RIVN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Motors has a net margin of -43.95% compared to Rivian Automotive's net margin of 6.32%. Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -57.26% beat General Motors's return on equity of 8.33%.

Rivian Automotive has a consensus price target of $14.24, signalling downside risk potential of -1.41%. On the other hand General Motors has an analysts' consensus of $54.39 which suggests that it could grow by 14.5%. Given that General Motors has higher upside potential than Rivian Automotive, analysts believe General Motors is more attractive than Rivian Automotive.

Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Motors has a beta of 1.361, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.127%.

Rivian Automotive has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. General Motors offers a yield of 1.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Rivian Automotive pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors pays out 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than General Motors quarterly revenues of $44B. Rivian Automotive's net income of -$545M is lower than General Motors's net income of $2.8B. Notably, Rivian Automotive's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while General Motors's PE ratio is 6.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rivian Automotive is 3.00x versus 0.27x for General Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lucid Group has a net margin of -43.95% compared to Rivian Automotive's net margin of -155.79%. Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -57.26% beat Lucid Group's return on equity of -68.6%.

Rivian Automotive has a consensus price target of $14.24, signalling downside risk potential of -1.41%. On the other hand Lucid Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.53 which suggests that it could grow by 0.71%. Given that Lucid Group has higher upside potential than Rivian Automotive, analysts believe Lucid Group is more attractive than Rivian Automotive.

Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Rivian Automotive has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lucid Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rivian Automotive pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Lucid Group quarterly revenues of $235M. Rivian Automotive's net income of -$545M is lower than Lucid Group's net income of -$366.2M. Notably, Rivian Automotive's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lucid Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rivian Automotive is 3.00x versus 7.58x for Lucid Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of -43.95% compared to Rivian Automotive's net margin of 2.12%. Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -57.26% beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

Rivian Automotive has a consensus price target of $14.24, signalling downside risk potential of -1.41%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $289.44 which suggests that it could fall by -2.96%. Given that Tesla has more downside risk than Rivian Automotive, analysts believe Rivian Automotive is more attractive than Tesla.

Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.429, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 142.869%.

Rivian Automotive has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rivian Automotive pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. Rivian Automotive's net income of -$545M is lower than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, Rivian Automotive's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tesla's PE ratio is 163.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rivian Automotive is 3.00x versus 10.92x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Winnebago Industries has a net margin of -43.95% compared to Rivian Automotive's net margin of -0.07%. Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -57.26% beat Winnebago Industries's return on equity of -0.45%.

Rivian Automotive has a consensus price target of $14.24, signalling downside risk potential of -1.41%. On the other hand Winnebago Industries has an analysts' consensus of $48.92 which suggests that it could grow by 43.79%. Given that Winnebago Industries has higher upside potential than Rivian Automotive, analysts believe Winnebago Industries is more attractive than Rivian Automotive.

Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Winnebago Industries has a beta of 1.120, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.955%.

Rivian Automotive has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Winnebago Industries offers a yield of 3.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Rivian Automotive pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Winnebago Industries pays out 283.08% of its earnings as a dividend.

Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Winnebago Industries quarterly revenues of $620.2M. Rivian Automotive's net income of -$545M is lower than Winnebago Industries's net income of -$400K. Notably, Rivian Automotive's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Winnebago Industries's PE ratio is 196.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rivian Automotive is 3.00x versus 0.36x for Winnebago Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.