LI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hesai Group has a net margin of -2.28% compared to Li Auto, Inc.'s net margin of 32.21%. Li Auto, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.22% beat Hesai Group's return on equity of 8.34%.

Li Auto, Inc. has a consensus price target of $24.68, signalling upside risk potential of 40.28%. On the other hand Hesai Group has an analysts' consensus of $29.82 which suggests that it could grow by 49.19%. Given that Hesai Group has higher upside potential than Li Auto, Inc., analysts believe Hesai Group is more attractive than Li Auto, Inc..

Li Auto, Inc. has a beta of 0.497, which suggesting that the stock is 50.336% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hesai Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Li Auto, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hesai Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Li Auto, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hesai Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Li Auto, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are larger than Hesai Group quarterly revenues of $111.1M. Li Auto, Inc.'s net income of -$87.8M is lower than Hesai Group's net income of $35.8M. Notably, Li Auto, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.61x while Hesai Group's PE ratio is 45.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Li Auto, Inc. is 1.06x versus 7.07x for Hesai Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NIO, Inc. has a net margin of -2.28% compared to Li Auto, Inc.'s net margin of -16.68%. Li Auto, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.22% beat NIO, Inc.'s return on equity of -205.77%.

Li Auto, Inc. has a consensus price target of $24.68, signalling upside risk potential of 40.28%. On the other hand NIO, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.75 which suggests that it could grow by 34.64%. Given that Li Auto, Inc. has higher upside potential than NIO, Inc., analysts believe Li Auto, Inc. is more attractive than NIO, Inc..

Li Auto, Inc. has a beta of 0.497, which suggesting that the stock is 50.336% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NIO, Inc. has a beta of 1.039, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.908%.

Li Auto, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NIO, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Li Auto, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NIO, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Li Auto, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are larger than NIO, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Li Auto, Inc.'s net income of -$87.8M is higher than NIO, Inc.'s net income of -$511.4M. Notably, Li Auto, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.61x while NIO, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Li Auto, Inc. is 1.06x versus 1.11x for NIO, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla, Inc. has a net margin of -2.28% compared to Li Auto, Inc.'s net margin of 4.94%. Li Auto, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.22% beat Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.04%.

Li Auto, Inc. has a consensus price target of $24.68, signalling upside risk potential of 40.28%. On the other hand Tesla, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $392.93 which suggests that it could fall by -13.55%. Given that Li Auto, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tesla, Inc., analysts believe Li Auto, Inc. is more attractive than Tesla, Inc..

Li Auto, Inc. has a beta of 0.497, which suggesting that the stock is 50.336% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.874, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.392%.

Li Auto, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Li Auto, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Li Auto, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are smaller than Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues of $28.1B. Li Auto, Inc.'s net income of -$87.8M is lower than Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $1.4B. Notably, Li Auto, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.61x while Tesla, Inc.'s PE ratio is 303.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Li Auto, Inc. is 1.06x versus 16.73x for Tesla, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

XPeng, Inc. has a net margin of -2.28% compared to Li Auto, Inc.'s net margin of -1.87%. Li Auto, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.22% beat XPeng, Inc.'s return on equity of -9.19%.

Li Auto, Inc. has a consensus price target of $24.68, signalling upside risk potential of 40.28%. On the other hand XPeng, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $28.29 which suggests that it could grow by 45.06%. Given that XPeng, Inc. has higher upside potential than Li Auto, Inc., analysts believe XPeng, Inc. is more attractive than Li Auto, Inc..

Li Auto, Inc. has a beta of 0.497, which suggesting that the stock is 50.336% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison XPeng, Inc. has a beta of 1.054, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.397%.

Li Auto, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. XPeng, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Li Auto, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. XPeng, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Li Auto, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are larger than XPeng, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Li Auto, Inc.'s net income of -$87.8M is lower than XPeng, Inc.'s net income of -$53.2M. Notably, Li Auto, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.61x while XPeng, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Li Auto, Inc. is 1.06x versus 1.89x for XPeng, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.