SCHL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Goodheart-Willcox has a net margin of 8.96% compared to Scholastic's net margin of --. Scholastic's return on equity of -0.43% beat Goodheart-Willcox's return on equity of --.

Scholastic has a consensus price target of $40.00, signalling upside risk potential of 101.92%. On the other hand Goodheart-Willcox has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Scholastic has higher upside potential than Goodheart-Willcox, analysts believe Scholastic is more attractive than Goodheart-Willcox.

Scholastic has a beta of 1.070, which suggesting that the stock is 6.977% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goodheart-Willcox has a beta of 0.692, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.764%.

Scholastic has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.04%. Goodheart-Willcox offers a yield of 6.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $26.50 per share. Scholastic pays 204.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Goodheart-Willcox pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Scholastic quarterly revenues are $544.6M, which are larger than Goodheart-Willcox quarterly revenues of --. Scholastic's net income of $48.8M is higher than Goodheart-Willcox's net income of --. Notably, Scholastic's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.43x while Goodheart-Willcox's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Scholastic is 0.37x versus -- for Goodheart-Willcox. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lee Enterprises has a net margin of 8.96% compared to Scholastic's net margin of -6.36%. Scholastic's return on equity of -0.43% beat Lee Enterprises's return on equity of -232.94%.

Scholastic has a consensus price target of $40.00, signalling upside risk potential of 101.92%. On the other hand Lee Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 65.02%. Given that Scholastic has higher upside potential than Lee Enterprises, analysts believe Scholastic is more attractive than Lee Enterprises.

Scholastic has a beta of 1.070, which suggesting that the stock is 6.977% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lee Enterprises has a beta of 1.019, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.854%.

Scholastic has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.04%. Lee Enterprises offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Scholastic pays 204.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Lee Enterprises pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Scholastic quarterly revenues are $544.6M, which are larger than Lee Enterprises quarterly revenues of $158.6M. Scholastic's net income of $48.8M is higher than Lee Enterprises's net income of -$10.1M. Notably, Scholastic's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.43x while Lee Enterprises's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Scholastic is 0.37x versus 0.15x for Lee Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

New York Times has a net margin of 8.96% compared to Scholastic's net margin of 10.02%. Scholastic's return on equity of -0.43% beat New York Times's return on equity of 15.87%.

Scholastic has a consensus price target of $40.00, signalling upside risk potential of 101.92%. On the other hand New York Times has an analysts' consensus of $58.00 which suggests that it could grow by 9.7%. Given that Scholastic has higher upside potential than New York Times, analysts believe Scholastic is more attractive than New York Times.

Scholastic has a beta of 1.070, which suggesting that the stock is 6.977% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New York Times has a beta of 0.998, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.224%.

Scholastic has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.04%. New York Times offers a yield of 0.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Scholastic pays 204.13% of its earnings as a dividend. New York Times pays out 29.89% of its earnings as a dividend. New York Times's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Scholastic's is not.

Scholastic quarterly revenues are $544.6M, which are smaller than New York Times quarterly revenues of $640.2M. Scholastic's net income of $48.8M is lower than New York Times's net income of $64.1M. Notably, Scholastic's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.43x while New York Times's PE ratio is 31.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Scholastic is 0.37x versus 3.46x for New York Times. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

John Wiley & Sons has a net margin of 8.96% compared to Scholastic's net margin of 9.48%. Scholastic's return on equity of -0.43% beat John Wiley & Sons's return on equity of -6.48%.

Scholastic has a consensus price target of $40.00, signalling upside risk potential of 101.92%. On the other hand John Wiley & Sons has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 30.81%. Given that Scholastic has higher upside potential than John Wiley & Sons, analysts believe Scholastic is more attractive than John Wiley & Sons.

Scholastic has a beta of 1.070, which suggesting that the stock is 6.977% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison John Wiley & Sons has a beta of 0.853, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.735%.

Scholastic has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.04%. John Wiley & Sons offers a yield of 3.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Scholastic pays 204.13% of its earnings as a dividend. John Wiley & Sons pays out -38.42% of its earnings as a dividend.

Scholastic quarterly revenues are $544.6M, which are larger than John Wiley & Sons quarterly revenues of $426.6M. Scholastic's net income of $48.8M is higher than John Wiley & Sons's net income of $40.5M. Notably, Scholastic's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.43x while John Wiley & Sons's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Scholastic is 0.37x versus 1.38x for John Wiley & Sons. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.