BYDDY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Li Auto has a net margin of 5.77% compared to BYD's net margin of 6.56%. BYD's return on equity of 21.94% beat Li Auto's return on equity of 16.5%.

BYD has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Li Auto has an analysts' consensus of $29.96 which suggests that it could grow by 22.57%. Given that Li Auto has higher upside potential than BYD, analysts believe Li Auto is more attractive than BYD.

BYD has a beta of 0.290, which suggesting that the stock is 70.967% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Li Auto has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

BYD has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. Li Auto offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BYD pays 13.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Li Auto pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BYD's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BYD quarterly revenues are $28.1B, which are larger than Li Auto quarterly revenues of $6B. BYD's net income of $1.6B is higher than Li Auto's net income of $393.1M. Notably, BYD's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.92x while Li Auto's PE ratio is 18.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BYD is 1.09x versus 1.32x for Li Auto. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NIO has a net margin of 5.77% compared to BYD's net margin of -27.53%. BYD's return on equity of 21.94% beat NIO's return on equity of -98.45%.

BYD has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NIO has an analysts' consensus of $6.32 which suggests that it could grow by 36.7%. Given that NIO has higher upside potential than BYD, analysts believe NIO is more attractive than BYD.

BYD has a beta of 0.290, which suggesting that the stock is 70.967% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NIO has a beta of 1.769, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.919%.

BYD has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. NIO offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BYD pays 13.23% of its earnings as a dividend. NIO pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BYD's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BYD quarterly revenues are $28.1B, which are larger than NIO quarterly revenues of $2.6B. BYD's net income of $1.6B is higher than NIO's net income of -$718.1M. Notably, BYD's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.92x while NIO's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BYD is 1.09x versus 1.04x for NIO. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

XPeng has a net margin of 5.77% compared to BYD's net margin of -17.9%. BYD's return on equity of 21.94% beat XPeng's return on equity of -17.41%.

BYD has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand XPeng has an analysts' consensus of $14.36 which suggests that it could grow by 10.6%. Given that XPeng has higher upside potential than BYD, analysts believe XPeng is more attractive than BYD.

BYD has a beta of 0.290, which suggesting that the stock is 70.967% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison XPeng has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

BYD has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. XPeng offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BYD pays 13.23% of its earnings as a dividend. XPeng pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BYD's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BYD quarterly revenues are $28.1B, which are larger than XPeng quarterly revenues of $1.4B. BYD's net income of $1.6B is higher than XPeng's net income of -$252.5M. Notably, BYD's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.92x while XPeng's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BYD is 1.09x versus 2.30x for XPeng. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding has a net margin of 5.77% compared to BYD's net margin of -6.68%. BYD's return on equity of 21.94% beat ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding's return on equity of --.

BYD has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding has an analysts' consensus of $34.69 which suggests that it could grow by 16.67%. Given that ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding has higher upside potential than BYD, analysts believe ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding is more attractive than BYD.

BYD has a beta of 0.290, which suggesting that the stock is 70.967% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

BYD has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BYD pays 13.23% of its earnings as a dividend. ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BYD's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BYD quarterly revenues are $28.1B, which are larger than ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding quarterly revenues of $2.6B. BYD's net income of $1.6B is higher than ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding's net income of -$171.3M. Notably, BYD's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.92x while ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BYD is 1.09x versus 0.75x for ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.