NIO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Motors Co. has a net margin of -16.68% compared to NIO, Inc.'s net margin of -7.2%. NIO, Inc.'s return on equity of -203.88% beat General Motors Co.'s return on equity of 4.19%.

NIO, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.52, signalling upside risk potential of 32.34%. On the other hand General Motors Co. has an analysts' consensus of $94.63 which suggests that it could grow by 16.15%. Given that NIO, Inc. has higher upside potential than General Motors Co., analysts believe NIO, Inc. is more attractive than General Motors Co..

NIO, Inc. has a beta of 1.096, which suggesting that the stock is 9.626% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Motors Co. has a beta of 1.363, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.25%.

NIO, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. General Motors Co. offers a yield of 0.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. NIO, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors Co. pays out 17.44% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NIO, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than General Motors Co. quarterly revenues of $45.3B. NIO, Inc.'s net income of -$508M is higher than General Motors Co.'s net income of -$3.3B. Notably, NIO, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while General Motors Co.'s PE ratio is 27.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NIO, Inc. is 1.08x versus 0.43x for General Motors Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Li Auto, Inc. has a net margin of -16.68% compared to NIO, Inc.'s net margin of -2.28%. NIO, Inc.'s return on equity of -203.88% beat Li Auto, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.47%.

NIO, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.52, signalling upside risk potential of 32.34%. On the other hand Li Auto, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $23.62 which suggests that it could grow by 28.41%. Given that NIO, Inc. has higher upside potential than Li Auto, Inc., analysts believe NIO, Inc. is more attractive than Li Auto, Inc..

NIO, Inc. has a beta of 1.096, which suggesting that the stock is 9.626% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Li Auto, Inc. has a beta of 0.581, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.919%.

NIO, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Li Auto, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NIO, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Li Auto, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NIO, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than Li Auto, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.8B. NIO, Inc.'s net income of -$508M is lower than Li Auto, Inc.'s net income of -$87.2M. Notably, NIO, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Li Auto, Inc.'s PE ratio is 30.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NIO, Inc. is 1.08x versus 1.09x for Li Auto, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla, Inc. has a net margin of -16.68% compared to NIO, Inc.'s net margin of 3.44%. NIO, Inc.'s return on equity of -203.88% beat Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.93%.

NIO, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.52, signalling upside risk potential of 32.34%. On the other hand Tesla, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $421.73 which suggests that it could grow by 2.43%. Given that NIO, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tesla, Inc., analysts believe NIO, Inc. is more attractive than Tesla, Inc..

NIO, Inc. has a beta of 1.096, which suggesting that the stock is 9.626% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.858, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.812%.

NIO, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NIO, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NIO, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues of $24.9B. NIO, Inc.'s net income of -$508M is lower than Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $856M. Notably, NIO, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tesla, Inc.'s PE ratio is 382.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NIO, Inc. is 1.08x versus 15.31x for Tesla, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

XPeng, Inc. has a net margin of -16.68% compared to NIO, Inc.'s net margin of -1.87%. NIO, Inc.'s return on equity of -203.88% beat XPeng, Inc.'s return on equity of -9.19%.

NIO, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.52, signalling upside risk potential of 32.34%. On the other hand XPeng, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $26.91 which suggests that it could grow by 51.62%. Given that XPeng, Inc. has higher upside potential than NIO, Inc., analysts believe XPeng, Inc. is more attractive than NIO, Inc..

NIO, Inc. has a beta of 1.096, which suggesting that the stock is 9.626% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison XPeng, Inc. has a beta of 1.159, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.89%.

NIO, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. XPeng, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NIO, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. XPeng, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NIO, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3B, which are larger than XPeng, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.8B. NIO, Inc.'s net income of -$508M is lower than XPeng, Inc.'s net income of -$53.2M. Notably, NIO, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while XPeng, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NIO, Inc. is 1.08x versus 1.72x for XPeng, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.