Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?
Shares of embattled health insurance giant UnitedHealth (NYSE:UNH) plummeted by…
Buy
52
NG.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$13.56
Seasonality move
:
23.15%
Day range:
$12.65 - $13.84
52-week range:
$3.22 - $16.27
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
3,120.67x
P/B ratio:
26.01x
Volume:
738.9K
Avg. volume:
682.4K
1-year change:
199.34%
Market cap:
$5.9B
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
-$0.36
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NG.TO
NovaGold Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -$0.04 | -- | -57.95% | $20.67 |
|
CNO.V
California Nanotechnologies Corp.
|
$1.3M | -- | -33.44% | -35.21% | $0.75 |
|
IAU.TO
i-80 Gold Corp.
|
$50.4M | -$0.01 | -- | -77.12% | $2.14 |
|
IFOS.V
Itafos, Inc.
|
$195.7M | -- | 1.29% | -- | $5.00 |
|
SSRM.TO
SSR Mining, Inc.
|
$322.5M | $0.41 | 18.08% | 96.46% | $24.29 |
|
TSG.V
TriStar Gold, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.85 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NG.TO
NovaGold Resources, Inc.
|
$13.56 | $20.67 | $5.9B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 3,120.67x |
|
CNO.V
California Nanotechnologies Corp.
|
$0.30 | $0.75 | $14.2M | 41.29x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.20x |
|
IAU.TO
i-80 Gold Corp.
|
$2.72 | $2.14 | $2.2B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 12.50x |
|
IFOS.V
Itafos, Inc.
|
$3.10 | $5.00 | $599M | 3.40x | $0.17 | 0% | 0.78x |
|
SSRM.TO
SSR Mining, Inc.
|
$35.13 | $24.29 | $7.1B | 24.79x | $0.10 | 0% | 3.75x |
|
TSG.V
TriStar Gold, Inc.
|
$0.31 | $0.85 | $109.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NG.TO
NovaGold Resources, Inc.
|
50.49% | 2.574 | 4.01% | 23.33x |
|
CNO.V
California Nanotechnologies Corp.
|
39.43% | 0.927 | 12.05% | 0.97x |
|
IAU.TO
i-80 Gold Corp.
|
29.37% | 2.803 | 16.2% | 0.80x |
|
IFOS.V
Itafos, Inc.
|
17.14% | -1.792 | 23.01% | 1.18x |
|
SSRM.TO
SSR Mining, Inc.
|
9.95% | 4.325 | 6.37% | 1.05x |
|
TSG.V
TriStar Gold, Inc.
|
-- | -1.452 | -- | 21.06x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NG.TO
NovaGold Resources, Inc.
|
-$7K | -$11.8M | -39.8% | -120.25% | -- | -$8.4M |
|
CNO.V
California Nanotechnologies Corp.
|
-$654.7K | -$1.2M | -57.29% | -100.03% | -210.56% | -$231.4K |
|
IAU.TO
i-80 Gold Corp.
|
-$17.1M | -$27.8M | -21.98% | -32.24% | -86.72% | -$3.2M |
|
IFOS.V
Itafos, Inc.
|
$55.6M | $44.7M | 26.65% | 33.61% | 21.23% | -$10.6M |
|
SSRM.TO
SSR Mining, Inc.
|
$188.9M | $132.7M | 4.31% | 4.69% | 24.97% | -$4.9M |
|
TSG.V
TriStar Gold, Inc.
|
-- | -$1M | -4.09% | -4.09% | -- | -$2M |
NovaGold Resources, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns NG.TO or CNO.V?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to NovaGold Resources, Inc.'s net margin of -278.92%. NovaGold Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -120.25% beat California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s return on equity of -100.03%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NG.TONovaGold Resources, Inc.-- -$0.05 $461.2M CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.-119.58% -$0.03 $4.9M -
What do Analysts Say About NG.TO or CNO.V?
