Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Sell
47
GNZUF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.48
Seasonality move
:
10.1%
Day range:
$0.48 - $0.48
52-week range:
$0.30 - $0.56
Dividend yield:
1.44%
P/E ratio:
32.77x
P/S ratio:
0.35x
P/B ratio:
0.32x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
1.4K
1-year change:
24.05%
Market cap:
$4.9B
Revenue:
$14.6B
EPS (TTM):
-$0.05
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GNZUF
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BYDDY
BYD Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GWLLF
Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LI
Li Auto, Inc.
|
$4.2B | $0.03 | 5.86% | -92.78% | $23.62 |
|
NIO
NIO, Inc.
|
$4.8B | $0.01 | 9603.47% | -810.1% | $6.52 |
|
XPEV
XPeng, Inc.
|
$3.2B | $0.02 | 5274.77% | -75.33% | $27.35 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GNZUF
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.
|
$0.48 | -- | $4.9B | 32.77x | $0.00 | 1.44% | 0.35x |
|
BYDDY
BYD Co., Ltd.
|
$12.26 | -- | $111.8B | 9.36x | $0.18 | 1.5% | 0.75x |
|
GWLLF
Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd.
|
$1.54 | -- | $13.2B | 10.95x | $0.06 | 4.07% | 0.43x |
|
LI
Li Auto, Inc.
|
$18.46 | $23.62 | $18.7B | 30.90x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.10x |
|
NIO
NIO, Inc.
|
$4.95 | $6.52 | $12.5B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.09x |
|
XPEV
XPeng, Inc.
|
$17.94 | $27.35 | $17.1B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.74x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GNZUF
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.
|
31.44% | -0.794 | 149.53% | 0.57x |
|
BYDDY
BYD Co., Ltd.
|
36.22% | -1.137 | 13.46% | 0.45x |
|
GWLLF
Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd.
|
-- | 0.401 | -- | 0.77x |
|
LI
Li Auto, Inc.
|
19.75% | 1.168 | 9.76% | 1.58x |
|
NIO
NIO, Inc.
|
88.28% | 1.404 | 19.45% | 0.56x |
|
XPEV
XPeng, Inc.
|
53.64% | -0.156 | 21.84% | 0.81x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GNZUF
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.
|
-$72.8M | -$541.9M | -3.36% | -4.79% | -15.95% | -$226.5M |
|
BYDDY
BYD Co., Ltd.
|
$4.8B | $800.1M | 13.92% | 18.57% | 2.94% | -$3.6B |
|
GWLLF
Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd.
|
-- | $237.5M | 7.64% | 11.71% | 2.43% | $1.4B |
|
LI
Li Auto, Inc.
|
$624.4M | -$178M | 5.09% | 6.47% | -4.66% | -$1B |
|
NIO
NIO, Inc.
|
$422.6M | -$496.1M | -53.96% | -203.88% | -16.29% | -- |
|
XPEV
XPeng, Inc.
|
$573.4M | -$114.2M | -5.12% | -9.19% | -4.01% | -$1.2B |
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GNZUF or BYDDY?
BYD Co., Ltd. has a net margin of -9.42% compared to Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 4.2%. Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of -4.79% beat BYD Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 18.57%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GNZUFGuangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.-2.14% -$0.02 $23.5B BYDDYBYD Co., Ltd.17.62% $0.12 $50.2B -
What do Analysts Say About GNZUF or BYDDY?
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BYD Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than BYD Co., Ltd., analysts believe Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. is more attractive than BYD Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GNZUFGuangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.0 0 0 BYDDYBYD Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is GNZUF or BYDDY More Risky?
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.037, which suggesting that the stock is 96.266% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BYD Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.207, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.305%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GNZUF or BYDDY?
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.44%. BYD Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. pays 63.02% of its earnings as a dividend. BYD Co., Ltd. pays out 23.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GNZUF or BYDDY?
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are smaller than BYD Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $27.2B. Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s net income of -$320M is lower than BYD Co., Ltd.'s net income of $1.1B. Notably, Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 32.77x while BYD Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 9.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. is 0.35x versus 0.75x for BYD Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GNZUFGuangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.0.35x 32.77x $3.4B -$320M BYDDYBYD Co., Ltd.0.75x 9.36x $27.2B $1.1B
-
Which has Higher Returns GNZUF or GWLLF?
Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd. has a net margin of -9.42% compared to Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 1.85%. Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of -4.79% beat Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 11.71%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GNZUFGuangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.-2.14% -$0.02 $23.5B GWLLFGreat Wall Motor Co., Ltd.-- -- $12.6B -
What do Analysts Say About GNZUF or GWLLF?
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd., analysts believe Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GNZUFGuangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.0 0 0 GWLLFGreat Wall Motor Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is GNZUF or GWLLF More Risky?
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.037, which suggesting that the stock is 96.266% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.146, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.415%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GNZUF or GWLLF?
