WLY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Goodheart-Willcox has a net margin of 9.48% compared to John Wiley & Sons's net margin of --. John Wiley & Sons's return on equity of -6.48% beat Goodheart-Willcox's return on equity of --.

John Wiley & Sons has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 30.81%. On the other hand Goodheart-Willcox has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that John Wiley & Sons has higher upside potential than Goodheart-Willcox, analysts believe John Wiley & Sons is more attractive than Goodheart-Willcox.

John Wiley & Sons has a beta of 0.853, which suggesting that the stock is 14.735% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goodheart-Willcox has a beta of 0.692, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.764%.

John Wiley & Sons has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.17%. Goodheart-Willcox offers a yield of 6.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $26.50 per share. John Wiley & Sons pays -38.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Goodheart-Willcox pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

John Wiley & Sons quarterly revenues are $426.6M, which are larger than Goodheart-Willcox quarterly revenues of --. John Wiley & Sons's net income of $40.5M is higher than Goodheart-Willcox's net income of --. Notably, John Wiley & Sons's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Goodheart-Willcox's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for John Wiley & Sons is 1.38x versus -- for Goodheart-Willcox. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lee Enterprises has a net margin of 9.48% compared to John Wiley & Sons's net margin of -6.36%. John Wiley & Sons's return on equity of -6.48% beat Lee Enterprises's return on equity of -232.94%.

John Wiley & Sons has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 30.81%. On the other hand Lee Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 65.02%. Given that Lee Enterprises has higher upside potential than John Wiley & Sons, analysts believe Lee Enterprises is more attractive than John Wiley & Sons.

John Wiley & Sons has a beta of 0.853, which suggesting that the stock is 14.735% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lee Enterprises has a beta of 1.019, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.854%.

John Wiley & Sons has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.17%. Lee Enterprises offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. John Wiley & Sons pays -38.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Lee Enterprises pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

John Wiley & Sons quarterly revenues are $426.6M, which are larger than Lee Enterprises quarterly revenues of $158.6M. John Wiley & Sons's net income of $40.5M is higher than Lee Enterprises's net income of -$10.1M. Notably, John Wiley & Sons's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lee Enterprises's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for John Wiley & Sons is 1.38x versus 0.15x for Lee Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

New York Times has a net margin of 9.48% compared to John Wiley & Sons's net margin of 10.02%. John Wiley & Sons's return on equity of -6.48% beat New York Times's return on equity of 15.87%.

John Wiley & Sons has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 30.81%. On the other hand New York Times has an analysts' consensus of $58.00 which suggests that it could grow by 9.7%. Given that John Wiley & Sons has higher upside potential than New York Times, analysts believe John Wiley & Sons is more attractive than New York Times.

John Wiley & Sons has a beta of 0.853, which suggesting that the stock is 14.735% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New York Times has a beta of 0.998, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.224%.

John Wiley & Sons has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.17%. New York Times offers a yield of 0.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. John Wiley & Sons pays -38.42% of its earnings as a dividend. New York Times pays out 29.89% of its earnings as a dividend. New York Times's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

John Wiley & Sons quarterly revenues are $426.6M, which are smaller than New York Times quarterly revenues of $640.2M. John Wiley & Sons's net income of $40.5M is lower than New York Times's net income of $64.1M. Notably, John Wiley & Sons's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while New York Times's PE ratio is 31.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for John Wiley & Sons is 1.38x versus 3.46x for New York Times. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Scholastic has a net margin of 9.48% compared to John Wiley & Sons's net margin of 8.96%. John Wiley & Sons's return on equity of -6.48% beat Scholastic's return on equity of -0.43%.

John Wiley & Sons has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 30.81%. On the other hand Scholastic has an analysts' consensus of $40.00 which suggests that it could grow by 101.92%. Given that Scholastic has higher upside potential than John Wiley & Sons, analysts believe Scholastic is more attractive than John Wiley & Sons.

John Wiley & Sons has a beta of 0.853, which suggesting that the stock is 14.735% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Scholastic has a beta of 1.070, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.977%.

John Wiley & Sons has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.17%. Scholastic offers a yield of 4.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. John Wiley & Sons pays -38.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Scholastic pays out 204.13% of its earnings as a dividend.

John Wiley & Sons quarterly revenues are $426.6M, which are smaller than Scholastic quarterly revenues of $544.6M. John Wiley & Sons's net income of $40.5M is lower than Scholastic's net income of $48.8M. Notably, John Wiley & Sons's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Scholastic's PE ratio is 37.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for John Wiley & Sons is 1.38x versus 0.37x for Scholastic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.