SPTJF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

PetroChina has a net margin of 1.33% compared to Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's net margin of 6.25%. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's return on equity of 1.26% beat PetroChina's return on equity of 9.77%.

Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PetroChina has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical has higher upside potential than PetroChina, analysts believe Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical is more attractive than PetroChina.

Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical has a beta of 0.372, which suggesting that the stock is 62.776% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PetroChina has a beta of 0.498, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.25%.

Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PetroChina offers a yield of 8.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical pays 30.92% of its earnings as a dividend. PetroChina pays out 57.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are smaller than PetroChina quarterly revenues of $98.1B. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's net income of $39.2M is lower than PetroChina's net income of $6.1B. Notably, Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.01x while PetroChina's PE ratio is 6.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical is 0.13x versus 0.34x for PetroChina. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Recon Technology has a net margin of 1.33% compared to Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's net margin of --. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's return on equity of 1.26% beat Recon Technology's return on equity of -11.14%.

Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Recon Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical has higher upside potential than Recon Technology, analysts believe Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical is more attractive than Recon Technology.

Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical has a beta of 0.372, which suggesting that the stock is 62.776% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Recon Technology has a beta of 2.606, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 160.589%.

Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Recon Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical pays 30.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Recon Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Recon Technology quarterly revenues of --. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's net income of $39.2M is higher than Recon Technology's net income of --. Notably, Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.01x while Recon Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical is 0.13x versus 2.12x for Recon Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sinopec Oilfield Service has a net margin of 1.33% compared to Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's net margin of -0.17%. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's return on equity of 1.26% beat Sinopec Oilfield Service's return on equity of 7.36%.

Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sinopec Oilfield Service has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical has higher upside potential than Sinopec Oilfield Service, analysts believe Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical is more attractive than Sinopec Oilfield Service.

Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical has a beta of 0.372, which suggesting that the stock is 62.776% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sinopec Oilfield Service has a beta of 0.434, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.598%.

Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sinopec Oilfield Service offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical pays 30.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Sinopec Oilfield Service pays out 106.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Sinopec Oilfield Service's is not.

Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are smaller than Sinopec Oilfield Service quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's net income of $39.2M is higher than Sinopec Oilfield Service's net income of -$6.2M. Notably, Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.01x while Sinopec Oilfield Service's PE ratio is 14.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical is 0.13x versus -- for Sinopec Oilfield Service. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.