PANL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kirby has a net margin of 5.73% compared to Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net margin of 5.34%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's return on equity of 7.3% beat Kirby's return on equity of 8.75%.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a consensus price target of $9.38, signalling upside risk potential of 114.72%. On the other hand Kirby has an analysts' consensus of $133.83 which suggests that it could grow by 44.06%. Given that Pangaea Logistics Solutions has higher upside potential than Kirby, analysts believe Pangaea Logistics Solutions is more attractive than Kirby.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a beta of 0.678, which suggesting that the stock is 32.203% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kirby has a beta of 0.994, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.61099999999999%.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.15%. Kirby offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays 64.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Kirby pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions quarterly revenues are $147.2M, which are smaller than Kirby quarterly revenues of $802.3M. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net income of $8.4M is lower than Kirby's net income of $42.8M. Notably, Pangaea Logistics Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.05x while Kirby's PE ratio is 18.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pangaea Logistics Solutions is 0.38x versus 1.66x for Kirby. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Matson has a net margin of 5.73% compared to Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net margin of 14.38%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's return on equity of 7.3% beat Matson's return on equity of 19.24%.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a consensus price target of $9.38, signalling upside risk potential of 114.72%. On the other hand Matson has an analysts' consensus of $167.50 which suggests that it could grow by 45.4%. Given that Pangaea Logistics Solutions has higher upside potential than Matson, analysts believe Pangaea Logistics Solutions is more attractive than Matson.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a beta of 0.678, which suggesting that the stock is 32.203% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matson has a beta of 1.121, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.097%.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.15%. Matson offers a yield of 1.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays 64.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Matson pays out 9.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions quarterly revenues are $147.2M, which are smaller than Matson quarterly revenues of $890.3M. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net income of $8.4M is lower than Matson's net income of $128M. Notably, Pangaea Logistics Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.05x while Matson's PE ratio is 8.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pangaea Logistics Solutions is 0.38x versus 1.15x for Matson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Radiant Logistics has a net margin of 5.73% compared to Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net margin of 2.45%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's return on equity of 7.3% beat Radiant Logistics's return on equity of 6.63%.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a consensus price target of $9.38, signalling upside risk potential of 114.72%. On the other hand Radiant Logistics has an analysts' consensus of $9.67 which suggests that it could grow by 70.75%. Given that Pangaea Logistics Solutions has higher upside potential than Radiant Logistics, analysts believe Pangaea Logistics Solutions is more attractive than Radiant Logistics.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a beta of 0.678, which suggesting that the stock is 32.203% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Radiant Logistics has a beta of 0.873, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.749%.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.15%. Radiant Logistics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays 64.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Radiant Logistics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions quarterly revenues are $147.2M, which are smaller than Radiant Logistics quarterly revenues of $264.5M. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net income of $8.4M is higher than Radiant Logistics's net income of $6.5M. Notably, Pangaea Logistics Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.05x while Radiant Logistics's PE ratio is 20.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pangaea Logistics Solutions is 0.38x versus 0.32x for Radiant Logistics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a net margin of 5.73% compared to Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net margin of -37.57%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's return on equity of 7.3% beat Seacor Marine Holdings's return on equity of -23.19%.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a consensus price target of $9.38, signalling upside risk potential of 114.72%. On the other hand Seacor Marine Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $13.00 which suggests that it could grow by 181.39%. Given that Seacor Marine Holdings has higher upside potential than Pangaea Logistics Solutions, analysts believe Seacor Marine Holdings is more attractive than Pangaea Logistics Solutions.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a beta of 0.678, which suggesting that the stock is 32.203% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seacor Marine Holdings has a beta of 0.948, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.229%.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.15%. Seacor Marine Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays 64.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Seacor Marine Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions quarterly revenues are $147.2M, which are larger than Seacor Marine Holdings quarterly revenues of $69.8M. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net income of $8.4M is higher than Seacor Marine Holdings's net income of -$26.2M. Notably, Pangaea Logistics Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.05x while Seacor Marine Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pangaea Logistics Solutions is 0.38x versus 0.47x for Seacor Marine Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.