XPEV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BYD Co., Ltd. has a net margin of -1.87% compared to XPeng, Inc.'s net margin of 4.2%. XPeng, Inc.'s return on equity of -9.19% beat BYD Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 18.57%.

XPeng, Inc. has a consensus price target of $28.16, signalling upside risk potential of 49.85%. On the other hand BYD Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that XPeng, Inc. has higher upside potential than BYD Co., Ltd., analysts believe XPeng, Inc. is more attractive than BYD Co., Ltd..

XPeng, Inc. has a beta of 1.134, which suggesting that the stock is 13.353% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BYD Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.178, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.153%.

XPeng, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BYD Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 1.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. XPeng, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BYD Co., Ltd. pays out 23.41% of its earnings as a dividend. BYD Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

XPeng, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are smaller than BYD Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $27.2B. XPeng, Inc.'s net income of -$53.2M is lower than BYD Co., Ltd.'s net income of $1.1B. Notably, XPeng, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BYD Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 9.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for XPeng, Inc. is 1.83x versus 0.80x for BYD Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Li Auto, Inc. has a net margin of -1.87% compared to XPeng, Inc.'s net margin of -2.28%. XPeng, Inc.'s return on equity of -9.19% beat Li Auto, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.47%.

XPeng, Inc. has a consensus price target of $28.16, signalling upside risk potential of 49.85%. On the other hand Li Auto, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $23.85 which suggests that it could grow by 39.09%. Given that XPeng, Inc. has higher upside potential than Li Auto, Inc., analysts believe XPeng, Inc. is more attractive than Li Auto, Inc..

XPeng, Inc. has a beta of 1.134, which suggesting that the stock is 13.353% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Li Auto, Inc. has a beta of 0.557, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.286%.

XPeng, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Li Auto, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. XPeng, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Li Auto, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

XPeng, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are smaller than Li Auto, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.8B. XPeng, Inc.'s net income of -$53.2M is higher than Li Auto, Inc.'s net income of -$87.2M. Notably, XPeng, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Li Auto, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for XPeng, Inc. is 1.83x versus 1.02x for Li Auto, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NIO, Inc. has a net margin of -1.87% compared to XPeng, Inc.'s net margin of -16.68%. XPeng, Inc.'s return on equity of -9.19% beat NIO, Inc.'s return on equity of -203.88%.

XPeng, Inc. has a consensus price target of $28.16, signalling upside risk potential of 49.85%. On the other hand NIO, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.66 which suggests that it could grow by 44.91%. Given that XPeng, Inc. has higher upside potential than NIO, Inc., analysts believe XPeng, Inc. is more attractive than NIO, Inc..

XPeng, Inc. has a beta of 1.134, which suggesting that the stock is 13.353% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NIO, Inc. has a beta of 1.055, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.517%.

XPeng, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NIO, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. XPeng, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NIO, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

XPeng, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are smaller than NIO, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3B. XPeng, Inc.'s net income of -$53.2M is higher than NIO, Inc.'s net income of -$508M. Notably, XPeng, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NIO, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for XPeng, Inc. is 1.83x versus 1.01x for NIO, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla, Inc. has a net margin of -1.87% compared to XPeng, Inc.'s net margin of 4.94%. XPeng, Inc.'s return on equity of -9.19% beat Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.04%.

XPeng, Inc. has a consensus price target of $28.16, signalling upside risk potential of 49.85%. On the other hand Tesla, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $411.40 which suggests that it could fall by -4.65%. Given that XPeng, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tesla, Inc., analysts believe XPeng, Inc. is more attractive than Tesla, Inc..

XPeng, Inc. has a beta of 1.134, which suggesting that the stock is 13.353% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.831, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.075%.

XPeng, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. XPeng, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

XPeng, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are smaller than Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues of $28.1B. XPeng, Inc.'s net income of -$53.2M is lower than Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $1.4B. Notably, XPeng, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tesla, Inc.'s PE ratio is 288.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for XPeng, Inc. is 1.83x versus 15.88x for Tesla, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.