Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Buy
84
SPTJF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.21
Seasonality move
:
1.58%
Day range:
$0.20 - $0.21
52-week range:
$0.10 - $0.21
Dividend yield:
1.36%
P/E ratio:
88.02x
P/S ratio:
0.20x
P/B ratio:
0.63x
Volume:
11.5K
Avg. volume:
5.1K
1-year change:
36.3%
Market cap:
$2.2B
Revenue:
$10.3B
EPS (TTM):
-$0.00
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SPTJF
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.
|
$2.5B | -- | -15.64% | -- | -- |
|
CHOLF
China Oilfield Services Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCCYF
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
|
$101.7B | -- | 6.21% | -- | -- |
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
$94.5B | -- | -5.25% | -- | -- |
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SPTJF
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.
|
$0.21 | -- | $2.2B | 88.02x | $0.00 | 1.36% | 0.20x |
|
CHOLF
China Oilfield Services Ltd.
|
$1.20 | -- | $5.7B | 10.57x | $0.03 | 2.66% | 0.83x |
|
PCCYF
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
|
$1.22 | -- | $223.3B | 10.19x | $0.03 | 5.38% | 0.57x |
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
$1.32 | -- | $40.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.77x |
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
$0.66 | -- | $79.9B | 15.74x | $0.01 | 4.81% | 0.21x |
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
$0.13 | -- | $2.4B | 13.37x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.22x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SPTJF
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.
|
31.55% | 3.198 | 88.28% | 0.69x |
|
CHOLF
China Oilfield Services Ltd.
|
27.47% | 0.250 | 57.92% | 0.92x |
|
PCCYF
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
|
19.33% | 0.628 | 26.74% | 0.66x |
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
6.06% | 2.227 | 22.17% | 9.49x |
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
41.99% | 0.380 | 100.72% | 0.35x |
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
77.4% | 0.000 | 358.74% | 0.57x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SPTJF
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.
|
$461.9M | -$6.5M | -0.4% | -0.58% | -0.24% | $181.1M |
|
CHOLF
China Oilfield Services Ltd.
|
$314.7M | $241.3M | 6.51% | 9.14% | 14.98% | $194.4M |
|
PCCYF
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
|
$21.6B | $8B | 8.12% | 9.86% | 7.97% | $8.7B |
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -10.39% | -11.14% | -- | -- |
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
$15.7B | $1.9B | 2.71% | 4.2% | 1.95% | $3B |
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
$212.1M | $71.6M | 3.76% | 16.82% | 3.14% | -$2.9M |
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SPTJF or CHOLF?
China Oilfield Services Ltd. has a net margin of 0.16% compared to Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 11.39%. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.58% beat China Oilfield Services Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.14%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SPTJFSinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.17.07% $0.00 $5B CHOLFChina Oilfield Services Ltd.19.53% $0.04 $9B -
What do Analysts Say About SPTJF or CHOLF?
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Oilfield Services Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Oilfield Services Ltd., analysts believe Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. is more attractive than China Oilfield Services Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SPTJFSinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.0 0 0 CHOLFChina Oilfield Services Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SPTJF or CHOLF More Risky?
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.634, which suggesting that the stock is 36.585% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Oilfield Services Ltd. has a beta of -0.519, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 151.948%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SPTJF or CHOLF?
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.36%. China Oilfield Services Ltd. offers a yield of 2.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. pays 66.9% of its earnings as a dividend. China Oilfield Services Ltd. pays out 35.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SPTJF or CHOLF?
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than China Oilfield Services Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s net income of $4.4M is lower than China Oilfield Services Ltd.'s net income of $183.6M. Notably, Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 88.02x while China Oilfield Services Ltd.'s PE ratio is 10.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. is 0.20x versus 0.83x for China Oilfield Services Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SPTJFSinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.0.20x 88.02x $2.7B $4.4M CHOLFChina Oilfield Services Ltd.0.83x 10.57x $1.6B $183.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns SPTJF or PCCYF?
PetroChina Co., Ltd. has a net margin of 0.16% compared to Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 6.46%. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.58% beat PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.86%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SPTJFSinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.17.07% $0.00 $5B PCCYFPetroChina Co., Ltd.21.49% $0.03 $299.2B -
What do Analysts Say About SPTJF or PCCYF?
