SFL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Costamare has a net margin of 8.98% compared to SFL's net margin of 6.38%. SFL's return on equity of 12.11% beat Costamare's return on equity of 12.71%.

SFL has a consensus price target of $11.80, signalling upside risk potential of 42%. On the other hand Costamare has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 28.7%. Given that SFL has higher upside potential than Costamare, analysts believe SFL is more attractive than Costamare.

SFL has a beta of 0.472, which suggesting that the stock is 52.761% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Costamare has a beta of 1.139, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.877%.

SFL has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 13%. Costamare offers a yield of 4.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. SFL pays 106% of its earnings as a dividend. Costamare pays out 23.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Costamare's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but SFL's is not.

SFL quarterly revenues are $225M, which are smaller than Costamare quarterly revenues of $548.4M. SFL's net income of $20.2M is lower than Costamare's net income of $35M. Notably, SFL's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.23x while Costamare's PE ratio is 3.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SFL is 1.21x versus 0.44x for Costamare. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gold and GemStone Mining has a net margin of 8.98% compared to SFL's net margin of --. SFL's return on equity of 12.11% beat Gold and GemStone Mining's return on equity of --.

SFL has a consensus price target of $11.80, signalling upside risk potential of 42%. On the other hand Gold and GemStone Mining has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SFL has higher upside potential than Gold and GemStone Mining, analysts believe SFL is more attractive than Gold and GemStone Mining.

SFL has a beta of 0.472, which suggesting that the stock is 52.761% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold and GemStone Mining has a beta of 2.142, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 114.171%.

SFL has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 13%. Gold and GemStone Mining offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SFL pays 106% of its earnings as a dividend. Gold and GemStone Mining pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SFL quarterly revenues are $225M, which are larger than Gold and GemStone Mining quarterly revenues of --. SFL's net income of $20.2M is higher than Gold and GemStone Mining's net income of --. Notably, SFL's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.23x while Gold and GemStone Mining's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SFL is 1.21x versus -- for Gold and GemStone Mining. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Siem Industries has a net margin of 8.98% compared to SFL's net margin of --. SFL's return on equity of 12.11% beat Siem Industries's return on equity of --.

SFL has a consensus price target of $11.80, signalling upside risk potential of 42%. On the other hand Siem Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SFL has higher upside potential than Siem Industries, analysts believe SFL is more attractive than Siem Industries.

SFL has a beta of 0.472, which suggesting that the stock is 52.761% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Siem Industries has a beta of 0.087, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.256%.

SFL has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 13%. Siem Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SFL pays 106% of its earnings as a dividend. Siem Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SFL quarterly revenues are $225M, which are larger than Siem Industries quarterly revenues of --. SFL's net income of $20.2M is higher than Siem Industries's net income of --. Notably, SFL's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.23x while Siem Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SFL is 1.21x versus 1.07x for Siem Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stolt-Nielsen has a net margin of 8.98% compared to SFL's net margin of 22.41%. SFL's return on equity of 12.11% beat Stolt-Nielsen's return on equity of 20.67%.

SFL has a consensus price target of $11.80, signalling upside risk potential of 42%. On the other hand Stolt-Nielsen has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SFL has higher upside potential than Stolt-Nielsen, analysts believe SFL is more attractive than Stolt-Nielsen.

SFL has a beta of 0.472, which suggesting that the stock is 52.761% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stolt-Nielsen has a beta of 0.226, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.377%.

SFL has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 13%. Stolt-Nielsen offers a yield of 10.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share. SFL pays 106% of its earnings as a dividend. Stolt-Nielsen pays out 33.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Stolt-Nielsen's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but SFL's is not.

SFL quarterly revenues are $225M, which are smaller than Stolt-Nielsen quarterly revenues of $675.6M. SFL's net income of $20.2M is lower than Stolt-Nielsen's net income of $151.4M. Notably, SFL's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.23x while Stolt-Nielsen's PE ratio is 2.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SFL is 1.21x versus 0.43x for Stolt-Nielsen. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.