Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Buy
53
SPTJF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.16
Seasonality move
:
29.59%
Day range:
$0.16 - $0.18
52-week range:
$0.10 - $0.20
Dividend yield:
1.79%
P/E ratio:
88.02x
P/S ratio:
0.15x
P/B ratio:
0.48x
Volume:
9.5K
Avg. volume:
23.8K
1-year change:
14.17%
Market cap:
$1.6B
Revenue:
$10.3B
EPS (TTM):
-$0.00
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SPTJF
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.
|
$2.7B | -- | -17.19% | -- | -- |
|
LSE
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
$99.6B | -- | -7.02% | -- | -- |
|
STAK
Stak
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SPTJF
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.
|
$0.16 | -- | $1.6B | 88.02x | $0.00 | 1.79% | 0.15x |
|
LSE
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
$1.30 | -- | $39.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.75x |
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
$0.56 | -- | $67.4B | 17.53x | $0.01 | 5.71% | 0.18x |
|
STAK
Stak
|
$0.47 | -- | $6.2M | 6.09x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.77x |
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
$0.07 | -- | $1.2B | 13.37x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.11x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SPTJF
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.
|
31.55% | 2.624 | 88.28% | 0.69x |
|
LSE
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
6.06% | 2.653 | 22.17% | 9.49x |
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
41.99% | 0.234 | 100.72% | 0.35x |
|
STAK
Stak
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
77.4% | 0.000 | 358.74% | 0.57x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SPTJF
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.
|
$461.9M | -$6.5M | -0.4% | -0.58% | -0.24% | $181.1M |
|
LSE
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RCON
Recon Technology Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -10.39% | -11.14% | -- | -- |
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
|
$15.7B | $1.9B | 2.71% | 4.2% | 1.95% | $3B |
|
STAK
Stak
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.
|
$212.1M | $71.6M | 3.76% | 16.82% | 3.14% | -$2.9M |
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SPTJF or LSE?
has a net margin of 0.16% compared to Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.58% beat 's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SPTJFSinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.17.07% $0.00 $5B LSE-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SPTJF or LSE?
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than , analysts believe Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. is more attractive than .
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SPTJFSinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.0 0 0 LSE0 0 0 -
Is SPTJF or LSE More Risky?
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.615, which suggesting that the stock is 38.51% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SPTJF or LSE?
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. pays 66.9% of its earnings as a dividend. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SPTJF or LSE?
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than quarterly revenues of --. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s net income of $4.4M is higher than 's net income of --. Notably, Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 88.02x while 's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. is 0.15x versus -- for . Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SPTJFSinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.0.15x 88.02x $2.7B $4.4M LSE-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SPTJF or RCON?
Recon Technology Ltd. has a net margin of 0.16% compared to Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.58% beat Recon Technology Ltd.'s return on equity of -11.14%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SPTJFSinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.17.07% $0.00 $5B RCONRecon Technology Ltd.-- -- $72M -
What do Analysts Say About SPTJF or RCON?
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Recon Technology Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Recon Technology Ltd., analysts believe Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Recon Technology Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SPTJFSinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.0 0 0 RCONRecon Technology Ltd.0 1 0 -
Is SPTJF or RCON More Risky?
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.615, which suggesting that the stock is 38.51% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Recon Technology Ltd. has a beta of 1.881, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.086%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SPTJF or RCON?
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. Recon Technology Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. pays 66.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Recon Technology Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SPTJF or RCON?
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Recon Technology Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s net income of $4.4M is higher than Recon Technology Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 88.02x while Recon Technology Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. is 0.15x versus 0.75x for Recon Technology Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SPTJFSinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.0.15x 88.02x $2.7B $4.4M RCONRecon Technology Ltd.0.75x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SPTJF or SNPMF?
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a net margin of 0.16% compared to Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 1.49%. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.58% beat China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s return on equity of 4.2%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SPTJFSinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.17.07% $0.00 $5B SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.15.94% $0.01 $223.3B -
What do Analysts Say About SPTJF or SNPMF?
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Petroleum & Chemical Corp., analysts believe Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. is more attractive than China Petroleum & Chemical Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SPTJFSinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.0 0 0 SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.0 0 0 -
Is SPTJF or SNPMF More Risky?
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.615, which suggesting that the stock is 38.51% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. has a beta of 0.230, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.005%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SPTJF or SNPMF?
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. offers a yield of 5.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. pays 66.9% of its earnings as a dividend. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. pays out 73.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SPTJF or SNPMF?
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. quarterly revenues of $98.4B. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s net income of $4.4M is lower than China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s net income of $1.5B. Notably, Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 88.02x while China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.'s PE ratio is 17.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. is 0.15x versus 0.18x for China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SPTJFSinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.0.15x 88.02x $2.7B $4.4M SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical Corp.0.18x 17.53x $98.4B $1.5B
-
Which has Higher Returns SPTJF or STAK?
Stak has a net margin of 0.16% compared to Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.58% beat Stak's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SPTJFSinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.17.07% $0.00 $5B STAKStak-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SPTJF or STAK?
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Stak has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Stak, analysts believe Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Stak.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SPTJFSinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.0 0 0 STAKStak0 0 0 -
Is SPTJF or STAK More Risky?
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.615, which suggesting that the stock is 38.51% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stak has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SPTJF or STAK?
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. Stak offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. pays 66.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Stak pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SPTJF or STAK?
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Stak quarterly revenues of --. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s net income of $4.4M is higher than Stak's net income of --. Notably, Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 88.02x while Stak's PE ratio is 6.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. is 0.15x versus 0.77x for Stak. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SPTJFSinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.0.15x 88.02x $2.7B $4.4M STAKStak0.77x 6.09x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SPTJF or YZCFF?
Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a net margin of 0.16% compared to Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 1.43%. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.58% beat Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s return on equity of 16.82%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SPTJFSinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.17.07% $0.00 $5B YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.8.17% $0.00 $5.7B -
What do Analysts Say About SPTJF or YZCFF?
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp., analysts believe Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SPTJFSinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.0 0 0 YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.0 0 0 -
Is SPTJF or YZCFF More Risky?
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.615, which suggesting that the stock is 38.51% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. has a beta of 0.189, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.121%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SPTJF or YZCFF?
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. pays 66.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SPTJF or YZCFF?
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s net income of $4.4M is lower than Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s net income of $24.7M. Notably, Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 88.02x while Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.'s PE ratio is 13.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd. is 0.15x versus 0.11x for Sinopec Oilfield Service Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SPTJFSinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd.0.15x 88.02x $2.7B $4.4M YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service Corp.0.11x 13.37x $2.5B $24.7M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 8
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 48.08% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 8
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 6.66% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 8
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 6.48% over the past day.
