XPEV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Li Auto, Inc. has a net margin of -1.87% compared to XPeng, Inc.'s net margin of -2.28%. XPeng, Inc.'s return on equity of -9.19% beat Li Auto, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.47%.

XPeng, Inc. has a consensus price target of $26.91, signalling upside risk potential of 51.62%. On the other hand Li Auto, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $23.62 which suggests that it could grow by 28.41%. Given that XPeng, Inc. has higher upside potential than Li Auto, Inc., analysts believe XPeng, Inc. is more attractive than Li Auto, Inc..

XPeng, Inc. has a beta of 1.159, which suggesting that the stock is 15.89% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Li Auto, Inc. has a beta of 0.581, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.919%.

XPeng, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Li Auto, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. XPeng, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Li Auto, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

XPeng, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are smaller than Li Auto, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.8B. XPeng, Inc.'s net income of -$53.2M is higher than Li Auto, Inc.'s net income of -$87.2M. Notably, XPeng, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Li Auto, Inc.'s PE ratio is 30.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for XPeng, Inc. is 1.72x versus 1.09x for Li Auto, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NIO, Inc. has a net margin of -1.87% compared to XPeng, Inc.'s net margin of -16.68%. XPeng, Inc.'s return on equity of -9.19% beat NIO, Inc.'s return on equity of -203.88%.

XPeng, Inc. has a consensus price target of $26.91, signalling upside risk potential of 51.62%. On the other hand NIO, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.52 which suggests that it could grow by 32.34%. Given that XPeng, Inc. has higher upside potential than NIO, Inc., analysts believe XPeng, Inc. is more attractive than NIO, Inc..

XPeng, Inc. has a beta of 1.159, which suggesting that the stock is 15.89% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NIO, Inc. has a beta of 1.096, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.626%.

XPeng, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NIO, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. XPeng, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NIO, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

XPeng, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are smaller than NIO, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3B. XPeng, Inc.'s net income of -$53.2M is higher than NIO, Inc.'s net income of -$508M. Notably, XPeng, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NIO, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for XPeng, Inc. is 1.72x versus 1.08x for NIO, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Niu Technologies has a net margin of -1.87% compared to XPeng, Inc.'s net margin of 4.82%. XPeng, Inc.'s return on equity of -9.19% beat Niu Technologies's return on equity of -2.44%.

XPeng, Inc. has a consensus price target of $26.91, signalling upside risk potential of 51.62%. On the other hand Niu Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $4.65 which suggests that it could grow by 35.03%. Given that XPeng, Inc. has higher upside potential than Niu Technologies, analysts believe XPeng, Inc. is more attractive than Niu Technologies.

XPeng, Inc. has a beta of 1.159, which suggesting that the stock is 15.89% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Niu Technologies has a beta of -0.237, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 123.667%.

XPeng, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Niu Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. XPeng, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Niu Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

XPeng, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Niu Technologies quarterly revenues of $236.7M. XPeng, Inc.'s net income of -$53.2M is lower than Niu Technologies's net income of $11.4M. Notably, XPeng, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Niu Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for XPeng, Inc. is 1.72x versus 0.45x for Niu Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla, Inc. has a net margin of -1.87% compared to XPeng, Inc.'s net margin of 3.44%. XPeng, Inc.'s return on equity of -9.19% beat Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.93%.

XPeng, Inc. has a consensus price target of $26.91, signalling upside risk potential of 51.62%. On the other hand Tesla, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $421.73 which suggests that it could grow by 2.43%. Given that XPeng, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tesla, Inc., analysts believe XPeng, Inc. is more attractive than Tesla, Inc..

XPeng, Inc. has a beta of 1.159, which suggesting that the stock is 15.89% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.858, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.812%.

XPeng, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. XPeng, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

XPeng, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are smaller than Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues of $24.9B. XPeng, Inc.'s net income of -$53.2M is lower than Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $856M. Notably, XPeng, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tesla, Inc.'s PE ratio is 382.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for XPeng, Inc. is 1.72x versus 15.31x for Tesla, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.