GWOX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lee Enterprises has a net margin of -- compared to Goodheart-Willcox's net margin of -11.59%. Goodheart-Willcox's return on equity of -- beat Lee Enterprises's return on equity of -2850.44%.

Goodheart-Willcox has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lee Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of $20.00 which suggests that it could grow by 94.55%. Given that Lee Enterprises has higher upside potential than Goodheart-Willcox, analysts believe Lee Enterprises is more attractive than Goodheart-Willcox.

Goodheart-Willcox has a beta of 0.690, which suggesting that the stock is 31.016% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lee Enterprises has a beta of 1.012, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.204%.

Goodheart-Willcox has a quarterly dividend of $26.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.3%. Lee Enterprises offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Goodheart-Willcox pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lee Enterprises pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Goodheart-Willcox quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lee Enterprises quarterly revenues of $144.6M. Goodheart-Willcox's net income of -- is lower than Lee Enterprises's net income of -$16.7M. Notably, Goodheart-Willcox's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lee Enterprises's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goodheart-Willcox is -- versus 0.10x for Lee Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

New York Times has a net margin of -- compared to Goodheart-Willcox's net margin of 17.03%. Goodheart-Willcox's return on equity of -- beat New York Times's return on equity of 16.15%.

Goodheart-Willcox has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand New York Times has an analysts' consensus of $56.12 which suggests that it could grow by 14.21%. Given that New York Times has higher upside potential than Goodheart-Willcox, analysts believe New York Times is more attractive than Goodheart-Willcox.

Goodheart-Willcox has a beta of 0.690, which suggesting that the stock is 31.016% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New York Times has a beta of 1.182, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.221%.

Goodheart-Willcox has a quarterly dividend of $26.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.3%. New York Times offers a yield of 1.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Goodheart-Willcox pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. New York Times pays out 28.2% of its earnings as a dividend. New York Times's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Goodheart-Willcox quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than New York Times quarterly revenues of $726.6M. Goodheart-Willcox's net income of -- is lower than New York Times's net income of $123.7M. Notably, Goodheart-Willcox's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while New York Times's PE ratio is 27.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goodheart-Willcox is -- versus 3.15x for New York Times. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Scholastic has a net margin of -- compared to Goodheart-Willcox's net margin of -1.07%. Goodheart-Willcox's return on equity of -- beat Scholastic's return on equity of 1.9%.

Goodheart-Willcox has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Scholastic has an analysts' consensus of $35.00 which suggests that it could grow by 85.68%. Given that Scholastic has higher upside potential than Goodheart-Willcox, analysts believe Scholastic is more attractive than Goodheart-Willcox.

Goodheart-Willcox has a beta of 0.690, which suggesting that the stock is 31.016% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Scholastic has a beta of 1.105, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.456%.

Goodheart-Willcox has a quarterly dividend of $26.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.3%. Scholastic offers a yield of 4.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Goodheart-Willcox pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Scholastic pays out 204.13% of its earnings as a dividend.

Goodheart-Willcox quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Scholastic quarterly revenues of $335.4M. Goodheart-Willcox's net income of -- is lower than Scholastic's net income of -$3.6M. Notably, Goodheart-Willcox's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Scholastic's PE ratio is 33.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goodheart-Willcox is -- versus 0.35x for Scholastic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

John Wiley & Sons has a net margin of -- compared to Goodheart-Willcox's net margin of -5.67%. Goodheart-Willcox's return on equity of -- beat John Wiley & Sons's return on equity of 5.67%.

Goodheart-Willcox has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand John Wiley & Sons has an analysts' consensus of $60.00 which suggests that it could grow by 35.01%. Given that John Wiley & Sons has higher upside potential than Goodheart-Willcox, analysts believe John Wiley & Sons is more attractive than Goodheart-Willcox.

Goodheart-Willcox has a beta of 0.690, which suggesting that the stock is 31.016% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison John Wiley & Sons has a beta of 0.823, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.692%.

Goodheart-Willcox has a quarterly dividend of $26.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.3%. John Wiley & Sons offers a yield of 3.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Goodheart-Willcox pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. John Wiley & Sons pays out -38.42% of its earnings as a dividend.

Goodheart-Willcox quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than John Wiley & Sons quarterly revenues of $404.6M. Goodheart-Willcox's net income of -- is lower than John Wiley & Sons's net income of -$23M. Notably, Goodheart-Willcox's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while John Wiley & Sons's PE ratio is 60.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goodheart-Willcox is -- versus 1.42x for John Wiley & Sons. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.