EVTV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. has a net margin of -350.76% compared to Envirotech Vehicles, Inc.'s net margin of -600505.41%. Envirotech Vehicles, Inc.'s return on equity of -245.24% beat Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.'s return on equity of -553.9%.

Envirotech Vehicles, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 11664.71%. On the other hand Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 342.48%. Given that Envirotech Vehicles, Inc. has higher upside potential than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc., analysts believe Envirotech Vehicles, Inc. is more attractive than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc..

Envirotech Vehicles, Inc. has a beta of 0.424, which suggesting that the stock is 57.64% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. has a beta of 5.002, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 400.215%.

Envirotech Vehicles, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Envirotech Vehicles, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Envirotech Vehicles, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.8M, which are larger than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. quarterly revenues of $37K. Envirotech Vehicles, Inc.'s net income of -$6.4M is higher than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.'s net income of -$222.2M. Notably, Envirotech Vehicles, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Envirotech Vehicles, Inc. is 0.81x versus 170.97x for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lucid Group, Inc. has a net margin of -350.76% compared to Envirotech Vehicles, Inc.'s net margin of -290.7%. Envirotech Vehicles, Inc.'s return on equity of -245.24% beat Lucid Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -52.42%.

Envirotech Vehicles, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 11664.71%. On the other hand Lucid Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $18.43 which suggests that it could grow by 37.31%. Given that Envirotech Vehicles, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lucid Group, Inc., analysts believe Envirotech Vehicles, Inc. is more attractive than Lucid Group, Inc..

Envirotech Vehicles, Inc. has a beta of 0.424, which suggesting that the stock is 57.64% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.865, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.52%.

Envirotech Vehicles, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lucid Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Envirotech Vehicles, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Envirotech Vehicles, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.8M, which are smaller than Lucid Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $336.6M. Envirotech Vehicles, Inc.'s net income of -$6.4M is higher than Lucid Group, Inc.'s net income of -$978.4M. Notably, Envirotech Vehicles, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lucid Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Envirotech Vehicles, Inc. is 0.81x versus 20.45x for Lucid Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workhorse Group, Inc. has a net margin of -350.76% compared to Envirotech Vehicles, Inc.'s net margin of -328.21%. Envirotech Vehicles, Inc.'s return on equity of -245.24% beat Workhorse Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -181.65%.

Envirotech Vehicles, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 11664.71%. On the other hand Workhorse Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $0.65 which suggests that it could fall by -16.8%. Given that Envirotech Vehicles, Inc. has higher upside potential than Workhorse Group, Inc., analysts believe Envirotech Vehicles, Inc. is more attractive than Workhorse Group, Inc..

Envirotech Vehicles, Inc. has a beta of 0.424, which suggesting that the stock is 57.64% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workhorse Group, Inc. has a beta of 2.326, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 132.607%.

Envirotech Vehicles, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Workhorse Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Envirotech Vehicles, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Workhorse Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Envirotech Vehicles, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.8M, which are smaller than Workhorse Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Envirotech Vehicles, Inc.'s net income of -$6.4M is higher than Workhorse Group, Inc.'s net income of -$7.8M. Notably, Envirotech Vehicles, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Workhorse Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Envirotech Vehicles, Inc. is 0.81x versus 0.57x for Workhorse Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.