NovaGold Resources, Inc. has a consensus price target of $20.67, signalling upside risk potential of 52.41%. On the other hand California Nanotechnologies Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $0.75 which suggests that it could grow by 154.61%. Given that California Nanotechnologies Corp. has higher upside potential than NovaGold Resources, Inc., analysts believe California Nanotechnologies Corp. is more attractive than NovaGold Resources, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NG.TONovaGold Resources, Inc.3 0 0 CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.0 0 0 -
Is NG.TO or CNO.V More Risky?
NovaGold Resources, Inc. has a beta of 1.467, which suggesting that the stock is 46.68% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a beta of 1.259, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.897%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NG.TO or CNO.V?
NovaGold Resources, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. California Nanotechnologies Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NovaGold Resources, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. California Nanotechnologies Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NG.TO or CNO.V?
NovaGold Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than California Nanotechnologies Corp. quarterly revenues of $547.5K. NovaGold Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$21.8M is lower than California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s net income of -$1.5M. Notably, NovaGold Resources, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s PE ratio is 41.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NovaGold Resources, Inc. is 3,120.67x versus 3.20x for California Nanotechnologies Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NG.TONovaGold Resources, Inc.3,120.67x -- -- -$21.8M CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.3.20x 41.29x $547.5K -$1.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns NG.TO or IAU.TO?
i-80 Gold Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to NovaGold Resources, Inc.'s net margin of -130.76%. NovaGold Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -120.25% beat i-80 Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -32.24%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NG.TONovaGold Resources, Inc.-- -$0.05 $461.2M IAU.TOi-80 Gold Corp.-53.51% -$0.05 $598.9M -
What do Analysts Say About NG.TO or IAU.TO?
NovaGold Resources, Inc. has a consensus price target of $20.67, signalling upside risk potential of 52.41%. On the other hand i-80 Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $2.14 which suggests that it could fall by -21.17%. Given that NovaGold Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than i-80 Gold Corp., analysts believe NovaGold Resources, Inc. is more attractive than i-80 Gold Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NG.TONovaGold Resources, Inc.3 0 0 IAU.TOi-80 Gold Corp.3 0 0 -
Is NG.TO or IAU.TO More Risky?
NovaGold Resources, Inc. has a beta of 1.467, which suggesting that the stock is 46.68% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison i-80 Gold Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NG.TO or IAU.TO?
NovaGold Resources, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. i-80 Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NovaGold Resources, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. i-80 Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NG.TO or IAU.TO?
NovaGold Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than i-80 Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of $32M. NovaGold Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$21.8M is higher than i-80 Gold Corp.'s net income of -$41.9M. Notably, NovaGold Resources, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while i-80 Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NovaGold Resources, Inc. is 3,120.67x versus 12.50x for i-80 Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NG.TONovaGold Resources, Inc.3,120.67x -- -- -$21.8M IAU.TOi-80 Gold Corp.12.50x -- $32M -$41.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns NG.TO or IFOS.V?
Itafos, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to NovaGold Resources, Inc.'s net margin of 23.7%. NovaGold Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -120.25% beat Itafos, Inc.'s return on equity of 33.61%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NG.TONovaGold Resources, Inc.-- -$0.05 $461.2M IFOS.VItafos, Inc.26.43% $0.26 $737M -
What do Analysts Say About NG.TO or IFOS.V?
NovaGold Resources, Inc. has a consensus price target of $20.67, signalling upside risk potential of 52.41%. On the other hand Itafos, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 61.45%. Given that Itafos, Inc. has higher upside potential than NovaGold Resources, Inc., analysts believe Itafos, Inc. is more attractive than NovaGold Resources, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NG.TONovaGold Resources, Inc.3 0 0 IFOS.VItafos, Inc.1 0 0 -
Is NG.TO or IFOS.V More Risky?
NovaGold Resources, Inc. has a beta of 1.467, which suggesting that the stock is 46.68% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Itafos, Inc. has a beta of 0.951, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.947%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NG.TO or IFOS.V?
NovaGold Resources, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Itafos, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. NovaGold Resources, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Itafos, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NG.TO or IFOS.V?
NovaGold Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Itafos, Inc. quarterly revenues of $210.5M. NovaGold Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$21.8M is lower than Itafos, Inc.'s net income of $49.9M. Notably, NovaGold Resources, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Itafos, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NovaGold Resources, Inc. is 3,120.67x versus 0.78x for Itafos, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NG.TONovaGold Resources, Inc.3,120.67x -- -- -$21.8M IFOS.VItafos, Inc.0.78x 3.40x $210.5M $49.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns NG.TO or SSRM.TO?
