CMRE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gold and GemStone Mining has a net margin of 14.83% compared to Costamare's net margin of --. Costamare's return on equity of 15.71% beat Gold and GemStone Mining's return on equity of --.

Costamare has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.36%. On the other hand Gold and GemStone Mining has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Costamare has higher upside potential than Gold and GemStone Mining, analysts believe Costamare is more attractive than Gold and GemStone Mining.

Costamare has a beta of 1.347, which suggesting that the stock is 34.671% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold and GemStone Mining has a beta of 1.547, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.683%.

Costamare has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.56%. Gold and GemStone Mining offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Costamare pays 18.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Gold and GemStone Mining pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Costamare's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Costamare quarterly revenues are $544.6M, which are larger than Gold and GemStone Mining quarterly revenues of --. Costamare's net income of $80.8M is higher than Gold and GemStone Mining's net income of --. Notably, Costamare's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.29x while Gold and GemStone Mining's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Costamare is 0.76x versus -- for Gold and GemStone Mining. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Siem Industries has a net margin of 14.83% compared to Costamare's net margin of --. Costamare's return on equity of 15.71% beat Siem Industries's return on equity of --.

Costamare has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.36%. On the other hand Siem Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Costamare has higher upside potential than Siem Industries, analysts believe Costamare is more attractive than Siem Industries.

Costamare has a beta of 1.347, which suggesting that the stock is 34.671% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Siem Industries has a beta of 0.527, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.284%.

Costamare has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.56%. Siem Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Costamare pays 18.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Siem Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Costamare's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Costamare quarterly revenues are $544.6M, which are larger than Siem Industries quarterly revenues of --. Costamare's net income of $80.8M is higher than Siem Industries's net income of --. Notably, Costamare's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.29x while Siem Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Costamare is 0.76x versus 1.16x for Siem Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SFL has a net margin of 14.83% compared to Costamare's net margin of 17.58%. Costamare's return on equity of 15.71% beat SFL's return on equity of 13.36%.

Costamare has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.36%. On the other hand SFL has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 27.59%. Given that SFL has higher upside potential than Costamare, analysts believe SFL is more attractive than Costamare.

Costamare has a beta of 1.347, which suggesting that the stock is 34.671% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SFL has a beta of 0.683, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.693%.

Costamare has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.56%. SFL offers a yield of 10.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Costamare pays 18.63% of its earnings as a dividend. SFL pays out 146.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Costamare's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but SFL's is not.

Costamare quarterly revenues are $544.6M, which are larger than SFL quarterly revenues of $253.2M. Costamare's net income of $80.8M is higher than SFL's net income of $44.5M. Notably, Costamare's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.29x while SFL's PE ratio is 9.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Costamare is 0.76x versus 1.48x for SFL. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Toro has a net margin of 14.83% compared to Costamare's net margin of 18.34%. Costamare's return on equity of 15.71% beat Toro's return on equity of 59.63%.

Costamare has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.36%. On the other hand Toro has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Costamare has higher upside potential than Toro, analysts believe Costamare is more attractive than Toro.

Costamare has a beta of 1.347, which suggesting that the stock is 34.671% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Toro has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Costamare has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.56%. Toro offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Costamare pays 18.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Toro pays out 0.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Costamare quarterly revenues are $544.6M, which are larger than Toro quarterly revenues of $5.3M. Costamare's net income of $80.8M is higher than Toro's net income of $975.4K. Notably, Costamare's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.29x while Toro's PE ratio is 2.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Costamare is 0.76x versus 0.86x for Toro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.