SCHL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lee Enterprises, Inc. has a net margin of -31.52% compared to Scholastic Corp.'s net margin of -4.19%. Scholastic Corp.'s return on equity of -1.12% beat Lee Enterprises, Inc.'s return on equity of -2850.44%.

Scholastic Corp. has a consensus price target of $36.00, signalling upside risk potential of 22.57%. On the other hand Lee Enterprises, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $20.00 which suggests that it could grow by 440.54%. Given that Lee Enterprises, Inc. has higher upside potential than Scholastic Corp., analysts believe Lee Enterprises, Inc. is more attractive than Scholastic Corp..

Scholastic Corp. has a beta of 1.177, which suggesting that the stock is 17.731% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lee Enterprises, Inc. has a beta of 0.592, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.844%.

Scholastic Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.72%. Lee Enterprises, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Scholastic Corp. pays 1189.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Lee Enterprises, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Scholastic Corp. quarterly revenues are $225.6M, which are larger than Lee Enterprises, Inc. quarterly revenues of $139.1M. Scholastic Corp.'s net income of -$71.1M is lower than Lee Enterprises, Inc.'s net income of -$5.8M. Notably, Scholastic Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 37.81x while Lee Enterprises, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Scholastic Corp. is 0.49x versus 0.04x for Lee Enterprises, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The New York Times Co. has a net margin of -31.52% compared to Scholastic Corp.'s net margin of 11.65%. Scholastic Corp.'s return on equity of -1.12% beat The New York Times Co.'s return on equity of 17.63%.

Scholastic Corp. has a consensus price target of $36.00, signalling upside risk potential of 22.57%. On the other hand The New York Times Co. has an analysts' consensus of $65.00 which suggests that it could grow by 1.25%. Given that Scholastic Corp. has higher upside potential than The New York Times Co., analysts believe Scholastic Corp. is more attractive than The New York Times Co..

Scholastic Corp. has a beta of 1.177, which suggesting that the stock is 17.731% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The New York Times Co. has a beta of 1.164, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.358%.

Scholastic Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.72%. The New York Times Co. offers a yield of 1.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Scholastic Corp. pays 1189.47% of its earnings as a dividend. The New York Times Co. pays out 29.34% of its earnings as a dividend. The New York Times Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Scholastic Corp.'s is not.

Scholastic Corp. quarterly revenues are $225.6M, which are smaller than The New York Times Co. quarterly revenues of $700.8M. Scholastic Corp.'s net income of -$71.1M is lower than The New York Times Co.'s net income of $81.6M. Notably, Scholastic Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 37.81x while The New York Times Co.'s PE ratio is 31.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Scholastic Corp. is 0.49x versus 3.85x for The New York Times Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

John Wiley & Sons, Inc. has a net margin of -31.52% compared to Scholastic Corp.'s net margin of 2.95%. Scholastic Corp.'s return on equity of -1.12% beat John Wiley & Sons, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.37%.

Scholastic Corp. has a consensus price target of $36.00, signalling upside risk potential of 22.57%. On the other hand John Wiley & Sons, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $60.00 which suggests that it could grow by 58.35%. Given that John Wiley & Sons, Inc. has higher upside potential than Scholastic Corp., analysts believe John Wiley & Sons, Inc. is more attractive than Scholastic Corp..

Scholastic Corp. has a beta of 1.177, which suggesting that the stock is 17.731% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison John Wiley & Sons, Inc. has a beta of 1.031, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.054%.

Scholastic Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.72%. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. offers a yield of 3.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Scholastic Corp. pays 1189.47% of its earnings as a dividend. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. pays out 91.86% of its earnings as a dividend. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Scholastic Corp.'s is not.

Scholastic Corp. quarterly revenues are $225.6M, which are smaller than John Wiley & Sons, Inc. quarterly revenues of $396.8M. Scholastic Corp.'s net income of -$71.1M is lower than John Wiley & Sons, Inc.'s net income of $11.7M. Notably, Scholastic Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 37.81x while John Wiley & Sons, Inc.'s PE ratio is 21.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Scholastic Corp. is 0.49x versus 1.23x for John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.