Financhill
Buy
64

IFOS.V Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$3.10
Seasonality move :
-2.9%
Day range:
$3.02 - $3.14
52-week range:
$1.93 - $3.64
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
3.27x
P/S ratio:
0.75x
P/B ratio:
0.94x
Volume:
59.7K
Avg. volume:
107.5K
1-year change:
52.82%
Market cap:
$575.8M
Revenue:
$673M
EPS (TTM):
$0.91

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
IFOS.V
Itafos, Inc.
$195.7M -- 1.29% -- $5.00
CNO.V
California Nanotechnologies Corp.
$1.3M -- -33.44% -35.21% $0.75
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
$998.7M $0.05 20.33% -38.42% $22.41
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
$867.8M $0.22 -36.31% -18.13% $18.47
MKO.V
Mako Mining Corp.
-- -- -- -- $5.65
SOMA.V
Soma Gold Corp.
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
IFOS.V
Itafos, Inc.
$2.98 $5.00 $575.8M 3.27x $0.17 0% 0.75x
CNO.V
California Nanotechnologies Corp.
$0.30 $0.75 $14.2M 41.29x $0.00 0% 3.20x
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
$37.36 $22.41 $31.2B 484.57x $0.08 0% 4.44x
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
$33.45 $18.47 $28.7B 730.35x $0.03 0.52% 6.28x
MKO.V
Mako Mining Corp.
$9.95 $5.65 $865.7M 23.68x $0.00 0% 4.53x
SOMA.V
Soma Gold Corp.
$1.97 -- $231M 21.05x $0.00 0% 2.05x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
IFOS.V
Itafos, Inc.
17.14% -1.792 23.01% 1.18x
CNO.V
California Nanotechnologies Corp.
39.43% 0.927 12.05% 0.97x
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
38.13% 2.180 36.48% 0.72x
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
9.6% 2.698 4.71% 0.79x
MKO.V
Mako Mining Corp.
5.11% 1.618 1.13% 1.52x
SOMA.V
Soma Gold Corp.
28.83% 0.758 14.47% 0.96x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
IFOS.V
Itafos, Inc.
$55.6M $44.7M 26.65% 33.61% 21.23% -$10.6M
CNO.V
California Nanotechnologies Corp.
-$654.7K -$1.2M -57.29% -100.03% -210.56% -$231.4K
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
$477.9M $433.9M 0.1% 0.17% 23.4% $1.1B
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
$401.4M $381.2M 4.26% 5.26% 28.74% $138.3M
MKO.V
Mako Mining Corp.
$9M $5.1M 26.44% 28.32% 13.32% $1.1M
SOMA.V
Soma Gold Corp.
$4.3M $3.2M 15.84% 35.72% 17.66% -$4.4M

Itafos, Inc. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns IFOS.V or CNO.V?

    California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a net margin of 23.7% compared to Itafos, Inc.'s net margin of -278.92%. Itafos, Inc.'s return on equity of 33.61% beat California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s return on equity of -100.03%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    IFOS.V
    Itafos, Inc.
    26.43% $0.26 $737M
    CNO.V
    California Nanotechnologies Corp.
    -119.58% -$0.03 $4.9M
  • What do Analysts Say About IFOS.V or CNO.V?

    Itafos, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 67.96%. On the other hand California Nanotechnologies Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $0.75 which suggests that it could grow by 154.61%. Given that California Nanotechnologies Corp. has higher upside potential than Itafos, Inc., analysts believe California Nanotechnologies Corp. is more attractive than Itafos, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    IFOS.V
    Itafos, Inc.
    1 0 0
    CNO.V
    California Nanotechnologies Corp.
    0 0 0
  • Is IFOS.V or CNO.V More Risky?

    Itafos, Inc. has a beta of 0.951, which suggesting that the stock is 4.947% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a beta of 1.259, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.897%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock IFOS.V or CNO.V?

    Itafos, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. California Nanotechnologies Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Itafos, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. California Nanotechnologies Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios IFOS.V or CNO.V?

    Itafos, Inc. quarterly revenues are $210.5M, which are larger than California Nanotechnologies Corp. quarterly revenues of $547.5K. Itafos, Inc.'s net income of $49.9M is higher than California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Itafos, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.27x while California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s PE ratio is 41.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Itafos, Inc. is 0.75x versus 3.20x for California Nanotechnologies Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    IFOS.V
    Itafos, Inc.
    0.75x 3.27x $210.5M $49.9M
    CNO.V
    California Nanotechnologies Corp.
    3.20x 41.29x $547.5K -$1.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns IFOS.V or FM.TO?

    First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a net margin of 23.7% compared to Itafos, Inc.'s net margin of -5.8%. Itafos, Inc.'s return on equity of 33.61% beat First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.17%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    IFOS.V
    Itafos, Inc.
    26.43% $0.26 $737M
    FM.TO
    First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
    25.78% -$0.08 $25.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About IFOS.V or FM.TO?

    Itafos, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 67.96%. On the other hand First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $22.41 which suggests that it could fall by -40.44%. Given that Itafos, Inc. has higher upside potential than First Quantum Minerals Ltd., analysts believe Itafos, Inc. is more attractive than First Quantum Minerals Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    IFOS.V
    Itafos, Inc.
    1 0 0
    FM.TO
    First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
    7 10 0
  • Is IFOS.V or FM.TO More Risky?

    Itafos, Inc. has a beta of 0.951, which suggesting that the stock is 4.947% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.860, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.031%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock IFOS.V or FM.TO?

    Itafos, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Itafos, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios IFOS.V or FM.TO?

    Itafos, Inc. quarterly revenues are $210.5M, which are smaller than First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Itafos, Inc.'s net income of $49.9M is higher than First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$107.4M. Notably, Itafos, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.27x while First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s PE ratio is 484.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Itafos, Inc. is 0.75x versus 4.44x for First Quantum Minerals Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    IFOS.V
    Itafos, Inc.
    0.75x 3.27x $210.5M $49.9M
    FM.TO
    First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
    4.44x 484.57x $1.9B -$107.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns IFOS.V or LUN.TO?

    Lundin Mining Corp. has a net margin of 23.7% compared to Itafos, Inc.'s net margin of 19.16%. Itafos, Inc.'s return on equity of 33.61% beat Lundin Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 5.26%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    IFOS.V
    Itafos, Inc.
    26.43% $0.26 $737M
    LUN.TO
    Lundin Mining Corp.
    30.25% $0.26 $10.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About IFOS.V or LUN.TO?

    Itafos, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 67.96%. On the other hand Lundin Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $18.47 which suggests that it could fall by -45.19%. Given that Itafos, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lundin Mining Corp., analysts believe Itafos, Inc. is more attractive than Lundin Mining Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    IFOS.V
    Itafos, Inc.
    1 0 0
    LUN.TO
    Lundin Mining Corp.
    8 8 0
  • Is IFOS.V or LUN.TO More Risky?

    Itafos, Inc. has a beta of 0.951, which suggesting that the stock is 4.947% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lundin Mining Corp. has a beta of 1.692, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.211%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock IFOS.V or LUN.TO?

    Itafos, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lundin Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Itafos, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lundin Mining Corp. pays out -132.05% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios IFOS.V or LUN.TO?

    Itafos, Inc. quarterly revenues are $210.5M, which are smaller than Lundin Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Itafos, Inc.'s net income of $49.9M is lower than Lundin Mining Corp.'s net income of $254.3M. Notably, Itafos, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.27x while Lundin Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is 730.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Itafos, Inc. is 0.75x versus 6.28x for Lundin Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    IFOS.V
    Itafos, Inc.
    0.75x 3.27x $210.5M $49.9M
    LUN.TO
    Lundin Mining Corp.
    6.28x 730.35x $1.3B $254.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns IFOS.V or MKO.V?

    Mako Mining Corp. has a net margin of 23.7% compared to Itafos, Inc.'s net margin of 4.34%. Itafos, Inc.'s return on equity of 33.61% beat Mako Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 28.32%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    IFOS.V
    Itafos, Inc.
    26.43% $0.26 $737M
    MKO.V
    Mako Mining Corp.
    23.7% $0.02 $143.5M
  • What do Analysts Say About IFOS.V or MKO.V?

    Itafos, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 67.96%. On the other hand Mako Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $5.65 which suggests that it could fall by -43.22%. Given that Itafos, Inc. has higher upside potential than Mako Mining Corp., analysts believe Itafos, Inc. is more attractive than Mako Mining Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    IFOS.V
    Itafos, Inc.
    1 0 0
    MKO.V
    Mako Mining Corp.
    1 0 0
  • Is IFOS.V or MKO.V More Risky?

    Itafos, Inc. has a beta of 0.951, which suggesting that the stock is 4.947% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mako Mining Corp. has a beta of 1.295, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.525%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock IFOS.V or MKO.V?

    Itafos, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mako Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Itafos, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mako Mining Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios IFOS.V or MKO.V?

    Itafos, Inc. quarterly revenues are $210.5M, which are larger than Mako Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of $38M. Itafos, Inc.'s net income of $49.9M is higher than Mako Mining Corp.'s net income of $1.6M. Notably, Itafos, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.27x while Mako Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is 23.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Itafos, Inc. is 0.75x versus 4.53x for Mako Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    IFOS.V
    Itafos, Inc.
    0.75x 3.27x $210.5M $49.9M
    MKO.V
    Mako Mining Corp.
    4.53x 23.68x $38M $1.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns IFOS.V or SOMA.V?

    Soma Gold Corp. has a net margin of 23.7% compared to Itafos, Inc.'s net margin of 2.35%. Itafos, Inc.'s return on equity of 33.61% beat Soma Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 35.72%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    IFOS.V
    Itafos, Inc.
    26.43% $0.26 $737M
    SOMA.V
    Soma Gold Corp.
    23.46% $0.00 $73.5M
  • What do Analysts Say About IFOS.V or SOMA.V?

    Itafos, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 67.96%. On the other hand Soma Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Itafos, Inc. has higher upside potential than Soma Gold Corp., analysts believe Itafos, Inc. is more attractive than Soma Gold Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    IFOS.V
    Itafos, Inc.
    1 0 0
    SOMA.V
    Soma Gold Corp.
    0 0 0
  • Is IFOS.V or SOMA.V More Risky?

    Itafos, Inc. has a beta of 0.951, which suggesting that the stock is 4.947% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Soma Gold Corp. has a beta of 0.143, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.743%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock IFOS.V or SOMA.V?

    Itafos, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Soma Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Itafos, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Soma Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios IFOS.V or SOMA.V?

    Itafos, Inc. quarterly revenues are $210.5M, which are larger than Soma Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of $18.1M. Itafos, Inc.'s net income of $49.9M is higher than Soma Gold Corp.'s net income of $425K. Notably, Itafos, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.27x while Soma Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is 21.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Itafos, Inc. is 0.75x versus 2.05x for Soma Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    IFOS.V
    Itafos, Inc.
    0.75x 3.27x $210.5M $49.9M
    SOMA.V
    Soma Gold Corp.
    2.05x 21.05x $18.1M $425K

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?
Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?

Shares of embattled health insurance giant UnitedHealth (NYSE:UNH) plummeted by…

Is Lumentum The Best Laser Stock to Buy?
Is Lumentum The Best Laser Stock to Buy?

Though certainly less well-known than the huge tech businesses that…

Is Planet Fitness Stock Undervalued?
Is Planet Fitness Stock Undervalued?

Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) has had a difficult 12 months, retreating…

Stock Ideas

Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x

Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Buy
53
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 30x

Alerts

Sell
40
BILL alert for Feb 10

Bill Holdings, Inc. [BILL] is up 3.7% over the past day.

Buy
75
PRLB alert for Feb 9

Proto Labs, Inc. [PRLB] is down 2.16% over the past day.

Sell
30
MSTR alert for Feb 9

Strategy, Inc. [MSTR] is up 2.59% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock