META Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Alphabet has a net margin of 38.65% compared to Meta Platforms's net margin of 29.8%. Meta Platforms's return on equity of 36.21% beat Alphabet's return on equity of 32.19%.

Meta Platforms has a consensus price target of $654.06, signalling upside risk potential of 11.56%. On the other hand Alphabet has an analysts' consensus of $211.12 which suggests that it could grow by 10.3%. Given that Meta Platforms has higher upside potential than Alphabet, analysts believe Meta Platforms is more attractive than Alphabet.

Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.198, which suggesting that the stock is 19.786% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alphabet has a beta of 1.011, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.097%.

Meta Platforms has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.34%. Alphabet offers a yield of 0.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Meta Platforms pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alphabet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Meta Platforms quarterly revenues are $40.6B, which are smaller than Alphabet quarterly revenues of $88.3B. Meta Platforms's net income of $15.7B is lower than Alphabet's net income of $26.3B. Notably, Meta Platforms's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.57x while Alphabet's PE ratio is 25.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Meta Platforms is 9.82x versus 7.17x for Alphabet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Netflix has a net margin of 38.65% compared to Meta Platforms's net margin of 24.06%. Meta Platforms's return on equity of 36.21% beat Netflix's return on equity of 35.73%.

Meta Platforms has a consensus price target of $654.06, signalling upside risk potential of 11.56%. On the other hand Netflix has an analysts' consensus of $832.51 which suggests that it could fall by -8.42%. Given that Meta Platforms has higher upside potential than Netflix, analysts believe Meta Platforms is more attractive than Netflix.

Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.198, which suggesting that the stock is 19.786% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Netflix has a beta of 1.270, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.982%.

Meta Platforms has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.34%. Netflix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Meta Platforms pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Netflix pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Meta Platforms quarterly revenues are $40.6B, which are larger than Netflix quarterly revenues of $9.8B. Meta Platforms's net income of $15.7B is higher than Netflix's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Meta Platforms's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.57x while Netflix's PE ratio is 51.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Meta Platforms is 9.82x versus 10.66x for Netflix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pinterest has a net margin of 38.65% compared to Meta Platforms's net margin of 3.4%. Meta Platforms's return on equity of 36.21% beat Pinterest's return on equity of 7.13%.

Meta Platforms has a consensus price target of $654.06, signalling upside risk potential of 11.56%. On the other hand Pinterest has an analysts' consensus of $39.67 which suggests that it could grow by 34.53%. Given that Pinterest has higher upside potential than Meta Platforms, analysts believe Pinterest is more attractive than Meta Platforms.

Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.198, which suggesting that the stock is 19.786% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pinterest has a beta of 1.023, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.253%.

Meta Platforms has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.34%. Pinterest offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Meta Platforms pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pinterest pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Meta Platforms quarterly revenues are $40.6B, which are larger than Pinterest quarterly revenues of $898.4M. Meta Platforms's net income of $15.7B is higher than Pinterest's net income of $30.6M. Notably, Meta Platforms's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.57x while Pinterest's PE ratio is 95.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Meta Platforms is 9.82x versus 5.85x for Pinterest. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Snap has a net margin of 38.65% compared to Meta Platforms's net margin of -11.17%. Meta Platforms's return on equity of 36.21% beat Snap's return on equity of -42.21%.

Meta Platforms has a consensus price target of $654.06, signalling upside risk potential of 11.56%. On the other hand Snap has an analysts' consensus of $13.09 which suggests that it could grow by 14.8%. Given that Snap has higher upside potential than Meta Platforms, analysts believe Snap is more attractive than Meta Platforms.

Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.198, which suggesting that the stock is 19.786% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Snap has a beta of 0.972, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.805%.

Meta Platforms has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.34%. Snap offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Meta Platforms pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Snap pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Meta Platforms quarterly revenues are $40.6B, which are larger than Snap quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Meta Platforms's net income of $15.7B is higher than Snap's net income of -$153.2M. Notably, Meta Platforms's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.57x while Snap's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Meta Platforms is 9.82x versus 3.64x for Snap. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.