MATX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kirby Corp. has a net margin of 15.31% compared to Matson, Inc.'s net margin of 10.8%. Matson, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.34% beat Kirby Corp.'s return on equity of 10.57%.

Matson, Inc. has a consensus price target of $190.00, signalling upside risk potential of 14.97%. On the other hand Kirby Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $139.67 which suggests that it could grow by 15.73%. Given that Kirby Corp. has higher upside potential than Matson, Inc., analysts believe Kirby Corp. is more attractive than Matson, Inc..

Matson, Inc. has a beta of 1.349, which suggesting that the stock is 34.862% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kirby Corp. has a beta of 0.880, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.025%.

Matson, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.85%. Kirby Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Matson, Inc. pays 9.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Kirby Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Matson, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Matson, Inc. quarterly revenues are $880.1M, which are larger than Kirby Corp. quarterly revenues of $851.8M. Matson, Inc.'s net income of $134.7M is higher than Kirby Corp.'s net income of $92M. Notably, Matson, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.58x while Kirby Corp.'s PE ratio is 19.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matson, Inc. is 1.60x versus 2.01x for Kirby Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. has a net margin of 15.31% compared to Matson, Inc.'s net margin of 7.7%. Matson, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.34% beat Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd.'s return on equity of 4.37%.

Matson, Inc. has a consensus price target of $190.00, signalling upside risk potential of 14.97%. On the other hand Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $10.42 which suggests that it could grow by 20.42%. Given that Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. has higher upside potential than Matson, Inc., analysts believe Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. is more attractive than Matson, Inc..

Matson, Inc. has a beta of 1.349, which suggesting that the stock is 34.862% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. has a beta of 0.790, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.042%.

Matson, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.85%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. offers a yield of 2.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Matson, Inc. pays 9.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. pays out 63.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Matson, Inc. quarterly revenues are $880.1M, which are larger than Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. quarterly revenues of $168.7M. Matson, Inc.'s net income of $134.7M is higher than Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd.'s net income of $13M. Notably, Matson, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.58x while Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd.'s PE ratio is 29.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matson, Inc. is 1.60x versus 0.87x for Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Radiant Logistics, Inc. has a net margin of 15.31% compared to Matson, Inc.'s net margin of 0.56%. Matson, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.34% beat Radiant Logistics, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.96%.

Matson, Inc. has a consensus price target of $190.00, signalling upside risk potential of 14.97%. On the other hand Radiant Logistics, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $8.33 which suggests that it could grow by 16.71%. Given that Radiant Logistics, Inc. has higher upside potential than Matson, Inc., analysts believe Radiant Logistics, Inc. is more attractive than Matson, Inc..

Matson, Inc. has a beta of 1.349, which suggesting that the stock is 34.862% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Radiant Logistics, Inc. has a beta of 0.737, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.303%.

Matson, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.85%. Radiant Logistics, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Matson, Inc. pays 9.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Radiant Logistics, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Matson, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Matson, Inc. quarterly revenues are $880.1M, which are larger than Radiant Logistics, Inc. quarterly revenues of $226.7M. Matson, Inc.'s net income of $134.7M is higher than Radiant Logistics, Inc.'s net income of $1.3M. Notably, Matson, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.58x while Radiant Logistics, Inc.'s PE ratio is 22.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matson, Inc. is 1.60x versus 0.38x for Radiant Logistics, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seacor Marine Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 15.31% compared to Matson, Inc.'s net margin of 15.19%. Matson, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.34% beat Seacor Marine Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -13.58%.

Matson, Inc. has a consensus price target of $190.00, signalling upside risk potential of 14.97%. On the other hand Seacor Marine Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $11.00 which suggests that it could grow by 55.15%. Given that Seacor Marine Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Matson, Inc., analysts believe Seacor Marine Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Matson, Inc..

Matson, Inc. has a beta of 1.349, which suggesting that the stock is 34.862% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seacor Marine Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.264, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.372%.

Matson, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.85%. Seacor Marine Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Matson, Inc. pays 9.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Seacor Marine Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Matson, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Matson, Inc. quarterly revenues are $880.1M, which are larger than Seacor Marine Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $59.2M. Matson, Inc.'s net income of $134.7M is higher than Seacor Marine Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $9M. Notably, Matson, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.58x while Seacor Marine Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matson, Inc. is 1.60x versus 0.78x for Seacor Marine Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.