SOIEF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kirby has a net margin of 13.52% compared to Stolt-Nielsen's net margin of 10.83%. Stolt-Nielsen's return on equity of 20.45% beat Kirby's return on equity of 9.47%.

Stolt-Nielsen has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kirby has an analysts' consensus of $114.20 which suggests that it could grow by 31.41%. Given that Kirby has higher upside potential than Stolt-Nielsen, analysts believe Kirby is more attractive than Stolt-Nielsen.

Stolt-Nielsen has a beta of 0.559, which suggesting that the stock is 44.114% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kirby has a beta of 1.182, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.17%.

Stolt-Nielsen has a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.17%. Kirby offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stolt-Nielsen pays 40.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Kirby pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Stolt-Nielsen's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Stolt-Nielsen quarterly revenues are $741.1M, which are smaller than Kirby quarterly revenues of $831.1M. Stolt-Nielsen's net income of $100.2M is higher than Kirby's net income of $90M. Notably, Stolt-Nielsen's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.28x while Kirby's PE ratio is 20.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stolt-Nielsen is 0.46x versus 1.92x for Kirby. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Matson has a net margin of 13.52% compared to Stolt-Nielsen's net margin of 20.7%. Stolt-Nielsen's return on equity of 20.45% beat Matson's return on equity of 16.95%.

Stolt-Nielsen has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Matson has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 8.06%. Given that Matson has higher upside potential than Stolt-Nielsen, analysts believe Matson is more attractive than Stolt-Nielsen.

Stolt-Nielsen has a beta of 0.559, which suggesting that the stock is 44.114% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matson has a beta of 1.044, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.435%.

Stolt-Nielsen has a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.17%. Matson offers a yield of 0.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Stolt-Nielsen pays 40.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Matson pays out 15.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Stolt-Nielsen quarterly revenues are $741.1M, which are smaller than Matson quarterly revenues of $962M. Stolt-Nielsen's net income of $100.2M is lower than Matson's net income of $199.1M. Notably, Stolt-Nielsen's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.28x while Matson's PE ratio is 11.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stolt-Nielsen is 0.46x versus 1.45x for Matson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a net margin of 13.52% compared to Stolt-Nielsen's net margin of 3.34%. Stolt-Nielsen's return on equity of 20.45% beat Pangaea Logistics Solutions's return on equity of 5.74%.

Stolt-Nielsen has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pangaea Logistics Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 95.94%. Given that Pangaea Logistics Solutions has higher upside potential than Stolt-Nielsen, analysts believe Pangaea Logistics Solutions is more attractive than Stolt-Nielsen.

Stolt-Nielsen has a beta of 0.559, which suggesting that the stock is 44.114% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a beta of 0.834, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.6%.

Stolt-Nielsen has a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.17%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions offers a yield of 7.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Stolt-Nielsen pays 40.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays out 68.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Stolt-Nielsen quarterly revenues are $741.1M, which are larger than Pangaea Logistics Solutions quarterly revenues of $153.1M. Stolt-Nielsen's net income of $100.2M is higher than Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net income of $5.1M. Notably, Stolt-Nielsen's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.28x while Pangaea Logistics Solutions's PE ratio is 10.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stolt-Nielsen is 0.46x versus 0.44x for Pangaea Logistics Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SFL has a net margin of 13.52% compared to Stolt-Nielsen's net margin of 17.58%. Stolt-Nielsen's return on equity of 20.45% beat SFL's return on equity of 13.36%.

Stolt-Nielsen has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SFL has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 27.59%. Given that SFL has higher upside potential than Stolt-Nielsen, analysts believe SFL is more attractive than Stolt-Nielsen.

Stolt-Nielsen has a beta of 0.559, which suggesting that the stock is 44.114% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SFL has a beta of 0.683, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.693%.

Stolt-Nielsen has a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.17%. SFL offers a yield of 10.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Stolt-Nielsen pays 40.62% of its earnings as a dividend. SFL pays out 146.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Stolt-Nielsen's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but SFL's is not.

Stolt-Nielsen quarterly revenues are $741.1M, which are larger than SFL quarterly revenues of $253.2M. Stolt-Nielsen's net income of $100.2M is higher than SFL's net income of $44.5M. Notably, Stolt-Nielsen's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.28x while SFL's PE ratio is 9.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stolt-Nielsen is 0.46x versus 1.48x for SFL. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.