Financhill
Sell
47

IFOS.V Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$3.07
Seasonality move :
7.92%
Day range:
$3.00 - $3.05
52-week range:
$1.97 - $3.64
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
3.33x
P/S ratio:
0.76x
P/B ratio:
0.96x
Volume:
138.2K
Avg. volume:
113.5K
1-year change:
48.29%
Market cap:
$587.4M
Revenue:
$673M
EPS (TTM):
$0.91

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
IFOS.V
Itafos, Inc.
$196.1M $0.18 1.5% -16.77% $5.00
CNO.V
California Nanotechnologies Corp.
$1.1M -$0.01 -33.44% -35.21% $0.75
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
$1.9B $0.10 20.91% -38.42% $43.53
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
$1.7B $0.41 24.1% 106.05% $37.20
MKO.V
Mako Mining Corp.
-- -- -- -- $5.65
SOMA.V
Soma Gold Corp.
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
IFOS.V
Itafos, Inc.
$3.04 $5.00 $587.4M 3.33x $0.17 0% 0.76x
CNO.V
California Nanotechnologies Corp.
$0.32 $0.75 $15.3M 41.29x $0.00 0% 3.47x
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
$36.68 $43.53 $30.4B 502.72x $0.08 0% 4.18x
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
$38.72 $37.20 $33.1B 18.54x $0.03 0.45% 6.35x
MKO.V
Mako Mining Corp.
$10.90 $5.65 $948.4M 25.95x $0.00 0% 4.96x
SOMA.V
Soma Gold Corp.
$2.19 -- $256.8M 23.40x $0.00 0% 2.28x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
IFOS.V
Itafos, Inc.
17.14% -1.006 23.01% 1.18x
CNO.V
California Nanotechnologies Corp.
39.43% 0.408 12.09% 0.97x
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
38.83% 1.398 31.36% 0.52x
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
6.36% 2.783 2.28% 0.79x
MKO.V
Mako Mining Corp.
5.11% 1.562 1.13% 1.52x
SOMA.V
Soma Gold Corp.
28.83% 0.431 14.47% 0.96x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
IFOS.V
Itafos, Inc.
$55.6M $44.7M 26.65% 33.61% 21.23% -$10.6M
CNO.V
California Nanotechnologies Corp.
-$654.7K -$1.2M -57.29% -100.03% -210.56% -$231.4K
FM.TO
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
$556.3M $543.8M -0.35% -0.56% 26.44% -$580.7M
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corp.
$400.5M $382.6M 17.83% 20.96% 28.16% $510.9M
MKO.V
Mako Mining Corp.
$9M $5.1M 26.44% 28.32% 13.32% $1.1M
SOMA.V
Soma Gold Corp.
$4.3M $3.2M 15.84% 35.72% 17.66% -$4.4M

Itafos, Inc. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns IFOS.V or CNO.V?

    California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a net margin of 23.7% compared to Itafos, Inc.'s net margin of -278.92%. Itafos, Inc.'s return on equity of 33.61% beat California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s return on equity of -100.03%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    IFOS.V
    Itafos, Inc.
    26.43% $0.26 $737M
    CNO.V
    California Nanotechnologies Corp.
    -119.58% -$0.03 $4.9M
  • What do Analysts Say About IFOS.V or CNO.V?

    Itafos, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 64.64%. On the other hand California Nanotechnologies Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $0.75 which suggests that it could grow by 134.72%. Given that California Nanotechnologies Corp. has higher upside potential than Itafos, Inc., analysts believe California Nanotechnologies Corp. is more attractive than Itafos, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    IFOS.V
    Itafos, Inc.
    1 0 0
    CNO.V
    California Nanotechnologies Corp.
    0 0 0
  • Is IFOS.V or CNO.V More Risky?

    Itafos, Inc. has a beta of 0.961, which suggesting that the stock is 3.892% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a beta of 0.965, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.471%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock IFOS.V or CNO.V?

