Will Tesla Stock Go Up In 2026?
EV giant Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) has, somewhat surprisingly, undershot the broader…
Sell
34
CNO.V Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.35
Seasonality move
:
0.82%
Day range:
$0.35 - $0.35
52-week range:
$0.27 - $1.07
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
41.29x
P/S ratio:
2.63x
P/B ratio:
5.10x
Volume:
3.5K
Avg. volume:
30.7K
1-year change:
-65.84%
Market cap:
$16.6M
Revenue:
$8.6M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.03
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNO.V
California Nanotechnologies Corp.
|
$1.3M | -- | -49.3% | -100% | $1.00 |
|
AII.TO
Almonty Industries, Inc.
|
$10.7M | -$0.01 | 257.39% | -32.04% | $10.45 |
|
CEMX.TO
Cematrix Corp.
|
$16M | -- | 15.93% | -- | $0.55 |
|
NG.TO
NovaGold Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -$0.04 | -- | -13.67% | $19.50 |
|
RBX.V
Robex Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $6.10 |
|
WRLG.V
West Red Lake Gold Mines Ltd.
|
-- | $0.05 | -- | -50% | $1.98 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNO.V
California Nanotechnologies Corp.
|
$0.35 | $1.00 | $16.6M | 41.29x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.63x |
|
AII.TO
Almonty Industries, Inc.
|
$9.32 | $10.45 | $1.8B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 57.93x |
|
CEMX.TO
Cematrix Corp.
|
$0.34 | $0.55 | $50.3M | 16.58x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.19x |
|
NG.TO
NovaGold Resources, Inc.
|
$13.36 | $19.50 | $5.4B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 3,120.67x |
|
RBX.V
Robex Resources, Inc.
|
$5.00 | $6.10 | $1.2B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 4.61x |
|
WRLG.V
West Red Lake Gold Mines Ltd.
|
$1.03 | $1.98 | $408.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 5.88x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNO.V
California Nanotechnologies Corp.
|
38.26% | 2.452 | 13.59% | 1.11x |
|
AII.TO
Almonty Industries, Inc.
|
53.65% | 0.386 | 12.02% | 2.11x |
|
CEMX.TO
Cematrix Corp.
|
8.83% | 1.049 | 6.94% | 3.67x |
|
NG.TO
NovaGold Resources, Inc.
|
47.99% | 1.784 | 5.87% | 26.70x |
|
RBX.V
Robex Resources, Inc.
|
6.02% | -1.925 | 3.07% | 1.49x |
|
WRLG.V
West Red Lake Gold Mines Ltd.
|
57.11% | 1.999 | 28.44% | 1.31x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNO.V
California Nanotechnologies Corp.
|
-$15.9K | -$482.2K | -25.48% | -50.4% | -45.07% | -$431K |
|
AII.TO
Almonty Industries, Inc.
|
$1.3M | -$3.1M | -27.94% | -112.47% | -36.21% | -$27.1M |
|
CEMX.TO
Cematrix Corp.
|
$5.2M | $2.8M | 7.6% | 8.36% | 18.07% | $1.6M |
|
NG.TO
NovaGold Resources, Inc.
|
-$8.2K | -$8.6M | -51.34% | -231.04% | -- | -$1.2M |
|
RBX.V
Robex Resources, Inc.
|
$21.6M | $11.4M | -23.73% | -27.12% | 24.65% | -$104.4M |
|
WRLG.V
West Red Lake Gold Mines Ltd.
|
$10.3M | $7M | -28.23% | -62.93% | 21.64% | -$17M |
California Nanotechnologies Corp. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CNO.V or AII.TO?
