SFL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Costamare has a net margin of 17.58% compared to SFL's net margin of 14.83%. SFL's return on equity of 13.36% beat Costamare's return on equity of 15.71%.

SFL has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 29.63%. On the other hand Costamare has an analysts' consensus of $12.00 which suggests that it could grow by 9.2%. Given that SFL has higher upside potential than Costamare, analysts believe SFL is more attractive than Costamare.

SFL has a beta of 0.683, which suggesting that the stock is 31.693% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Costamare has a beta of 1.347, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.671%.

SFL has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.71%. Costamare offers a yield of 3.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. SFL pays 146.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Costamare pays out 18.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Costamare's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but SFL's is not.

SFL quarterly revenues are $253.2M, which are smaller than Costamare quarterly revenues of $544.6M. SFL's net income of $44.5M is lower than Costamare's net income of $80.8M. Notably, SFL's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.00x while Costamare's PE ratio is 4.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SFL is 1.46x versus 0.75x for Costamare. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gold and GemStone Mining has a net margin of 17.58% compared to SFL's net margin of --. SFL's return on equity of 13.36% beat Gold and GemStone Mining's return on equity of --.

SFL has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 29.63%. On the other hand Gold and GemStone Mining has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SFL has higher upside potential than Gold and GemStone Mining, analysts believe SFL is more attractive than Gold and GemStone Mining.

SFL has a beta of 0.683, which suggesting that the stock is 31.693% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold and GemStone Mining has a beta of 1.547, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.683%.

SFL has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.71%. Gold and GemStone Mining offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SFL pays 146.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Gold and GemStone Mining pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SFL quarterly revenues are $253.2M, which are larger than Gold and GemStone Mining quarterly revenues of --. SFL's net income of $44.5M is higher than Gold and GemStone Mining's net income of --. Notably, SFL's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.00x while Gold and GemStone Mining's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SFL is 1.46x versus -- for Gold and GemStone Mining. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Siem Industries has a net margin of 17.58% compared to SFL's net margin of --. SFL's return on equity of 13.36% beat Siem Industries's return on equity of --.

SFL has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 29.63%. On the other hand Siem Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SFL has higher upside potential than Siem Industries, analysts believe SFL is more attractive than Siem Industries.

SFL has a beta of 0.683, which suggesting that the stock is 31.693% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Siem Industries has a beta of 0.527, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.284%.

SFL has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.71%. Siem Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SFL pays 146.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Siem Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SFL quarterly revenues are $253.2M, which are larger than Siem Industries quarterly revenues of --. SFL's net income of $44.5M is higher than Siem Industries's net income of --. Notably, SFL's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.00x while Siem Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SFL is 1.46x versus 1.16x for Siem Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Toro has a net margin of 17.58% compared to SFL's net margin of 18.34%. SFL's return on equity of 13.36% beat Toro's return on equity of 59.63%.

SFL has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 29.63%. On the other hand Toro has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SFL has higher upside potential than Toro, analysts believe SFL is more attractive than Toro.

SFL has a beta of 0.683, which suggesting that the stock is 31.693% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Toro has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

SFL has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.71%. Toro offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SFL pays 146.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Toro pays out 0.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Toro's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but SFL's is not.

SFL quarterly revenues are $253.2M, which are larger than Toro quarterly revenues of $5.3M. SFL's net income of $44.5M is higher than Toro's net income of $975.4K. Notably, SFL's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.00x while Toro's PE ratio is 2.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SFL is 1.46x versus 0.81x for Toro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.