NIO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Li Auto, Inc. has a net margin of -16.68% compared to NIO, Inc.'s net margin of -2.28%. NIO, Inc.'s return on equity of -203.88% beat Li Auto, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.47%.

NIO, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.66, signalling upside risk potential of 33.25%. On the other hand Li Auto, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $24.51 which suggests that it could grow by 44.37%. Given that Li Auto, Inc. has higher upside potential than NIO, Inc., analysts believe Li Auto, Inc. is more attractive than NIO, Inc..

NIO, Inc. has a beta of 1.039, which suggesting that the stock is 3.908% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Li Auto, Inc. has a beta of 0.497, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.336%.

NIO, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Li Auto, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NIO, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Li Auto, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NIO, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than Li Auto, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.8B. NIO, Inc.'s net income of -$508M is lower than Li Auto, Inc.'s net income of -$87.2M. Notably, NIO, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Li Auto, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NIO, Inc. is 1.10x versus 1.01x for Li Auto, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

QuantumScape Corp. has a net margin of -16.68% compared to NIO, Inc.'s net margin of --. NIO, Inc.'s return on equity of -203.88% beat QuantumScape Corp.'s return on equity of -40.02%.

NIO, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.66, signalling upside risk potential of 33.25%. On the other hand QuantumScape Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $9.89 which suggests that it could fall by -14.08%. Given that NIO, Inc. has higher upside potential than QuantumScape Corp., analysts believe NIO, Inc. is more attractive than QuantumScape Corp..

NIO, Inc. has a beta of 1.039, which suggesting that the stock is 3.908% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison QuantumScape Corp. has a beta of 2.757, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 175.734%.

NIO, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. QuantumScape Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NIO, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. QuantumScape Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NIO, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3B, which are larger than QuantumScape Corp. quarterly revenues of --. NIO, Inc.'s net income of -$508M is lower than QuantumScape Corp.'s net income of -$105.8M. Notably, NIO, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while QuantumScape Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NIO, Inc. is 1.10x versus -- for QuantumScape Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla, Inc. has a net margin of -16.68% compared to NIO, Inc.'s net margin of 4.94%. NIO, Inc.'s return on equity of -203.88% beat Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.04%.

NIO, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.66, signalling upside risk potential of 33.25%. On the other hand Tesla, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $399.15 which suggests that it could fall by -18.68%. Given that NIO, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tesla, Inc., analysts believe NIO, Inc. is more attractive than Tesla, Inc..

NIO, Inc. has a beta of 1.039, which suggesting that the stock is 3.908% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.874, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.392%.

NIO, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NIO, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NIO, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues of $28.1B. NIO, Inc.'s net income of -$508M is lower than Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $1.4B. Notably, NIO, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tesla, Inc.'s PE ratio is 326.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NIO, Inc. is 1.10x versus 17.99x for Tesla, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

XPeng, Inc. has a net margin of -16.68% compared to NIO, Inc.'s net margin of -1.87%. NIO, Inc.'s return on equity of -203.88% beat XPeng, Inc.'s return on equity of -9.19%.

NIO, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.66, signalling upside risk potential of 33.25%. On the other hand XPeng, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $28.38 which suggests that it could grow by 41.74%. Given that XPeng, Inc. has higher upside potential than NIO, Inc., analysts believe XPeng, Inc. is more attractive than NIO, Inc..

NIO, Inc. has a beta of 1.039, which suggesting that the stock is 3.908% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison XPeng, Inc. has a beta of 1.054, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.397%.

NIO, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. XPeng, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NIO, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. XPeng, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NIO, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3B, which are larger than XPeng, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.8B. NIO, Inc.'s net income of -$508M is lower than XPeng, Inc.'s net income of -$53.2M. Notably, NIO, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while XPeng, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NIO, Inc. is 1.10x versus 1.94x for XPeng, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.