Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?
Shares of embattled health insurance giant UnitedHealth (NYSE:UNH) plummeted by…
Sell
26
CNO.V Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.30
Seasonality move
:
19.43%
Day range:
$0.30 - $0.30
52-week range:
$0.27 - $1.00
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
41.29x
P/S ratio:
3.20x
P/B ratio:
4.76x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
53.7K
1-year change:
-65.7%
Market cap:
$14.2M
Revenue:
$8.6M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.06
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNO.V
California Nanotechnologies Corp.
|
$1.3M | -- | -33.44% | -35.21% | $0.75 |
|
AII.TO
Almonty Industries, Inc.
|
$16.5M | $0.01 | 391.7% | -32.04% | $15.36 |
|
IFOS.V
Itafos, Inc.
|
$195.7M | -- | 1.29% | -- | $5.00 |
|
NG.TO
NovaGold Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -$0.04 | -- | -57.95% | $20.67 |
|
RBX.V
Robex Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $6.10 |
|
WRLG.V
West Red Lake Gold Mines Ltd.
|
-- | $0.05 | -- | -50% | $2.38 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNO.V
California Nanotechnologies Corp.
|
$0.30 | $0.75 | $14.2M | 41.29x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.20x |
|
AII.TO
Almonty Industries, Inc.
|
$20.13 | $15.36 | $3.9B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 125.11x |
|
IFOS.V
Itafos, Inc.
|
$3.10 | $5.00 | $599M | 3.40x | $0.17 | 0% | 0.78x |
|
NG.TO
NovaGold Resources, Inc.
|
$12.56 | $20.67 | $5.5B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 3,120.67x |
|
RBX.V
Robex Resources, Inc.
|
$5.90 | $6.10 | $1.4B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 5.43x |
|
WRLG.V
West Red Lake Gold Mines Ltd.
|
$1.17 | $2.38 | $463.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 6.68x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNO.V
California Nanotechnologies Corp.
|
39.43% | 0.927 | 12.05% | 0.97x |
|
AII.TO
Almonty Industries, Inc.
|
53.65% | -1.753 | 12.02% | 2.11x |
|
IFOS.V
Itafos, Inc.
|
17.14% | -1.792 | 23.01% | 1.18x |
|
NG.TO
NovaGold Resources, Inc.
|
50.49% | 2.574 | 4.01% | 23.33x |
|
RBX.V
Robex Resources, Inc.
|
6.02% | -1.462 | 3.07% | 1.49x |
|
WRLG.V
West Red Lake Gold Mines Ltd.
|
57.11% | 2.758 | 28.44% | 1.31x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNO.V
California Nanotechnologies Corp.
|
-$654.7K | -$1.2M | -57.29% | -100.03% | -210.56% | -$231.4K |
|
AII.TO
Almonty Industries, Inc.
|
$1.3M | -$3.1M | -27.94% | -112.47% | -36.21% | -$27.1M |
|
IFOS.V
Itafos, Inc.
|
$55.6M | $44.7M | 26.65% | 33.61% | 21.23% | -$10.6M |
|
NG.TO
NovaGold Resources, Inc.
|
-$7K | -$11.8M | -39.8% | -120.25% | -- | -$8.4M |
|
RBX.V
Robex Resources, Inc.
|
$21.6M | $11.4M | -23.73% | -27.12% | 24.65% | -$104.4M |
|
WRLG.V
West Red Lake Gold Mines Ltd.
|
$10.3M | $7M | -28.23% | -62.93% | 21.64% | -$17M |
California Nanotechnologies Corp. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CNO.V or AII.TO?
