Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Buy
77
SSRM.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$31.72
Seasonality move
:
6.89%
Day range:
$31.20 - $32.28
52-week range:
$9.77 - $36.45
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
22.39x
P/S ratio:
3.39x
P/B ratio:
1.39x
Volume:
230.3K
Avg. volume:
314.9K
1-year change:
210.07%
Market cap:
$6.4B
Revenue:
$1.4B
EPS (TTM):
$1.42
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SSRM.TO
SSR Mining, Inc.
|
$560.9M | $0.48 | 53.2% | 2223.24% | $38.25 |
|
CNO.V
California Nanotechnologies Corp.
|
$1.3M | -- | -49.3% | -100% | $1.00 |
|
IAU.TO
i-80 Gold Corp.
|
$50.4M | -$0.01 | -- | -77.12% | $3.18 |
|
IFOS.V
Itafos, Inc.
|
$194.9M | -- | 1.29% | -- | $5.00 |
|
NG.TO
NovaGold Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -$0.04 | -- | -13.67% | $20.25 |
|
PPTA.TO
Perpetua Resources Corp.
|
-- | -$0.04 | -- | -29.76% | $44.08 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SSRM.TO
SSR Mining, Inc.
|
$31.72 | $38.25 | $6.4B | 22.39x | $0.10 | 0% | 3.39x |
|
CNO.V
California Nanotechnologies Corp.
|
$0.34 | $1.00 | $16.3M | 41.29x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.59x |
|
IAU.TO
i-80 Gold Corp.
|
$2.12 | $3.18 | $1.8B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 9.75x |
|
IFOS.V
Itafos, Inc.
|
$2.92 | $5.00 | $564.2M | 3.20x | $0.17 | 0% | 0.73x |
|
NG.TO
NovaGold Resources, Inc.
|
$13.84 | $20.25 | $5.6B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 3,120.67x |
|
PPTA.TO
Perpetua Resources Corp.
|
$37.96 | $44.08 | $4.6B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SSRM.TO
SSR Mining, Inc.
|
9.95% | 2.131 | 6.37% | 1.05x |
|
CNO.V
California Nanotechnologies Corp.
|
38.26% | 2.452 | 13.59% | 1.11x |
|
IAU.TO
i-80 Gold Corp.
|
29.37% | 4.018 | 16.2% | 0.80x |
|
IFOS.V
Itafos, Inc.
|
17.14% | -1.231 | 23.01% | 1.18x |
|
NG.TO
NovaGold Resources, Inc.
|
47.99% | 1.784 | 5.87% | 26.70x |
|
PPTA.TO
Perpetua Resources Corp.
|
0.01% | -0.834 | -- | 40.93x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SSRM.TO
SSR Mining, Inc.
|
$188.9M | $132.7M | 4.31% | 4.69% | 24.97% | -$4.9M |
|
CNO.V
California Nanotechnologies Corp.
|
-$15.9K | -$482.2K | -25.48% | -50.4% | -45.07% | -$431K |
|
IAU.TO
i-80 Gold Corp.
|
-$17.1M | -$27.8M | -21.98% | -32.24% | -86.72% | -$3.2M |
|
IFOS.V
Itafos, Inc.
|
$55.6M | $44.7M | 26.65% | 33.61% | 21.23% | -$10.6M |
|
NG.TO
NovaGold Resources, Inc.
|
-$8.2K | -$8.6M | -51.34% | -231.04% | -- | -$1.2M |
|
PPTA.TO
Perpetua Resources Corp.
|
-$49.2K | -$46.5M | -16.7% | -16.7% | -- | -$17.4M |
SSR Mining, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SSRM.TO or CNO.V?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a net margin of 14.8% compared to SSR Mining, Inc.'s net margin of -37.5%. SSR Mining, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.69% beat California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s return on equity of -50.4%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SSRM.TOSSR Mining, Inc.35.54% $0.41 $6.3B CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.-1.49% -$0.01 $5.3M -
What do Analysts Say About SSRM.TO or CNO.V?
SSR Mining, Inc. has a consensus price target of $38.25, signalling upside risk potential of 20.6%. On the other hand California Nanotechnologies Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.00 which suggests that it could grow by 197.94%. Given that California Nanotechnologies Corp. has higher upside potential than SSR Mining, Inc., analysts believe California Nanotechnologies Corp. is more attractive than SSR Mining, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SSRM.TOSSR Mining, Inc.2 5 0 CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.0 0 0 -
Is SSRM.TO or CNO.V More Risky?
SSR Mining, Inc. has a beta of 0.358, which suggesting that the stock is 64.183% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a beta of 1.248, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.843%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SSRM.TO or CNO.V?
SSR Mining, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. California Nanotechnologies Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SSR Mining, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. California Nanotechnologies Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SSRM.TO or CNO.V?
SSR Mining, Inc. quarterly revenues are $531.4M, which are larger than California Nanotechnologies Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.1M. SSR Mining, Inc.'s net income of $78.6M is higher than California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s net income of -$401.2K. Notably, SSR Mining, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.39x while California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s PE ratio is 41.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SSR Mining, Inc. is 3.39x versus 2.59x for California Nanotechnologies Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SSRM.TOSSR Mining, Inc.3.39x 22.39x $531.4M $78.6M CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.2.59x 41.29x $1.1M -$401.2K
-
Which has Higher Returns SSRM.TO or IAU.TO?
i-80 Gold Corp. has a net margin of 14.8% compared to SSR Mining, Inc.'s net margin of -130.76%. SSR Mining, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.69% beat i-80 Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -32.24%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SSRM.TOSSR Mining, Inc.35.54% $0.41 $6.3B IAU.TOi-80 Gold Corp.-53.51% -$0.05 $598.9M -
What do Analysts Say About SSRM.TO or IAU.TO?
SSR Mining, Inc. has a consensus price target of $38.25, signalling upside risk potential of 20.6%. On the other hand i-80 Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $3.18 which suggests that it could grow by 50.18%. Given that i-80 Gold Corp. has higher upside potential than SSR Mining, Inc., analysts believe i-80 Gold Corp. is more attractive than SSR Mining, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SSRM.TOSSR Mining, Inc.2 5 0 IAU.TOi-80 Gold Corp.2 1 0 -
Is SSRM.TO or IAU.TO More Risky?
SSR Mining, Inc. has a beta of 0.358, which suggesting that the stock is 64.183% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison i-80 Gold Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SSRM.TO or IAU.TO?
SSR Mining, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. i-80 Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SSR Mining, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. i-80 Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SSRM.TO or IAU.TO?
SSR Mining, Inc. quarterly revenues are $531.4M, which are larger than i-80 Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of $32M. SSR Mining, Inc.'s net income of $78.6M is higher than i-80 Gold Corp.'s net income of -$41.9M. Notably, SSR Mining, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.39x while i-80 Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SSR Mining, Inc. is 3.39x versus 9.75x for i-80 Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SSRM.TOSSR Mining, Inc.3.39x 22.39x $531.4M $78.6M IAU.TOi-80 Gold Corp.9.75x -- $32M -$41.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns SSRM.TO or IFOS.V?
Itafos, Inc. has a net margin of 14.8% compared to SSR Mining, Inc.'s net margin of 23.7%. SSR Mining, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.69% beat Itafos, Inc.'s return on equity of 33.61%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SSRM.TOSSR Mining, Inc.35.54% $0.41 $6.3B IFOS.VItafos, Inc.26.43% $0.26 $737M -
What do Analysts Say About SSRM.TO or IFOS.V?
SSR Mining, Inc. has a consensus price target of $38.25, signalling upside risk potential of 20.6%. On the other hand Itafos, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 71.41%. Given that Itafos, Inc. has higher upside potential than SSR Mining, Inc., analysts believe Itafos, Inc. is more attractive than SSR Mining, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SSRM.TOSSR Mining, Inc.2 5 0 IFOS.VItafos, Inc.1 0 0 -
Is SSRM.TO or IFOS.V More Risky?
SSR Mining, Inc. has a beta of 0.358, which suggesting that the stock is 64.183% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Itafos, Inc. has a beta of 0.484, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.618%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SSRM.TO or IFOS.V?
SSR Mining, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Itafos, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. SSR Mining, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Itafos, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SSRM.TO or IFOS.V?
