, which suggesting that the stock is 15.622% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lucid Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rivian Automotive, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lucid Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lucid Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $336.6M, which are smaller than Rivian Automotive, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Lucid Group, Inc.'s net income of -$978.4M is lower than Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s net income of -$804M. Notably, Lucid Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lucid Group, Inc. is 15.67x versus 3.90x for Rivian Automotive, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla, Inc. has a net margin of -290.7% compared to Lucid Group, Inc.'s net margin of 3.44%. Lucid Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -52.42% beat Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.93%.

Lucid Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $16.67, signalling upside risk potential of 62.13%. On the other hand Tesla, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $421.73 which suggests that it could grow by 1.03%. Given that Lucid Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tesla, Inc., analysts believe Lucid Group, Inc. is more attractive than Tesla, Inc..

Lucid Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.156, which suggesting that the stock is 15.622% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.858, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.812%.

Lucid Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lucid Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lucid Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $336.6M, which are smaller than Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues of $24.9B. Lucid Group, Inc.'s net income of -$978.4M is lower than Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $856M. Notably, Lucid Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tesla, Inc.'s PE ratio is 387.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lucid Group, Inc. is 15.67x versus 15.52x for Tesla, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.