WKHS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Envirotech Vehicles, Inc. has a net margin of -328.21% compared to Workhorse Group, Inc.'s net margin of -350.76%. Workhorse Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -181.65% beat Envirotech Vehicles, Inc.'s return on equity of -245.24%.

Workhorse Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $0.65, signalling upside risk potential of 42.6%. On the other hand Envirotech Vehicles, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 30595.02%. Given that Envirotech Vehicles, Inc. has higher upside potential than Workhorse Group, Inc., analysts believe Envirotech Vehicles, Inc. is more attractive than Workhorse Group, Inc..

Workhorse Group, Inc. has a beta of 2.326, which suggesting that the stock is 132.607% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Envirotech Vehicles, Inc. has a beta of 0.424, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.64%.

Workhorse Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Envirotech Vehicles, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Workhorse Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Envirotech Vehicles, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Workhorse Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.4M, which are larger than Envirotech Vehicles, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.8M. Workhorse Group, Inc.'s net income of -$7.8M is lower than Envirotech Vehicles, Inc.'s net income of -$6.4M. Notably, Workhorse Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Envirotech Vehicles, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Workhorse Group, Inc. is 0.33x versus 0.31x for Envirotech Vehicles, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. has a net margin of -328.21% compared to Workhorse Group, Inc.'s net margin of -600505.41%. Workhorse Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -181.65% beat Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.'s return on equity of -553.9%.

Workhorse Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $0.65, signalling upside risk potential of 42.6%. On the other hand Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 320.17%. Given that Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. has higher upside potential than Workhorse Group, Inc., analysts believe Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. is more attractive than Workhorse Group, Inc..

Workhorse Group, Inc. has a beta of 2.326, which suggesting that the stock is 132.607% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. has a beta of 5.002, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 400.215%.

Workhorse Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Workhorse Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Workhorse Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.4M, which are larger than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. quarterly revenues of $37K. Workhorse Group, Inc.'s net income of -$7.8M is higher than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.'s net income of -$222.2M. Notably, Workhorse Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Workhorse Group, Inc. is 0.33x versus 180.05x for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lucid Group, Inc. has a net margin of -328.21% compared to Workhorse Group, Inc.'s net margin of -290.7%. Workhorse Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -181.65% beat Lucid Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -52.42%.

Workhorse Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $0.65, signalling upside risk potential of 42.6%. On the other hand Lucid Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $18.06 which suggests that it could grow by 55.25%. Given that Lucid Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Workhorse Group, Inc., analysts believe Lucid Group, Inc. is more attractive than Workhorse Group, Inc..

Workhorse Group, Inc. has a beta of 2.326, which suggesting that the stock is 132.607% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.865, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.52%.

Workhorse Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lucid Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Workhorse Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Workhorse Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.4M, which are smaller than Lucid Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $336.6M. Workhorse Group, Inc.'s net income of -$7.8M is higher than Lucid Group, Inc.'s net income of -$978.4M. Notably, Workhorse Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lucid Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Workhorse Group, Inc. is 0.33x versus 17.72x for Lucid Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.