Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
37
CSUAY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$22.89
Seasonality move
:
2.71%
Day range:
$22.01 - $22.96
52-week range:
$14.50 - $23.29
Dividend yield:
8.18%
P/E ratio:
14.87x
P/S ratio:
2.66x
P/B ratio:
1.86x
Volume:
8K
Avg. volume:
8.7K
1-year change:
49.97%
Market cap:
$109.7B
Revenue:
$47B
EPS (TTM):
$1.49
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CSUAY
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCCYF
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
|
$101.7B | -- | 6.21% | -- | -- |
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
$94.5B | -- | -5.25% | -- | -- |
|
SPTJF
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.
|
$2.5B | -- | -15.64% | -- | -- |
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CSUAY
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.
|
$22.09 | -- | $109.7B | 14.87x | $0.55 | 8.18% | 2.66x |
|
PCCYF
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
|
$1.22 | -- | $223.3B | 10.19x | $0.03 | 5.38% | 0.57x |
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
$1.32 | -- | $40.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.77x |
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
$0.66 | -- | $79.9B | 15.74x | $0.01 | 4.81% | 0.21x |
|
SPTJF
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.
|
$0.21 | -- | $2.2B | 88.02x | $0.00 | 1.36% | 0.20x |
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
$0.13 | -- | $2.4B | 13.37x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.22x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CSUAY
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.
|
7.79% | 0.702 | 4.75% | 1.46x |
|
PCCYF
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
|
19.33% | 0.628 | 26.74% | 0.66x |
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
6.06% | 2.227 | 22.17% | 9.49x |
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
41.99% | 0.380 | 100.72% | 0.35x |
|
SPTJF
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.
|
31.55% | 3.198 | 88.28% | 0.69x |
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
77.4% | 0.000 | 358.74% | 0.57x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CSUAY
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.
|
$3.3B | $2.9B | 11.88% | 12.8% | 27.82% | $2.3B |
|
PCCYF
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
|
$21.6B | $8B | 8.12% | 9.86% | 7.97% | $8.7B |
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -10.39% | -11.14% | -- | -- |
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
$15.7B | $1.9B | 2.71% | 4.2% | 1.95% | $3B |
|
SPTJF
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.
|
$461.9M | -$6.5M | -0.4% | -0.58% | -0.24% | $181.1M |
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
$212.1M | $71.6M | 3.76% | 16.82% | 3.14% | -$2.9M |
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CSUAY or PCCYF?
PetroChina Co., Ltd. has a net margin of 23.53% compared to China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 6.46%. China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.8% beat PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.86%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CSUAYChina Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.31.9% $0.41 $73.8B PCCYFPetroChina Co., Ltd.21.49% $0.03 $299.2B -
What do Analysts Say About CSUAY or PCCYF?
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PetroChina Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than PetroChina Co., Ltd., analysts believe China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. is more attractive than PetroChina Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CSUAYChina Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.0 0 0 PCCYFPetroChina Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CSUAY or PCCYF More Risky?
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.243, which suggesting that the stock is 75.696% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PetroChina Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.484, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.623%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CSUAY or PCCYF?
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.18%. PetroChina Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 5.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. pays -61.34% of its earnings as a dividend. PetroChina Co., Ltd. pays out 56.08% of its earnings as a dividend. PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CSUAY or PCCYF?
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $10.5B, which are smaller than PetroChina Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $100.5B. China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.'s net income of $2.5B is lower than PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s net income of $6.5B. Notably, China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.87x while PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 10.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. is 2.66x versus 0.57x for PetroChina Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CSUAYChina Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.2.66x 14.87x $10.5B $2.5B PCCYFPetroChina Co., Ltd.0.57x 10.19x $100.5B $6.5B
-
Which has Higher Returns CSUAY or RCON?
Recon Technology Ltd. has a net margin of 23.53% compared to China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.8% beat Recon Technology Ltd.'s return on equity of -11.14%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CSUAYChina Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.31.9% $0.41 $73.8B RCONRecon Technology Ltd.-- -- $72M -
What do Analysts Say About CSUAY or RCON?
