Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
38
CNO.V Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.32
Seasonality move
:
19.43%
Day range:
$0.28 - $0.32
52-week range:
$0.27 - $1.00
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
41.29x
P/S ratio:
3.47x
P/B ratio:
5.14x
Volume:
25.6K
Avg. volume:
42.9K
1-year change:
-50%
Market cap:
$15.3M
Revenue:
$8.6M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.06
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNO.V
California Nanotechnologies Corp.
|
$1.1M | -$0.01 | -33.44% | -35.21% | $0.75 |
|
IAU.TO
i-80 Gold Corp.
|
$50.4M | -$0.01 | -- | -77.37% | $4.19 |
|
IFOS.V
Itafos, Inc.
|
$196.1M | $0.18 | 1.5% | -16.77% | $5.00 |
|
NG.TO
NovaGold Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -$0.08 | -- | -106.85% | $20.67 |
|
SSRM.TO
SSR Mining, Inc.
|
$615.1M | $0.79 | 89.49% | 188.21% | $44.92 |
|
TSG.V
TriStar Gold, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.85 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNO.V
California Nanotechnologies Corp.
|
$0.32 | $0.75 | $15.3M | 41.29x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.47x |
|
IAU.TO
i-80 Gold Corp.
|
$2.57 | $4.19 | $2.2B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 13.00x |
|
IFOS.V
Itafos, Inc.
|
$3.04 | $5.00 | $587.4M | 3.33x | $0.17 | 0% | 0.76x |
|
NG.TO
NovaGold Resources, Inc.
|
$17.37 | $20.67 | $7.6B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 3,120.67x |
|
SSRM.TO
SSR Mining, Inc.
|
$39.53 | $44.92 | $8B | 15.51x | $0.10 | 0% | 3.77x |
|
TSG.V
TriStar Gold, Inc.
|
$0.32 | $0.85 | $112.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNO.V
California Nanotechnologies Corp.
|
39.43% | 0.408 | 12.09% | 0.97x |
|
IAU.TO
i-80 Gold Corp.
|
33.5% | 4.426 | 14.33% | 0.46x |
|
IFOS.V
Itafos, Inc.
|
17.14% | -1.006 | 23.01% | 1.18x |
|
NG.TO
NovaGold Resources, Inc.
|
50.49% | 4.049 | 4.01% | 23.33x |
|
SSRM.TO
SSR Mining, Inc.
|
10.13% | 5.851 | 7.51% | 1.08x |
|
TSG.V
TriStar Gold, Inc.
|
-- | 2.928 | -- | 21.06x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNO.V
California Nanotechnologies Corp.
|
-$654.7K | -$1.2M | -57.29% | -100.03% | -210.56% | -$231.4K |
|
IAU.TO
i-80 Gold Corp.
|
-$32.2M | -$50M | -35.38% | -52.56% | -168.34% | -$55.7M |
|
IFOS.V
Itafos, Inc.
|
$55.6M | $44.7M | 26.65% | 33.61% | 21.23% | -$10.6M |
|
NG.TO
NovaGold Resources, Inc.
|
-$7K | -$11.8M | -39.8% | -120.25% | -- | -$8.4M |
|
SSRM.TO
SSR Mining, Inc.
|
$335.9M | $309.4M | 8.1% | 8.81% | 42.53% | $148.5M |
|
TSG.V
TriStar Gold, Inc.
|
-- | -$1M | -4.09% | -4.09% | -- | -$2M |
California Nanotechnologies Corp. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CNO.V or IAU.TO?
i-80 Gold Corp. has a net margin of -278.92% compared to California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s net margin of -401.87%. California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s return on equity of -100.03% beat i-80 Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -52.56%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.-119.58% -$0.03 $4.9M IAU.TOi-80 Gold Corp.-108.34% -$0.14 $714.8M -
What do Analysts Say About CNO.V or IAU.TO?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a consensus price target of $0.75, signalling upside risk potential of 134.72%. On the other hand i-80 Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $4.19 which suggests that it could grow by 63%. Given that California Nanotechnologies Corp. has higher upside potential than i-80 Gold Corp., analysts believe California Nanotechnologies Corp. is more attractive than i-80 Gold Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.0 0 0 IAU.TOi-80 Gold Corp.3 0 0 -
Is CNO.V or IAU.TO More Risky?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a beta of 0.965, which suggesting that the stock is 3.471% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison i-80 Gold Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNO.V or IAU.TO?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. i-80 Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. California Nanotechnologies Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. i-80 Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNO.V or IAU.TO?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. quarterly revenues are $547.5K, which are smaller than i-80 Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of $29.7M. California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s net income of -$1.5M is higher than i-80 Gold Corp.'s net income of -$119.3M. Notably, California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.29x while i-80 Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Nanotechnologies Corp. is 3.47x versus 13.00x for i-80 Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.3.47x 41.29x $547.5K -$1.5M IAU.TOi-80 Gold Corp.13.00x -- $29.7M -$119.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns CNO.V or IFOS.V?
