XPEV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

JD.com, Inc. has a net margin of -1.87% compared to XPeng, Inc.'s net margin of 2.13%. XPeng, Inc.'s return on equity of -9.19% beat JD.com, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.48%.

XPeng, Inc. has a consensus price target of $28.29, signalling upside risk potential of 49.9%. On the other hand JD.com, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $43.37 which suggests that it could grow by 45.18%. Given that XPeng, Inc. has higher upside potential than JD.com, Inc., analysts believe XPeng, Inc. is more attractive than JD.com, Inc..

XPeng, Inc. has a beta of 1.054, which suggesting that the stock is 5.397% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JD.com, Inc. has a beta of 0.402, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.758%.

XPeng, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. JD.com, Inc. offers a yield of 3.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. XPeng, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. JD.com, Inc. pays out 26.59% of its earnings as a dividend. JD.com, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

XPeng, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are smaller than JD.com, Inc. quarterly revenues of $42.1B. XPeng, Inc.'s net income of -$53.2M is lower than JD.com, Inc.'s net income of $897.2M. Notably, XPeng, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while JD.com, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for XPeng, Inc. is 1.83x versus 0.25x for JD.com, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Li Auto, Inc. has a net margin of -1.87% compared to XPeng, Inc.'s net margin of -2.28%. XPeng, Inc.'s return on equity of -9.19% beat Li Auto, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.22%.

XPeng, Inc. has a consensus price target of $28.29, signalling upside risk potential of 49.9%. On the other hand Li Auto, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $24.68 which suggests that it could grow by 43.79%. Given that XPeng, Inc. has higher upside potential than Li Auto, Inc., analysts believe XPeng, Inc. is more attractive than Li Auto, Inc..

XPeng, Inc. has a beta of 1.054, which suggesting that the stock is 5.397% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Li Auto, Inc. has a beta of 0.497, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.336%.

XPeng, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Li Auto, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. XPeng, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Li Auto, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

XPeng, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are smaller than Li Auto, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.8B. XPeng, Inc.'s net income of -$53.2M is higher than Li Auto, Inc.'s net income of -$87.8M. Notably, XPeng, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Li Auto, Inc.'s PE ratio is 30.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for XPeng, Inc. is 1.83x versus 1.06x for Li Auto, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NIO, Inc. has a net margin of -1.87% compared to XPeng, Inc.'s net margin of -16.68%. XPeng, Inc.'s return on equity of -9.19% beat NIO, Inc.'s return on equity of -205.77%.

XPeng, Inc. has a consensus price target of $28.29, signalling upside risk potential of 49.9%. On the other hand NIO, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.75 which suggests that it could grow by 40.83%. Given that XPeng, Inc. has higher upside potential than NIO, Inc., analysts believe XPeng, Inc. is more attractive than NIO, Inc..

XPeng, Inc. has a beta of 1.054, which suggesting that the stock is 5.397% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NIO, Inc. has a beta of 1.039, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.908%.

XPeng, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NIO, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. XPeng, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NIO, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

XPeng, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are smaller than NIO, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.1B. XPeng, Inc.'s net income of -$53.2M is higher than NIO, Inc.'s net income of -$511.4M. Notably, XPeng, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NIO, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for XPeng, Inc. is 1.83x versus 1.06x for NIO, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla, Inc. has a net margin of -1.87% compared to XPeng, Inc.'s net margin of 4.94%. XPeng, Inc.'s return on equity of -9.19% beat Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.04%.

XPeng, Inc. has a consensus price target of $28.29, signalling upside risk potential of 49.9%. On the other hand Tesla, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $392.93 which suggests that it could fall by -12.05%. Given that XPeng, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tesla, Inc., analysts believe XPeng, Inc. is more attractive than Tesla, Inc..

XPeng, Inc. has a beta of 1.054, which suggesting that the stock is 5.397% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.874, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.392%.

XPeng, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. XPeng, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

XPeng, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are smaller than Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues of $28.1B. XPeng, Inc.'s net income of -$53.2M is lower than Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $1.4B. Notably, XPeng, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tesla, Inc.'s PE ratio is 298.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for XPeng, Inc. is 1.83x versus 16.45x for Tesla, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.