MATX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Genco Shipping & Trading has a net margin of 9.25% compared to Matson's net margin of -16.73%. Matson's return on equity of 20.32% beat Genco Shipping & Trading's return on equity of 4.96%.

Matson has a consensus price target of $142.50, signalling upside risk potential of 22.53%. On the other hand Genco Shipping & Trading has an analysts' consensus of $19.77 which suggests that it could grow by 30.94%. Given that Genco Shipping & Trading has higher upside potential than Matson, analysts believe Genco Shipping & Trading is more attractive than Matson.

Matson has a beta of 1.284, which suggesting that the stock is 28.385% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genco Shipping & Trading has a beta of 1.184, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.444%.

Matson has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.17%. Genco Shipping & Trading offers a yield of 7.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Matson pays 9.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Genco Shipping & Trading pays out 88.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Matson quarterly revenues are $782M, which are larger than Genco Shipping & Trading quarterly revenues of $71.3M. Matson's net income of $72.3M is higher than Genco Shipping & Trading's net income of -$11.9M. Notably, Matson's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.66x while Genco Shipping & Trading's PE ratio is 14.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matson is 1.13x versus 1.75x for Genco Shipping & Trading. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kirby has a net margin of 9.25% compared to Matson's net margin of 9.67%. Matson's return on equity of 20.32% beat Kirby's return on equity of 8.84%.

Matson has a consensus price target of $142.50, signalling upside risk potential of 22.53%. On the other hand Kirby has an analysts' consensus of $131.00 which suggests that it could grow by 12%. Given that Matson has higher upside potential than Kirby, analysts believe Matson is more attractive than Kirby.

Matson has a beta of 1.284, which suggesting that the stock is 28.385% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kirby has a beta of 0.960, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.037%.

Matson has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.17%. Kirby offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Matson pays 9.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Kirby pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Matson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Matson quarterly revenues are $782M, which are smaller than Kirby quarterly revenues of $785.7M. Matson's net income of $72.3M is lower than Kirby's net income of $76M. Notably, Matson's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.66x while Kirby's PE ratio is 23.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matson is 1.13x versus 2.09x for Kirby. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a net margin of 9.25% compared to Matson's net margin of -1.61%. Matson's return on equity of 20.32% beat Pangaea Logistics Solutions's return on equity of 3.67%.

Matson has a consensus price target of $142.50, signalling upside risk potential of 22.53%. On the other hand Pangaea Logistics Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $9.28 which suggests that it could grow by 77.84%. Given that Pangaea Logistics Solutions has higher upside potential than Matson, analysts believe Pangaea Logistics Solutions is more attractive than Matson.

Matson has a beta of 1.284, which suggesting that the stock is 28.385% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a beta of 0.688, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.175%.

Matson has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.17%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions offers a yield of 6.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Matson pays 9.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays out 64.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Matson quarterly revenues are $782M, which are larger than Pangaea Logistics Solutions quarterly revenues of $122.8M. Matson's net income of $72.3M is higher than Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net income of -$2M. Notably, Matson's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.66x while Pangaea Logistics Solutions's PE ratio is 15.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matson is 1.13x versus 0.48x for Pangaea Logistics Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a net margin of 9.25% compared to Matson's net margin of -27.91%. Matson's return on equity of 20.32% beat Seacor Marine Holdings's return on equity of -22.13%.

Matson has a consensus price target of $142.50, signalling upside risk potential of 22.53%. On the other hand Seacor Marine Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $13.00 which suggests that it could grow by 120.71%. Given that Seacor Marine Holdings has higher upside potential than Matson, analysts believe Seacor Marine Holdings is more attractive than Matson.

Matson has a beta of 1.284, which suggesting that the stock is 28.385% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seacor Marine Holdings has a beta of 1.416, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.613%.

Matson has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.17%. Seacor Marine Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Matson pays 9.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Seacor Marine Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Matson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Matson quarterly revenues are $782M, which are larger than Seacor Marine Holdings quarterly revenues of $55.5M. Matson's net income of $72.3M is higher than Seacor Marine Holdings's net income of -$15.5M. Notably, Matson's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.66x while Seacor Marine Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matson is 1.13x versus 0.62x for Seacor Marine Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.