XPEV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Li Auto has a net margin of -17.9% compared to XPeng's net margin of 6.56%. XPeng's return on equity of -17.41% beat Li Auto's return on equity of 16.5%.

XPeng has a consensus price target of $14.36, signalling upside risk potential of 13.57%. On the other hand Li Auto has an analysts' consensus of $29.96 which suggests that it could grow by 27.14%. Given that Li Auto has higher upside potential than XPeng, analysts believe Li Auto is more attractive than XPeng.

XPeng has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Li Auto has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

XPeng has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Li Auto offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. XPeng pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Li Auto pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

XPeng quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Li Auto quarterly revenues of $6B. XPeng's net income of -$252.5M is lower than Li Auto's net income of $393.1M. Notably, XPeng's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Li Auto's PE ratio is 17.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for XPeng is 2.24x versus 1.27x for Li Auto. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NIO has a net margin of -17.9% compared to XPeng's net margin of -27.53%. XPeng's return on equity of -17.41% beat NIO's return on equity of -98.45%.

XPeng has a consensus price target of $14.36, signalling upside risk potential of 13.57%. On the other hand NIO has an analysts' consensus of $6.32 which suggests that it could grow by 39.31%. Given that NIO has higher upside potential than XPeng, analysts believe NIO is more attractive than XPeng.

XPeng has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NIO has a beta of 1.769, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.919%.

XPeng has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NIO offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. XPeng pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NIO pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

XPeng quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than NIO quarterly revenues of $2.6B. XPeng's net income of -$252.5M is higher than NIO's net income of -$718.1M. Notably, XPeng's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NIO's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for XPeng is 2.24x versus 1.02x for NIO. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of -17.9% compared to XPeng's net margin of 8.61%. XPeng's return on equity of -17.41% beat Tesla's return on equity of 19.77%.

XPeng has a consensus price target of $14.36, signalling upside risk potential of 13.57%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $283.88 which suggests that it could fall by -32.58%. Given that XPeng has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe XPeng is more attractive than Tesla.

XPeng has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.361, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 136.098%.

XPeng has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. XPeng pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

XPeng quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.2B. XPeng's net income of -$252.5M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.2B. Notably, XPeng's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tesla's PE ratio is 115.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for XPeng is 2.24x versus 15.13x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding has a net margin of -17.9% compared to XPeng's net margin of -6.68%. XPeng's return on equity of -17.41% beat ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding's return on equity of --.

XPeng has a consensus price target of $14.36, signalling upside risk potential of 13.57%. On the other hand ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding has an analysts' consensus of $34.69 which suggests that it could grow by 25.9%. Given that ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding has higher upside potential than XPeng, analysts believe ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding is more attractive than XPeng.

XPeng has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

XPeng has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. XPeng pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

XPeng quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding quarterly revenues of $2.6B. XPeng's net income of -$252.5M is lower than ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding's net income of -$171.3M. Notably, XPeng's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for XPeng is 2.24x versus 0.70x for ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.