Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Buy
99
YZCFF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.13
Seasonality move
:
-16.59%
Day range:
$0.13 - $0.13
52-week range:
$0.07 - $0.13
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
13.37x
P/S ratio:
0.22x
P/B ratio:
1.78x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
167
1-year change:
92.51%
Market cap:
$2.4B
Revenue:
$11.3B
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CHOLF
China Oilfield Services Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCCYF
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
|
$101.7B | -- | 6.21% | -- | -- |
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
$94.5B | -- | -5.25% | -- | -- |
|
SPTJF
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.
|
$2.5B | -- | -15.64% | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
$0.13 | -- | $2.4B | 13.37x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.22x |
|
CHOLF
China Oilfield Services Ltd.
|
$1.20 | -- | $5.7B | 10.57x | $0.03 | 2.66% | 0.83x |
|
PCCYF
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
|
$1.22 | -- | $223.3B | 10.19x | $0.03 | 5.38% | 0.57x |
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
$1.32 | -- | $40.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.77x |
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
$0.66 | -- | $79.9B | 15.74x | $0.01 | 4.81% | 0.21x |
|
SPTJF
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.
|
$0.21 | -- | $2.2B | 88.02x | $0.00 | 1.36% | 0.20x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
77.4% | 0.000 | 358.74% | 0.57x |
|
CHOLF
China Oilfield Services Ltd.
|
27.47% | 0.250 | 57.92% | 0.92x |
|
PCCYF
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
|
19.33% | 0.628 | 26.74% | 0.66x |
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
6.06% | 2.227 | 22.17% | 9.49x |
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
41.99% | 0.380 | 100.72% | 0.35x |
|
SPTJF
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.
|
31.55% | 3.198 | 88.28% | 0.69x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
$212.1M | $71.6M | 3.76% | 16.82% | 3.14% | -$2.9M |
|
CHOLF
China Oilfield Services Ltd.
|
$314.7M | $241.3M | 6.51% | 9.14% | 14.98% | $194.4M |
|
PCCYF
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
|
$21.6B | $8B | 8.12% | 9.86% | 7.97% | $8.7B |
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -10.39% | -11.14% | -- | -- |
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
$15.7B | $1.9B | 2.71% | 4.2% | 1.95% | $3B |
|
SPTJF
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.
|
$461.9M | -$6.5M | -0.4% | -0.58% | -0.24% | $181.1M |
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns YZCFF or CHOLF?
China Oilfield Services Ltd. has a net margin of 1.43% compared to Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s net margin of 11.39%. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s return on equity of 16.82% beat China Oilfield Services Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.14%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.8.17% $0.00 $5.7B CHOLFChina Oilfield Services Ltd.19.53% $0.04 $9B -
What do Analysts Say About YZCFF or CHOLF?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Oilfield Services Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has higher upside potential than China Oilfield Services Ltd., analysts believe Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. is more attractive than China Oilfield Services Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.0 0 0 CHOLFChina Oilfield Services Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is YZCFF or CHOLF More Risky?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a beta of 0.224, which suggesting that the stock is 77.578% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Oilfield Services Ltd. has a beta of -0.519, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 151.948%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock YZCFF or CHOLF?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Oilfield Services Ltd. offers a yield of 2.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Oilfield Services Ltd. pays out 35.13% of its earnings as a dividend. China Oilfield Services Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios YZCFF or CHOLF?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than China Oilfield Services Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s net income of $24.7M is lower than China Oilfield Services Ltd.'s net income of $183.6M. Notably, Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.37x while China Oilfield Services Ltd.'s PE ratio is 10.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. is 0.22x versus 0.83x for China Oilfield Services Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.0.22x 13.37x $2.5B $24.7M CHOLFChina Oilfield Services Ltd.0.83x 10.57x $1.6B $183.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns YZCFF or PCCYF?
