SOIEF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kirby has a net margin of 22.41% compared to Stolt-Nielsen's net margin of 9.67%. Stolt-Nielsen's return on equity of 20.67% beat Kirby's return on equity of 8.84%.

Stolt-Nielsen has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kirby has an analysts' consensus of $126.50 which suggests that it could grow by 23.78%. Given that Kirby has higher upside potential than Stolt-Nielsen, analysts believe Kirby is more attractive than Stolt-Nielsen.

Stolt-Nielsen has a beta of 0.226, which suggesting that the stock is 77.377% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kirby has a beta of 0.912, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.806%.

Stolt-Nielsen has a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.31%. Kirby offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stolt-Nielsen pays 33.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Kirby pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Stolt-Nielsen's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Stolt-Nielsen quarterly revenues are $675.6M, which are smaller than Kirby quarterly revenues of $785.7M. Stolt-Nielsen's net income of $151.4M is higher than Kirby's net income of $76M. Notably, Stolt-Nielsen's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.68x while Kirby's PE ratio is 20.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stolt-Nielsen is 0.41x versus 1.83x for Kirby. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Matson has a net margin of 22.41% compared to Stolt-Nielsen's net margin of 9.25%. Stolt-Nielsen's return on equity of 20.67% beat Matson's return on equity of 20.32%.

Stolt-Nielsen has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Matson has an analysts' consensus of $135.00 which suggests that it could grow by 42.89%. Given that Matson has higher upside potential than Stolt-Nielsen, analysts believe Matson is more attractive than Stolt-Nielsen.

Stolt-Nielsen has a beta of 0.226, which suggesting that the stock is 77.377% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matson has a beta of 1.298, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.847%.

Stolt-Nielsen has a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.31%. Matson offers a yield of 1.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Stolt-Nielsen pays 33.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Matson pays out 9.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Stolt-Nielsen quarterly revenues are $675.6M, which are smaller than Matson quarterly revenues of $782M. Stolt-Nielsen's net income of $151.4M is higher than Matson's net income of $72.3M. Notably, Stolt-Nielsen's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.68x while Matson's PE ratio is 6.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stolt-Nielsen is 0.41x versus 0.91x for Matson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a net margin of 22.41% compared to Stolt-Nielsen's net margin of 5.73%. Stolt-Nielsen's return on equity of 20.67% beat Pangaea Logistics Solutions's return on equity of 7.3%.

Stolt-Nielsen has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pangaea Logistics Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $9.38 which suggests that it could grow by 131.69%. Given that Pangaea Logistics Solutions has higher upside potential than Stolt-Nielsen, analysts believe Pangaea Logistics Solutions is more attractive than Stolt-Nielsen.

Stolt-Nielsen has a beta of 0.226, which suggesting that the stock is 77.377% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a beta of 0.625, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.463%.

Stolt-Nielsen has a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.31%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions offers a yield of 9.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Stolt-Nielsen pays 33.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays out 64.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Stolt-Nielsen quarterly revenues are $675.6M, which are larger than Pangaea Logistics Solutions quarterly revenues of $147.2M. Stolt-Nielsen's net income of $151.4M is higher than Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net income of $8.4M. Notably, Stolt-Nielsen's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.68x while Pangaea Logistics Solutions's PE ratio is 6.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stolt-Nielsen is 0.41x versus 0.35x for Pangaea Logistics Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SFL has a net margin of 22.41% compared to Stolt-Nielsen's net margin of 8.98%. Stolt-Nielsen's return on equity of 20.67% beat SFL's return on equity of 12.11%.

Stolt-Nielsen has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SFL has an analysts' consensus of $11.80 which suggests that it could grow by 43.2%. Given that SFL has higher upside potential than Stolt-Nielsen, analysts believe SFL is more attractive than Stolt-Nielsen.

Stolt-Nielsen has a beta of 0.226, which suggesting that the stock is 77.377% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SFL has a beta of 0.472, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.761%.

Stolt-Nielsen has a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.31%. SFL offers a yield of 13.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Stolt-Nielsen pays 33.91% of its earnings as a dividend. SFL pays out 106% of its earnings as a dividend. Stolt-Nielsen's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but SFL's is not.

Stolt-Nielsen quarterly revenues are $675.6M, which are larger than SFL quarterly revenues of $225M. Stolt-Nielsen's net income of $151.4M is higher than SFL's net income of $20.2M. Notably, Stolt-Nielsen's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.68x while SFL's PE ratio is 8.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stolt-Nielsen is 0.41x versus 1.20x for SFL. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.