Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
40
SNPMF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.67
Seasonality move
:
2.3%
Day range:
$0.66 - $0.66
52-week range:
$0.46 - $0.71
Dividend yield:
4.81%
P/E ratio:
15.74x
P/S ratio:
0.21x
P/B ratio:
0.68x
Volume:
946
Avg. volume:
72.8K
1-year change:
23.55%
Market cap:
$79.9B
Revenue:
$393B
EPS (TTM):
$0.04
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
$94.5B | -- | -5.25% | -- | -- |
|
CHOLF
China Oilfield Services Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCCYF
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
|
$101.7B | -- | 6.21% | -- | -- |
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPTJF
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.
|
$2.5B | -- | -15.64% | -- | -- |
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
$0.66 | -- | $79.9B | 15.74x | $0.01 | 4.81% | 0.21x |
|
CHOLF
China Oilfield Services Ltd.
|
$1.20 | -- | $5.7B | 10.57x | $0.03 | 2.66% | 0.83x |
|
PCCYF
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
|
$1.22 | -- | $223.3B | 10.19x | $0.03 | 5.38% | 0.57x |
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
$1.32 | -- | $40.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.77x |
|
SPTJF
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.
|
$0.21 | -- | $2.2B | 88.02x | $0.00 | 1.36% | 0.20x |
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
$0.13 | -- | $2.4B | 13.37x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.22x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
41.99% | 0.380 | 100.72% | 0.35x |
|
CHOLF
China Oilfield Services Ltd.
|
27.47% | 0.250 | 57.92% | 0.92x |
|
PCCYF
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
|
19.33% | 0.628 | 26.74% | 0.66x |
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
6.06% | 2.227 | 22.17% | 9.49x |
|
SPTJF
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.
|
31.55% | 3.198 | 88.28% | 0.69x |
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
77.4% | 0.000 | 358.74% | 0.57x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
$15.7B | $1.9B | 2.71% | 4.2% | 1.95% | $3B |
|
CHOLF
China Oilfield Services Ltd.
|
$314.7M | $241.3M | 6.51% | 9.14% | 14.98% | $194.4M |
|
PCCYF
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
|
$21.6B | $8B | 8.12% | 9.86% | 7.97% | $8.7B |
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -10.39% | -11.14% | -- | -- |
|
SPTJF
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.
|
$461.9M | -$6.5M | -0.4% | -0.58% | -0.24% | $181.1M |
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
$212.1M | $71.6M | 3.76% | 16.82% | 3.14% | -$2.9M |
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SNPMF or CHOLF?
China Oilfield Services Ltd. has a net margin of 1.49% compared to China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s net margin of 11.39%. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s return on equity of 4.2% beat China Oilfield Services Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.14%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.15.94% $0.01 $223.3B CHOLFChina Oilfield Services Ltd.19.53% $0.04 $9B -
What do Analysts Say About SNPMF or CHOLF?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Oilfield Services Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has higher upside potential than China Oilfield Services Ltd., analysts believe China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. is more attractive than China Oilfield Services Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.0 0 0 CHOLFChina Oilfield Services Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SNPMF or CHOLF More Risky?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a beta of 0.264, which suggesting that the stock is 73.559% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Oilfield Services Ltd. has a beta of -0.519, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 151.948%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNPMF or CHOLF?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.81%. China Oilfield Services Ltd. offers a yield of 2.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. pays 73.99% of its earnings as a dividend. China Oilfield Services Ltd. pays out 35.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SNPMF or CHOLF?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. quarterly revenues are $98.4B, which are larger than China Oilfield Services Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s net income of $1.5B is higher than China Oilfield Services Ltd.'s net income of $183.6M. Notably, China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.74x while China Oilfield Services Ltd.'s PE ratio is 10.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. is 0.21x versus 0.83x for China Oilfield Services Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.0.21x 15.74x $98.4B $1.5B CHOLFChina Oilfield Services Ltd.0.83x 10.57x $1.6B $183.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns SNPMF or PCCYF?
