How Big Will the SpaceX IPO Be?
Operated up to now as a private business, SpaceX will…
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CSUAY
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LSE
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
$91.6B | -- | -7.02% | -- | -- |
|
STAK
STAK Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CSUAY
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.
|
$21.53 | -- | $106.9B | 14.49x | $0.55 | 8.4% | 2.59x |
|
LSE
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
$1.33 | -- | $40.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.77x |
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
$0.68 | -- | $82.2B | 16.18x | $0.01 | 4.68% | 0.22x |
|
STAK
STAK Inc.
|
$0.33 | -- | $4.4M | 6.09x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.77x |
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
$0.07 | -- | $1.2B | 13.37x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.11x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CSUAY
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.
|
7.79% | 0.703 | 4.75% | 1.46x |
|
LSE
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
6.06% | 2.227 | 22.17% | 9.49x |
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
41.99% | 0.380 | 100.72% | 0.35x |
|
STAK
STAK Inc.
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
77.4% | 0.000 | 358.74% | 0.57x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CSUAY
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.
|
$3.3B | $2.9B | 11.88% | 12.8% | 27.82% | $2.3B |
|
LSE
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -10.39% | -11.14% | -- | -- |
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
$15.7B | $1.9B | 2.71% | 4.2% | 1.95% | $3B |
|
STAK
STAK Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
$212.1M | $71.6M | 3.76% | 16.82% | 3.14% | -$2.9M |
has a net margin of 23.53% compared to China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.8% beat 's return on equity of --.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
CSUAY
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.
|
31.9% | $0.41 | $73.8B |
|
LSE
|
-- | -- | -- |
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than , analysts believe China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. is more attractive than .
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
CSUAY
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
|
LSE
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.243, which suggesting that the stock is 75.687% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.4%. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. pays -61.34% of its earnings as a dividend. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $10.5B, which are larger than quarterly revenues of --. China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.'s net income of $2.5B is higher than 's net income of --. Notably, China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.49x while 's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. is 2.59x versus -- for . Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CSUAY
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.
|
2.59x | 14.49x | $10.5B | $2.5B |
|
LSE
|
-- | -- | -- | -- |
Recon Technology Ltd. has a net margin of 23.53% compared to China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.8% beat Recon Technology Ltd.'s return on equity of -11.14%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
CSUAY
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.
|
31.9% | $0.41 | $73.8B |
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
-- | -- | $72M |
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Recon Technology Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Recon Technology Ltd., analysts believe China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Recon Technology Ltd..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
CSUAY
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
0 | 1 | 0 |
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.243, which suggesting that the stock is 75.687% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Recon Technology Ltd. has a beta of 1.930, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.027%.
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.4%. Recon Technology Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. pays -61.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Recon Technology Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $10.5B, which are larger than Recon Technology Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.'s net income of $2.5B is higher than Recon Technology Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.49x while Recon Technology Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. is 2.59x versus 0.77x for Recon Technology Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CSUAY
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.
|
2.59x | 14.49x | $10.5B | $2.5B |
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
0.77x | -- | -- | -- |
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a net margin of 23.53% compared to China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 1.49%. China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.8% beat China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s return on equity of 4.2%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
CSUAY
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.
|
31.9% | $0.41 | $73.8B |
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
15.94% | $0.01 | $223.3B |
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Petroleum & Chemical Corp., analysts believe China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. is more attractive than China Petroleum & Chemical Corp..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
CSUAY
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.243, which suggesting that the stock is 75.687% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a beta of 0.264, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.559%.
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.4%. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. offers a yield of 4.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. pays -61.34% of its earnings as a dividend. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. pays out 73.99% of its earnings as a dividend. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $10.5B, which are smaller than China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. quarterly revenues of $98.4B. China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.'s net income of $2.5B is higher than China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s net income of $1.5B. Notably, China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.49x while China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s PE ratio is 16.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. is 2.59x versus 0.22x for China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CSUAY
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.
|
2.59x | 14.49x | $10.5B | $2.5B |
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
0.22x | 16.18x | $98.4B | $1.5B |
STAK Inc. has a net margin of 23.53% compared to China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.8% beat STAK Inc.'s return on equity of --.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
CSUAY
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.
|
31.9% | $0.41 | $73.8B |
|
STAK
STAK Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- |
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand STAK Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than STAK Inc., analysts believe China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. is more attractive than STAK Inc..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
CSUAY
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
|
STAK
STAK Inc.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.243, which suggesting that the stock is 75.687% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison STAK Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.4%. STAK Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. pays -61.34% of its earnings as a dividend. STAK Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $10.5B, which are larger than STAK Inc. quarterly revenues of --. China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.'s net income of $2.5B is higher than STAK Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.49x while STAK Inc.'s PE ratio is 6.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. is 2.59x versus 0.77x for STAK Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CSUAY
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.
|
2.59x | 14.49x | $10.5B | $2.5B |
|
STAK
STAK Inc.
|
0.77x | 6.09x | -- | -- |
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a net margin of 23.53% compared to China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 1.43%. China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.8% beat Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s return on equity of 16.82%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
CSUAY
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.
|
31.9% | $0.41 | $73.8B |
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
8.17% | $0.00 | $5.7B |
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp., analysts believe China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
CSUAY
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.243, which suggesting that the stock is 75.687% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a beta of 0.224, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.578%.
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.4%. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. pays -61.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $10.5B, which are larger than Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.5B. China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.'s net income of $2.5B is higher than Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s net income of $24.7M. Notably, China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.49x while Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s PE ratio is 13.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. is 2.59x versus 0.11x for Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CSUAY
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.
|
2.59x | 14.49x | $10.5B | $2.5B |
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
0.11x | 13.37x | $2.5B | $24.7M |
Signup to receive the latest stock alerts
Operated up to now as a private business, SpaceX will…
Intuitive Surgical (NASDAQ:ISRG) is the innovative medical tech business behind…
UAV and hypersonic system defense contractor Kratos (NASDAQ:KTOS) has swung…
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 59x
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Silicon Laboratories, Inc. [SLAB] is up 0.91% over the past day.
Enphase Energy, Inc. [ENPH] is down 8.53% over the past day.
Mercury Systems, Inc. [MRCY] is up 2.61% over the past day.