PII Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Document Security Systems has a net margin of -4.35% compared to Polaris's net margin of --. Polaris's return on equity of 3.05% beat Document Security Systems's return on equity of --.

Polaris has a consensus price target of $35.45, signalling upside risk potential of 4.52%. On the other hand Document Security Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Polaris has higher upside potential than Document Security Systems, analysts believe Polaris is more attractive than Document Security Systems.

Polaris has a beta of 1.055, which suggesting that the stock is 5.509% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Document Security Systems has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Polaris has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.81%. Document Security Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Polaris pays 133.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Document Security Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Polaris quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Document Security Systems quarterly revenues of --. Polaris's net income of -$66.8M is higher than Document Security Systems's net income of --. Notably, Polaris's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.11x while Document Security Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Polaris is 0.28x versus -- for Document Security Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Goodyear Tire & Rubber has a net margin of -4.35% compared to Polaris's net margin of 1.54%. Polaris's return on equity of 3.05% beat Goodyear Tire & Rubber's return on equity of 1.44%.

Polaris has a consensus price target of $35.45, signalling upside risk potential of 4.52%. On the other hand Goodyear Tire & Rubber has an analysts' consensus of $11.54 which suggests that it could grow by 4.53%. Given that Goodyear Tire & Rubber has higher upside potential than Polaris, analysts believe Goodyear Tire & Rubber is more attractive than Polaris.

Polaris has a beta of 1.055, which suggesting that the stock is 5.509% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goodyear Tire & Rubber has a beta of 1.418, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.782%.

Polaris has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.81%. Goodyear Tire & Rubber offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Polaris pays 133.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Goodyear Tire & Rubber pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Polaris quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Goodyear Tire & Rubber quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Polaris's net income of -$66.8M is lower than Goodyear Tire & Rubber's net income of $76M. Notably, Polaris's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.11x while Goodyear Tire & Rubber's PE ratio is 46.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Polaris is 0.28x versus 0.17x for Goodyear Tire & Rubber. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MillerKnoll has a net margin of -4.35% compared to Polaris's net margin of -1.45%. Polaris's return on equity of 3.05% beat MillerKnoll's return on equity of 2.13%.

Polaris has a consensus price target of $35.45, signalling upside risk potential of 4.52%. On the other hand MillerKnoll has an analysts' consensus of $30.50 which suggests that it could grow by 86.89%. Given that MillerKnoll has higher upside potential than Polaris, analysts believe MillerKnoll is more attractive than Polaris.

Polaris has a beta of 1.055, which suggesting that the stock is 5.509% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MillerKnoll has a beta of 1.175, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.46%.

Polaris has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.81%. MillerKnoll offers a yield of 4.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Polaris pays 133.3% of its earnings as a dividend. MillerKnoll pays out 67.56% of its earnings as a dividend. MillerKnoll's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Polaris's is not.

Polaris quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than MillerKnoll quarterly revenues of $876.2M. Polaris's net income of -$66.8M is lower than MillerKnoll's net income of -$12.7M. Notably, Polaris's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.11x while MillerKnoll's PE ratio is 38.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Polaris is 0.28x versus 0.32x for MillerKnoll. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yunhong Green CTI has a net margin of -4.35% compared to Polaris's net margin of -46.97%. Polaris's return on equity of 3.05% beat Yunhong Green CTI's return on equity of -25.74%.

Polaris has a consensus price target of $35.45, signalling upside risk potential of 4.52%. On the other hand Yunhong Green CTI has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 775%. Given that Yunhong Green CTI has higher upside potential than Polaris, analysts believe Yunhong Green CTI is more attractive than Polaris.

Polaris has a beta of 1.055, which suggesting that the stock is 5.509% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yunhong Green CTI has a beta of 0.191, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.9%.

Polaris has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.81%. Yunhong Green CTI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Polaris pays 133.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Yunhong Green CTI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Polaris quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Yunhong Green CTI quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Polaris's net income of -$66.8M is lower than Yunhong Green CTI's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Polaris's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.11x while Yunhong Green CTI's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Polaris is 0.28x versus 1.04x for Yunhong Green CTI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.