PetroChina Co., Ltd. has a net margin of 1.49% compared to China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s net margin of 6.46%. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s return on equity of 4.2% beat PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.86%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.15.94% $0.01 $223.3B PCCYFPetroChina Co., Ltd.21.49% $0.03 $299.2B -
What do Analysts Say About SNPMF or PCCYF?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PetroChina Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has higher upside potential than PetroChina Co., Ltd., analysts believe China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. is more attractive than PetroChina Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.0 0 0 PCCYFPetroChina Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SNPMF or PCCYF More Risky?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a beta of 0.264, which suggesting that the stock is 73.559% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PetroChina Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.484, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.623%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNPMF or PCCYF?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.81%. PetroChina Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 5.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. pays 73.99% of its earnings as a dividend. PetroChina Co., Ltd. pays out 56.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SNPMF or PCCYF?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. quarterly revenues are $98.4B, which are smaller than PetroChina Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $100.5B. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s net income of $1.5B is lower than PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s net income of $6.5B. Notably, China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.74x while PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 10.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. is 0.21x versus 0.57x for PetroChina Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.0.21x 15.74x $98.4B $1.5B PCCYFPetroChina Co., Ltd.0.57x 10.19x $100.5B $6.5B
-
Which has Higher Returns SNPMF or RCON?
Recon Technology Ltd. has a net margin of 1.49% compared to China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s net margin of --. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s return on equity of 4.2% beat Recon Technology Ltd.'s return on equity of -11.14%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.15.94% $0.01 $223.3B RCONRecon Technology Ltd.-- -- $72M -
What do Analysts Say About SNPMF or RCON?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Recon Technology Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has higher upside potential than Recon Technology Ltd., analysts believe China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. is more attractive than Recon Technology Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.0 0 0 RCONRecon Technology Ltd.0 1 0 -
Is SNPMF or RCON More Risky?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a beta of 0.264, which suggesting that the stock is 73.559% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Recon Technology Ltd. has a beta of 1.930, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.027%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNPMF or RCON?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.81%. Recon Technology Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. pays 73.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Recon Technology Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SNPMF or RCON?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. quarterly revenues are $98.4B, which are larger than Recon Technology Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s net income of $1.5B is higher than Recon Technology Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.74x while Recon Technology Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. is 0.21x versus 0.77x for Recon Technology Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.0.21x 15.74x $98.4B $1.5B RCONRecon Technology Ltd.0.77x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SNPMF or SPTJF?
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has a net margin of 1.49% compared to China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s net margin of 0.16%. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s return on equity of 4.2% beat Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.58%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.15.94% $0.01 $223.3B SPTJFSinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.17.07% $0.00 $5B -
What do Analysts Say About SNPMF or SPTJF?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has higher upside potential than Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd., analysts believe China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. is more attractive than Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.0 0 0 SPTJFSinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SNPMF or SPTJF More Risky?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a beta of 0.264, which suggesting that the stock is 73.559% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.634, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.585%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNPMF or SPTJF?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.81%. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 1.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. pays 73.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. pays out 66.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SNPMF or SPTJF?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. quarterly revenues are $98.4B, which are larger than Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $2.7B. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s net income of $1.5B is higher than Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s net income of $4.4M. Notably, China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.74x while Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 88.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. is 0.21x versus 0.20x for Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.0.21x 15.74x $98.4B $1.5B SPTJFSinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.0.20x 88.02x $2.7B $4.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns SNPMF or YZCFF?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a net margin of 1.49% compared to China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s net margin of 1.43%. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s return on equity of 4.2% beat Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s return on equity of 16.82%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.15.94% $0.01 $223.3B YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.8.17% $0.00 $5.7B -
What do Analysts Say About SNPMF or YZCFF?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has higher upside potential than Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp., analysts believe China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. is more attractive than Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.0 0 0 YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.0 0 0 -
Is SNPMF or YZCFF More Risky?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a beta of 0.264, which suggesting that the stock is 73.559% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a beta of 0.224, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.578%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNPMF or YZCFF?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.81%. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. pays 73.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SNPMF or YZCFF?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. quarterly revenues are $98.4B, which are larger than Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.5B. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s net income of $1.5B is higher than Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s net income of $24.7M. Notably, China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.74x while Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s PE ratio is 13.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. is 0.21x versus 0.22x for Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.0.21x 15.74x $98.4B $1.5B YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.0.22x 13.37x $2.5B $24.7M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
37
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Buy
59
SEZL alert for Feb 27
Sezzle, Inc. [SEZL] is down 13.92% over the past day.
Buy
83
GCT alert for Feb 27
GigaCloud Technology, Inc. [GCT] is down 5.87% over the past day.
Buy
62
LMAT alert for Feb 27
LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. [LMAT] is down 4.76% over the past day.