    Itafos, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. California Nanotechnologies Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Itafos, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. California Nanotechnologies Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios IFOS.V or CNO.V?

    Itafos, Inc. quarterly revenues are $210.5M, which are larger than California Nanotechnologies Corp. quarterly revenues of $547.5K. Itafos, Inc.'s net income of $49.9M is higher than California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Itafos, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.33x while California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s PE ratio is 41.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Itafos, Inc. is 0.76x versus 3.47x for California Nanotechnologies Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    IFOS.V
    Itafos, Inc.
    0.76x 3.33x $210.5M $49.9M
    CNO.V
    California Nanotechnologies Corp.
    3.47x 41.29x $547.5K -$1.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns IFOS.V or FM.TO?

    First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a net margin of 23.7% compared to Itafos, Inc.'s net margin of 7.12%. Itafos, Inc.'s return on equity of 33.61% beat First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.56%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    IFOS.V
    Itafos, Inc.
    26.43% $0.26 $737M
    FM.TO
    First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
    27.05% $0.04 $25.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About IFOS.V or FM.TO?

    Itafos, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 64.64%. On the other hand First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $43.53 which suggests that it could grow by 18.68%. Given that Itafos, Inc. has higher upside potential than First Quantum Minerals Ltd., analysts believe Itafos, Inc. is more attractive than First Quantum Minerals Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    IFOS.V
    Itafos, Inc.
    1 0 0
    FM.TO
    First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
    7 9 0
  • Is IFOS.V or FM.TO More Risky?

    Itafos, Inc. has a beta of 0.961, which suggesting that the stock is 3.892% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.725, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.466%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock IFOS.V or FM.TO?

    Itafos, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Itafos, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios IFOS.V or FM.TO?

    Itafos, Inc. quarterly revenues are $210.5M, which are smaller than First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Itafos, Inc.'s net income of $49.9M is lower than First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of $146.4M. Notably, Itafos, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.33x while First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s PE ratio is 502.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Itafos, Inc. is 0.76x versus 4.18x for First Quantum Minerals Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    IFOS.V
    Itafos, Inc.
    0.76x 3.33x $210.5M $49.9M
    FM.TO
    First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
    4.18x 502.72x $2.1B $146.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns IFOS.V or LUN.TO?

    Lundin Mining Corp. has a net margin of 23.7% compared to Itafos, Inc.'s net margin of 91.56%. Itafos, Inc.'s return on equity of 33.61% beat Lundin Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 20.96%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    IFOS.V
    Itafos, Inc.
    26.43% $0.26 $737M
    LUN.TO
    Lundin Mining Corp.
    29.47% $1.25 $11.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About IFOS.V or LUN.TO?

    Itafos, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 64.64%. On the other hand Lundin Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $37.20 which suggests that it could fall by -3.92%. Given that Itafos, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lundin Mining Corp., analysts believe Itafos, Inc. is more attractive than Lundin Mining Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    IFOS.V
    Itafos, Inc.
    1 0 0
    LUN.TO
    Lundin Mining Corp.
    7 11 0
  • Is IFOS.V or LUN.TO More Risky?

    Itafos, Inc. has a beta of 0.961, which suggesting that the stock is 3.892% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lundin Mining Corp. has a beta of 1.708, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.831%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock IFOS.V or LUN.TO?

    Itafos, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lundin Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Itafos, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lundin Mining Corp. pays out 8.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Lundin Mining Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios IFOS.V or LUN.TO?

    Itafos, Inc. quarterly revenues are $210.5M, which are smaller than Lundin Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Itafos, Inc.'s net income of $49.9M is lower than Lundin Mining Corp.'s net income of $1.2B. Notably, Itafos, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.33x while Lundin Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is 18.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Itafos, Inc. is 0.76x versus 6.35x for Lundin Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    IFOS.V
    Itafos, Inc.
    0.76x 3.33x $210.5M $49.9M
    LUN.TO
    Lundin Mining Corp.
    6.35x 18.54x $1.4B $1.2B
  • Which has Higher Returns IFOS.V or MKO.V?