Itafos, Inc. has a net margin of -278.92% compared to California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s net margin of 23.7%. California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s return on equity of -100.03% beat Itafos, Inc.'s return on equity of 33.61%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.-119.58% -$0.03 $4.9M IFOS.VItafos, Inc.26.43% $0.26 $737M -
What do Analysts Say About CNO.V or IFOS.V?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a consensus price target of $0.75, signalling upside risk potential of 134.72%. On the other hand Itafos, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 64.64%. Given that California Nanotechnologies Corp. has higher upside potential than Itafos, Inc., analysts believe California Nanotechnologies Corp. is more attractive than Itafos, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.0 0 0 IFOS.VItafos, Inc.1 0 0 -
Is CNO.V or IFOS.V More Risky?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a beta of 0.965, which suggesting that the stock is 3.471% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Itafos, Inc. has a beta of 0.961, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.892%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNO.V or IFOS.V?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Itafos, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. California Nanotechnologies Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Itafos, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNO.V or IFOS.V?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. quarterly revenues are $547.5K, which are smaller than Itafos, Inc. quarterly revenues of $210.5M. California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s net income of -$1.5M is lower than Itafos, Inc.'s net income of $49.9M. Notably, California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.29x while Itafos, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Nanotechnologies Corp. is 3.47x versus 0.76x for Itafos, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.3.47x 41.29x $547.5K -$1.5M IFOS.VItafos, Inc.0.76x 3.33x $210.5M $49.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns CNO.V or NG.TO?
NovaGold Resources, Inc. has a net margin of -278.92% compared to California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s net margin of --. California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s return on equity of -100.03% beat NovaGold Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -120.25%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.-119.58% -$0.03 $4.9M NG.TONovaGold Resources, Inc.-- -$0.05 $461.2M -
What do Analysts Say About CNO.V or NG.TO?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a consensus price target of $0.75, signalling upside risk potential of 134.72%. On the other hand NovaGold Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $20.67 which suggests that it could grow by 18.98%. Given that California Nanotechnologies Corp. has higher upside potential than NovaGold Resources, Inc., analysts believe California Nanotechnologies Corp. is more attractive than NovaGold Resources, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.0 0 0 NG.TONovaGold Resources, Inc.3 0 0 -
Is CNO.V or NG.TO More Risky?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a beta of 0.965, which suggesting that the stock is 3.471% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NovaGold Resources, Inc. has a beta of 1.851, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.086%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNO.V or NG.TO?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NovaGold Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. California Nanotechnologies Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NovaGold Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNO.V or NG.TO?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. quarterly revenues are $547.5K, which are larger than NovaGold Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s net income of -$1.5M is higher than NovaGold Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$21.8M. Notably, California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.29x while NovaGold Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Nanotechnologies Corp. is 3.47x versus 3,120.67x for NovaGold Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.3.47x 41.29x $547.5K -$1.5M NG.TONovaGold Resources, Inc.3,120.67x -- -- -$21.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns CNO.V or SSRM.TO?
SSR Mining, Inc. has a net margin of -278.92% compared to California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s net margin of 32.68%. California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s return on equity of -100.03% beat SSR Mining, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.81%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.-119.58% -$0.03 $4.9M SSRM.TOSSR Mining, Inc.46.18% $1.17 $6.5B -
What do Analysts Say About CNO.V or SSRM.TO?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a consensus price target of $0.75, signalling upside risk potential of 134.72%. On the other hand SSR Mining, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $44.92 which suggests that it could grow by 13.64%. Given that California Nanotechnologies Corp. has higher upside potential than SSR Mining, Inc., analysts believe California Nanotechnologies Corp. is more attractive than SSR Mining, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.0 0 0 SSRM.TOSSR Mining, Inc.4 4 0 -
Is CNO.V or SSRM.TO More Risky?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a beta of 0.965, which suggesting that the stock is 3.471% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SSR Mining, Inc. has a beta of 0.694, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.603%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNO.V or SSRM.TO?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SSR Mining, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. California Nanotechnologies Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SSR Mining, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNO.V or SSRM.TO?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. quarterly revenues are $547.5K, which are smaller than SSR Mining, Inc. quarterly revenues of $727.5M. California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s net income of -$1.5M is lower than SSR Mining, Inc.'s net income of $237.8M. Notably, California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.29x while SSR Mining, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Nanotechnologies Corp. is 3.47x versus 3.77x for SSR Mining, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.3.47x 41.29x $547.5K -$1.5M SSRM.TOSSR Mining, Inc.3.77x 15.51x $727.5M $237.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns CNO.V or TSG.V?
TriStar Gold, Inc. has a net margin of -278.92% compared to California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s net margin of --. California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s return on equity of -100.03% beat TriStar Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.09%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.-119.58% -$0.03 $4.9M TSG.VTriStar Gold, Inc.-- -$0.00 $44.9M -
What do Analysts Say About CNO.V or TSG.V?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a consensus price target of $0.75, signalling upside risk potential of 134.72%. On the other hand TriStar Gold, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $0.85 which suggests that it could grow by 166.38%. Given that TriStar Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than California Nanotechnologies Corp., analysts believe TriStar Gold, Inc. is more attractive than California Nanotechnologies Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.0 0 0 TSG.VTriStar Gold, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CNO.V or TSG.V More Risky?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a beta of 0.965, which suggesting that the stock is 3.471% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TriStar Gold, Inc. has a beta of 1.018, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.761%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNO.V or TSG.V?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TriStar Gold, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. California Nanotechnologies Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TriStar Gold, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNO.V or TSG.V?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. quarterly revenues are $547.5K, which are larger than TriStar Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s net income of -$1.5M is lower than TriStar Gold, Inc.'s net income of -$148.1K. Notably, California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.29x while TriStar Gold, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Nanotechnologies Corp. is 3.47x versus -- for TriStar Gold, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.3.47x 41.29x $547.5K -$1.5M TSG.VTriStar Gold, Inc.-- -- -- -$148.1K
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
34
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Sell
46
ZD alert for Mar 4
Ziff Davis, Inc. [ZD] is up 2.12% over the past day.
Buy
54
KORU alert for Mar 4
Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares [KORU] is up 6.17% over the past day.
Sell
40
PSIX alert for Mar 4
Power Solutions International, Inc. [PSIX] is down 0.67% over the past day.
