TSLA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Motors Co. has a net margin of 3.44% compared to Tesla, Inc.'s net margin of -7.2%. Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.93% beat General Motors Co.'s return on equity of 4.19%.

Tesla, Inc. has a consensus price target of $413.87, signalling downside risk potential of -0.65%. On the other hand General Motors Co. has an analysts' consensus of $92.00 which suggests that it could grow by 6.65%. Given that General Motors Co. has higher upside potential than Tesla, Inc., analysts believe General Motors Co. is more attractive than Tesla, Inc..

Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.831, which suggesting that the stock is 83.075% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Motors Co. has a beta of 1.315, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.549%.

Tesla, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. General Motors Co. offers a yield of 0.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Tesla, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors Co. pays out 17.44% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues are $24.9B, which are smaller than General Motors Co. quarterly revenues of $45.3B. Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $856M is higher than General Motors Co.'s net income of -$3.3B. Notably, Tesla, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 387.14x while General Motors Co.'s PE ratio is 28.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tesla, Inc. is 15.49x versus 0.45x for General Motors Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lucid Group, Inc. has a net margin of 3.44% compared to Tesla, Inc.'s net margin of -290.7%. Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.93% beat Lucid Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -52.42%.

Tesla, Inc. has a consensus price target of $413.87, signalling downside risk potential of -0.65%. On the other hand Lucid Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $17.06 which suggests that it could grow by 50.54%. Given that Lucid Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tesla, Inc., analysts believe Lucid Group, Inc. is more attractive than Tesla, Inc..

Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.831, which suggesting that the stock is 83.075% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.888, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.157%.

Tesla, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lucid Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tesla, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues are $24.9B, which are larger than Lucid Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $336.6M. Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $856M is higher than Lucid Group, Inc.'s net income of -$978.4M. Notably, Tesla, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 387.14x while Lucid Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tesla, Inc. is 15.49x versus 17.27x for Lucid Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive, Inc. has a net margin of 3.44% compared to Tesla, Inc.'s net margin of -74.84%. Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.93% beat Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s return on equity of -59.71%.

Tesla, Inc. has a consensus price target of $413.87, signalling downside risk potential of -0.65%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $16.96 which suggests that it could grow by 11.8%. Given that Rivian Automotive, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tesla, Inc., analysts believe Rivian Automotive, Inc. is more attractive than Tesla, Inc..

Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.831, which suggesting that the stock is 83.075% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Tesla, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rivian Automotive, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tesla, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues are $24.9B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $856M is higher than Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s net income of -$1.2B. Notably, Tesla, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 387.14x while Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tesla, Inc. is 15.49x versus 2.97x for Rivian Automotive, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gentherm, Inc. has a net margin of 3.44% compared to Tesla, Inc.'s net margin of 3.86%. Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.93% beat Gentherm, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.58%.

Tesla, Inc. has a consensus price target of $413.87, signalling downside risk potential of -0.65%. On the other hand Gentherm, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $45.60 which suggests that it could grow by 27.23%. Given that Gentherm, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tesla, Inc., analysts believe Gentherm, Inc. is more attractive than Tesla, Inc..

Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.831, which suggesting that the stock is 83.075% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gentherm, Inc. has a beta of 1.351, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.069%.

Tesla, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gentherm, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tesla, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gentherm, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues are $24.9B, which are larger than Gentherm, Inc. quarterly revenues of $386.9M. Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $856M is higher than Gentherm, Inc.'s net income of $14.9M. Notably, Tesla, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 387.14x while Gentherm, Inc.'s PE ratio is 36.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tesla, Inc. is 15.49x versus 0.75x for Gentherm, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.