NIO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Li Auto, Inc. has a net margin of 0.35% compared to NIO, Inc.'s net margin of 0.07%. NIO, Inc.'s return on equity of -147.28% beat Li Auto, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.54%.

NIO, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.55, signalling upside risk potential of 4.01%. On the other hand Li Auto, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $21.67 which suggests that it could grow by 17.34%. Given that Li Auto, Inc. has higher upside potential than NIO, Inc., analysts believe Li Auto, Inc. is more attractive than NIO, Inc..

NIO, Inc. has a beta of 0.990, which suggesting that the stock is 1.018% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Li Auto, Inc. has a beta of 0.597, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.263%.

NIO, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Li Auto, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NIO, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Li Auto, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NIO, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are larger than Li Auto, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.1B. NIO, Inc.'s net income of $17.1M is higher than Li Auto, Inc.'s net income of $2.9M. Notably, NIO, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Li Auto, Inc.'s PE ratio is 133.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NIO, Inc. is 1.21x versus 1.24x for Li Auto, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive, Inc. has a net margin of 0.35% compared to NIO, Inc.'s net margin of -62.52%. NIO, Inc.'s return on equity of -147.28% beat Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s return on equity of -63.51%.

NIO, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.55, signalling upside risk potential of 4.01%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $18.16 which suggests that it could grow by 18.44%. Given that Rivian Automotive, Inc. has higher upside potential than NIO, Inc., analysts believe Rivian Automotive, Inc. is more attractive than NIO, Inc..

NIO, Inc. has a beta of 0.990, which suggesting that the stock is 1.018% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

NIO, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rivian Automotive, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NIO, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NIO, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. NIO, Inc.'s net income of $17.1M is higher than Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s net income of -$804M. Notably, NIO, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NIO, Inc. is 1.21x versus 3.39x for Rivian Automotive, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla, Inc. has a net margin of 0.35% compared to NIO, Inc.'s net margin of 3.44%. NIO, Inc.'s return on equity of -147.28% beat Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.93%.

NIO, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.55, signalling upside risk potential of 4.01%. On the other hand Tesla, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $417.08 which suggests that it could grow by 16.15%. Given that Tesla, Inc. has higher upside potential than NIO, Inc., analysts believe Tesla, Inc. is more attractive than NIO, Inc..

NIO, Inc. has a beta of 0.990, which suggesting that the stock is 1.018% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.913, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.3%.

NIO, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NIO, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NIO, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are smaller than Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues of $24.9B. NIO, Inc.'s net income of $17.1M is lower than Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $856M. Notably, NIO, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tesla, Inc.'s PE ratio is 316.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NIO, Inc. is 1.21x versus 12.67x for Tesla, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

XPeng, Inc. has a net margin of 0.35% compared to NIO, Inc.'s net margin of 1.72%. NIO, Inc.'s return on equity of -147.28% beat XPeng, Inc.'s return on equity of -3.67%.

NIO, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.55, signalling upside risk potential of 4.01%. On the other hand XPeng, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $25.09 which suggests that it could grow by 41.75%. Given that XPeng, Inc. has higher upside potential than NIO, Inc., analysts believe XPeng, Inc. is more attractive than NIO, Inc..

NIO, Inc. has a beta of 0.990, which suggesting that the stock is 1.018% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison XPeng, Inc. has a beta of 1.183, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.269%.

NIO, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. XPeng, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NIO, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. XPeng, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NIO, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are larger than XPeng, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.1B. NIO, Inc.'s net income of $17.1M is lower than XPeng, Inc.'s net income of $54M. Notably, NIO, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while XPeng, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NIO, Inc. is 1.21x versus 1.60x for XPeng, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.