    Mako Mining Corp. has a net margin of 23.7% compared to Itafos, Inc.'s net margin of 4.34%. Itafos, Inc.'s return on equity of 33.61% beat Mako Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 28.32%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    IFOS.V
    Itafos, Inc.
    26.43% $0.26 $737M
    MKO.V
    Mako Mining Corp.
    23.7% $0.02 $143.5M
  • What do Analysts Say About IFOS.V or MKO.V?

    Itafos, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 64.64%. On the other hand Mako Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $5.65 which suggests that it could fall by -48.17%. Given that Itafos, Inc. has higher upside potential than Mako Mining Corp., analysts believe Itafos, Inc. is more attractive than Mako Mining Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    IFOS.V
    Itafos, Inc.
    1 0 0
    MKO.V
    Mako Mining Corp.
    1 0 0
  • Is IFOS.V or MKO.V More Risky?

    Itafos, Inc. has a beta of 0.961, which suggesting that the stock is 3.892% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mako Mining Corp. has a beta of 1.419, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.891%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock IFOS.V or MKO.V?

    Itafos, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mako Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Itafos, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mako Mining Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios IFOS.V or MKO.V?

    Itafos, Inc. quarterly revenues are $210.5M, which are larger than Mako Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of $38M. Itafos, Inc.'s net income of $49.9M is higher than Mako Mining Corp.'s net income of $1.6M. Notably, Itafos, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.33x while Mako Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is 25.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Itafos, Inc. is 0.76x versus 4.96x for Mako Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    IFOS.V
    Itafos, Inc.
    0.76x 3.33x $210.5M $49.9M
    MKO.V
    Mako Mining Corp.
    4.96x 25.95x $38M $1.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns IFOS.V or SOMA.V?

    Soma Gold Corp. has a net margin of 23.7% compared to Itafos, Inc.'s net margin of 2.35%. Itafos, Inc.'s return on equity of 33.61% beat Soma Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 35.72%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    IFOS.V
    Itafos, Inc.
    26.43% $0.26 $737M
    SOMA.V
    Soma Gold Corp.
    23.46% $0.00 $73.5M
  • What do Analysts Say About IFOS.V or SOMA.V?

    Itafos, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 64.64%. On the other hand Soma Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Itafos, Inc. has higher upside potential than Soma Gold Corp., analysts believe Itafos, Inc. is more attractive than Soma Gold Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    IFOS.V
    Itafos, Inc.
    1 0 0
    SOMA.V
    Soma Gold Corp.
    0 0 0
  • Is IFOS.V or SOMA.V More Risky?

    Itafos, Inc. has a beta of 0.961, which suggesting that the stock is 3.892% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Soma Gold Corp. has a beta of 0.130, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.978%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock IFOS.V or SOMA.V?

    Itafos, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Soma Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Itafos, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Soma Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios IFOS.V or SOMA.V?

    Itafos, Inc. quarterly revenues are $210.5M, which are larger than Soma Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of $18.1M. Itafos, Inc.'s net income of $49.9M is higher than Soma Gold Corp.'s net income of $425K. Notably, Itafos, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.33x while Soma Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is 23.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Itafos, Inc. is 0.76x versus 2.28x for Soma Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    IFOS.V
    Itafos, Inc.
    0.76x 3.33x $210.5M $49.9M
    SOMA.V
    Soma Gold Corp.
    2.28x 23.40x $18.1M $425K

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?

Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…

Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?

Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…

Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?

Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…

Stock Ideas

Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Sell
34
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x

Alerts

Sell
46
ZD alert for Mar 4

Ziff Davis, Inc. [ZD] is up 0.75% over the past day.

Buy
54
KORU alert for Mar 4

Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares [KORU] is up 7.42% over the past day.

Sell
40
PSIX alert for Mar 4

Power Solutions International, Inc. [PSIX] is down 0.53% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock