GWOX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lee Enterprises has a net margin of -- compared to Goodheart-Willcox's net margin of -6.36%. Goodheart-Willcox's return on equity of -- beat Lee Enterprises's return on equity of -232.94%.

Goodheart-Willcox has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lee Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of $25.00 which suggests that it could grow by 81.82%. Given that Lee Enterprises has higher upside potential than Goodheart-Willcox, analysts believe Lee Enterprises is more attractive than Goodheart-Willcox.

Goodheart-Willcox has a beta of 0.661, which suggesting that the stock is 33.895% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lee Enterprises has a beta of 1.069, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.852%.

Goodheart-Willcox has a quarterly dividend of $26.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.89%. Lee Enterprises offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Goodheart-Willcox pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lee Enterprises pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Goodheart-Willcox quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lee Enterprises quarterly revenues of $158.6M. Goodheart-Willcox's net income of -- is lower than Lee Enterprises's net income of -$10.1M. Notably, Goodheart-Willcox's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lee Enterprises's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goodheart-Willcox is -- versus 0.13x for Lee Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

New York Times has a net margin of -- compared to Goodheart-Willcox's net margin of 10.02%. Goodheart-Willcox's return on equity of -- beat New York Times's return on equity of 15.87%.

Goodheart-Willcox has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand New York Times has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 11.65%. Given that New York Times has higher upside potential than Goodheart-Willcox, analysts believe New York Times is more attractive than Goodheart-Willcox.

Goodheart-Willcox has a beta of 0.661, which suggesting that the stock is 33.895% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New York Times has a beta of 1.005, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.53000000000001%.

Goodheart-Willcox has a quarterly dividend of $26.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.89%. New York Times offers a yield of 0.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Goodheart-Willcox pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. New York Times pays out 29.89% of its earnings as a dividend. New York Times's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Goodheart-Willcox quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than New York Times quarterly revenues of $640.2M. Goodheart-Willcox's net income of -- is lower than New York Times's net income of $64.1M. Notably, Goodheart-Willcox's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while New York Times's PE ratio is 30.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goodheart-Willcox is -- versus 3.40x for New York Times. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Scholastic has a net margin of -- compared to Goodheart-Willcox's net margin of 8.96%. Goodheart-Willcox's return on equity of -- beat Scholastic's return on equity of -0.43%.

Goodheart-Willcox has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Scholastic has an analysts' consensus of $44.00 which suggests that it could grow by 101.11%. Given that Scholastic has higher upside potential than Goodheart-Willcox, analysts believe Scholastic is more attractive than Goodheart-Willcox.

Goodheart-Willcox has a beta of 0.661, which suggesting that the stock is 33.895% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Scholastic has a beta of 1.103, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.266%.

Goodheart-Willcox has a quarterly dividend of $26.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.89%. Scholastic offers a yield of 4.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Goodheart-Willcox pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Scholastic pays out 204.13% of its earnings as a dividend.

Goodheart-Willcox quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Scholastic quarterly revenues of $544.6M. Goodheart-Willcox's net income of -- is lower than Scholastic's net income of $48.8M. Notably, Goodheart-Willcox's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Scholastic's PE ratio is 49.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goodheart-Willcox is -- versus 0.37x for Scholastic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

John Wiley & Sons has a net margin of -- compared to Goodheart-Willcox's net margin of 9.48%. Goodheart-Willcox's return on equity of -- beat John Wiley & Sons's return on equity of -6.48%.

Goodheart-Willcox has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand John Wiley & Sons has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 35.55%. Given that John Wiley & Sons has higher upside potential than Goodheart-Willcox, analysts believe John Wiley & Sons is more attractive than Goodheart-Willcox.

Goodheart-Willcox has a beta of 0.661, which suggesting that the stock is 33.895% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison John Wiley & Sons has a beta of 0.881, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.874%.

Goodheart-Willcox has a quarterly dividend of $26.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.89%. John Wiley & Sons offers a yield of 3.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Goodheart-Willcox pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. John Wiley & Sons pays out -38.42% of its earnings as a dividend.

Goodheart-Willcox quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than John Wiley & Sons quarterly revenues of $426.6M. Goodheart-Willcox's net income of -- is lower than John Wiley & Sons's net income of $40.5M. Notably, Goodheart-Willcox's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while John Wiley & Sons's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goodheart-Willcox is -- versus 1.33x for John Wiley & Sons. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.