SSR Mining, Inc. quarterly revenues are $531.4M, which are larger than Itafos, Inc. quarterly revenues of $210.5M. SSR Mining, Inc.'s net income of $78.6M is higher than Itafos, Inc.'s net income of $49.9M. Notably, SSR Mining, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.39x while Itafos, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SSR Mining, Inc. is 3.39x versus 0.73x for Itafos, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SSRM.TOSSR Mining, Inc.3.39x 22.39x $531.4M $78.6M IFOS.VItafos, Inc.0.73x 3.20x $210.5M $49.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns SSRM.TO or NG.TO?
NovaGold Resources, Inc. has a net margin of 14.8% compared to SSR Mining, Inc.'s net margin of --. SSR Mining, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.69% beat NovaGold Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -231.04%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SSRM.TOSSR Mining, Inc.35.54% $0.41 $6.3B NG.TONovaGold Resources, Inc.-- -$0.05 $467.6M -
What do Analysts Say About SSRM.TO or NG.TO?
SSR Mining, Inc. has a consensus price target of $38.25, signalling upside risk potential of 20.6%. On the other hand NovaGold Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $20.25 which suggests that it could grow by 46.32%. Given that NovaGold Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than SSR Mining, Inc., analysts believe NovaGold Resources, Inc. is more attractive than SSR Mining, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SSRM.TOSSR Mining, Inc.2 5 0 NG.TONovaGold Resources, Inc.3 0 0 -
Is SSRM.TO or NG.TO More Risky?
SSR Mining, Inc. has a beta of 0.358, which suggesting that the stock is 64.183% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NovaGold Resources, Inc. has a beta of 1.462, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.217%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SSRM.TO or NG.TO?
SSR Mining, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NovaGold Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SSR Mining, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NovaGold Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SSRM.TO or NG.TO?
SSR Mining, Inc. quarterly revenues are $531.4M, which are larger than NovaGold Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. SSR Mining, Inc.'s net income of $78.6M is higher than NovaGold Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$21.5M. Notably, SSR Mining, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.39x while NovaGold Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SSR Mining, Inc. is 3.39x versus 3,120.67x for NovaGold Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SSRM.TOSSR Mining, Inc.3.39x 22.39x $531.4M $78.6M NG.TONovaGold Resources, Inc.3,120.67x -- -- -$21.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns SSRM.TO or PPTA.TO?
Perpetua Resources Corp. has a net margin of 14.8% compared to SSR Mining, Inc.'s net margin of --. SSR Mining, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.69% beat Perpetua Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -16.7%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SSRM.TOSSR Mining, Inc.35.54% $0.41 $6.3B PPTA.TOPerpetua Resources Corp.-- -$0.33 $740.3M -
What do Analysts Say About SSRM.TO or PPTA.TO?
SSR Mining, Inc. has a consensus price target of $38.25, signalling upside risk potential of 20.6%. On the other hand Perpetua Resources Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $44.08 which suggests that it could grow by 16.13%. Given that SSR Mining, Inc. has higher upside potential than Perpetua Resources Corp., analysts believe SSR Mining, Inc. is more attractive than Perpetua Resources Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SSRM.TOSSR Mining, Inc.2 5 0 PPTA.TOPerpetua Resources Corp.5 0 0 -
Is SSRM.TO or PPTA.TO More Risky?
SSR Mining, Inc. has a beta of 0.358, which suggesting that the stock is 64.183% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perpetua Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.111, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.896%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SSRM.TO or PPTA.TO?
SSR Mining, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Perpetua Resources Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SSR Mining, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Perpetua Resources Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SSRM.TO or PPTA.TO?
SSR Mining, Inc. quarterly revenues are $531.4M, which are larger than Perpetua Resources Corp. quarterly revenues of --. SSR Mining, Inc.'s net income of $78.6M is higher than Perpetua Resources Corp.'s net income of -$35.5M. Notably, SSR Mining, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.39x while Perpetua Resources Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SSR Mining, Inc. is 3.39x versus -- for Perpetua Resources Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SSRM.TOSSR Mining, Inc.3.39x 22.39x $531.4M $78.6M PPTA.TOPerpetua Resources Corp.-- -- -- -$35.5M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
60
AAOI alert for Dec 24
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 5.1% over the past day.
Buy
85
HUT alert for Dec 24
Hut 8 Corp. [HUT] is up 0.65% over the past day.
Buy
63
GPCR alert for Dec 24
Structure Therapeutics, Inc. [GPCR] is down 2.36% over the past day.
