TSLA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ford Motor Co. has a net margin of 3.44% compared to Tesla, Inc.'s net margin of -24.09%. Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.93% beat Ford Motor Co.'s return on equity of -18.72%.

Tesla, Inc. has a consensus price target of $421.73, signalling upside risk potential of 2.53%. On the other hand Ford Motor Co. has an analysts' consensus of $13.97 which suggests that it could grow by 0.88%. Given that Tesla, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ford Motor Co., analysts believe Tesla, Inc. is more attractive than Ford Motor Co..

Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.858, which suggesting that the stock is 85.812% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ford Motor Co. has a beta of 1.666, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.583%.

Tesla, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ford Motor Co. offers a yield of 4.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Tesla, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ford Motor Co. pays out 53.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Ford Motor Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues are $24.9B, which are smaller than Ford Motor Co. quarterly revenues of $45.9B. Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $856M is higher than Ford Motor Co.'s net income of -$11.1B. Notably, Tesla, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 382.27x while Ford Motor Co.'s PE ratio is 11.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tesla, Inc. is 15.30x versus 0.30x for Ford Motor Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

General Motors Co. has a net margin of 3.44% compared to Tesla, Inc.'s net margin of -7.2%. Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.93% beat General Motors Co.'s return on equity of 4.19%.

Tesla, Inc. has a consensus price target of $421.73, signalling upside risk potential of 2.53%. On the other hand General Motors Co. has an analysts' consensus of $94.63 which suggests that it could grow by 13.09%. Given that General Motors Co. has higher upside potential than Tesla, Inc., analysts believe General Motors Co. is more attractive than Tesla, Inc..

Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.858, which suggesting that the stock is 85.812% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Motors Co. has a beta of 1.363, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.25%.

Tesla, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. General Motors Co. offers a yield of 0.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Tesla, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors Co. pays out 17.44% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues are $24.9B, which are smaller than General Motors Co. quarterly revenues of $45.3B. Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $856M is higher than General Motors Co.'s net income of -$3.3B. Notably, Tesla, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 382.27x while General Motors Co.'s PE ratio is 27.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tesla, Inc. is 15.30x versus 0.44x for General Motors Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lucid Group, Inc. has a net margin of 3.44% compared to Tesla, Inc.'s net margin of -290.7%. Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.93% beat Lucid Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -52.42%.

Tesla, Inc. has a consensus price target of $421.73, signalling upside risk potential of 2.53%. On the other hand Lucid Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $16.67 which suggests that it could grow by 70.07%. Given that Lucid Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tesla, Inc., analysts believe Lucid Group, Inc. is more attractive than Tesla, Inc..

Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.858, which suggesting that the stock is 85.812% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.156, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.622%.

Tesla, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lucid Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tesla, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues are $24.9B, which are larger than Lucid Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $336.6M. Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $856M is higher than Lucid Group, Inc.'s net income of -$978.4M. Notably, Tesla, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 382.27x while Lucid Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tesla, Inc. is 15.30x versus 14.93x for Lucid Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive, Inc. has a net margin of 3.44% compared to Tesla, Inc.'s net margin of -62.52%. Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.93% beat Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s return on equity of -63.51%.

Tesla, Inc. has a consensus price target of $421.73, signalling upside risk potential of 2.53%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $17.96 which suggests that it could grow by 11.21%. Given that Rivian Automotive, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tesla, Inc., analysts believe Rivian Automotive, Inc. is more attractive than Tesla, Inc..

Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.858, which suggesting that the stock is 85.812% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Tesla, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rivian Automotive, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tesla, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues are $24.9B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $856M is higher than Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s net income of -$804M. Notably, Tesla, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 382.27x while Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tesla, Inc. is 15.30x versus 3.56x for Rivian Automotive, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.