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PetroChina Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than PetroChina Co., Ltd., analysts believe Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. is more attractive than PetroChina Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SPTJFSinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.0 0 0 PCCYFPetroChina Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SPTJF or PCCYF More Risky?
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.634, which suggesting that the stock is 36.585% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PetroChina Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.484, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.623%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SPTJF or PCCYF?
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.36%. PetroChina Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 5.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. pays 66.9% of its earnings as a dividend. PetroChina Co., Ltd. pays out 56.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SPTJF or PCCYF?
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than PetroChina Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $100.5B. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s net income of $4.4M is lower than PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s net income of $6.5B. Notably, Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 88.02x while PetroChina Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 10.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. is 0.20x versus 0.57x for PetroChina Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SPTJFSinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.0.20x 88.02x $2.7B $4.4M PCCYFPetroChina Co., Ltd.0.57x 10.19x $100.5B $6.5B
-
Which has Higher Returns SPTJF or RCON?
Recon Technology Ltd. has a net margin of 0.16% compared to Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.58% beat Recon Technology Ltd.'s return on equity of -11.14%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SPTJFSinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.17.07% $0.00 $5B RCONRecon Technology Ltd.-- -- $72M -
What do Analysts Say About SPTJF or RCON?
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Recon Technology Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Recon Technology Ltd., analysts believe Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Recon Technology Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SPTJFSinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.0 0 0 RCONRecon Technology Ltd.0 1 0 -
Is SPTJF or RCON More Risky?
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.634, which suggesting that the stock is 36.585% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Recon Technology Ltd. has a beta of 1.930, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.027%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SPTJF or RCON?
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.36%. Recon Technology Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. pays 66.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Recon Technology Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SPTJF or RCON?
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Recon Technology Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s net income of $4.4M is higher than Recon Technology Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 88.02x while Recon Technology Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. is 0.20x versus 0.77x for Recon Technology Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SPTJFSinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.0.20x 88.02x $2.7B $4.4M RCONRecon Technology Ltd.0.77x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SPTJF or SNPMF?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a net margin of 0.16% compared to Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 1.49%. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.58% beat China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s return on equity of 4.2%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SPTJFSinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.17.07% $0.00 $5B SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.15.94% $0.01 $223.3B -
What do Analysts Say About SPTJF or SNPMF?
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Petroleum & Chemical Corp., analysts believe Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. is more attractive than China Petroleum & Chemical Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SPTJFSinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.0 0 0 SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.0 0 0 -
Is SPTJF or SNPMF More Risky?
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.634, which suggesting that the stock is 36.585% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a beta of 0.264, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.559%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SPTJF or SNPMF?
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.36%. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. offers a yield of 4.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. pays 66.9% of its earnings as a dividend. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. pays out 73.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SPTJF or SNPMF?
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. quarterly revenues of $98.4B. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s net income of $4.4M is lower than China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s net income of $1.5B. Notably, Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 88.02x while China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s PE ratio is 15.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. is 0.20x versus 0.21x for China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SPTJFSinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.0.20x 88.02x $2.7B $4.4M SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.0.21x 15.74x $98.4B $1.5B
-
Which has Higher Returns SPTJF or YZCFF?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a net margin of 0.16% compared to Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 1.43%. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.58% beat Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s return on equity of 16.82%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SPTJFSinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.17.07% $0.00 $5B YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.8.17% $0.00 $5.7B -
What do Analysts Say About SPTJF or YZCFF?
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp., analysts believe Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SPTJFSinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.0 0 0 YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.0 0 0 -
Is SPTJF or YZCFF More Risky?
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.634, which suggesting that the stock is 36.585% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a beta of 0.224, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.578%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SPTJF or YZCFF?
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.36%. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. pays 66.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SPTJF or YZCFF?
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s net income of $4.4M is lower than Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s net income of $24.7M. Notably, Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 88.02x while Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s PE ratio is 13.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. is 0.20x versus 0.22x for Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SPTJFSinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.0.20x 88.02x $2.7B $4.4M YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.0.22x 13.37x $2.5B $24.7M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
37
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Buy
59
SEZL alert for Feb 27
Sezzle, Inc. [SEZL] is down 15.01% over the past day.
Buy
83
GCT alert for Feb 27
GigaCloud Technology, Inc. [GCT] is down 7.02% over the past day.
Buy
62
LMAT alert for Feb 27
LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. [LMAT] is down 5.48% over the past day.
