Why Is Amkor Stock Up So Much?
Semiconductor packaging and testing major Amkor (NASDAQ:AMKR) has started 2026…
Buy
61
PCCYF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1.05
Seasonality move
:
8.36%
Day range:
$1.00 - $1.07
52-week range:
$0.59 - $1.18
Dividend yield:
6.25%
P/E ratio:
8.77x
P/S ratio:
0.49x
P/B ratio:
0.88x
Volume:
18.5K
Avg. volume:
36.5K
1-year change:
31.25%
Market cap:
$192.2B
Revenue:
$379.5B
EPS (TTM):
$0.12
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PCCYF
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
|
$96.7B | -- | 5.96% | -- | -- |
|
LSE
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
$91.6B | -- | -7.02% | -- | -- |
|
STAK
STAK Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PCCYF
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
|
$1.05 | -- | $192.2B | 8.77x | $0.03 | 6.25% | 0.49x |
|
LSE
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
$1.53 | -- | $46.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.89x |
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
$0.61 | -- | $73.2B | 18.29x | $0.01 | 5.26% | 0.19x |
|
STAK
STAK Inc.
|
$0.42 | -- | $5.6M | 6.09x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.77x |
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
$0.07 | -- | $1.2B | 13.37x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.11x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PCCYF
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
|
19.33% | 0.539 | 26.74% | 0.66x |
|
LSE
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
6.06% | 2.217 | 22.17% | 9.49x |
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
41.99% | 0.405 | 100.72% | 0.35x |
|
STAK
STAK Inc.
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
77.4% | 0.000 | 358.74% | 0.57x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PCCYF
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
|
$21.6B | $8B | 8.12% | 9.86% | 7.97% | $8.7B |
|
LSE
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -10.39% | -11.14% | -- | -- |
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
$15.7B | $1.9B | 2.71% | 4.2% | 1.95% | $3B |
|
STAK
STAK Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
$212.1M | $71.6M | 3.76% | 16.82% | 3.14% | -$2.9M |
PetroChina Co., Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PCCYF or LSE?
has a net margin of 6.46% compared to PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.86% beat 's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PCCYFPetroChina Co., Ltd.21.49% $0.03 $299.2B LSE-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PCCYF or LSE?
PetroChina Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PetroChina Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than , analysts believe PetroChina Co., Ltd. is more attractive than .
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PCCYFPetroChina Co., Ltd.0 0 0 LSE0 0 0 -
Is PCCYF or LSE More Risky?
PetroChina Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.489, which suggesting that the stock is 51.118% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PCCYF or LSE?
PetroChina Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.25%. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PetroChina Co., Ltd. pays 56.08% of its earnings as a dividend. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PCCYF or LSE?
PetroChina Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $100.5B, which are larger than quarterly revenues of --. PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s net income of $6.5B is higher than 's net income of --. Notably, PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.77x while 's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PetroChina Co., Ltd. is 0.49x versus -- for . Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PCCYFPetroChina Co., Ltd.0.49x 8.77x $100.5B $6.5B LSE-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PCCYF or RCON?
Recon Technology Ltd. has a net margin of 6.46% compared to PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.86% beat Recon Technology Ltd.'s return on equity of -11.14%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PCCYFPetroChina Co., Ltd.21.49% $0.03 $299.2B RCONRecon Technology Ltd.-- -- $72M -
What do Analysts Say About PCCYF or RCON?
PetroChina Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Recon Technology Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PetroChina Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Recon Technology Ltd., analysts believe PetroChina Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Recon Technology Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PCCYFPetroChina Co., Ltd.0 0 0 RCONRecon Technology Ltd.0 1 0 -
Is PCCYF or RCON More Risky?
PetroChina Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.489, which suggesting that the stock is 51.118% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Recon Technology Ltd. has a beta of 1.846, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.552%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PCCYF or RCON?
PetroChina Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.25%. Recon Technology Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PetroChina Co., Ltd. pays 56.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Recon Technology Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PCCYF or RCON?
PetroChina Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $100.5B, which are larger than Recon Technology Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s net income of $6.5B is higher than Recon Technology Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.77x while Recon Technology Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PetroChina Co., Ltd. is 0.49x versus 0.89x for Recon Technology Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PCCYFPetroChina Co., Ltd.0.49x 8.77x $100.5B $6.5B RCONRecon Technology Ltd.0.89x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PCCYF or SNPMF?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a net margin of 6.46% compared to PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 1.49%. PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.86% beat China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s return on equity of 4.2%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PCCYFPetroChina Co., Ltd.21.49% $0.03 $299.2B SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.15.94% $0.01 $223.3B -
What do Analysts Say About PCCYF or SNPMF?
