MATX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Genco Shipping & Trading Ltd. has a net margin of 15.31% compared to Matson, Inc.'s net margin of -1.35%. Matson, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.34% beat Genco Shipping & Trading Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.81%.

Matson, Inc. has a consensus price target of $135.00, signalling upside risk potential of 26.14%. On the other hand Genco Shipping & Trading Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $23.30 which suggests that it could grow by 22.05%. Given that Matson, Inc. has higher upside potential than Genco Shipping & Trading Ltd., analysts believe Matson, Inc. is more attractive than Genco Shipping & Trading Ltd..

Matson, Inc. has a beta of 1.329, which suggesting that the stock is 32.903% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genco Shipping & Trading Ltd. has a beta of 1.169, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.9%.

Matson, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.23%. Genco Shipping & Trading Ltd. offers a yield of 3.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Matson, Inc. pays 9.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Genco Shipping & Trading Ltd. pays out 89.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Matson, Inc. quarterly revenues are $880.1M, which are larger than Genco Shipping & Trading Ltd. quarterly revenues of $79.9M. Matson, Inc.'s net income of $134.7M is higher than Genco Shipping & Trading Ltd.'s net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Matson, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.69x while Genco Shipping & Trading Ltd.'s PE ratio is 48.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matson, Inc. is 1.11x versus 2.50x for Genco Shipping & Trading Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kirby Corp. has a net margin of 15.31% compared to Matson, Inc.'s net margin of 10.64%. Matson, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.34% beat Kirby Corp.'s return on equity of 9.15%.

Matson, Inc. has a consensus price target of $135.00, signalling upside risk potential of 26.14%. On the other hand Kirby Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $125.33 which suggests that it could grow by 10.95%. Given that Matson, Inc. has higher upside potential than Kirby Corp., analysts believe Matson, Inc. is more attractive than Kirby Corp..

Matson, Inc. has a beta of 1.329, which suggesting that the stock is 32.903% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kirby Corp. has a beta of 0.875, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.487%.

Matson, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.23%. Kirby Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Matson, Inc. pays 9.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Kirby Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Matson, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Matson, Inc. quarterly revenues are $880.1M, which are larger than Kirby Corp. quarterly revenues of $871.2M. Matson, Inc.'s net income of $134.7M is higher than Kirby Corp.'s net income of $92.7M. Notably, Matson, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.69x while Kirby Corp.'s PE ratio is 20.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matson, Inc. is 1.11x versus 1.94x for Kirby Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. has a net margin of 15.31% compared to Matson, Inc.'s net margin of 7.7%. Matson, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.34% beat Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd.'s return on equity of 4.37%.

Matson, Inc. has a consensus price target of $135.00, signalling upside risk potential of 26.14%. On the other hand Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $8.75 which suggests that it could grow by 24.29%. Given that Matson, Inc. has higher upside potential than Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd., analysts believe Matson, Inc. is more attractive than Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd..

Matson, Inc. has a beta of 1.329, which suggesting that the stock is 32.903% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. has a beta of 0.784, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.571%.

Matson, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.23%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. offers a yield of 3.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Matson, Inc. pays 9.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. pays out 63.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Matson, Inc. quarterly revenues are $880.1M, which are larger than Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. quarterly revenues of $168.7M. Matson, Inc.'s net income of $134.7M is higher than Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd.'s net income of $13M. Notably, Matson, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.69x while Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd.'s PE ratio is 23.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matson, Inc. is 1.11x versus 0.71x for Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seacor Marine Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 15.31% compared to Matson, Inc.'s net margin of 15.19%. Matson, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.34% beat Seacor Marine Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -13.58%.

Matson, Inc. has a consensus price target of $135.00, signalling upside risk potential of 26.14%. On the other hand Seacor Marine Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $11.00 which suggests that it could grow by 52.14%. Given that Seacor Marine Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Matson, Inc., analysts believe Seacor Marine Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Matson, Inc..

Matson, Inc. has a beta of 1.329, which suggesting that the stock is 32.903% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seacor Marine Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.304, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.39%.

Matson, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.23%. Seacor Marine Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Matson, Inc. pays 9.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Seacor Marine Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Matson, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Matson, Inc. quarterly revenues are $880.1M, which are larger than Seacor Marine Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $59.2M. Matson, Inc.'s net income of $134.7M is higher than Seacor Marine Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $9M. Notably, Matson, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.69x while Seacor Marine Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matson, Inc. is 1.11x versus 0.79x for Seacor Marine Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.