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.44%. Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 4.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. pays 63.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd. pays out 27.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GNZUF or GWLLF?
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are smaller than Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $9.8B. Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s net income of -$320M is lower than Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd.'s net income of $180.1M. Notably, Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 32.77x while Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 10.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. is 0.35x versus 0.43x for Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GNZUFGuangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.0.35x 32.77x $3.4B -$320M GWLLFGreat Wall Motor Co., Ltd.0.43x 10.95x $9.8B $180.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns GNZUF or LI?
Li Auto, Inc. has a net margin of -9.42% compared to Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s net margin of -2.28%. Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of -4.79% beat Li Auto, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.47%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GNZUFGuangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.-2.14% -$0.02 $23.5B LILi Auto, Inc.16.33% -$0.09 $12.8B -
What do Analysts Say About GNZUF or LI?
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Li Auto, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $23.62 which suggests that it could grow by 27.97%. Given that Li Auto, Inc. has higher upside potential than Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd., analysts believe Li Auto, Inc. is more attractive than Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GNZUFGuangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.0 0 0 LILi Auto, Inc.9 11 2 -
Is GNZUF or LI More Risky?
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.037, which suggesting that the stock is 96.266% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Li Auto, Inc. has a beta of 0.581, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.919%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GNZUF or LI?
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.44%. Li Auto, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. pays 63.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Li Auto, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GNZUF or LI?
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are smaller than Li Auto, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.8B. Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s net income of -$320M is lower than Li Auto, Inc.'s net income of -$87.2M. Notably, Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 32.77x while Li Auto, Inc.'s PE ratio is 30.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. is 0.35x versus 1.10x for Li Auto, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GNZUFGuangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.0.35x 32.77x $3.4B -$320M LILi Auto, Inc.1.10x 30.90x $3.8B -$87.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns GNZUF or NIO?
NIO, Inc. has a net margin of -9.42% compared to Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s net margin of -16.68%. Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of -4.79% beat NIO, Inc.'s return on equity of -203.88%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GNZUFGuangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.-2.14% -$0.02 $23.5B NIONIO, Inc.13.88% -$0.21 $5.6B -
What do Analysts Say About GNZUF or NIO?
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NIO, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.52 which suggests that it could grow by 31.81%. Given that NIO, Inc. has higher upside potential than Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd., analysts believe NIO, Inc. is more attractive than Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GNZUFGuangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.0 0 0 NIONIO, Inc.11 10 1 -
Is GNZUF or NIO More Risky?
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.037, which suggesting that the stock is 96.266% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NIO, Inc. has a beta of 1.096, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.626%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GNZUF or NIO?
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.44%. NIO, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. pays 63.02% of its earnings as a dividend. NIO, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GNZUF or NIO?
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than NIO, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3B. Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s net income of -$320M is higher than NIO, Inc.'s net income of -$508M. Notably, Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 32.77x while NIO, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. is 0.35x versus 1.09x for NIO, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GNZUFGuangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.0.35x 32.77x $3.4B -$320M NIONIO, Inc.1.09x -- $3B -$508M
-
Which has Higher Returns GNZUF or XPEV?
XPeng, Inc. has a net margin of -9.42% compared to Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s net margin of -1.87%. Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of -4.79% beat XPeng, Inc.'s return on equity of -9.19%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GNZUFGuangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.-2.14% -$0.02 $23.5B XPEVXPeng, Inc.20.14% -$0.06 $9.1B -
What do Analysts Say About GNZUF or XPEV?
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand XPeng, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $27.35 which suggests that it could grow by 52.49%. Given that XPeng, Inc. has higher upside potential than Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd., analysts believe XPeng, Inc. is more attractive than Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GNZUFGuangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.0 0 0 XPEVXPeng, Inc.17 4 0 -
Is GNZUF or XPEV More Risky?
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.037, which suggesting that the stock is 96.266% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison XPeng, Inc. has a beta of 1.159, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.89%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GNZUF or XPEV?
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.44%. XPeng, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. pays 63.02% of its earnings as a dividend. XPeng, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GNZUF or XPEV?
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than XPeng, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s net income of -$320M is lower than XPeng, Inc.'s net income of -$53.2M. Notably, Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 32.77x while XPeng, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. is 0.35x versus 1.74x for XPeng, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GNZUFGuangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd.0.35x 32.77x $3.4B -$320M XPEVXPeng, Inc.1.74x -- $2.8B -$53.2M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Is Sandisk The Next Big Memory Stock?
Computer memory manufacturer Sandisk (NASDAQ:SNDK) has quietly been one of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Sell
43
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Sell
44
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Buy
77
CPS alert for Feb 14
Cooper-Standard Holdings, Inc. [CPS] is up 32.06% over the past day.
Buy
58
TPH alert for Feb 14
Tri Pointe Homes, Inc. [TPH] is up 26.83% over the past day.
Sell
20
IRON alert for Feb 14
Disc Medicine, Inc. [IRON] is down 21.88% over the past day.
