WKHS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ford Motor has a net margin of -1001.53% compared to Workhorse Group's net margin of 1.93%. Workhorse Group's return on equity of -170.46% beat Ford Motor's return on equity of 8.1%.

Workhorse Group has a consensus price target of $3.83, signalling upside risk potential of 40.03%. On the other hand Ford Motor has an analysts' consensus of $11.91 which suggests that it could grow by 20.51%. Given that Workhorse Group has higher upside potential than Ford Motor, analysts believe Workhorse Group is more attractive than Ford Motor.

Workhorse Group has a beta of 2.628, which suggesting that the stock is 162.766% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ford Motor has a beta of 1.623, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.313%.

Workhorse Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ford Motor offers a yield of 6.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Workhorse Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ford Motor pays out 114.91% of its earnings as a dividend.

Workhorse Group quarterly revenues are $2.5M, which are smaller than Ford Motor quarterly revenues of $46.2B. Workhorse Group's net income of -$25.1M is lower than Ford Motor's net income of $892M. Notably, Workhorse Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ford Motor's PE ratio is 11.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Workhorse Group is 1.60x versus 0.22x for Ford Motor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Canoo has a net margin of -1001.53% compared to Workhorse Group's net margin of -819.84%. Workhorse Group's return on equity of -170.46% beat Canoo's return on equity of -69.19%.

Workhorse Group has a consensus price target of $3.83, signalling upside risk potential of 40.03%. On the other hand Canoo has an analysts' consensus of $12.86 which suggests that it could grow by 3804.43%. Given that Canoo has higher upside potential than Workhorse Group, analysts believe Canoo is more attractive than Workhorse Group.

Workhorse Group has a beta of 2.628, which suggesting that the stock is 162.766% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Canoo has a beta of 1.145, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.492%.

Workhorse Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Canoo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Workhorse Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Canoo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Workhorse Group quarterly revenues are $2.5M, which are larger than Canoo quarterly revenues of $891K. Workhorse Group's net income of -$25.1M is lower than Canoo's net income of $3.3M. Notably, Workhorse Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Canoo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Workhorse Group is 1.60x versus -- for Canoo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lucid Group has a net margin of -1001.53% compared to Workhorse Group's net margin of -496.14%. Workhorse Group's return on equity of -170.46% beat Lucid Group's return on equity of -71.79%.

Workhorse Group has a consensus price target of $3.83, signalling upside risk potential of 40.03%. On the other hand Lucid Group has an analysts' consensus of $3.27 which suggests that it could fall by -6.22%. Given that Workhorse Group has higher upside potential than Lucid Group, analysts believe Workhorse Group is more attractive than Lucid Group.

Workhorse Group has a beta of 2.628, which suggesting that the stock is 162.766% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Workhorse Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lucid Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Workhorse Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Workhorse Group quarterly revenues are $2.5M, which are smaller than Lucid Group quarterly revenues of $200M. Workhorse Group's net income of -$25.1M is higher than Lucid Group's net income of -$992.5M. Notably, Workhorse Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lucid Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Workhorse Group is 1.60x versus 9.51x for Lucid Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of -1001.53% compared to Workhorse Group's net margin of -125.86%. Workhorse Group's return on equity of -170.46% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -68.23%.

Workhorse Group has a consensus price target of $3.83, signalling upside risk potential of 40.03%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $15.03 which suggests that it could grow by 8.7%. Given that Workhorse Group has higher upside potential than Rivian Automotive, analysts believe Workhorse Group is more attractive than Rivian Automotive.

Workhorse Group has a beta of 2.628, which suggesting that the stock is 162.766% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Workhorse Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Workhorse Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Workhorse Group quarterly revenues are $2.5M, which are smaller than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $874M. Workhorse Group's net income of -$25.1M is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$1.1B. Notably, Workhorse Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Workhorse Group is 1.60x versus 3.00x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.