MATX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kirby Corp. has a net margin of 16.8% compared to Matson, Inc.'s net margin of 10.8%. Matson, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.66% beat Kirby Corp.'s return on equity of 10.57%.

Matson, Inc. has a consensus price target of $213.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.01%. On the other hand Kirby Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $139.67 which suggests that it could grow by 2.76%. Given that Matson, Inc. has higher upside potential than Kirby Corp., analysts believe Matson, Inc. is more attractive than Kirby Corp..

Matson, Inc. has a beta of 1.329, which suggesting that the stock is 32.946% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kirby Corp. has a beta of 0.825, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.482%.

Matson, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.85%. Kirby Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Matson, Inc. pays 10.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Kirby Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Matson, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Matson, Inc. quarterly revenues are $851.9M, which are larger than Kirby Corp. quarterly revenues of $851.8M. Matson, Inc.'s net income of $143.1M is higher than Kirby Corp.'s net income of $92M. Notably, Matson, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.05x while Kirby Corp.'s PE ratio is 21.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matson, Inc. is 1.61x versus 2.28x for Kirby Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. has a net margin of 16.8% compared to Matson, Inc.'s net margin of 17.55%. Matson, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.66% beat Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.'s return on equity of 24.05%.

Matson, Inc. has a consensus price target of $213.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.01%. On the other hand Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $199.29 which suggests that it could grow by 0.65%. Given that Matson, Inc. has higher upside potential than Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc., analysts believe Matson, Inc. is more attractive than Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc..

Matson, Inc. has a beta of 1.329, which suggesting that the stock is 32.946% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. has a beta of 1.202, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.234%.

Matson, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.85%. Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. offers a yield of 0.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Matson, Inc. pays 10.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. pays out 23.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Matson, Inc. quarterly revenues are $851.9M, which are smaller than Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Matson, Inc.'s net income of $143.1M is lower than Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.'s net income of $229.5M. Notably, Matson, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.05x while Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.'s PE ratio is 40.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matson, Inc. is 1.61x versus 7.56x for Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. has a net margin of 16.8% compared to Matson, Inc.'s net margin of 6.68%. Matson, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.66% beat Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd.'s return on equity of 4.31%.

Matson, Inc. has a consensus price target of $213.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.01%. On the other hand Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $10.85 which suggests that it could grow by 48.83%. Given that Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. has higher upside potential than Matson, Inc., analysts believe Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. is more attractive than Matson, Inc..

Matson, Inc. has a beta of 1.329, which suggesting that the stock is 32.946% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. has a beta of 0.888, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.197%.

Matson, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.85%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. offers a yield of 2.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Matson, Inc. pays 10.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. pays out 83.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Matson, Inc. quarterly revenues are $851.9M, which are larger than Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. quarterly revenues of $183.9M. Matson, Inc.'s net income of $143.1M is higher than Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd.'s net income of $12.3M. Notably, Matson, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.05x while Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd.'s PE ratio is 24.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matson, Inc. is 1.61x versus 0.76x for Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seacor Marine Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 16.8% compared to Matson, Inc.'s net margin of -27.94%. Matson, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.66% beat Seacor Marine Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -10%.

Matson, Inc. has a consensus price target of $213.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.01%. On the other hand Seacor Marine Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $11.00 which suggests that it could grow by 51.31%. Given that Seacor Marine Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Matson, Inc., analysts believe Seacor Marine Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Matson, Inc..

Matson, Inc. has a beta of 1.329, which suggesting that the stock is 32.946% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seacor Marine Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.109, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.887%.

Matson, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.85%. Seacor Marine Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Matson, Inc. pays 10.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Seacor Marine Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Matson, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Matson, Inc. quarterly revenues are $851.9M, which are larger than Seacor Marine Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $52.3M. Matson, Inc.'s net income of $143.1M is higher than Seacor Marine Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$14.6M. Notably, Matson, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.05x while Seacor Marine Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matson, Inc. is 1.61x versus 0.85x for Seacor Marine Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.