Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Buy
71
SSRM.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$30.07
Seasonality move
:
6.89%
Day range:
$29.96 - $30.68
52-week range:
$9.77 - $36.45
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
21.14x
P/S ratio:
3.20x
P/B ratio:
1.31x
Volume:
307.1K
Avg. volume:
297.3K
1-year change:
194.3%
Market cap:
$6.1B
Revenue:
$1.4B
EPS (TTM):
$1.42
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SSRM.TO
SSR Mining, Inc.
|
$560.9M | $0.48 | 47% | 2223.2% | $38.25 |
|
CNO.V
California Nanotechnologies Corp.
|
$1.3M | -- | -49.3% | -100% | $1.00 |
|
IAU.TO
i-80 Gold Corp.
|
$50.4M | -$0.01 | -- | -77.12% | $3.18 |
|
IFOS.V
Itafos, Inc.
|
$194.9M | -- | 1.29% | -- | $5.00 |
|
NG.TO
NovaGold Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -$0.04 | -- | -13.67% | $20.25 |
|
PPTA.TO
Perpetua Resources Corp.
|
-- | -$0.04 | -- | -29.76% | $44.08 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SSRM.TO
SSR Mining, Inc.
|
$29.96 | $38.25 | $6.1B | 21.14x | $0.10 | 0% | 3.20x |
|
CNO.V
California Nanotechnologies Corp.
|
$0.32 | $1.00 | $15.4M | 41.29x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.44x |
|
IAU.TO
i-80 Gold Corp.
|
$1.99 | $3.18 | $1.6B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 9.15x |
|
IFOS.V
Itafos, Inc.
|
$2.95 | $5.00 | $570M | 3.24x | $0.17 | 0% | 0.74x |
|
NG.TO
NovaGold Resources, Inc.
|
$12.98 | $20.25 | $5.3B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 3,120.67x |
|
PPTA.TO
Perpetua Resources Corp.
|
$33.82 | $44.08 | $4.1B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SSRM.TO
SSR Mining, Inc.
|
9.95% | 2.131 | 6.37% | 1.05x |
|
CNO.V
California Nanotechnologies Corp.
|
38.26% | 2.452 | 13.59% | 1.11x |
|
IAU.TO
i-80 Gold Corp.
|
29.37% | 4.018 | 16.2% | 0.80x |
|
IFOS.V
Itafos, Inc.
|
17.14% | -1.231 | 23.01% | 1.18x |
|
NG.TO
NovaGold Resources, Inc.
|
47.99% | 1.784 | 5.87% | 26.70x |
|
PPTA.TO
Perpetua Resources Corp.
|
0.01% | -0.834 | -- | 40.93x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SSRM.TO
SSR Mining, Inc.
|
$188.9M | $132.7M | 4.31% | 4.69% | 24.97% | -$4.9M |
|
CNO.V
California Nanotechnologies Corp.
|
-$15.9K | -$482.2K | -25.48% | -50.4% | -45.07% | -$431K |
|
IAU.TO
i-80 Gold Corp.
|
-$17.1M | -$27.8M | -21.98% | -32.24% | -86.72% | -$3.2M |
|
IFOS.V
Itafos, Inc.
|
$55.6M | $44.7M | 26.65% | 33.61% | 21.23% | -$10.6M |
|
NG.TO
NovaGold Resources, Inc.
|
-$8.2K | -$8.6M | -51.34% | -231.04% | -- | -$1.2M |
|
PPTA.TO
Perpetua Resources Corp.
|
-$49.2K | -$46.5M | -16.7% | -16.7% | -- | -$17.4M |
SSR Mining, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SSRM.TO or CNO.V?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a net margin of 14.8% compared to SSR Mining, Inc.'s net margin of -37.5%. SSR Mining, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.69% beat California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s return on equity of -50.4%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SSRM.TOSSR Mining, Inc.35.54% $0.41 $6.3B CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.-1.49% -$0.01 $5.3M -
What do Analysts Say About SSRM.TO or CNO.V?
SSR Mining, Inc. has a consensus price target of $38.25, signalling upside risk potential of 27.69%. On the other hand California Nanotechnologies Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.00 which suggests that it could grow by 211.9%. Given that California Nanotechnologies Corp. has higher upside potential than SSR Mining, Inc., analysts believe California Nanotechnologies Corp. is more attractive than SSR Mining, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SSRM.TOSSR Mining, Inc.2 5 0 CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.0 0 0 -
Is SSRM.TO or CNO.V More Risky?
SSR Mining, Inc. has a beta of 0.358, which suggesting that the stock is 64.183% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a beta of 1.248, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.843%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SSRM.TO or CNO.V?
SSR Mining, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. California Nanotechnologies Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SSR Mining, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. California Nanotechnologies Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SSRM.TO or CNO.V?
SSR Mining, Inc. quarterly revenues are $531.4M, which are larger than California Nanotechnologies Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.1M. SSR Mining, Inc.'s net income of $78.6M is higher than California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s net income of -$401.2K. Notably, SSR Mining, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.14x while California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s PE ratio is 41.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SSR Mining, Inc. is 3.20x versus 2.44x for California Nanotechnologies Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SSRM.TOSSR Mining, Inc.3.20x 21.14x $531.4M $78.6M CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.2.44x 41.29x $1.1M -$401.2K
-
Which has Higher Returns SSRM.TO or IAU.TO?
i-80 Gold Corp. has a net margin of 14.8% compared to SSR Mining, Inc.'s net margin of -130.76%. SSR Mining, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.69% beat i-80 Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -32.24%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SSRM.TOSSR Mining, Inc.35.54% $0.41 $6.3B IAU.TOi-80 Gold Corp.-53.51% -$0.05 $598.9M -
What do Analysts Say About SSRM.TO or IAU.TO?
SSR Mining, Inc. has a consensus price target of $38.25, signalling upside risk potential of 27.69%. On the other hand i-80 Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $3.18 which suggests that it could grow by 59.99%. Given that i-80 Gold Corp. has higher upside potential than SSR Mining, Inc., analysts believe i-80 Gold Corp. is more attractive than SSR Mining, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SSRM.TOSSR Mining, Inc.2 5 0 IAU.TOi-80 Gold Corp.2 1 0 -
Is SSRM.TO or IAU.TO More Risky?
SSR Mining, Inc. has a beta of 0.358, which suggesting that the stock is 64.183% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison i-80 Gold Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SSRM.TO or IAU.TO?
SSR Mining, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. i-80 Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SSR Mining, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. i-80 Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SSRM.TO or IAU.TO?
SSR Mining, Inc. quarterly revenues are $531.4M, which are larger than i-80 Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of $32M. SSR Mining, Inc.'s net income of $78.6M is higher than i-80 Gold Corp.'s net income of -$41.9M. Notably, SSR Mining, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.14x while i-80 Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SSR Mining, Inc. is 3.20x versus 9.15x for i-80 Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SSRM.TOSSR Mining, Inc.3.20x 21.14x $531.4M $78.6M IAU.TOi-80 Gold Corp.9.15x -- $32M -$41.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns SSRM.TO or IFOS.V?
Itafos, Inc. has a net margin of 14.8% compared to SSR Mining, Inc.'s net margin of 23.7%. SSR Mining, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.69% beat Itafos, Inc.'s return on equity of 33.61%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SSRM.TOSSR Mining, Inc.35.54% $0.41 $6.3B IFOS.VItafos, Inc.26.43% $0.26 $737M -
What do Analysts Say About SSRM.TO or IFOS.V?
SSR Mining, Inc. has a consensus price target of $38.25, signalling upside risk potential of 27.69%. On the other hand Itafos, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 69.66%. Given that Itafos, Inc. has higher upside potential than SSR Mining, Inc., analysts believe Itafos, Inc. is more attractive than SSR Mining, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SSRM.TOSSR Mining, Inc.2 5 0 IFOS.VItafos, Inc.1 0 0 -
Is SSRM.TO or IFOS.V More Risky?
SSR Mining, Inc. has a beta of 0.358, which suggesting that the stock is 64.183% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Itafos, Inc. has a beta of 0.484, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.618%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SSRM.TO or IFOS.V?
SSR Mining, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Itafos, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. SSR Mining, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Itafos, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SSRM.TO or IFOS.V?
SSR Mining, Inc. quarterly revenues are $531.4M, which are larger than Itafos, Inc. quarterly revenues of $210.5M. SSR Mining, Inc.'s net income of $78.6M is higher than Itafos, Inc.'s net income of $49.9M. Notably, SSR Mining, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.14x while Itafos, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SSR Mining, Inc. is 3.20x versus 0.74x for Itafos, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SSRM.TOSSR Mining, Inc.3.20x 21.14x $531.4M $78.6M IFOS.VItafos, Inc.0.74x 3.24x $210.5M $49.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns SSRM.TO or NG.TO?
NovaGold Resources, Inc. has a net margin of 14.8% compared to SSR Mining, Inc.'s net margin of --. SSR Mining, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.69% beat NovaGold Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -231.04%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SSRM.TOSSR Mining, Inc.35.54% $0.41 $6.3B NG.TONovaGold Resources, Inc.-- -$0.05 $467.6M -
What do Analysts Say About SSRM.TO or NG.TO?
SSR Mining, Inc. has a consensus price target of $38.25, signalling upside risk potential of 27.69%. On the other hand NovaGold Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $20.25 which suggests that it could grow by 56.01%. Given that NovaGold Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than SSR Mining, Inc., analysts believe NovaGold Resources, Inc. is more attractive than SSR Mining, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SSRM.TOSSR Mining, Inc.2 5 0 NG.TONovaGold Resources, Inc.3 0 0 -
Is SSRM.TO or NG.TO More Risky?
SSR Mining, Inc. has a beta of 0.358, which suggesting that the stock is 64.183% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NovaGold Resources, Inc. has a beta of 1.462, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.217%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SSRM.TO or NG.TO?
SSR Mining, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NovaGold Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SSR Mining, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NovaGold Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SSRM.TO or NG.TO?
SSR Mining, Inc. quarterly revenues are $531.4M, which are larger than NovaGold Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. SSR Mining, Inc.'s net income of $78.6M is higher than NovaGold Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$21.5M. Notably, SSR Mining, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.14x while NovaGold Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SSR Mining, Inc. is 3.20x versus 3,120.67x for NovaGold Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SSRM.TOSSR Mining, Inc.3.20x 21.14x $531.4M $78.6M NG.TONovaGold Resources, Inc.3,120.67x -- -- -$21.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns SSRM.TO or PPTA.TO?
Perpetua Resources Corp. has a net margin of 14.8% compared to SSR Mining, Inc.'s net margin of --. SSR Mining, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.69% beat Perpetua Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -16.7%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SSRM.TOSSR Mining, Inc.35.54% $0.41 $6.3B PPTA.TOPerpetua Resources Corp.-- -$0.33 $740.3M -
What do Analysts Say About SSRM.TO or PPTA.TO?
SSR Mining, Inc. has a consensus price target of $38.25, signalling upside risk potential of 27.69%. On the other hand Perpetua Resources Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $44.08 which suggests that it could grow by 30.35%. Given that Perpetua Resources Corp. has higher upside potential than SSR Mining, Inc., analysts believe Perpetua Resources Corp. is more attractive than SSR Mining, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SSRM.TOSSR Mining, Inc.2 5 0 PPTA.TOPerpetua Resources Corp.5 0 0 -
Is SSRM.TO or PPTA.TO More Risky?
SSR Mining, Inc. has a beta of 0.358, which suggesting that the stock is 64.183% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perpetua Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.111, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.896%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SSRM.TO or PPTA.TO?
SSR Mining, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Perpetua Resources Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SSR Mining, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Perpetua Resources Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SSRM.TO or PPTA.TO?
SSR Mining, Inc. quarterly revenues are $531.4M, which are larger than Perpetua Resources Corp. quarterly revenues of --. SSR Mining, Inc.'s net income of $78.6M is higher than Perpetua Resources Corp.'s net income of -$35.5M. Notably, SSR Mining, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.14x while Perpetua Resources Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SSR Mining, Inc. is 3.20x versus -- for Perpetua Resources Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SSRM.TOSSR Mining, Inc.3.20x 21.14x $531.4M $78.6M PPTA.TOPerpetua Resources Corp.-- -- -- -$35.5M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Sell
14
SMX alert for Dec 30
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 40.26% over the past day.
Buy
71
ZCSH alert for Dec 30
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is down 4.56% over the past day.
Buy
69
GDXU alert for Dec 31
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is up 3.19% over the past day.