Almonty Industries, Inc. has a net margin of -37.5% compared to California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s net margin of -809.36%. California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s return on equity of -50.4% beat Almonty Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of -112.47%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.-1.49% -$0.01 $5.3M AII.TOAlmonty Industries, Inc.14.42% $0.13 $368.6M -
What do Analysts Say About CNO.V or AII.TO?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a consensus price target of $1.00, signalling upside risk potential of 189.3%. On the other hand Almonty Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $10.45 which suggests that it could grow by 12.11%. Given that California Nanotechnologies Corp. has higher upside potential than Almonty Industries, Inc., analysts believe California Nanotechnologies Corp. is more attractive than Almonty Industries, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.0 0 0 AII.TOAlmonty Industries, Inc.7 1 0 -
Is CNO.V or AII.TO More Risky?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a beta of 1.248, which suggesting that the stock is 24.843% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Almonty Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.346, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.571%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNO.V or AII.TO?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Almonty Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. California Nanotechnologies Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Almonty Industries, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNO.V or AII.TO?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.1M, which are smaller than Almonty Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $8.7M. California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s net income of -$401.2K is lower than Almonty Industries, Inc.'s net income of $33.2M. Notably, California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.29x while Almonty Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Nanotechnologies Corp. is 2.63x versus 57.93x for Almonty Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.2.63x 41.29x $1.1M -$401.2K AII.TOAlmonty Industries, Inc.57.93x -- $8.7M $33.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns CNO.V or CEMX.TO?
Cematrix Corp. has a net margin of -37.5% compared to California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s net margin of 12.47%. California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s return on equity of -50.4% beat Cematrix Corp.'s return on equity of 8.36%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.-1.49% -$0.01 $5.3M CEMX.TOCematrix Corp.33.68% $0.01 $43.1M -
What do Analysts Say About CNO.V or CEMX.TO?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a consensus price target of $1.00, signalling upside risk potential of 189.3%. On the other hand Cematrix Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $0.55 which suggests that it could grow by 94.03%. Given that California Nanotechnologies Corp. has higher upside potential than Cematrix Corp., analysts believe California Nanotechnologies Corp. is more attractive than Cematrix Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.0 0 0 CEMX.TOCematrix Corp.1 0 0 -
Is CNO.V or CEMX.TO More Risky?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a beta of 1.248, which suggesting that the stock is 24.843% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cematrix Corp. has a beta of -0.128, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 112.813%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNO.V or CEMX.TO?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cematrix Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. California Nanotechnologies Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cematrix Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNO.V or CEMX.TO?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.1M, which are smaller than Cematrix Corp. quarterly revenues of $15.3M. California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s net income of -$401.2K is lower than Cematrix Corp.'s net income of $1.9M. Notably, California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.29x while Cematrix Corp.'s PE ratio is 16.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Nanotechnologies Corp. is 2.63x versus 1.19x for Cematrix Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.2.63x 41.29x $1.1M -$401.2K CEMX.TOCematrix Corp.1.19x 16.58x $15.3M $1.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns CNO.V or NG.TO?
NovaGold Resources, Inc. has a net margin of -37.5% compared to California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s net margin of --. California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s return on equity of -50.4% beat NovaGold Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -231.04%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.-1.49% -$0.01 $5.3M NG.TONovaGold Resources, Inc.-- -$0.05 $467.6M -
What do Analysts Say About CNO.V or NG.TO?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a consensus price target of $1.00, signalling upside risk potential of 189.3%. On the other hand NovaGold Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $19.50 which suggests that it could grow by 45.96%. Given that California Nanotechnologies Corp. has higher upside potential than NovaGold Resources, Inc., analysts believe California Nanotechnologies Corp. is more attractive than NovaGold Resources, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.0 0 0 NG.TONovaGold Resources, Inc.3 0 0 -
Is CNO.V or NG.TO More Risky?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a beta of 1.248, which suggesting that the stock is 24.843% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NovaGold Resources, Inc. has a beta of 1.462, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.217%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNO.V or NG.TO?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NovaGold Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. California Nanotechnologies Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NovaGold Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNO.V or NG.TO?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.1M, which are larger than NovaGold Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s net income of -$401.2K is higher than NovaGold Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$21.5M. Notably, California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.29x while NovaGold Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Nanotechnologies Corp. is 2.63x versus 3,120.67x for NovaGold Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.2.63x 41.29x $1.1M -$401.2K NG.TONovaGold Resources, Inc.3,120.67x -- -- -$21.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns CNO.V or RBX.V?