Almonty Industries, Inc. has a net margin of -278.92% compared to California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s net margin of -809.36%. California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s return on equity of -100.03% beat Almonty Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of -112.47%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.-119.58% -$0.03 $4.9M AII.TOAlmonty Industries, Inc.14.42% $0.13 $368.6M -
What do Analysts Say About CNO.V or AII.TO?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a consensus price target of $0.75, signalling upside risk potential of 154.61%. On the other hand Almonty Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $15.36 which suggests that it could fall by -23.7%. Given that California Nanotechnologies Corp. has higher upside potential than Almonty Industries, Inc., analysts believe California Nanotechnologies Corp. is more attractive than Almonty Industries, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.0 0 0 AII.TOAlmonty Industries, Inc.7 0 0 -
Is CNO.V or AII.TO More Risky?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a beta of 1.259, which suggesting that the stock is 25.897% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Almonty Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.332, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.233%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNO.V or AII.TO?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Almonty Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. California Nanotechnologies Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Almonty Industries, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNO.V or AII.TO?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. quarterly revenues are $547.5K, which are smaller than Almonty Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $8.7M. California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s net income of -$1.5M is lower than Almonty Industries, Inc.'s net income of $33.2M. Notably, California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.29x while Almonty Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Nanotechnologies Corp. is 3.20x versus 125.11x for Almonty Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.3.20x 41.29x $547.5K -$1.5M AII.TOAlmonty Industries, Inc.125.11x -- $8.7M $33.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns CNO.V or IFOS.V?
Itafos, Inc. has a net margin of -278.92% compared to California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s net margin of 23.7%. California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s return on equity of -100.03% beat Itafos, Inc.'s return on equity of 33.61%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.-119.58% -$0.03 $4.9M IFOS.VItafos, Inc.26.43% $0.26 $737M -
What do Analysts Say About CNO.V or IFOS.V?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a consensus price target of $0.75, signalling upside risk potential of 154.61%. On the other hand Itafos, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 61.45%. Given that California Nanotechnologies Corp. has higher upside potential than Itafos, Inc., analysts believe California Nanotechnologies Corp. is more attractive than Itafos, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.0 0 0 IFOS.VItafos, Inc.1 0 0 -
Is CNO.V or IFOS.V More Risky?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a beta of 1.259, which suggesting that the stock is 25.897% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Itafos, Inc. has a beta of 0.951, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.947%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNO.V or IFOS.V?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Itafos, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. California Nanotechnologies Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Itafos, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNO.V or IFOS.V?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. quarterly revenues are $547.5K, which are smaller than Itafos, Inc. quarterly revenues of $210.5M. California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s net income of -$1.5M is lower than Itafos, Inc.'s net income of $49.9M. Notably, California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.29x while Itafos, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Nanotechnologies Corp. is 3.20x versus 0.78x for Itafos, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.3.20x 41.29x $547.5K -$1.5M IFOS.VItafos, Inc.0.78x 3.40x $210.5M $49.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns CNO.V or NG.TO?
NovaGold Resources, Inc. has a net margin of -278.92% compared to California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s net margin of --. California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s return on equity of -100.03% beat NovaGold Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -120.25%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.-119.58% -$0.03 $4.9M NG.TONovaGold Resources, Inc.-- -$0.05 $461.2M -
What do Analysts Say About CNO.V or NG.TO?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a consensus price target of $0.75, signalling upside risk potential of 154.61%. On the other hand NovaGold Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $20.67 which suggests that it could grow by 64.54%. Given that California Nanotechnologies Corp. has higher upside potential than NovaGold Resources, Inc., analysts believe California Nanotechnologies Corp. is more attractive than NovaGold Resources, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.0 0 0 NG.TONovaGold Resources, Inc.3 0 0 -
Is CNO.V or NG.TO More Risky?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a beta of 1.259, which suggesting that the stock is 25.897% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NovaGold Resources, Inc. has a beta of 1.467, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.68%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNO.V or NG.TO?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NovaGold Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. California Nanotechnologies Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NovaGold Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNO.V or NG.TO?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. quarterly revenues are $547.5K, which are larger than NovaGold Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s net income of -$1.5M is higher than NovaGold Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$21.8M. Notably, California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.29x while NovaGold Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Nanotechnologies Corp. is 3.20x versus 3,120.67x for NovaGold Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.3.20x 41.29x $547.5K -$1.5M NG.TONovaGold Resources, Inc.3,120.67x -- -- -$21.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns CNO.V or RBX.V?
