Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Sell
43
YZCFF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.07
Seasonality move
:
-7.53%
Day range:
$0.07 - $0.07
52-week range:
$0.07 - $0.07
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
13.37x
P/S ratio:
0.11x
P/B ratio:
0.92x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
$1.2B
Revenue:
$11.3B
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LSE
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCCYF
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
|
$94.5B | -- | 5.13% | -- | -- |
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
$99.6B | -- | -7.02% | -- | -- |
|
STAK
Stak
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
$0.07 | -- | $1.2B | 13.37x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.11x |
|
LSE
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
PCCYF
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
|
$1.08 | -- | $197.7B | 8.93x | $0.03 | 6.08% | 0.50x |
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
$1.27 | -- | $38.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.74x |
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
$0.54 | -- | $65.1B | 16.93x | $0.01 | 5.91% | 0.17x |
|
STAK
Stak
|
$0.46 | -- | $6M | 6.09x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.77x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
77.4% | 0.000 | 358.74% | 0.57x |
|
LSE
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
PCCYF
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
|
19.7% | 0.214 | 28.84% | 0.63x |
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
6.06% | 2.653 | 22.17% | 9.49x |
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
41.99% | 0.234 | 100.72% | 0.35x |
|
STAK
Stak
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
$212.1M | $71.6M | 3.76% | 16.82% | 3.14% | -$2.9M |
|
LSE
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCCYF
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
|
$10.5B | $6.4B | 8.35% | 10.12% | 7.35% | $5.2B |
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -10.39% | -11.14% | -- | -- |
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
$15.7B | $1.9B | 2.71% | 4.2% | 1.95% | $3B |
|
STAK
Stak
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns YZCFF or LSE?
has a net margin of 1.43% compared to Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s net margin of --. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s return on equity of 16.82% beat 's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.8.17% $0.00 $5.7B LSE-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About YZCFF or LSE?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has higher upside potential than , analysts believe Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. is more attractive than .
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.0 0 0 LSE0 0 0 -
Is YZCFF or LSE More Risky?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a beta of 0.189, which suggesting that the stock is 81.121% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock YZCFF or LSE?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios YZCFF or LSE?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than quarterly revenues of --. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s net income of $24.7M is higher than 's net income of --. Notably, Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.37x while 's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. is 0.11x versus -- for . Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.0.11x 13.37x $2.5B $24.7M LSE-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns YZCFF or PCCYF?
PetroChina Co., Ltd. has a net margin of 1.43% compared to Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s net margin of 6.59%. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s return on equity of 16.82% beat PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 10.12%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.8.17% $0.00 $5.7B PCCYFPetroChina Co., Ltd.11.94% -- $297.9B -
What do Analysts Say About YZCFF or PCCYF?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PetroChina Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has higher upside potential than PetroChina Co., Ltd., analysts believe Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. is more attractive than PetroChina Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.0 0 0 PCCYFPetroChina Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is YZCFF or PCCYF More Risky?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a beta of 0.189, which suggesting that the stock is 81.121% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PetroChina Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.453, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.672%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock YZCFF or PCCYF?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PetroChina Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 6.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PetroChina Co., Ltd. pays out 56.08% of its earnings as a dividend. PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios YZCFF or PCCYF?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than PetroChina Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $87.7B. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s net income of $24.7M is lower than PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s net income of $5.8B. Notably, Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.37x while PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 8.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. is 0.11x versus 0.50x for PetroChina Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.0.11x 13.37x $2.5B $24.7M PCCYFPetroChina Co., Ltd.0.50x 8.93x $87.7B $5.8B
-
Which has Higher Returns YZCFF or RCON?
Recon Technology Ltd. has a net margin of 1.43% compared to Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s net margin of --. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s return on equity of 16.82% beat Recon Technology Ltd.'s return on equity of -11.14%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.8.17% $0.00 $5.7B RCONRecon Technology Ltd.-- -- $72M -
What do Analysts Say About YZCFF or RCON?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Recon Technology Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has higher upside potential than Recon Technology Ltd., analysts believe Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. is more attractive than Recon Technology Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.0 0 0 RCONRecon Technology Ltd.0 1 0 -
Is YZCFF or RCON More Risky?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a beta of 0.189, which suggesting that the stock is 81.121% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Recon Technology Ltd. has a beta of 1.881, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.086%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock YZCFF or RCON?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Recon Technology Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Recon Technology Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios YZCFF or RCON?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Recon Technology Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s net income of $24.7M is higher than Recon Technology Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.37x while Recon Technology Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. is 0.11x versus 0.74x for Recon Technology Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.0.11x 13.37x $2.5B $24.7M RCONRecon Technology Ltd.0.74x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns YZCFF or SNPMF?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a net margin of 1.43% compared to Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s net margin of 1.49%. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s return on equity of 16.82% beat China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s return on equity of 4.2%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.8.17% $0.00 $5.7B SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.15.94% $0.01 $223.3B -
What do Analysts Say About YZCFF or SNPMF?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has higher upside potential than China Petroleum & Chemical Corp., analysts believe Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. is more attractive than China Petroleum & Chemical Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.0 0 0 SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.0 0 0 -
Is YZCFF or SNPMF More Risky?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a beta of 0.189, which suggesting that the stock is 81.121% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a beta of 0.230, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.005%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock YZCFF or SNPMF?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. offers a yield of 5.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. pays out 73.99% of its earnings as a dividend. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios YZCFF or SNPMF?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. quarterly revenues of $98.4B. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s net income of $24.7M is lower than China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s net income of $1.5B. Notably, Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.37x while China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s PE ratio is 16.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. is 0.11x versus 0.17x for China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.0.11x 13.37x $2.5B $24.7M SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.0.17x 16.93x $98.4B $1.5B
-
Which has Higher Returns YZCFF or STAK?
Stak has a net margin of 1.43% compared to Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s net margin of --. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s return on equity of 16.82% beat Stak's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.8.17% $0.00 $5.7B STAKStak-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About YZCFF or STAK?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Stak has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has higher upside potential than Stak, analysts believe Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. is more attractive than Stak.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.0 0 0 STAKStak0 0 0 -
Is YZCFF or STAK More Risky?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a beta of 0.189, which suggesting that the stock is 81.121% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stak has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock YZCFF or STAK?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Stak offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Stak pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios YZCFF or STAK?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Stak quarterly revenues of --. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s net income of $24.7M is higher than Stak's net income of --. Notably, Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.37x while Stak's PE ratio is 6.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. is 0.11x versus 0.77x for Stak. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.0.11x 13.37x $2.5B $24.7M STAKStak0.77x 6.09x -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?
NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been one of the best stocks to…
Stock Ideas
Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 61x
Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
69
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Sell
47
PSTG alert for Dec 4
Pure Storage, Inc. [PSTG] is up 5.05% over the past day.
Sell
41
SMX alert for Dec 4
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 154.74% over the past day.
Sell
43
HY alert for Dec 4
Hyster-Yale, Inc. [HY] is up 1.92% over the past day.