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Recon Technology Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Recon Technology Ltd., analysts believe China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Recon Technology Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CSUAYChina Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.0 0 0 RCONRecon Technology Ltd.0 1 0 -
Is CSUAY or RCON More Risky?
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.243, which suggesting that the stock is 75.696% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Recon Technology Ltd. has a beta of 1.930, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.027%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CSUAY or RCON?
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.18%. Recon Technology Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. pays -61.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Recon Technology Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CSUAY or RCON?
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $10.5B, which are larger than Recon Technology Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.'s net income of $2.5B is higher than Recon Technology Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.87x while Recon Technology Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. is 2.66x versus 0.77x for Recon Technology Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CSUAYChina Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.2.66x 14.87x $10.5B $2.5B RCONRecon Technology Ltd.0.77x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CSUAY or SNPMF?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a net margin of 23.53% compared to China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 1.49%. China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.8% beat China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s return on equity of 4.2%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CSUAYChina Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.31.9% $0.41 $73.8B SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.15.94% $0.01 $223.3B -
What do Analysts Say About CSUAY or SNPMF?
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Petroleum & Chemical Corp., analysts believe China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. is more attractive than China Petroleum & Chemical Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CSUAYChina Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.0 0 0 SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.0 0 0 -
Is CSUAY or SNPMF More Risky?
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.243, which suggesting that the stock is 75.696% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a beta of 0.264, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.559%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CSUAY or SNPMF?
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.18%. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. offers a yield of 4.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. pays -61.34% of its earnings as a dividend. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. pays out 73.99% of its earnings as a dividend. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CSUAY or SNPMF?
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $10.5B, which are smaller than China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. quarterly revenues of $98.4B. China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.'s net income of $2.5B is higher than China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s net income of $1.5B. Notably, China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.87x while China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s PE ratio is 15.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. is 2.66x versus 0.21x for China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CSUAYChina Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.2.66x 14.87x $10.5B $2.5B SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.0.21x 15.74x $98.4B $1.5B
-
Which has Higher Returns CSUAY or SPTJF?
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has a net margin of 23.53% compared to China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 0.16%. China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.8% beat Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.58%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CSUAYChina Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.31.9% $0.41 $73.8B SPTJFSinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.17.07% $0.00 $5B -
What do Analysts Say About CSUAY or SPTJF?
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd., analysts believe China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CSUAYChina Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.0 0 0 SPTJFSinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CSUAY or SPTJF More Risky?
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.243, which suggesting that the stock is 75.696% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.634, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.585%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CSUAY or SPTJF?
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.18%. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 1.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. pays -61.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. pays out 66.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CSUAY or SPTJF?
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $10.5B, which are larger than Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $2.7B. China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.'s net income of $2.5B is higher than Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s net income of $4.4M. Notably, China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.87x while Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 88.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. is 2.66x versus 0.20x for Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CSUAYChina Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.2.66x 14.87x $10.5B $2.5B SPTJFSinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.0.20x 88.02x $2.7B $4.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns CSUAY or YZCFF?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a net margin of 23.53% compared to China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 1.43%. China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.8% beat Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s return on equity of 16.82%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CSUAYChina Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.31.9% $0.41 $73.8B YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.8.17% $0.00 $5.7B -
What do Analysts Say About CSUAY or YZCFF?
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp., analysts believe China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CSUAYChina Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.0 0 0 YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.0 0 0 -
Is CSUAY or YZCFF More Risky?
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.243, which suggesting that the stock is 75.696% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a beta of 0.224, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.578%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CSUAY or YZCFF?
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.18%. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. pays -61.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CSUAY or YZCFF?
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $10.5B, which are larger than Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.5B. China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.'s net income of $2.5B is higher than Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s net income of $24.7M. Notably, China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.87x while Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s PE ratio is 13.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. is 2.66x versus 0.22x for Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CSUAYChina Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.2.66x 14.87x $10.5B $2.5B YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.0.22x 13.37x $2.5B $24.7M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
37
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Buy
59
SEZL alert for Feb 27
Sezzle, Inc. [SEZL] is down 15.01% over the past day.
Buy
83
GCT alert for Feb 27
GigaCloud Technology, Inc. [GCT] is down 7.02% over the past day.
Buy
62
LMAT alert for Feb 27
LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. [LMAT] is down 5.48% over the past day.
