WLY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Goodheart-Willcox has a net margin of -5.67% compared to John Wiley & Sons's net margin of --. John Wiley & Sons's return on equity of 5.67% beat Goodheart-Willcox's return on equity of --.

John Wiley & Sons has a consensus price target of $60.00, signalling upside risk potential of 35.01%. On the other hand Goodheart-Willcox has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that John Wiley & Sons has higher upside potential than Goodheart-Willcox, analysts believe John Wiley & Sons is more attractive than Goodheart-Willcox.

John Wiley & Sons has a beta of 0.823, which suggesting that the stock is 17.692% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goodheart-Willcox has a beta of 0.690, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.016%.

John Wiley & Sons has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.17%. Goodheart-Willcox offers a yield of 5.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $26.50 per share. John Wiley & Sons pays -38.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Goodheart-Willcox pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

John Wiley & Sons quarterly revenues are $404.6M, which are larger than Goodheart-Willcox quarterly revenues of --. John Wiley & Sons's net income of -$23M is higher than Goodheart-Willcox's net income of --. Notably, John Wiley & Sons's price-to-earnings ratio is 60.05x while Goodheart-Willcox's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for John Wiley & Sons is 1.42x versus -- for Goodheart-Willcox. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lee Enterprises has a net margin of -5.67% compared to John Wiley & Sons's net margin of -11.59%. John Wiley & Sons's return on equity of 5.67% beat Lee Enterprises's return on equity of -2850.44%.

John Wiley & Sons has a consensus price target of $60.00, signalling upside risk potential of 35.01%. On the other hand Lee Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of $20.00 which suggests that it could grow by 93.24%. Given that Lee Enterprises has higher upside potential than John Wiley & Sons, analysts believe Lee Enterprises is more attractive than John Wiley & Sons.

John Wiley & Sons has a beta of 0.823, which suggesting that the stock is 17.692% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lee Enterprises has a beta of 1.012, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.204%.

John Wiley & Sons has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.17%. Lee Enterprises offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. John Wiley & Sons pays -38.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Lee Enterprises pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

John Wiley & Sons quarterly revenues are $404.6M, which are larger than Lee Enterprises quarterly revenues of $144.6M. John Wiley & Sons's net income of -$23M is lower than Lee Enterprises's net income of -$16.7M. Notably, John Wiley & Sons's price-to-earnings ratio is 60.05x while Lee Enterprises's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for John Wiley & Sons is 1.42x versus 0.10x for Lee Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

New York Times has a net margin of -5.67% compared to John Wiley & Sons's net margin of 17.03%. John Wiley & Sons's return on equity of 5.67% beat New York Times's return on equity of 16.15%.

John Wiley & Sons has a consensus price target of $60.00, signalling upside risk potential of 35.01%. On the other hand New York Times has an analysts' consensus of $56.12 which suggests that it could grow by 15.27%. Given that John Wiley & Sons has higher upside potential than New York Times, analysts believe John Wiley & Sons is more attractive than New York Times.

John Wiley & Sons has a beta of 0.823, which suggesting that the stock is 17.692% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New York Times has a beta of 1.182, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.221%.

John Wiley & Sons has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.17%. New York Times offers a yield of 1.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. John Wiley & Sons pays -38.42% of its earnings as a dividend. New York Times pays out 28.2% of its earnings as a dividend. New York Times's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

John Wiley & Sons quarterly revenues are $404.6M, which are smaller than New York Times quarterly revenues of $726.6M. John Wiley & Sons's net income of -$23M is lower than New York Times's net income of $123.7M. Notably, John Wiley & Sons's price-to-earnings ratio is 60.05x while New York Times's PE ratio is 27.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for John Wiley & Sons is 1.42x versus 3.12x for New York Times. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Scholastic has a net margin of -5.67% compared to John Wiley & Sons's net margin of -1.07%. John Wiley & Sons's return on equity of 5.67% beat Scholastic's return on equity of 1.9%.

John Wiley & Sons has a consensus price target of $60.00, signalling upside risk potential of 35.01%. On the other hand Scholastic has an analysts' consensus of $35.00 which suggests that it could grow by 64.94%. Given that Scholastic has higher upside potential than John Wiley & Sons, analysts believe Scholastic is more attractive than John Wiley & Sons.

John Wiley & Sons has a beta of 0.823, which suggesting that the stock is 17.692% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Scholastic has a beta of 1.105, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.456%.

John Wiley & Sons has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.17%. Scholastic offers a yield of 3.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. John Wiley & Sons pays -38.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Scholastic pays out 204.13% of its earnings as a dividend.

John Wiley & Sons quarterly revenues are $404.6M, which are larger than Scholastic quarterly revenues of $335.4M. John Wiley & Sons's net income of -$23M is lower than Scholastic's net income of -$3.6M. Notably, John Wiley & Sons's price-to-earnings ratio is 60.05x while Scholastic's PE ratio is 37.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for John Wiley & Sons is 1.42x versus 0.39x for Scholastic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.