Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Buy
53
GNZUF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.50
Seasonality move
:
10.1%
Day range:
$0.48 - $0.48
52-week range:
$0.30 - $0.55
Dividend yield:
1.45%
P/E ratio:
32.77x
P/S ratio:
0.35x
P/B ratio:
0.32x
Volume:
1
Avg. volume:
4.3K
1-year change:
18.44%
Market cap:
$4.9B
Revenue:
$14.6B
EPS (TTM):
-$0.05
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GNZUF
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BQ
Boqii Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CAAS
China Automotive Systems, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HTHT
H World Group Ltd.
|
$948.8M | $0.67 | 6.68% | 1117.39% | $50.85 |
|
JXG
JX Luxventure Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KNDI
Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GNZUF
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.
|
$0.48 | -- | $4.9B | 32.77x | $0.00 | 1.45% | 0.35x |
|
BQ
Boqii Holding Ltd.
|
$2.39 | -- | $8.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 8.60x |
|
CAAS
China Automotive Systems, Inc.
|
$4.15 | -- | $125.2M | 3.74x | $0.80 | 0% | 0.17x |
|
HTHT
H World Group Ltd.
|
$47.90 | $50.85 | $14.7B | 27.44x | $0.81 | 3.72% | 4.37x |
|
JXG
JX Luxventure Group, Inc.
|
$4.62 | -- | $5.6M | 7.13x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.28x |
|
KNDI
Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.
|
$0.96 | -- | $78.4M | 58.83x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.65x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GNZUF
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.
|
31.44% | -1.557 | 149.53% | 0.57x |
|
BQ
Boqii Holding Ltd.
|
20.86% | 17.428 | 94.88% | 2.05x |
|
CAAS
China Automotive Systems, Inc.
|
17.66% | 0.704 | 42.96% | 0.94x |
|
HTHT
H World Group Ltd.
|
75.77% | -0.398 | 43.41% | 0.78x |
|
JXG
JX Luxventure Group, Inc.
|
3.38% | -0.478 | 4.92% | 0.59x |
|
KNDI
Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.
|
17.09% | -0.754 | 46.02% | 1.15x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GNZUF
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.
|
-$72.8M | -$541.9M | -3.36% | -4.79% | -15.95% | -$226.5M |
|
BQ
Boqii Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -17.81% | -25.13% | -- | -- |
|
CAAS
China Automotive Systems, Inc.
|
$33.4M | $12.1M | 8.03% | 10.53% | 6.29% | $22.8M |
|
HTHT
H World Group Ltd.
|
$408.5M | $283.4M | 8.31% | 33.7% | 28.94% | $208.8M |
|
JXG
JX Luxventure Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | 22.32% | 22.62% | -- | -- |
|
KNDI
Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.
|
$9.4M | -$6.6M | -1.38% | -1.54% | -9.78% | -- |
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GNZUF or BQ?
Boqii Holding Ltd. has a net margin of -9.42% compared to Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of -4.79% beat Boqii Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of -25.13%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GNZUFGuangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.-2.14% -$0.02 $23.5B BQBoqii Holding Ltd.-- -- $44.8M -
What do Analysts Say About GNZUF or BQ?
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Boqii Holding Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 24578.15%. Given that Boqii Holding Ltd. has higher upside potential than Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd., analysts believe Boqii Holding Ltd. is more attractive than Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GNZUFGuangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.0 0 0 BQBoqii Holding Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is GNZUF or BQ More Risky?
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.081, which suggesting that the stock is 91.927% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boqii Holding Ltd. has a beta of -2.484, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 348.387%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GNZUF or BQ?
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.45%. Boqii Holding Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. pays 63.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Boqii Holding Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GNZUF or BQ?
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than Boqii Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s net income of -$320M is higher than Boqii Holding Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 32.77x while Boqii Holding Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. is 0.35x versus 8.60x for Boqii Holding Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GNZUFGuangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.0.35x 32.77x $3.4B -$320M BQBoqii Holding Ltd.8.60x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GNZUF or CAAS?
China Automotive Systems, Inc. has a net margin of -9.42% compared to Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 6.1%. Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of -4.79% beat China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.53%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GNZUFGuangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.-2.14% -$0.02 $23.5B CAASChina Automotive Systems, Inc.17.28% $0.32 $507.1M -
What do Analysts Say About GNZUF or CAAS?
