NYT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Netflix, Inc. has a net margin of 11.65% compared to The New York Times Co.'s net margin of 21.88%. The New York Times Co.'s return on equity of 17.63% beat Netflix, Inc.'s return on equity of 42.61%.

The New York Times Co. has a consensus price target of $66.88, signalling downside risk potential of -5.82%. On the other hand Netflix, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $126.19 which suggests that it could grow by 34.76%. Given that Netflix, Inc. has higher upside potential than The New York Times Co., analysts believe Netflix, Inc. is more attractive than The New York Times Co..

The New York Times Co. has a beta of 1.164, which suggesting that the stock is 16.358% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Netflix, Inc. has a beta of 1.707, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.706%.

The New York Times Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.94%. Netflix, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The New York Times Co. pays 29.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Netflix, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. The New York Times Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The New York Times Co. quarterly revenues are $700.8M, which are smaller than Netflix, Inc. quarterly revenues of $11.6B. The New York Times Co.'s net income of $81.6M is lower than Netflix, Inc.'s net income of $2.5B. Notably, The New York Times Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 34.60x while Netflix, Inc.'s PE ratio is 39.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The New York Times Co. is 4.26x versus 9.42x for Netflix, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Scholastic Corp. has a net margin of 11.65% compared to The New York Times Co.'s net margin of 10.14%. The New York Times Co.'s return on equity of 17.63% beat Scholastic Corp.'s return on equity of -0.36%.

The New York Times Co. has a consensus price target of $66.88, signalling downside risk potential of -5.82%. On the other hand Scholastic Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $36.00 which suggests that it could grow by 23.92%. Given that Scholastic Corp. has higher upside potential than The New York Times Co., analysts believe Scholastic Corp. is more attractive than The New York Times Co..

The New York Times Co. has a beta of 1.164, which suggesting that the stock is 16.358% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Scholastic Corp. has a beta of 1.177, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.731%.

The New York Times Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.94%. Scholastic Corp. offers a yield of 2.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. The New York Times Co. pays 29.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Scholastic Corp. pays out 1189.47% of its earnings as a dividend. The New York Times Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Scholastic Corp.'s is not.

The New York Times Co. quarterly revenues are $700.8M, which are larger than Scholastic Corp. quarterly revenues of $551.1M. The New York Times Co.'s net income of $81.6M is higher than Scholastic Corp.'s net income of $55.9M. Notably, The New York Times Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 34.60x while Scholastic Corp.'s PE ratio is 37.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The New York Times Co. is 4.26x versus 0.47x for Scholastic Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

John Wiley & Sons, Inc. has a net margin of 11.65% compared to The New York Times Co.'s net margin of 10.64%. The New York Times Co.'s return on equity of 17.63% beat John Wiley & Sons, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.88%.

The New York Times Co. has a consensus price target of $66.88, signalling downside risk potential of -5.82%. On the other hand John Wiley & Sons, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $60.00 which suggests that it could grow by 91.63%. Given that John Wiley & Sons, Inc. has higher upside potential than The New York Times Co., analysts believe John Wiley & Sons, Inc. is more attractive than The New York Times Co..

The New York Times Co. has a beta of 1.164, which suggesting that the stock is 16.358% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison John Wiley & Sons, Inc. has a beta of 1.031, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.054%.

The New York Times Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.94%. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. offers a yield of 4.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. The New York Times Co. pays 29.34% of its earnings as a dividend. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. pays out 91.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The New York Times Co. quarterly revenues are $700.8M, which are larger than John Wiley & Sons, Inc. quarterly revenues of $421.8M. The New York Times Co.'s net income of $81.6M is higher than John Wiley & Sons, Inc.'s net income of $44.9M. Notably, The New York Times Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 34.60x while John Wiley & Sons, Inc.'s PE ratio is 16.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The New York Times Co. is 4.26x versus 1.01x for John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.