XPEV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

JD.com, Inc. has a net margin of -1.87% compared to XPeng, Inc.'s net margin of 2.13%. XPeng, Inc.'s return on equity of -9.19% beat JD.com, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.51%.

XPeng, Inc. has a consensus price target of $28.38, signalling upside risk potential of 44.04%. On the other hand JD.com, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $42.81 which suggests that it could grow by 47.21%. Given that JD.com, Inc. has higher upside potential than XPeng, Inc., analysts believe JD.com, Inc. is more attractive than XPeng, Inc..

XPeng, Inc. has a beta of 1.054, which suggesting that the stock is 5.397% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JD.com, Inc. has a beta of 0.402, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.758%.

XPeng, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. JD.com, Inc. offers a yield of 3.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. XPeng, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. JD.com, Inc. pays out 26.23% of its earnings as a dividend. JD.com, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

XPeng, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are smaller than JD.com, Inc. quarterly revenues of $41.8B. XPeng, Inc.'s net income of -$53.2M is lower than JD.com, Inc.'s net income of $891.5M. Notably, XPeng, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while JD.com, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for XPeng, Inc. is 1.91x versus 0.24x for JD.com, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Li Auto, Inc. has a net margin of -1.87% compared to XPeng, Inc.'s net margin of -2.28%. XPeng, Inc.'s return on equity of -9.19% beat Li Auto, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.47%.

XPeng, Inc. has a consensus price target of $28.38, signalling upside risk potential of 44.04%. On the other hand Li Auto, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $24.51 which suggests that it could grow by 46.88%. Given that Li Auto, Inc. has higher upside potential than XPeng, Inc., analysts believe Li Auto, Inc. is more attractive than XPeng, Inc..

XPeng, Inc. has a beta of 1.054, which suggesting that the stock is 5.397% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Li Auto, Inc. has a beta of 0.497, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.336%.

XPeng, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Li Auto, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. XPeng, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Li Auto, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

XPeng, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are smaller than Li Auto, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.8B. XPeng, Inc.'s net income of -$53.2M is higher than Li Auto, Inc.'s net income of -$87.2M. Notably, XPeng, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Li Auto, Inc.'s PE ratio is 27.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for XPeng, Inc. is 1.91x versus 0.99x for Li Auto, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NIO, Inc. has a net margin of -1.87% compared to XPeng, Inc.'s net margin of -16.68%. XPeng, Inc.'s return on equity of -9.19% beat NIO, Inc.'s return on equity of -203.88%.

XPeng, Inc. has a consensus price target of $28.38, signalling upside risk potential of 44.04%. On the other hand NIO, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.66 which suggests that it could grow by 36.25%. Given that XPeng, Inc. has higher upside potential than NIO, Inc., analysts believe XPeng, Inc. is more attractive than NIO, Inc..

XPeng, Inc. has a beta of 1.054, which suggesting that the stock is 5.397% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NIO, Inc. has a beta of 1.039, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.908%.

XPeng, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NIO, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. XPeng, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NIO, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

XPeng, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are smaller than NIO, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3B. XPeng, Inc.'s net income of -$53.2M is higher than NIO, Inc.'s net income of -$508M. Notably, XPeng, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NIO, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for XPeng, Inc. is 1.91x versus 1.08x for NIO, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla, Inc. has a net margin of -1.87% compared to XPeng, Inc.'s net margin of 4.94%. XPeng, Inc.'s return on equity of -9.19% beat Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.04%.

XPeng, Inc. has a consensus price target of $28.38, signalling upside risk potential of 44.04%. On the other hand Tesla, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $399.15 which suggests that it could fall by -17.8%. Given that XPeng, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tesla, Inc., analysts believe XPeng, Inc. is more attractive than Tesla, Inc..

XPeng, Inc. has a beta of 1.054, which suggesting that the stock is 5.397% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.874, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.392%.

XPeng, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. XPeng, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

XPeng, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are smaller than Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues of $28.1B. XPeng, Inc.'s net income of -$53.2M is lower than Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $1.4B. Notably, XPeng, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tesla, Inc.'s PE ratio is 324.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for XPeng, Inc. is 1.91x versus 17.88x for Tesla, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.