TSLA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Motors Co. has a net margin of 4.94% compared to Tesla, Inc.'s net margin of 2.66%. Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.04% beat General Motors Co.'s return on equity of 4.62%.

Tesla, Inc. has a consensus price target of $399.15, signalling downside risk potential of -17.8%. On the other hand General Motors Co. has an analysts' consensus of $79.46 which suggests that it could fall by -3.98%. Given that Tesla, Inc. has more downside risk than General Motors Co., analysts believe General Motors Co. is more attractive than Tesla, Inc..

Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.874, which suggesting that the stock is 87.392% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Motors Co. has a beta of 1.304, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.412%.

Tesla, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. General Motors Co. offers a yield of 0.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Tesla, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors Co. pays out 7.54% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues are $28.1B, which are smaller than General Motors Co. quarterly revenues of $48.6B. Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $1.4B is higher than General Motors Co.'s net income of $1.3B. Notably, Tesla, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 324.44x while General Motors Co.'s PE ratio is 16.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tesla, Inc. is 17.88x versus 0.44x for General Motors Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lucid Group, Inc. has a net margin of 4.94% compared to Tesla, Inc.'s net margin of -290.7%. Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.04% beat Lucid Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -52.42%.

Tesla, Inc. has a consensus price target of $399.15, signalling downside risk potential of -17.8%. On the other hand Lucid Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $18.06 which suggests that it could grow by 55.25%. Given that Lucid Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tesla, Inc., analysts believe Lucid Group, Inc. is more attractive than Tesla, Inc..

Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.874, which suggesting that the stock is 87.392% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.865, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.52%.

Tesla, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lucid Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tesla, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues are $28.1B, which are larger than Lucid Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $336.6M. Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $1.4B is higher than Lucid Group, Inc.'s net income of -$978.4M. Notably, Tesla, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 324.44x while Lucid Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tesla, Inc. is 17.88x versus 17.72x for Lucid Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mattel, Inc. has a net margin of 4.94% compared to Tesla, Inc.'s net margin of 16.04%. Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.04% beat Mattel, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.4%.

Tesla, Inc. has a consensus price target of $399.15, signalling downside risk potential of -17.8%. On the other hand Mattel, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $23.92 which suggests that it could grow by 20.31%. Given that Mattel, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tesla, Inc., analysts believe Mattel, Inc. is more attractive than Tesla, Inc..

Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.874, which suggesting that the stock is 87.392% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mattel, Inc. has a beta of 0.704, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.629%.

Tesla, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mattel, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tesla, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mattel, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues are $28.1B, which are larger than Mattel, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $1.4B is higher than Mattel, Inc.'s net income of $278.4M. Notably, Tesla, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 324.44x while Mattel, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tesla, Inc. is 17.88x versus 1.24x for Mattel, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive, Inc. has a net margin of 4.94% compared to Tesla, Inc.'s net margin of -74.84%. Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.04% beat Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s return on equity of -59.71%.

Tesla, Inc. has a consensus price target of $399.15, signalling downside risk potential of -17.8%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $16.58 which suggests that it could fall by -21.7%. Given that Rivian Automotive, Inc. has more downside risk than Tesla, Inc., analysts believe Tesla, Inc. is more attractive than Rivian Automotive, Inc..

Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.874, which suggesting that the stock is 87.392% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Tesla, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rivian Automotive, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tesla, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues are $28.1B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $1.4B is higher than Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s net income of -$1.2B. Notably, Tesla, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 324.44x while Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tesla, Inc. is 17.88x versus 4.15x for Rivian Automotive, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.