NYT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Walt Disney has a net margin of 17.03% compared to New York Times's net margin of 10.34%. New York Times's return on equity of 16.15% beat The Walt Disney's return on equity of 5.33%.

New York Times has a consensus price target of $56.12, signalling upside risk potential of 15.27%. On the other hand The Walt Disney has an analysts' consensus of $126.30 which suggests that it could grow by 26.98%. Given that The Walt Disney has higher upside potential than New York Times, analysts believe The Walt Disney is more attractive than New York Times.

New York Times has a beta of 1.182, which suggesting that the stock is 18.221% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Walt Disney has a beta of 1.408, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.799%.

New York Times has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.07%. The Walt Disney offers a yield of 0.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. New York Times pays 28.2% of its earnings as a dividend. The Walt Disney pays out 27.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

New York Times quarterly revenues are $726.6M, which are smaller than The Walt Disney quarterly revenues of $24.7B. New York Times's net income of $123.7M is lower than The Walt Disney's net income of $2.6B. Notably, New York Times's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.35x while The Walt Disney's PE ratio is 32.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New York Times is 3.12x versus 1.96x for The Walt Disney. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gannett has a net margin of 17.03% compared to New York Times's net margin of 10.35%. New York Times's return on equity of 16.15% beat Gannett's return on equity of -11.05%.

New York Times has a consensus price target of $56.12, signalling upside risk potential of 15.27%. On the other hand Gannett has an analysts' consensus of $5.53 which suggests that it could grow by 80.56%. Given that Gannett has higher upside potential than New York Times, analysts believe Gannett is more attractive than New York Times.

New York Times has a beta of 1.182, which suggesting that the stock is 18.221% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gannett has a beta of 2.476, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 147.575%.

New York Times has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.07%. Gannett offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. New York Times pays 28.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Gannett pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. New York Times's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

New York Times quarterly revenues are $726.6M, which are larger than Gannett quarterly revenues of $621.3M. New York Times's net income of $123.7M is higher than Gannett's net income of $64.3M. Notably, New York Times's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.35x while Gannett's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New York Times is 3.12x versus 0.20x for Gannett. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lee Enterprises has a net margin of 17.03% compared to New York Times's net margin of -11.59%. New York Times's return on equity of 16.15% beat Lee Enterprises's return on equity of -2850.44%.

New York Times has a consensus price target of $56.12, signalling upside risk potential of 15.27%. On the other hand Lee Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of $20.00 which suggests that it could grow by 93.24%. Given that Lee Enterprises has higher upside potential than New York Times, analysts believe Lee Enterprises is more attractive than New York Times.

New York Times has a beta of 1.182, which suggesting that the stock is 18.221% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lee Enterprises has a beta of 1.012, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.204%.

New York Times has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.07%. Lee Enterprises offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. New York Times pays 28.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Lee Enterprises pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. New York Times's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

New York Times quarterly revenues are $726.6M, which are larger than Lee Enterprises quarterly revenues of $144.6M. New York Times's net income of $123.7M is higher than Lee Enterprises's net income of -$16.7M. Notably, New York Times's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.35x while Lee Enterprises's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New York Times is 3.12x versus 0.10x for Lee Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Scholastic has a net margin of 17.03% compared to New York Times's net margin of -1.07%. New York Times's return on equity of 16.15% beat Scholastic's return on equity of 1.9%.

New York Times has a consensus price target of $56.12, signalling upside risk potential of 15.27%. On the other hand Scholastic has an analysts' consensus of $35.00 which suggests that it could grow by 64.94%. Given that Scholastic has higher upside potential than New York Times, analysts believe Scholastic is more attractive than New York Times.

New York Times has a beta of 1.182, which suggesting that the stock is 18.221% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Scholastic has a beta of 1.105, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.456%.

New York Times has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.07%. Scholastic offers a yield of 3.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. New York Times pays 28.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Scholastic pays out 204.13% of its earnings as a dividend. New York Times's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Scholastic's is not.

New York Times quarterly revenues are $726.6M, which are larger than Scholastic quarterly revenues of $335.4M. New York Times's net income of $123.7M is higher than Scholastic's net income of -$3.6M. Notably, New York Times's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.35x while Scholastic's PE ratio is 37.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New York Times is 3.12x versus 0.39x for Scholastic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.