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Automotive Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 80.72%. Given that China Automotive Systems, Inc. has higher upside potential than Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd., analysts believe China Automotive Systems, Inc. is more attractive than Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GNZUFGuangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.0 0 0 CAASChina Automotive Systems, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is GNZUF or CAAS More Risky?
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.081, which suggesting that the stock is 91.927% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Automotive Systems, Inc. has a beta of 0.862, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.83%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GNZUF or CAAS?
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.45%. China Automotive Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. pays 63.02% of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GNZUF or CAAS?
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than China Automotive Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of $193.2M. Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s net income of -$320M is lower than China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s net income of $11.8M. Notably, Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 32.77x while China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. is 0.35x versus 0.17x for China Automotive Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GNZUFGuangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.0.35x 32.77x $3.4B -$320M CAASChina Automotive Systems, Inc.0.17x 3.74x $193.2M $11.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns GNZUF or HTHT?
H World Group Ltd. has a net margin of -9.42% compared to Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 21.06%. Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of -4.79% beat H World Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 33.7%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GNZUFGuangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.-2.14% -$0.02 $23.5B HTHTH World Group Ltd.41.72% $0.63 $6.9B -
What do Analysts Say About GNZUF or HTHT?
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand H World Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $50.85 which suggests that it could grow by 6.13%. Given that H World Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd., analysts believe H World Group Ltd. is more attractive than Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GNZUFGuangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.0 0 0 HTHTH World Group Ltd.11 1 0 -
Is GNZUF or HTHT More Risky?
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.081, which suggesting that the stock is 91.927% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison H World Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.121, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.874%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GNZUF or HTHT?
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.45%. H World Group Ltd. offers a yield of 3.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share. Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. pays 63.02% of its earnings as a dividend. H World Group Ltd. pays out 120.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but H World Group Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GNZUF or HTHT?
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than H World Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of $979.3M. Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s net income of -$320M is lower than H World Group Ltd.'s net income of $206.3M. Notably, Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 32.77x while H World Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 27.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. is 0.35x versus 4.37x for H World Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GNZUFGuangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.0.35x 32.77x $3.4B -$320M HTHTH World Group Ltd.4.37x 27.44x $979.3M $206.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns GNZUF or JXG?
JX Luxventure Group, Inc. has a net margin of -9.42% compared to Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of -4.79% beat JX Luxventure Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.62%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GNZUFGuangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.-2.14% -$0.02 $23.5B JXGJX Luxventure Group, Inc.-- -- $18.3M -
What do Analysts Say About GNZUF or JXG?
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand JX Luxventure Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than JX Luxventure Group, Inc., analysts believe Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. is more attractive than JX Luxventure Group, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GNZUFGuangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.0 0 0 JXGJX Luxventure Group, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is GNZUF or JXG More Risky?
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.081, which suggesting that the stock is 91.927% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JX Luxventure Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.948, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.151%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GNZUF or JXG?
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.45%. JX Luxventure Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. pays 63.02% of its earnings as a dividend. JX Luxventure Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GNZUF or JXG?
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than JX Luxventure Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s net income of -$320M is higher than JX Luxventure Group, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 32.77x while JX Luxventure Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 7.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. is 0.35x versus 0.28x for JX Luxventure Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GNZUFGuangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.0.35x 32.77x $3.4B -$320M JXGJX Luxventure Group, Inc.0.28x 7.13x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GNZUF or KNDI?
Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. has a net margin of -9.42% compared to Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s net margin of -13.73%. Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of -4.79% beat Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.54%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GNZUFGuangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.-2.14% -$0.02 $23.5B KNDIKandi Technologies Group, Inc.31.3% -$0.05 $493.5M -
What do Analysts Say About GNZUF or KNDI?
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 423.56%. Given that Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd., analysts believe Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. is more attractive than Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GNZUFGuangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.0 0 0 KNDIKandi Technologies Group, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is GNZUF or KNDI More Risky?
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.081, which suggesting that the stock is 91.927% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.362, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.766%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GNZUF or KNDI?
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.45%. Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. pays 63.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GNZUF or KNDI?
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $29.9M. Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s net income of -$320M is lower than Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.'s net income of -$4.1M. Notably, Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 32.77x while Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 58.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. is 0.35x versus 0.65x for Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GNZUFGuangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.0.35x 32.77x $3.4B -$320M KNDIKandi Technologies Group, Inc.0.65x 58.83x $29.9M -$4.1M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 8
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 59.64% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 8
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 9.18% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 8
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 5.19% over the past day.