Robex Resources, Inc. has a net margin of -37.5% compared to California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s net margin of -35.64%. California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s return on equity of -50.4% beat Robex Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -27.12%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.-1.49% -$0.01 $5.3M RBX.VRobex Resources, Inc.46.52% -$0.08 $461.4M -
What do Analysts Say About CNO.V or RBX.V?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a consensus price target of $1.00, signalling upside risk potential of 189.3%. On the other hand Robex Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.10 which suggests that it could grow by 22%. Given that California Nanotechnologies Corp. has higher upside potential than Robex Resources, Inc., analysts believe California Nanotechnologies Corp. is more attractive than Robex Resources, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.0 0 0 RBX.VRobex Resources, Inc.1 0 0 -
Is CNO.V or RBX.V More Risky?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a beta of 1.248, which suggesting that the stock is 24.843% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Robex Resources, Inc. has a beta of -0.442, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 144.155%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNO.V or RBX.V?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Robex Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. California Nanotechnologies Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Robex Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNO.V or RBX.V?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.1M, which are smaller than Robex Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of $46.4M. California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s net income of -$401.2K is higher than Robex Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$16.5M. Notably, California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.29x while Robex Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Nanotechnologies Corp. is 2.63x versus 4.61x for Robex Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.2.63x 41.29x $1.1M -$401.2K RBX.VRobex Resources, Inc.4.61x -- $46.4M -$16.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns CNO.V or WRLG.V?
West Red Lake Gold Mines Ltd. has a net margin of -37.5% compared to California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s net margin of -7.34%. California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s return on equity of -50.4% beat West Red Lake Gold Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of -62.93%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.-1.49% -$0.01 $5.3M WRLG.VWest Red Lake Gold Mines Ltd.31.71% -$0.01 $197.3M -
What do Analysts Say About CNO.V or WRLG.V?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a consensus price target of $1.00, signalling upside risk potential of 189.3%. On the other hand West Red Lake Gold Mines Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $1.98 which suggests that it could grow by 91.75%. Given that California Nanotechnologies Corp. has higher upside potential than West Red Lake Gold Mines Ltd., analysts believe California Nanotechnologies Corp. is more attractive than West Red Lake Gold Mines Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.0 0 0 WRLG.VWest Red Lake Gold Mines Ltd.3 0 0 -
Is CNO.V or WRLG.V More Risky?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a beta of 1.248, which suggesting that the stock is 24.843% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison West Red Lake Gold Mines Ltd. has a beta of -0.087, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.681%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNO.V or WRLG.V?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. West Red Lake Gold Mines Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. California Nanotechnologies Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. West Red Lake Gold Mines Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNO.V or WRLG.V?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.1M, which are smaller than West Red Lake Gold Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues of $32.5M. California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s net income of -$401.2K is higher than West Red Lake Gold Mines Ltd.'s net income of -$2.4M. Notably, California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.29x while West Red Lake Gold Mines Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Nanotechnologies Corp. is 2.63x versus 5.88x for West Red Lake Gold Mines Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.2.63x 41.29x $1.1M -$401.2K WRLG.VWest Red Lake Gold Mines Ltd.5.88x -- $32.5M -$2.4M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
What Are the Best AI Power Stocks?
As the construction of AI infrastructure accelerates, the gap between…
Is IONQ The Best Quantum Stock to Buy?
Riding a wave of investor enthusiasm for the technology, quantum…
Stock Ideas
Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 60x
Buy
58
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
73
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
80
FEIM alert for Dec 15
Frequency Electronics, Inc. [FEIM] is down 3.51% over the past day.
Buy
57
MOD alert for Dec 15
Modine Manufacturing Co. [MOD] is up 1.79% over the past day.
Sell
42
OKLO alert for Dec 15
Oklo, Inc. [OKLO] is down 5.81% over the past day.
