TSLA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Deckers Outdoor Corp. has a net margin of 4.94% compared to Tesla, Inc.'s net margin of 18.85%. Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.04% beat Deckers Outdoor Corp.'s return on equity of 41.28%.

Tesla, Inc. has a consensus price target of $392.93, signalling downside risk potential of -12.05%. On the other hand Deckers Outdoor Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $111.97 which suggests that it could grow by 17.9%. Given that Deckers Outdoor Corp. has higher upside potential than Tesla, Inc., analysts believe Deckers Outdoor Corp. is more attractive than Tesla, Inc..

Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.874, which suggesting that the stock is 87.392% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deckers Outdoor Corp. has a beta of 1.188, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.76%.

Tesla, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Deckers Outdoor Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tesla, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Deckers Outdoor Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues are $28.1B, which are larger than Deckers Outdoor Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $1.4B is higher than Deckers Outdoor Corp.'s net income of $268.2M. Notably, Tesla, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 298.50x while Deckers Outdoor Corp.'s PE ratio is 14.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tesla, Inc. is 16.45x versus 2.73x for Deckers Outdoor Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

eBay, Inc. has a net margin of 4.94% compared to Tesla, Inc.'s net margin of 20.82%. Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.04% beat eBay, Inc.'s return on equity of 43.03%.

Tesla, Inc. has a consensus price target of $392.93, signalling downside risk potential of -12.05%. On the other hand eBay, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $93.97 which suggests that it could grow by 14.59%. Given that eBay, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tesla, Inc., analysts believe eBay, Inc. is more attractive than Tesla, Inc..

Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.874, which suggesting that the stock is 87.392% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison eBay, Inc. has a beta of 1.347, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.666%.

Tesla, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. eBay, Inc. offers a yield of 1.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Tesla, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. eBay, Inc. pays out 27.4% of its earnings as a dividend. eBay, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues are $28.1B, which are larger than eBay, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $1.4B is higher than eBay, Inc.'s net income of $597M. Notably, Tesla, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 298.50x while eBay, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tesla, Inc. is 16.45x versus 3.60x for eBay, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

General Motors Co. has a net margin of 4.94% compared to Tesla, Inc.'s net margin of 2.66%. Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.04% beat General Motors Co.'s return on equity of 4.62%.

Tesla, Inc. has a consensus price target of $392.93, signalling downside risk potential of -12.05%. On the other hand General Motors Co. has an analysts' consensus of $74.27 which suggests that it could fall by -0.56%. Given that Tesla, Inc. has more downside risk than General Motors Co., analysts believe General Motors Co. is more attractive than Tesla, Inc..

Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.874, which suggesting that the stock is 87.392% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Motors Co. has a beta of 1.304, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.412%.

Tesla, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. General Motors Co. offers a yield of 0.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Tesla, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors Co. pays out 7.54% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues are $28.1B, which are smaller than General Motors Co. quarterly revenues of $48.6B. Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $1.4B is higher than General Motors Co.'s net income of $1.3B. Notably, Tesla, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 298.50x while General Motors Co.'s PE ratio is 15.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tesla, Inc. is 16.45x versus 0.40x for General Motors Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NIKE, Inc. has a net margin of 4.94% compared to Tesla, Inc.'s net margin of 6.2%. Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.04% beat NIKE, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.08%.

Tesla, Inc. has a consensus price target of $392.93, signalling downside risk potential of -12.05%. On the other hand NIKE, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $83.30 which suggests that it could grow by 26.89%. Given that NIKE, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tesla, Inc., analysts believe NIKE, Inc. is more attractive than Tesla, Inc..

Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.874, which suggesting that the stock is 87.392% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NIKE, Inc. has a beta of 1.287, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.707%.

Tesla, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NIKE, Inc. offers a yield of 2.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Tesla, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NIKE, Inc. pays out 72.55% of its earnings as a dividend. NIKE, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues are $28.1B, which are larger than NIKE, Inc. quarterly revenues of $11.7B. Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $1.4B is higher than NIKE, Inc.'s net income of $727M. Notably, Tesla, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 298.50x while NIKE, Inc.'s PE ratio is 33.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tesla, Inc. is 16.45x versus 2.09x for NIKE, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.