Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Buy
64
SNPMF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.56
Seasonality move
:
5.45%
Day range:
$0.56 - $0.56
52-week range:
$0.46 - $0.61
Dividend yield:
5.91%
P/E ratio:
16.93x
P/S ratio:
0.17x
P/B ratio:
0.57x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
21.7K
1-year change:
7.44%
Market cap:
$65.1B
Revenue:
$393B
EPS (TTM):
$0.04
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
$99.6B | -- | -7.02% | -- | -- |
|
LSE
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCCYF
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
|
$94.5B | -- | 5.13% | -- | -- |
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
STAK
Stak
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
$0.54 | -- | $65.1B | 16.93x | $0.01 | 5.91% | 0.17x |
|
LSE
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
PCCYF
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
|
$1.08 | -- | $197.7B | 8.93x | $0.03 | 6.08% | 0.50x |
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
$1.27 | -- | $38.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.74x |
|
STAK
Stak
|
$0.46 | -- | $6M | 6.09x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.77x |
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
$0.07 | -- | $1.2B | 13.37x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.11x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
41.99% | 0.234 | 100.72% | 0.35x |
|
LSE
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
PCCYF
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
|
19.7% | 0.214 | 28.84% | 0.63x |
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
6.06% | 2.653 | 22.17% | 9.49x |
|
STAK
Stak
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
77.4% | 0.000 | 358.74% | 0.57x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
$15.7B | $1.9B | 2.71% | 4.2% | 1.95% | $3B |
|
LSE
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCCYF
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
|
$10.5B | $6.4B | 8.35% | 10.12% | 7.35% | $5.2B |
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -10.39% | -11.14% | -- | -- |
|
STAK
Stak
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
$212.1M | $71.6M | 3.76% | 16.82% | 3.14% | -$2.9M |
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SNPMF or LSE?
has a net margin of 1.49% compared to China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s net margin of --. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s return on equity of 4.2% beat 's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.15.94% $0.01 $223.3B LSE-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SNPMF or LSE?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has higher upside potential than , analysts believe China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. is more attractive than .
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.0 0 0 LSE0 0 0 -
Is SNPMF or LSE More Risky?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a beta of 0.230, which suggesting that the stock is 77.005% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNPMF or LSE?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.91%. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. pays 73.99% of its earnings as a dividend. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SNPMF or LSE?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. quarterly revenues are $98.4B, which are larger than quarterly revenues of --. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s net income of $1.5B is higher than 's net income of --. Notably, China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.93x while 's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. is 0.17x versus -- for . Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.0.17x 16.93x $98.4B $1.5B LSE-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SNPMF or PCCYF?
PetroChina Co., Ltd. has a net margin of 1.49% compared to China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s net margin of 6.59%. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s return on equity of 4.2% beat PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 10.12%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.15.94% $0.01 $223.3B PCCYFPetroChina Co., Ltd.11.94% -- $297.9B -
What do Analysts Say About SNPMF or PCCYF?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PetroChina Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has higher upside potential than PetroChina Co., Ltd., analysts believe China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. is more attractive than PetroChina Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.0 0 0 PCCYFPetroChina Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SNPMF or PCCYF More Risky?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a beta of 0.230, which suggesting that the stock is 77.005% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PetroChina Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.453, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.672%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNPMF or PCCYF?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.91%. PetroChina Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 6.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. pays 73.99% of its earnings as a dividend. PetroChina Co., Ltd. pays out 56.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SNPMF or PCCYF?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. quarterly revenues are $98.4B, which are larger than PetroChina Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $87.7B. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s net income of $1.5B is lower than PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s net income of $5.8B. Notably, China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.93x while PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 8.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. is 0.17x versus 0.50x for PetroChina Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.0.17x 16.93x $98.4B $1.5B PCCYFPetroChina Co., Ltd.0.50x 8.93x $87.7B $5.8B
-
Which has Higher Returns SNPMF or RCON?
Recon Technology Ltd. has a net margin of 1.49% compared to China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s net margin of --. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s return on equity of 4.2% beat Recon Technology Ltd.'s return on equity of -11.14%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.15.94% $0.01 $223.3B RCONRecon Technology Ltd.-- -- $72M -
What do Analysts Say About SNPMF or RCON?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Recon Technology Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has higher upside potential than Recon Technology Ltd., analysts believe China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. is more attractive than Recon Technology Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.0 0 0 RCONRecon Technology Ltd.0 1 0 -
Is SNPMF or RCON More Risky?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a beta of 0.230, which suggesting that the stock is 77.005% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Recon Technology Ltd. has a beta of 1.881, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.086%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNPMF or RCON?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.91%. Recon Technology Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. pays 73.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Recon Technology Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SNPMF or RCON?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. quarterly revenues are $98.4B, which are larger than Recon Technology Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s net income of $1.5B is higher than Recon Technology Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.93x while Recon Technology Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. is 0.17x versus 0.74x for Recon Technology Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.0.17x 16.93x $98.4B $1.5B RCONRecon Technology Ltd.0.74x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SNPMF or STAK?
Stak has a net margin of 1.49% compared to China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s net margin of --. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s return on equity of 4.2% beat Stak's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.15.94% $0.01 $223.3B STAKStak-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SNPMF or STAK?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Stak has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has higher upside potential than Stak, analysts believe China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. is more attractive than Stak.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.0 0 0 STAKStak0 0 0 -
Is SNPMF or STAK More Risky?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a beta of 0.230, which suggesting that the stock is 77.005% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stak has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNPMF or STAK?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.91%. Stak offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. pays 73.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Stak pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SNPMF or STAK?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. quarterly revenues are $98.4B, which are larger than Stak quarterly revenues of --. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s net income of $1.5B is higher than Stak's net income of --. Notably, China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.93x while Stak's PE ratio is 6.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. is 0.17x versus 0.77x for Stak. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.0.17x 16.93x $98.4B $1.5B STAKStak0.77x 6.09x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SNPMF or YZCFF?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a net margin of 1.49% compared to China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s net margin of 1.43%. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s return on equity of 4.2% beat Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s return on equity of 16.82%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.15.94% $0.01 $223.3B YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.8.17% $0.00 $5.7B -
What do Analysts Say About SNPMF or YZCFF?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has higher upside potential than Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp., analysts believe China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. is more attractive than Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.0 0 0 YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.0 0 0 -
Is SNPMF or YZCFF More Risky?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a beta of 0.230, which suggesting that the stock is 77.005% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a beta of 0.189, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.121%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNPMF or YZCFF?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.91%. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. pays 73.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SNPMF or YZCFF?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. quarterly revenues are $98.4B, which are larger than Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.5B. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s net income of $1.5B is higher than Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s net income of $24.7M. Notably, China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.93x while Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s PE ratio is 13.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. is 0.17x versus 0.11x for Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.0.17x 16.93x $98.4B $1.5B YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.0.11x 13.37x $2.5B $24.7M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?
NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been one of the best stocks to…
Stock Ideas
Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 61x
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
69
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Sell
47
PSTG alert for Dec 4
Pure Storage, Inc. [PSTG] is up 5.05% over the past day.
Sell
41
SMX alert for Dec 4
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 154.74% over the past day.
Sell
43
HY alert for Dec 4
Hyster-Yale, Inc. [HY] is up 1.92% over the past day.