Robex Resources, Inc. has a net margin of -278.92% compared to California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s net margin of -35.64%. California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s return on equity of -100.03% beat Robex Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -27.12%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.-119.58% -$0.03 $4.9M RBX.VRobex Resources, Inc.46.52% -$0.08 $461.4M -
What do Analysts Say About CNO.V or RBX.V?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a consensus price target of $0.75, signalling upside risk potential of 154.61%. On the other hand Robex Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.10 which suggests that it could grow by 3.39%. Given that California Nanotechnologies Corp. has higher upside potential than Robex Resources, Inc., analysts believe California Nanotechnologies Corp. is more attractive than Robex Resources, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.0 0 0 RBX.VRobex Resources, Inc.1 0 0 -
Is CNO.V or RBX.V More Risky?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a beta of 1.259, which suggesting that the stock is 25.897% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Robex Resources, Inc. has a beta of -0.501, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 150.121%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNO.V or RBX.V?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Robex Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. California Nanotechnologies Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Robex Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNO.V or RBX.V?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. quarterly revenues are $547.5K, which are smaller than Robex Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of $46.4M. California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s net income of -$1.5M is higher than Robex Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$16.5M. Notably, California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.29x while Robex Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Nanotechnologies Corp. is 3.20x versus 5.43x for Robex Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.3.20x 41.29x $547.5K -$1.5M RBX.VRobex Resources, Inc.5.43x -- $46.4M -$16.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns CNO.V or WRLG.V?
West Red Lake Gold Mines Ltd. has a net margin of -278.92% compared to California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s net margin of -7.34%. California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s return on equity of -100.03% beat West Red Lake Gold Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of -62.93%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.-119.58% -$0.03 $4.9M WRLG.VWest Red Lake Gold Mines Ltd.31.71% -$0.01 $197.3M -
What do Analysts Say About CNO.V or WRLG.V?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a consensus price target of $0.75, signalling upside risk potential of 154.61%. On the other hand West Red Lake Gold Mines Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $2.38 which suggests that it could grow by 98.72%. Given that California Nanotechnologies Corp. has higher upside potential than West Red Lake Gold Mines Ltd., analysts believe California Nanotechnologies Corp. is more attractive than West Red Lake Gold Mines Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.0 0 0 WRLG.VWest Red Lake Gold Mines Ltd.3 0 0 -
Is CNO.V or WRLG.V More Risky?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a beta of 1.259, which suggesting that the stock is 25.897% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison West Red Lake Gold Mines Ltd. has a beta of -0.098, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.834%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNO.V or WRLG.V?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. West Red Lake Gold Mines Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. California Nanotechnologies Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. West Red Lake Gold Mines Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNO.V or WRLG.V?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. quarterly revenues are $547.5K, which are smaller than West Red Lake Gold Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues of $32.5M. California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s net income of -$1.5M is higher than West Red Lake Gold Mines Ltd.'s net income of -$2.4M. Notably, California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.29x while West Red Lake Gold Mines Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Nanotechnologies Corp. is 3.20x versus 6.68x for West Red Lake Gold Mines Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.3.20x 41.29x $547.5K -$1.5M WRLG.VWest Red Lake Gold Mines Ltd.6.68x -- $32.5M -$2.4M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Lumentum The Best Laser Stock to Buy?
Though certainly less well-known than the huge tech businesses that…
Is Planet Fitness Stock Undervalued?
Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) has had a difficult 12 months, retreating…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
51
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 30x
Alerts
Buy
75
PRLB alert for Feb 10
Proto Labs, Inc. [PRLB] is down 2.16% over the past day.
Sell
30
MSTR alert for Feb 10
Strategy, Inc. [MSTR] is up 2.59% over the past day.
Sell
10
MOH alert for Feb 10
Molina Healthcare, Inc. [MOH] is down 3% over the past day.
