Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Buy
56
SNPMF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.55
Seasonality move
:
5.45%
Day range:
$0.55 - $0.55
52-week range:
$0.46 - $0.61
Dividend yield:
5.84%
P/E ratio:
17.14x
P/S ratio:
0.17x
P/B ratio:
0.58x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
25.6K
1-year change:
-2.68%
Market cap:
$65.9B
Revenue:
$393B
EPS (TTM):
$0.04
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
$99.6B | -- | -7.02% | -- | -- |
|
LSE
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCCYF
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
|
$94.5B | -- | 5.96% | -- | -- |
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
STAK
STAK Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
$0.55 | -- | $65.9B | 17.14x | $0.01 | 5.84% | 0.17x |
|
LSE
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
PCCYF
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
|
$1.04 | -- | $190.3B | 8.69x | $0.03 | 6.31% | 0.48x |
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
$1.26 | -- | $38.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.73x |
|
STAK
STAK Inc.
|
$0.40 | -- | $5.2M | 6.09x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.77x |
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
$0.07 | -- | $1.2B | 13.37x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.11x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
41.99% | 0.234 | 100.72% | 0.35x |
|
LSE
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
PCCYF
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
|
19.33% | 0.214 | 26.74% | 0.66x |
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
6.06% | 2.653 | 22.17% | 9.49x |
|
STAK
STAK Inc.
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
77.4% | 0.000 | 358.74% | 0.57x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
$15.7B | $1.9B | 2.71% | 4.2% | 1.95% | $3B |
|
LSE
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCCYF
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
|
$21.6B | $8B | 8.12% | 9.86% | 7.97% | $8.7B |
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -10.39% | -11.14% | -- | -- |
|
STAK
STAK Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
$212.1M | $71.6M | 3.76% | 16.82% | 3.14% | -$2.9M |
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SNPMF or LSE?
has a net margin of 1.49% compared to China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s net margin of --. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s return on equity of 4.2% beat 's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.15.94% $0.01 $223.3B LSE-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SNPMF or LSE?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has higher upside potential than , analysts believe China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. is more attractive than .
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.0 0 0 LSE0 0 0 -
Is SNPMF or LSE More Risky?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a beta of 0.230, which suggesting that the stock is 77.005% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNPMF or LSE?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.84%. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. pays 73.99% of its earnings as a dividend. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SNPMF or LSE?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. quarterly revenues are $98.4B, which are larger than quarterly revenues of --. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s net income of $1.5B is higher than 's net income of --. Notably, China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.14x while 's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. is 0.17x versus -- for . Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.0.17x 17.14x $98.4B $1.5B LSE-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SNPMF or PCCYF?
PetroChina Co., Ltd. has a net margin of 1.49% compared to China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s net margin of 6.46%. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s return on equity of 4.2% beat PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.86%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.15.94% $0.01 $223.3B PCCYFPetroChina Co., Ltd.21.49% $0.03 $299.2B -
What do Analysts Say About SNPMF or PCCYF?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PetroChina Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has higher upside potential than PetroChina Co., Ltd., analysts believe China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. is more attractive than PetroChina Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.0 0 0 PCCYFPetroChina Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SNPMF or PCCYF More Risky?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a beta of 0.230, which suggesting that the stock is 77.005% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PetroChina Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.453, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.672%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNPMF or PCCYF?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.84%. PetroChina Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 6.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. pays 73.99% of its earnings as a dividend. PetroChina Co., Ltd. pays out 56.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SNPMF or PCCYF?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. quarterly revenues are $98.4B, which are smaller than PetroChina Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $100.5B. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s net income of $1.5B is lower than PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s net income of $6.5B. Notably, China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.14x while PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 8.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. is 0.17x versus 0.48x for PetroChina Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.0.17x 17.14x $98.4B $1.5B PCCYFPetroChina Co., Ltd.0.48x 8.69x $100.5B $6.5B
-
Which has Higher Returns SNPMF or RCON?
Recon Technology Ltd. has a net margin of 1.49% compared to China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s net margin of --. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s return on equity of 4.2% beat Recon Technology Ltd.'s return on equity of -11.14%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.15.94% $0.01 $223.3B RCONRecon Technology Ltd.-- -- $72M -
What do Analysts Say About SNPMF or RCON?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Recon Technology Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has higher upside potential than Recon Technology Ltd., analysts believe China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. is more attractive than Recon Technology Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.0 0 0 RCONRecon Technology Ltd.0 1 0 -
Is SNPMF or RCON More Risky?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a beta of 0.230, which suggesting that the stock is 77.005% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Recon Technology Ltd. has a beta of 1.881, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.086%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNPMF or RCON?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.84%. Recon Technology Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. pays 73.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Recon Technology Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SNPMF or RCON?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. quarterly revenues are $98.4B, which are larger than Recon Technology Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s net income of $1.5B is higher than Recon Technology Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.14x while Recon Technology Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. is 0.17x versus 0.73x for Recon Technology Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.0.17x 17.14x $98.4B $1.5B RCONRecon Technology Ltd.0.73x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SNPMF or STAK?
STAK Inc. has a net margin of 1.49% compared to China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s net margin of --. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s return on equity of 4.2% beat STAK Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.15.94% $0.01 $223.3B STAKSTAK Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SNPMF or STAK?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand STAK Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has higher upside potential than STAK Inc., analysts believe China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. is more attractive than STAK Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.0 0 0 STAKSTAK Inc.0 0 0 -
Is SNPMF or STAK More Risky?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a beta of 0.230, which suggesting that the stock is 77.005% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison STAK Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNPMF or STAK?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.84%. STAK Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. pays 73.99% of its earnings as a dividend. STAK Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SNPMF or STAK?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. quarterly revenues are $98.4B, which are larger than STAK Inc. quarterly revenues of --. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s net income of $1.5B is higher than STAK Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.14x while STAK Inc.'s PE ratio is 6.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. is 0.17x versus 0.77x for STAK Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.0.17x 17.14x $98.4B $1.5B STAKSTAK Inc.0.77x 6.09x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SNPMF or YZCFF?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a net margin of 1.49% compared to China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s net margin of 1.43%. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s return on equity of 4.2% beat Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s return on equity of 16.82%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.15.94% $0.01 $223.3B YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.8.17% $0.00 $5.7B -
What do Analysts Say About SNPMF or YZCFF?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has higher upside potential than Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp., analysts believe China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. is more attractive than Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.0 0 0 YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.0 0 0 -
Is SNPMF or YZCFF More Risky?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a beta of 0.230, which suggesting that the stock is 77.005% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a beta of 0.189, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.121%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNPMF or YZCFF?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.84%. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. pays 73.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SNPMF or YZCFF?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. quarterly revenues are $98.4B, which are larger than Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.5B. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s net income of $1.5B is higher than Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s net income of $24.7M. Notably, China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.14x while Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s PE ratio is 13.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. is 0.17x versus 0.11x for Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.0.17x 17.14x $98.4B $1.5B YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.0.11x 13.37x $2.5B $24.7M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
80
TVTX alert for Dec 25
Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is up 14.03% over the past day.
Buy
68
KOD alert for Dec 25
Kodiak Sciences, Inc. [KOD] is up 13.41% over the past day.
Buy
64
ZCSH alert for Dec 25
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is up 5.33% over the past day.
