Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Sell
31
RCON Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1.28
Seasonality move
:
9%
Day range:
$1.26 - $1.30
52-week range:
$1.13 - $7.16
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.73x
P/B ratio:
3.36x
Volume:
3.2K
Avg. volume:
11.4K
1-year change:
-40.57%
Market cap:
$38.6M
Revenue:
$9.2M
EPS (TTM):
-$1.40
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LSE
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCCYF
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
|
$94.5B | -- | 5.96% | -- | -- |
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
$99.6B | -- | -7.02% | -- | -- |
|
STAK
STAK Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
$1.26 | -- | $38.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.73x |
|
LSE
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
PCCYF
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
|
$1.04 | -- | $190.3B | 8.69x | $0.03 | 6.31% | 0.48x |
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
$0.55 | -- | $65.9B | 17.14x | $0.01 | 5.84% | 0.17x |
|
STAK
STAK Inc.
|
$0.40 | -- | $5.2M | 6.09x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.77x |
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
$0.07 | -- | $1.2B | 13.37x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.11x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
6.06% | 2.653 | 22.17% | 9.49x |
|
LSE
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
PCCYF
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
|
19.33% | 0.214 | 26.74% | 0.66x |
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
41.99% | 0.234 | 100.72% | 0.35x |
|
STAK
STAK Inc.
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
77.4% | 0.000 | 358.74% | 0.57x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -10.39% | -11.14% | -- | -- |
|
LSE
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCCYF
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
|
$21.6B | $8B | 8.12% | 9.86% | 7.97% | $8.7B |
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
$15.7B | $1.9B | 2.71% | 4.2% | 1.95% | $3B |
|
STAK
STAK Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
$212.1M | $71.6M | 3.76% | 16.82% | 3.14% | -$2.9M |
Recon Technology Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns RCON or LSE?
has a net margin of -- compared to Recon Technology Ltd.'s net margin of --. Recon Technology Ltd.'s return on equity of -11.14% beat 's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RCONRecon Technology Ltd.-- -- $72M LSE-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About RCON or LSE?
Recon Technology Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Recon Technology Ltd. has higher upside potential than , analysts believe Recon Technology Ltd. is more attractive than .
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RCONRecon Technology Ltd.0 1 0 LSE0 0 0 -
Is RCON or LSE More Risky?
Recon Technology Ltd. has a beta of 1.881, which suggesting that the stock is 88.086% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RCON or LSE?
Recon Technology Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Recon Technology Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RCON or LSE?
Recon Technology Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than quarterly revenues of --. Recon Technology Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than 's net income of --. Notably, Recon Technology Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while 's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Recon Technology Ltd. is 0.73x versus -- for . Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RCONRecon Technology Ltd.0.73x -- -- -- LSE-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns RCON or PCCYF?
PetroChina Co., Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Recon Technology Ltd.'s net margin of 6.46%. Recon Technology Ltd.'s return on equity of -11.14% beat PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.86%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RCONRecon Technology Ltd.-- -- $72M PCCYFPetroChina Co., Ltd.21.49% $0.03 $299.2B -
What do Analysts Say About RCON or PCCYF?
Recon Technology Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PetroChina Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Recon Technology Ltd. has higher upside potential than PetroChina Co., Ltd., analysts believe Recon Technology Ltd. is more attractive than PetroChina Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RCONRecon Technology Ltd.0 1 0 PCCYFPetroChina Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is RCON or PCCYF More Risky?
Recon Technology Ltd. has a beta of 1.881, which suggesting that the stock is 88.086% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PetroChina Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.453, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.672%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RCON or PCCYF?
Recon Technology Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PetroChina Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 6.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Recon Technology Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PetroChina Co., Ltd. pays out 56.08% of its earnings as a dividend. PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RCON or PCCYF?
