LEE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gannett has a net margin of -11.59% compared to Lee Enterprises's net margin of 10.35%. Lee Enterprises's return on equity of -2850.44% beat Gannett's return on equity of -11.05%.

Lee Enterprises has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling upside risk potential of 93.24%. On the other hand Gannett has an analysts' consensus of $5.53 which suggests that it could grow by 80.56%. Given that Lee Enterprises has higher upside potential than Gannett, analysts believe Lee Enterprises is more attractive than Gannett.

Lee Enterprises has a beta of 1.012, which suggesting that the stock is 1.204% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gannett has a beta of 2.476, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 147.575%.

Lee Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gannett offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lee Enterprises pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gannett pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lee Enterprises quarterly revenues are $144.6M, which are smaller than Gannett quarterly revenues of $621.3M. Lee Enterprises's net income of -$16.7M is lower than Gannett's net income of $64.3M. Notably, Lee Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gannett's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lee Enterprises is 0.10x versus 0.20x for Gannett. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

New York Times has a net margin of -11.59% compared to Lee Enterprises's net margin of 17.03%. Lee Enterprises's return on equity of -2850.44% beat New York Times's return on equity of 16.15%.

Lee Enterprises has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling upside risk potential of 93.24%. On the other hand New York Times has an analysts' consensus of $56.12 which suggests that it could grow by 15.27%. Given that Lee Enterprises has higher upside potential than New York Times, analysts believe Lee Enterprises is more attractive than New York Times.

Lee Enterprises has a beta of 1.012, which suggesting that the stock is 1.204% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New York Times has a beta of 1.182, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.221%.

Lee Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. New York Times offers a yield of 1.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Lee Enterprises pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. New York Times pays out 28.2% of its earnings as a dividend. New York Times's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lee Enterprises quarterly revenues are $144.6M, which are smaller than New York Times quarterly revenues of $726.6M. Lee Enterprises's net income of -$16.7M is lower than New York Times's net income of $123.7M. Notably, Lee Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while New York Times's PE ratio is 27.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lee Enterprises is 0.10x versus 3.12x for New York Times. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Scholastic has a net margin of -11.59% compared to Lee Enterprises's net margin of -1.07%. Lee Enterprises's return on equity of -2850.44% beat Scholastic's return on equity of 1.9%.

Lee Enterprises has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling upside risk potential of 93.24%. On the other hand Scholastic has an analysts' consensus of $35.00 which suggests that it could grow by 64.94%. Given that Lee Enterprises has higher upside potential than Scholastic, analysts believe Lee Enterprises is more attractive than Scholastic.

Lee Enterprises has a beta of 1.012, which suggesting that the stock is 1.204% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Scholastic has a beta of 1.105, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.456%.

Lee Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Scholastic offers a yield of 3.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Lee Enterprises pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Scholastic pays out 204.13% of its earnings as a dividend.

Lee Enterprises quarterly revenues are $144.6M, which are smaller than Scholastic quarterly revenues of $335.4M. Lee Enterprises's net income of -$16.7M is lower than Scholastic's net income of -$3.6M. Notably, Lee Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Scholastic's PE ratio is 37.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lee Enterprises is 0.10x versus 0.39x for Scholastic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

John Wiley & Sons has a net margin of -11.59% compared to Lee Enterprises's net margin of -5.67%. Lee Enterprises's return on equity of -2850.44% beat John Wiley & Sons's return on equity of 5.67%.

Lee Enterprises has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling upside risk potential of 93.24%. On the other hand John Wiley & Sons has an analysts' consensus of $60.00 which suggests that it could grow by 35.01%. Given that Lee Enterprises has higher upside potential than John Wiley & Sons, analysts believe Lee Enterprises is more attractive than John Wiley & Sons.

Lee Enterprises has a beta of 1.012, which suggesting that the stock is 1.204% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison John Wiley & Sons has a beta of 0.823, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.692%.

Lee Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. John Wiley & Sons offers a yield of 3.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Lee Enterprises pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. John Wiley & Sons pays out -38.42% of its earnings as a dividend.

Lee Enterprises quarterly revenues are $144.6M, which are smaller than John Wiley & Sons quarterly revenues of $404.6M. Lee Enterprises's net income of -$16.7M is higher than John Wiley & Sons's net income of -$23M. Notably, Lee Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while John Wiley & Sons's PE ratio is 60.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lee Enterprises is 0.10x versus 1.42x for John Wiley & Sons. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.