SSR Mining, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to NovaGold Resources, Inc.'s net margin of 14.8%. NovaGold Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -120.25% beat SSR Mining, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.69%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NG.TONovaGold Resources, Inc.-- -$0.05 $461.2M SSRM.TOSSR Mining, Inc.35.54% $0.41 $6.3B -
What do Analysts Say About NG.TO or SSRM.TO?
NovaGold Resources, Inc. has a consensus price target of $20.67, signalling upside risk potential of 52.41%. On the other hand SSR Mining, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $24.29 which suggests that it could fall by -30.86%. Given that NovaGold Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than SSR Mining, Inc., analysts believe NovaGold Resources, Inc. is more attractive than SSR Mining, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NG.TONovaGold Resources, Inc.3 0 0 SSRM.TOSSR Mining, Inc.4 4 0 -
Is NG.TO or SSRM.TO More Risky?
NovaGold Resources, Inc. has a beta of 1.467, which suggesting that the stock is 46.68% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SSR Mining, Inc. has a beta of 0.320, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.962%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NG.TO or SSRM.TO?
NovaGold Resources, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SSR Mining, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. NovaGold Resources, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SSR Mining, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NG.TO or SSRM.TO?
NovaGold Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SSR Mining, Inc. quarterly revenues of $531.4M. NovaGold Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$21.8M is lower than SSR Mining, Inc.'s net income of $78.6M. Notably, NovaGold Resources, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SSR Mining, Inc.'s PE ratio is 24.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NovaGold Resources, Inc. is 3,120.67x versus 3.75x for SSR Mining, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NG.TONovaGold Resources, Inc.3,120.67x -- -- -$21.8M SSRM.TOSSR Mining, Inc.3.75x 24.79x $531.4M $78.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns NG.TO or TSG.V?
TriStar Gold, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to NovaGold Resources, Inc.'s net margin of --. NovaGold Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -120.25% beat TriStar Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.09%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NG.TONovaGold Resources, Inc.-- -$0.05 $461.2M TSG.VTriStar Gold, Inc.-- -$0.00 $44.9M -
What do Analysts Say About NG.TO or TSG.V?
NovaGold Resources, Inc. has a consensus price target of $20.67, signalling upside risk potential of 52.41%. On the other hand TriStar Gold, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $0.85 which suggests that it could grow by 174.97%. Given that TriStar Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than NovaGold Resources, Inc., analysts believe TriStar Gold, Inc. is more attractive than NovaGold Resources, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NG.TONovaGold Resources, Inc.3 0 0 TSG.VTriStar Gold, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is NG.TO or TSG.V More Risky?
NovaGold Resources, Inc. has a beta of 1.467, which suggesting that the stock is 46.68% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TriStar Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.562, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.8%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NG.TO or TSG.V?
NovaGold Resources, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TriStar Gold, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NovaGold Resources, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TriStar Gold, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NG.TO or TSG.V?
NovaGold Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TriStar Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. NovaGold Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$21.8M is lower than TriStar Gold, Inc.'s net income of -$148.1K. Notably, NovaGold Resources, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TriStar Gold, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NovaGold Resources, Inc. is 3,120.67x versus -- for TriStar Gold, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NG.TONovaGold Resources, Inc.3,120.67x -- -- -$21.8M TSG.VTriStar Gold, Inc.-- -- -- -$148.1K
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Lumentum The Best Laser Stock to Buy?
Though certainly less well-known than the huge tech businesses that…
Is Planet Fitness Stock Undervalued?
Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) has had a difficult 12 months, retreating…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
53
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 30x
Alerts
Buy
67
PRLB alert for Feb 10
Proto Labs, Inc. [PRLB] is down 2.16% over the past day.
Sell
33
MSTR alert for Feb 10
Strategy, Inc. [MSTR] is up 2.59% over the past day.
Sell
10
MOH alert for Feb 10
Molina Healthcare, Inc. [MOH] is down 3% over the past day.
