SEMUF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Costamare has a net margin of -- compared to Siem Industries's net margin of 14.83%. Siem Industries's return on equity of -- beat Costamare's return on equity of 15.71%.

Siem Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Costamare has an analysts' consensus of $12.00 which suggests that it could grow by 8.36%. Given that Costamare has higher upside potential than Siem Industries, analysts believe Costamare is more attractive than Siem Industries.

Siem Industries has a beta of 0.527, which suggesting that the stock is 47.284% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Costamare has a beta of 1.347, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.671%.

Siem Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Costamare offers a yield of 3.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Siem Industries pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Costamare pays out 18.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Costamare's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Siem Industries quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Costamare quarterly revenues of $544.6M. Siem Industries's net income of -- is lower than Costamare's net income of $80.8M. Notably, Siem Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Costamare's PE ratio is 4.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Siem Industries is 1.16x versus 0.76x for Costamare. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gold and GemStone Mining has a net margin of -- compared to Siem Industries's net margin of --. Siem Industries's return on equity of -- beat Gold and GemStone Mining's return on equity of --.

Siem Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gold and GemStone Mining has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Siem Industries has higher upside potential than Gold and GemStone Mining, analysts believe Siem Industries is more attractive than Gold and GemStone Mining.

Siem Industries has a beta of 0.527, which suggesting that the stock is 47.284% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold and GemStone Mining has a beta of 1.547, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.683%.

Siem Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold and GemStone Mining offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Siem Industries pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold and GemStone Mining pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Siem Industries quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Gold and GemStone Mining quarterly revenues of --. Siem Industries's net income of -- is lower than Gold and GemStone Mining's net income of --. Notably, Siem Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gold and GemStone Mining's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Siem Industries is 1.16x versus -- for Gold and GemStone Mining. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SFL has a net margin of -- compared to Siem Industries's net margin of 17.58%. Siem Industries's return on equity of -- beat SFL's return on equity of 13.36%.

Siem Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SFL has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 27.59%. Given that SFL has higher upside potential than Siem Industries, analysts believe SFL is more attractive than Siem Industries.

Siem Industries has a beta of 0.527, which suggesting that the stock is 47.284% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SFL has a beta of 0.683, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.693%.

Siem Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SFL offers a yield of 10.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Siem Industries pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SFL pays out 146.53% of its earnings as a dividend.

Siem Industries quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SFL quarterly revenues of $253.2M. Siem Industries's net income of -- is lower than SFL's net income of $44.5M. Notably, Siem Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SFL's PE ratio is 9.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Siem Industries is 1.16x versus 1.48x for SFL. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Toro has a net margin of -- compared to Siem Industries's net margin of 18.34%. Siem Industries's return on equity of -- beat Toro's return on equity of 59.63%.

Siem Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Toro has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Siem Industries has higher upside potential than Toro, analysts believe Siem Industries is more attractive than Toro.

Siem Industries has a beta of 0.527, which suggesting that the stock is 47.284% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Toro has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Siem Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Toro offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Siem Industries pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Toro pays out 0.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Toro's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Siem Industries quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Toro quarterly revenues of $5.3M. Siem Industries's net income of -- is lower than Toro's net income of $975.4K. Notably, Siem Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Toro's PE ratio is 2.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Siem Industries is 1.16x versus 0.86x for Toro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.