Recon Technology Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than PetroChina Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $100.5B. Recon Technology Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s net income of $6.5B. Notably, Recon Technology Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 8.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Recon Technology Ltd. is 0.73x versus 0.48x for PetroChina Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RCONRecon Technology Ltd.0.73x -- -- -- PCCYFPetroChina Co., Ltd.0.48x 8.69x $100.5B $6.5B
-
Which has Higher Returns RCON or SNPMF?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Recon Technology Ltd.'s net margin of 1.49%. Recon Technology Ltd.'s return on equity of -11.14% beat China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s return on equity of 4.2%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RCONRecon Technology Ltd.-- -- $72M SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.15.94% $0.01 $223.3B -
What do Analysts Say About RCON or SNPMF?
Recon Technology Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Recon Technology Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Petroleum & Chemical Corp., analysts believe Recon Technology Ltd. is more attractive than China Petroleum & Chemical Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RCONRecon Technology Ltd.0 1 0 SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.0 0 0 -
Is RCON or SNPMF More Risky?
Recon Technology Ltd. has a beta of 1.881, which suggesting that the stock is 88.086% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a beta of 0.230, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.005%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RCON or SNPMF?
Recon Technology Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. offers a yield of 5.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Recon Technology Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. pays out 73.99% of its earnings as a dividend. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RCON or SNPMF?
Recon Technology Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. quarterly revenues of $98.4B. Recon Technology Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s net income of $1.5B. Notably, Recon Technology Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s PE ratio is 17.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Recon Technology Ltd. is 0.73x versus 0.17x for China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RCONRecon Technology Ltd.0.73x -- -- -- SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.0.17x 17.14x $98.4B $1.5B
-
Which has Higher Returns RCON or STAK?
STAK Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Recon Technology Ltd.'s net margin of --. Recon Technology Ltd.'s return on equity of -11.14% beat STAK Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RCONRecon Technology Ltd.-- -- $72M STAKSTAK Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About RCON or STAK?
Recon Technology Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand STAK Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Recon Technology Ltd. has higher upside potential than STAK Inc., analysts believe Recon Technology Ltd. is more attractive than STAK Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RCONRecon Technology Ltd.0 1 0 STAKSTAK Inc.0 0 0 -
Is RCON or STAK More Risky?
Recon Technology Ltd. has a beta of 1.881, which suggesting that the stock is 88.086% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison STAK Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RCON or STAK?
Recon Technology Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. STAK Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Recon Technology Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. STAK Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RCON or STAK?
Recon Technology Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than STAK Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Recon Technology Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than STAK Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Recon Technology Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while STAK Inc.'s PE ratio is 6.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Recon Technology Ltd. is 0.73x versus 0.77x for STAK Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RCONRecon Technology Ltd.0.73x -- -- -- STAKSTAK Inc.0.77x 6.09x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns RCON or YZCFF?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Recon Technology Ltd.'s net margin of 1.43%. Recon Technology Ltd.'s return on equity of -11.14% beat Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s return on equity of 16.82%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RCONRecon Technology Ltd.-- -- $72M YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.8.17% $0.00 $5.7B -
What do Analysts Say About RCON or YZCFF?
Recon Technology Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Recon Technology Ltd. has higher upside potential than Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp., analysts believe Recon Technology Ltd. is more attractive than Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RCONRecon Technology Ltd.0 1 0 YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.0 0 0 -
Is RCON or YZCFF More Risky?
Recon Technology Ltd. has a beta of 1.881, which suggesting that the stock is 88.086% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a beta of 0.189, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.121%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RCON or YZCFF?
Recon Technology Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Recon Technology Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RCON or YZCFF?
Recon Technology Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Recon Technology Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s net income of $24.7M. Notably, Recon Technology Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s PE ratio is 13.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Recon Technology Ltd. is 0.73x versus 0.11x for Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RCONRecon Technology Ltd.0.73x -- -- -- YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.0.11x 13.37x $2.5B $24.7M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
80
TVTX alert for Dec 25
Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is up 14.03% over the past day.
Buy
68
KOD alert for Dec 25
Kodiak Sciences, Inc. [KOD] is up 13.41% over the past day.
Buy
64
ZCSH alert for Dec 25
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is up 5.33% over the past day.
