RIVN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ford Motor Co. has a net margin of -74.84% compared to Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s net margin of 4.84%. Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s return on equity of -59.71% beat Ford Motor Co.'s return on equity of 10.43%.

Rivian Automotive, Inc. has a consensus price target of $14.83, signalling downside risk potential of -15.38%. On the other hand Ford Motor Co. has an analysts' consensus of $12.64 which suggests that it could fall by -3.44%. Given that Rivian Automotive, Inc. has more downside risk than Ford Motor Co., analysts believe Ford Motor Co. is more attractive than Rivian Automotive, Inc..

Rivian Automotive, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ford Motor Co. has a beta of 1.599, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.903%.

Rivian Automotive, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ford Motor Co. offers a yield of 4.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Rivian Automotive, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ford Motor Co. pays out 53.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Ford Motor Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rivian Automotive, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than Ford Motor Co. quarterly revenues of $50.5B. Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s net income of -$1.2B is lower than Ford Motor Co.'s net income of $2.4B. Notably, Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ford Motor Co.'s PE ratio is 11.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rivian Automotive, Inc. is 3.43x versus 0.28x for Ford Motor Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

General Motors Co. has a net margin of -74.84% compared to Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s net margin of 2.66%. Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s return on equity of -59.71% beat General Motors Co.'s return on equity of 4.62%.

Rivian Automotive, Inc. has a consensus price target of $14.83, signalling downside risk potential of -15.38%. On the other hand General Motors Co. has an analysts' consensus of $74.27 which suggests that it could fall by -0.56%. Given that Rivian Automotive, Inc. has more downside risk than General Motors Co., analysts believe General Motors Co. is more attractive than Rivian Automotive, Inc..

Rivian Automotive, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Motors Co. has a beta of 1.304, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.412%.

Rivian Automotive, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. General Motors Co. offers a yield of 0.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Rivian Automotive, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors Co. pays out 7.54% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rivian Automotive, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than General Motors Co. quarterly revenues of $48.6B. Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s net income of -$1.2B is lower than General Motors Co.'s net income of $1.3B. Notably, Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while General Motors Co.'s PE ratio is 15.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rivian Automotive, Inc. is 3.43x versus 0.40x for General Motors Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lucid Group, Inc. has a net margin of -74.84% compared to Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s net margin of -290.7%. Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s return on equity of -59.71% beat Lucid Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -52.42%.

Rivian Automotive, Inc. has a consensus price target of $14.83, signalling downside risk potential of -15.38%. On the other hand Lucid Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $18.43 which suggests that it could grow by 35.89%. Given that Lucid Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Rivian Automotive, Inc., analysts believe Lucid Group, Inc. is more attractive than Rivian Automotive, Inc..

Rivian Automotive, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.865, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.52%.

Rivian Automotive, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lucid Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rivian Automotive, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rivian Automotive, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Lucid Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $336.6M. Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s net income of -$1.2B is lower than Lucid Group, Inc.'s net income of -$978.4M. Notably, Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lucid Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rivian Automotive, Inc. is 3.43x versus 20.66x for Lucid Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla, Inc. has a net margin of -74.84% compared to Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s net margin of 4.94%. Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s return on equity of -59.71% beat Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.04%.

Rivian Automotive, Inc. has a consensus price target of $14.83, signalling downside risk potential of -15.38%. On the other hand Tesla, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $392.93 which suggests that it could fall by -12.05%. Given that Rivian Automotive, Inc. has more downside risk than Tesla, Inc., analysts believe Tesla, Inc. is more attractive than Rivian Automotive, Inc..

Rivian Automotive, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.874, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.392%.

Rivian Automotive, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rivian Automotive, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rivian Automotive, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues of $28.1B. Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s net income of -$1.2B is lower than Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $1.4B. Notably, Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tesla, Inc.'s PE ratio is 298.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rivian Automotive, Inc. is 3.43x versus 16.45x for Tesla, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.