LI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd. has a net margin of -2.28% compared to Li Auto, Inc.'s net margin of 1.85%. Li Auto, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.47% beat Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 11.71%.

Li Auto, Inc. has a consensus price target of $23.85, signalling upside risk potential of 43.44%. On the other hand Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Li Auto, Inc. has higher upside potential than Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd., analysts believe Li Auto, Inc. is more attractive than Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd..

Li Auto, Inc. has a beta of 0.557, which suggesting that the stock is 44.286% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.173, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.693%.

Li Auto, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 3.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Li Auto, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd. pays out 27.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Li Auto, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are smaller than Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $9.8B. Li Auto, Inc.'s net income of -$87.2M is lower than Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd.'s net income of $180.1M. Notably, Li Auto, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.84x while Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 12.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Li Auto, Inc. is 0.99x versus 0.49x for Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NIO, Inc. has a net margin of -2.28% compared to Li Auto, Inc.'s net margin of -16.68%. Li Auto, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.47% beat NIO, Inc.'s return on equity of -203.88%.

Li Auto, Inc. has a consensus price target of $23.85, signalling upside risk potential of 43.44%. On the other hand NIO, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.66 which suggests that it could grow by 41.52%. Given that Li Auto, Inc. has higher upside potential than NIO, Inc., analysts believe Li Auto, Inc. is more attractive than NIO, Inc..

Li Auto, Inc. has a beta of 0.557, which suggesting that the stock is 44.286% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NIO, Inc. has a beta of 1.055, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.517%.

Li Auto, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NIO, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Li Auto, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NIO, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Li Auto, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are larger than NIO, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3B. Li Auto, Inc.'s net income of -$87.2M is higher than NIO, Inc.'s net income of -$508M. Notably, Li Auto, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.84x while NIO, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Li Auto, Inc. is 0.99x versus 1.03x for NIO, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla, Inc. has a net margin of -2.28% compared to Li Auto, Inc.'s net margin of 3.44%. Li Auto, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.47% beat Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.93%.

Li Auto, Inc. has a consensus price target of $23.85, signalling upside risk potential of 43.44%. On the other hand Tesla, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $413.12 which suggests that it could fall by -4.02%. Given that Li Auto, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tesla, Inc., analysts believe Li Auto, Inc. is more attractive than Tesla, Inc..

Li Auto, Inc. has a beta of 0.557, which suggesting that the stock is 44.286% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.831, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.075%.

Li Auto, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Li Auto, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Li Auto, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are smaller than Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues of $24.9B. Li Auto, Inc.'s net income of -$87.2M is lower than Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $856M. Notably, Li Auto, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.84x while Tesla, Inc.'s PE ratio is 400.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Li Auto, Inc. is 0.99x versus 16.01x for Tesla, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

XPeng, Inc. has a net margin of -2.28% compared to Li Auto, Inc.'s net margin of -1.87%. Li Auto, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.47% beat XPeng, Inc.'s return on equity of -9.19%.

Li Auto, Inc. has a consensus price target of $23.85, signalling upside risk potential of 43.44%. On the other hand XPeng, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $28.16 which suggests that it could grow by 56.6%. Given that XPeng, Inc. has higher upside potential than Li Auto, Inc., analysts believe XPeng, Inc. is more attractive than Li Auto, Inc..

Li Auto, Inc. has a beta of 0.557, which suggesting that the stock is 44.286% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison XPeng, Inc. has a beta of 1.134, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.353%.

Li Auto, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. XPeng, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Li Auto, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. XPeng, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Li Auto, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are larger than XPeng, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Li Auto, Inc.'s net income of -$87.2M is lower than XPeng, Inc.'s net income of -$53.2M. Notably, Li Auto, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.84x while XPeng, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Li Auto, Inc. is 0.99x versus 1.75x for XPeng, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.