SMHI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kirby has a net margin of -37.57% compared to Seacor Marine Holdings's net margin of 5.34%. Seacor Marine Holdings's return on equity of -23.19% beat Kirby's return on equity of 8.75%.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 213.25%. On the other hand Kirby has an analysts' consensus of $131.33 which suggests that it could grow by 37.42%. Given that Seacor Marine Holdings has higher upside potential than Kirby, analysts believe Seacor Marine Holdings is more attractive than Kirby.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a beta of 0.948, which suggesting that the stock is 5.229% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kirby has a beta of 0.994, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.61099999999999%.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kirby offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Seacor Marine Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kirby pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Seacor Marine Holdings quarterly revenues are $69.8M, which are smaller than Kirby quarterly revenues of $802.3M. Seacor Marine Holdings's net income of -$26.2M is lower than Kirby's net income of $42.8M. Notably, Seacor Marine Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kirby's PE ratio is 19.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seacor Marine Holdings is 0.42x versus 1.71x for Kirby. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Matson has a net margin of -37.57% compared to Seacor Marine Holdings's net margin of 14.38%. Seacor Marine Holdings's return on equity of -23.19% beat Matson's return on equity of 19.24%.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 213.25%. On the other hand Matson has an analysts' consensus of $167.50 which suggests that it could grow by 66.48%. Given that Seacor Marine Holdings has higher upside potential than Matson, analysts believe Seacor Marine Holdings is more attractive than Matson.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a beta of 0.948, which suggesting that the stock is 5.229% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matson has a beta of 1.121, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.097%.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Matson offers a yield of 1.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Seacor Marine Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Matson pays out 9.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Matson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Seacor Marine Holdings quarterly revenues are $69.8M, which are smaller than Matson quarterly revenues of $890.3M. Seacor Marine Holdings's net income of -$26.2M is lower than Matson's net income of $128M. Notably, Seacor Marine Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Matson's PE ratio is 7.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seacor Marine Holdings is 0.42x versus 1.00x for Matson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a net margin of -37.57% compared to Seacor Marine Holdings's net margin of 5.73%. Seacor Marine Holdings's return on equity of -23.19% beat Pangaea Logistics Solutions's return on equity of 7.3%.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 213.25%. On the other hand Pangaea Logistics Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $9.38 which suggests that it could grow by 123.95%. Given that Seacor Marine Holdings has higher upside potential than Pangaea Logistics Solutions, analysts believe Seacor Marine Holdings is more attractive than Pangaea Logistics Solutions.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a beta of 0.948, which suggesting that the stock is 5.229% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a beta of 0.678, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.203%.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions offers a yield of 9.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Seacor Marine Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays out 64.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Seacor Marine Holdings quarterly revenues are $69.8M, which are smaller than Pangaea Logistics Solutions quarterly revenues of $147.2M. Seacor Marine Holdings's net income of -$26.2M is lower than Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net income of $8.4M. Notably, Seacor Marine Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pangaea Logistics Solutions's PE ratio is 6.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seacor Marine Holdings is 0.42x versus 0.36x for Pangaea Logistics Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Radiant Logistics has a net margin of -37.57% compared to Seacor Marine Holdings's net margin of 2.45%. Seacor Marine Holdings's return on equity of -23.19% beat Radiant Logistics's return on equity of 6.63%.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 213.25%. On the other hand Radiant Logistics has an analysts' consensus of $9.50 which suggests that it could grow by 68.69%. Given that Seacor Marine Holdings has higher upside potential than Radiant Logistics, analysts believe Seacor Marine Holdings is more attractive than Radiant Logistics.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a beta of 0.948, which suggesting that the stock is 5.229% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Radiant Logistics has a beta of 0.873, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.749%.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Radiant Logistics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Seacor Marine Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Radiant Logistics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Seacor Marine Holdings quarterly revenues are $69.8M, which are smaller than Radiant Logistics quarterly revenues of $264.5M. Seacor Marine Holdings's net income of -$26.2M is lower than Radiant Logistics's net income of $6.5M. Notably, Seacor Marine Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Radiant Logistics's PE ratio is 20.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seacor Marine Holdings is 0.42x versus 0.33x for Radiant Logistics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.