PetroChina Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PetroChina Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Petroleum & Chemical Corp., analysts believe PetroChina Co., Ltd. is more attractive than China Petroleum & Chemical Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PCCYFPetroChina Co., Ltd.0 0 0 SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.0 0 0 -
Is PCCYF or SNPMF More Risky?
PetroChina Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.489, which suggesting that the stock is 51.118% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a beta of 0.246, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.355%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PCCYF or SNPMF?
PetroChina Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.25%. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. offers a yield of 5.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. PetroChina Co., Ltd. pays 56.08% of its earnings as a dividend. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. pays out 73.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PCCYF or SNPMF?
PetroChina Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $100.5B, which are larger than China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. quarterly revenues of $98.4B. PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s net income of $6.5B is higher than China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s net income of $1.5B. Notably, PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.77x while China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s PE ratio is 18.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PetroChina Co., Ltd. is 0.49x versus 0.19x for China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PCCYFPetroChina Co., Ltd.0.49x 8.77x $100.5B $6.5B SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.0.19x 18.29x $98.4B $1.5B
-
Which has Higher Returns PCCYF or STAK?
STAK Inc. has a net margin of 6.46% compared to PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.86% beat STAK Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PCCYFPetroChina Co., Ltd.21.49% $0.03 $299.2B STAKSTAK Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PCCYF or STAK?
PetroChina Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand STAK Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PetroChina Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than STAK Inc., analysts believe PetroChina Co., Ltd. is more attractive than STAK Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PCCYFPetroChina Co., Ltd.0 0 0 STAKSTAK Inc.0 0 0 -
Is PCCYF or STAK More Risky?
PetroChina Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.489, which suggesting that the stock is 51.118% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison STAK Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PCCYF or STAK?
PetroChina Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.25%. STAK Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PetroChina Co., Ltd. pays 56.08% of its earnings as a dividend. STAK Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PCCYF or STAK?
PetroChina Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $100.5B, which are larger than STAK Inc. quarterly revenues of --. PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s net income of $6.5B is higher than STAK Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.77x while STAK Inc.'s PE ratio is 6.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PetroChina Co., Ltd. is 0.49x versus 0.77x for STAK Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PCCYFPetroChina Co., Ltd.0.49x 8.77x $100.5B $6.5B STAKSTAK Inc.0.77x 6.09x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PCCYF or YZCFF?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a net margin of 6.46% compared to PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 1.43%. PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.86% beat Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s return on equity of 16.82%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PCCYFPetroChina Co., Ltd.21.49% $0.03 $299.2B YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.8.17% $0.00 $5.7B -
What do Analysts Say About PCCYF or YZCFF?
PetroChina Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PetroChina Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp., analysts believe PetroChina Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PCCYFPetroChina Co., Ltd.0 0 0 YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.0 0 0 -
Is PCCYF or YZCFF More Risky?
PetroChina Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.489, which suggesting that the stock is 51.118% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a beta of 0.224, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.567%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PCCYF or YZCFF?
PetroChina Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.25%. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PetroChina Co., Ltd. pays 56.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PCCYF or YZCFF?
PetroChina Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $100.5B, which are larger than Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.5B. PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s net income of $6.5B is higher than Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s net income of $24.7M. Notably, PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.77x while Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s PE ratio is 13.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PetroChina Co., Ltd. is 0.49x versus 0.11x for Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PCCYFPetroChina Co., Ltd.0.49x 8.77x $100.5B $6.5B YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.0.11x 13.37x $2.5B $24.7M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Shopify Stock a Good Buy Now?
eCommerce technology platform Shopify (NASDAQ:SHOP) delivered impressive returns in 2025…
Will The Magnificent 7 Stocks Go Up This Year?
2025 was another banner year for the Magnificent Seven stocks,…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
65
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Buy
51
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Alerts
Buy
100
ATGL alert for Jan 10
Alpha Technology Group Ltd. [ATGL] is up 47.05% over the past day.
Buy
71
NAIL alert for Jan 10
Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shs [NAIL] is up 18.52% over the past day.
Buy
54
LGIH alert for Jan 10
LGI Homes, Inc. [LGIH] is up 13.81% over the past day.