PetroChina Co., Ltd. has a net margin of 1.43% compared to Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s net margin of 6.46%. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s return on equity of 16.82% beat PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.86%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.8.17% $0.00 $5.7B PCCYFPetroChina Co., Ltd.21.49% $0.03 $299.2B -
What do Analysts Say About YZCFF or PCCYF?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PetroChina Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has higher upside potential than PetroChina Co., Ltd., analysts believe Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. is more attractive than PetroChina Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.0 0 0 PCCYFPetroChina Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is YZCFF or PCCYF More Risky?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a beta of 0.224, which suggesting that the stock is 77.578% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PetroChina Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.484, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.623%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock YZCFF or PCCYF?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PetroChina Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 5.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PetroChina Co., Ltd. pays out 56.08% of its earnings as a dividend. PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios YZCFF or PCCYF?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than PetroChina Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $100.5B. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s net income of $24.7M is lower than PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s net income of $6.5B. Notably, Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.37x while PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 10.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. is 0.22x versus 0.57x for PetroChina Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.0.22x 13.37x $2.5B $24.7M PCCYFPetroChina Co., Ltd.0.57x 10.19x $100.5B $6.5B
-
Which has Higher Returns YZCFF or RCON?
Recon Technology Ltd. has a net margin of 1.43% compared to Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s net margin of --. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s return on equity of 16.82% beat Recon Technology Ltd.'s return on equity of -11.14%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.8.17% $0.00 $5.7B RCONRecon Technology Ltd.-- -- $72M -
What do Analysts Say About YZCFF or RCON?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Recon Technology Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has higher upside potential than Recon Technology Ltd., analysts believe Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. is more attractive than Recon Technology Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.0 0 0 RCONRecon Technology Ltd.0 1 0 -
Is YZCFF or RCON More Risky?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a beta of 0.224, which suggesting that the stock is 77.578% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Recon Technology Ltd. has a beta of 1.930, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.027%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock YZCFF or RCON?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Recon Technology Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Recon Technology Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios YZCFF or RCON?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Recon Technology Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s net income of $24.7M is higher than Recon Technology Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.37x while Recon Technology Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. is 0.22x versus 0.77x for Recon Technology Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.0.22x 13.37x $2.5B $24.7M RCONRecon Technology Ltd.0.77x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns YZCFF or SNPMF?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a net margin of 1.43% compared to Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s net margin of 1.49%. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s return on equity of 16.82% beat China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s return on equity of 4.2%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.8.17% $0.00 $5.7B SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.15.94% $0.01 $223.3B -
What do Analysts Say About YZCFF or SNPMF?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has higher upside potential than China Petroleum & Chemical Corp., analysts believe Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. is more attractive than China Petroleum & Chemical Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.0 0 0 SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.0 0 0 -
Is YZCFF or SNPMF More Risky?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a beta of 0.224, which suggesting that the stock is 77.578% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a beta of 0.264, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.559%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock YZCFF or SNPMF?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. offers a yield of 4.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. pays out 73.99% of its earnings as a dividend. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios YZCFF or SNPMF?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. quarterly revenues of $98.4B. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s net income of $24.7M is lower than China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s net income of $1.5B. Notably, Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.37x while China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s PE ratio is 15.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. is 0.22x versus 0.21x for China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.0.22x 13.37x $2.5B $24.7M SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.0.21x 15.74x $98.4B $1.5B
-
Which has Higher Returns YZCFF or SPTJF?
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has a net margin of 1.43% compared to Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s net margin of 0.16%. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s return on equity of 16.82% beat Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.58%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.8.17% $0.00 $5.7B SPTJFSinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.17.07% $0.00 $5B -
What do Analysts Say About YZCFF or SPTJF?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has higher upside potential than Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd., analysts believe Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. is more attractive than Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.0 0 0 SPTJFSinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is YZCFF or SPTJF More Risky?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a beta of 0.224, which suggesting that the stock is 77.578% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.634, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.585%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock YZCFF or SPTJF?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 1.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. pays out 66.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios YZCFF or SPTJF?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s net income of $24.7M is higher than Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s net income of $4.4M. Notably, Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.37x while Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 88.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. is 0.22x versus 0.20x for Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.0.22x 13.37x $2.5B $24.7M SPTJFSinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.0.20x 88.02x $2.7B $4.4M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
37
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Buy
59
SEZL alert for Feb 27
Sezzle, Inc. [SEZL] is down 15.01% over the past day.
Buy
83
GCT alert for Feb 27
GigaCloud Technology, Inc. [GCT] is down 7.02% over the past day.
Buy
62
LMAT alert for Feb 27
LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. [LMAT] is down 5.48% over the past day.
