ASC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Matson has a net margin of 8.45% compared to Ardmore Shipping's net margin of 14.38%. Ardmore Shipping's return on equity of 21.22% beat Matson's return on equity of 19.24%.

Ardmore Shipping has a consensus price target of $12.63, signalling upside risk potential of 36.34%. On the other hand Matson has an analysts' consensus of $167.50 which suggests that it could grow by 65.56%. Given that Matson has higher upside potential than Ardmore Shipping, analysts believe Matson is more attractive than Ardmore Shipping.

Ardmore Shipping has a beta of 0.160, which suggesting that the stock is 84.008% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matson has a beta of 1.121, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.097%.

Ardmore Shipping has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.26%. Matson offers a yield of 1.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Ardmore Shipping pays 36.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Matson pays out 9.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ardmore Shipping quarterly revenues are $82M, which are smaller than Matson quarterly revenues of $890.3M. Ardmore Shipping's net income of $6.9M is lower than Matson's net income of $128M. Notably, Ardmore Shipping's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.03x while Matson's PE ratio is 7.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ardmore Shipping is 0.96x versus 1.01x for Matson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SFL has a net margin of 8.45% compared to Ardmore Shipping's net margin of 8.98%. Ardmore Shipping's return on equity of 21.22% beat SFL's return on equity of 12.11%.

Ardmore Shipping has a consensus price target of $12.63, signalling upside risk potential of 36.34%. On the other hand SFL has an analysts' consensus of $11.80 which suggests that it could grow by 51.28%. Given that SFL has higher upside potential than Ardmore Shipping, analysts believe SFL is more attractive than Ardmore Shipping.

Ardmore Shipping has a beta of 0.160, which suggesting that the stock is 84.008% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SFL has a beta of 0.579, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.087%.

Ardmore Shipping has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.26%. SFL offers a yield of 13.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Ardmore Shipping pays 36.75% of its earnings as a dividend. SFL pays out 106% of its earnings as a dividend. Ardmore Shipping's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but SFL's is not.

Ardmore Shipping quarterly revenues are $82M, which are smaller than SFL quarterly revenues of $225M. Ardmore Shipping's net income of $6.9M is lower than SFL's net income of $20.2M. Notably, Ardmore Shipping's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.03x while SFL's PE ratio is 7.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ardmore Shipping is 0.96x versus 1.14x for SFL. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stolt-Nielsen has a net margin of 8.45% compared to Ardmore Shipping's net margin of 22.41%. Ardmore Shipping's return on equity of 21.22% beat Stolt-Nielsen's return on equity of 20.67%.

Ardmore Shipping has a consensus price target of $12.63, signalling upside risk potential of 36.34%. On the other hand Stolt-Nielsen has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ardmore Shipping has higher upside potential than Stolt-Nielsen, analysts believe Ardmore Shipping is more attractive than Stolt-Nielsen.

Ardmore Shipping has a beta of 0.160, which suggesting that the stock is 84.008% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stolt-Nielsen has a beta of 0.263, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.655%.

Ardmore Shipping has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.26%. Stolt-Nielsen offers a yield of 10.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share. Ardmore Shipping pays 36.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Stolt-Nielsen pays out 33.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ardmore Shipping quarterly revenues are $82M, which are smaller than Stolt-Nielsen quarterly revenues of $675.6M. Ardmore Shipping's net income of $6.9M is lower than Stolt-Nielsen's net income of $151.4M. Notably, Ardmore Shipping's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.03x while Stolt-Nielsen's PE ratio is 2.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ardmore Shipping is 0.96x versus 0.44x for Stolt-Nielsen. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Toro has a net margin of 8.45% compared to Ardmore Shipping's net margin of 18.34%. Ardmore Shipping's return on equity of 21.22% beat Toro's return on equity of 59.63%.

Ardmore Shipping has a consensus price target of $12.63, signalling upside risk potential of 36.34%. On the other hand Toro has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ardmore Shipping has higher upside potential than Toro, analysts believe Ardmore Shipping is more attractive than Toro.

Ardmore Shipping has a beta of 0.160, which suggesting that the stock is 84.008% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Toro has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Ardmore Shipping has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.26%. Toro offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ardmore Shipping pays 36.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Toro pays out 5.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ardmore Shipping quarterly revenues are $82M, which are larger than Toro quarterly revenues of $5.3M. Ardmore Shipping's net income of $6.9M is higher than Toro's net income of $975.4K. Notably, Ardmore Shipping's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.03x while Toro's PE ratio is 3.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ardmore Shipping is 0.96x versus 1.90x for Toro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.