Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?
Shares of embattled health insurance giant UnitedHealth (NYSE:UNH) plummeted by…
Buy
79
IAU.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$2.72
Seasonality move
:
7.17%
Day range:
$2.57 - $2.75
52-week range:
$0.67 - $2.75
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
12.50x
P/B ratio:
5.31x
Volume:
1.7M
Avg. volume:
1.3M
1-year change:
223.81%
Market cap:
$2.2B
Revenue:
$69M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.32
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IAU.TO
i-80 Gold Corp.
|
$50.4M | -$0.01 | -- | -77.12% | $2.14 |
|
CNO.V
California Nanotechnologies Corp.
|
$1.3M | -- | -33.44% | -35.21% | $0.75 |
|
IFOS.V
Itafos, Inc.
|
$195.7M | -- | 1.29% | -- | $5.00 |
|
NG.TO
NovaGold Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -$0.04 | -- | -57.95% | $20.67 |
|
SSRM.TO
SSR Mining, Inc.
|
$322.5M | $0.41 | 18.08% | 96.46% | $24.29 |
|
TSG.V
TriStar Gold, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.85 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IAU.TO
i-80 Gold Corp.
|
$2.72 | $2.14 | $2.2B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 12.50x |
|
CNO.V
California Nanotechnologies Corp.
|
$0.30 | $0.75 | $14.2M | 41.29x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.20x |
|
IFOS.V
Itafos, Inc.
|
$3.10 | $5.00 | $599M | 3.40x | $0.17 | 0% | 0.78x |
|
NG.TO
NovaGold Resources, Inc.
|
$13.56 | $20.67 | $5.9B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 3,120.67x |
|
SSRM.TO
SSR Mining, Inc.
|
$35.13 | $24.29 | $7.1B | 24.79x | $0.10 | 0% | 3.75x |
|
TSG.V
TriStar Gold, Inc.
|
$0.31 | $0.85 | $109.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IAU.TO
i-80 Gold Corp.
|
29.37% | 2.803 | 16.2% | 0.80x |
|
CNO.V
California Nanotechnologies Corp.
|
39.43% | 0.927 | 12.05% | 0.97x |
|
IFOS.V
Itafos, Inc.
|
17.14% | -1.792 | 23.01% | 1.18x |
|
NG.TO
NovaGold Resources, Inc.
|
50.49% | 2.574 | 4.01% | 23.33x |
|
SSRM.TO
SSR Mining, Inc.
|
9.95% | 4.325 | 6.37% | 1.05x |
|
TSG.V
TriStar Gold, Inc.
|
-- | -1.452 | -- | 21.06x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IAU.TO
i-80 Gold Corp.
|
-$17.1M | -$27.8M | -21.98% | -32.24% | -86.72% | -$3.2M |
|
CNO.V
California Nanotechnologies Corp.
|
-$654.7K | -$1.2M | -57.29% | -100.03% | -210.56% | -$231.4K |
|
IFOS.V
Itafos, Inc.
|
$55.6M | $44.7M | 26.65% | 33.61% | 21.23% | -$10.6M |
|
NG.TO
NovaGold Resources, Inc.
|
-$7K | -$11.8M | -39.8% | -120.25% | -- | -$8.4M |
|
SSRM.TO
SSR Mining, Inc.
|
$188.9M | $132.7M | 4.31% | 4.69% | 24.97% | -$4.9M |
|
TSG.V
TriStar Gold, Inc.
|
-- | -$1M | -4.09% | -4.09% | -- | -$2M |
i-80 Gold Corp. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns IAU.TO or CNO.V?
California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a net margin of -130.76% compared to i-80 Gold Corp.'s net margin of -278.92%. i-80 Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -32.24% beat California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s return on equity of -100.03%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IAU.TOi-80 Gold Corp.-53.51% -$0.05 $598.9M CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.-119.58% -$0.03 $4.9M -
What do Analysts Say About IAU.TO or CNO.V?
i-80 Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of $2.14, signalling downside risk potential of -21.17%. On the other hand California Nanotechnologies Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $0.75 which suggests that it could grow by 154.61%. Given that California Nanotechnologies Corp. has higher upside potential than i-80 Gold Corp., analysts believe California Nanotechnologies Corp. is more attractive than i-80 Gold Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IAU.TOi-80 Gold Corp.3 0 0 CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.0 0 0 -
Is IAU.TO or CNO.V More Risky?
i-80 Gold Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a beta of 1.259, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.897%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IAU.TO or CNO.V?
i-80 Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. California Nanotechnologies Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. i-80 Gold Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. California Nanotechnologies Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IAU.TO or CNO.V?
i-80 Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are $32M, which are larger than California Nanotechnologies Corp. quarterly revenues of $547.5K. i-80 Gold Corp.'s net income of -$41.9M is lower than California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s net income of -$1.5M. Notably, i-80 Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s PE ratio is 41.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for i-80 Gold Corp. is 12.50x versus 3.20x for California Nanotechnologies Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IAU.TOi-80 Gold Corp.12.50x -- $32M -$41.9M CNO.VCalifornia Nanotechnologies Corp.3.20x 41.29x $547.5K -$1.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns IAU.TO or IFOS.V?
Itafos, Inc. has a net margin of -130.76% compared to i-80 Gold Corp.'s net margin of 23.7%. i-80 Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -32.24% beat Itafos, Inc.'s return on equity of 33.61%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IAU.TOi-80 Gold Corp.-53.51% -$0.05 $598.9M IFOS.VItafos, Inc.26.43% $0.26 $737M -
What do Analysts Say About IAU.TO or IFOS.V?
i-80 Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of $2.14, signalling downside risk potential of -21.17%. On the other hand Itafos, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 61.45%. Given that Itafos, Inc. has higher upside potential than i-80 Gold Corp., analysts believe Itafos, Inc. is more attractive than i-80 Gold Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IAU.TOi-80 Gold Corp.3 0 0 IFOS.VItafos, Inc.1 0 0 -
Is IAU.TO or IFOS.V More Risky?
i-80 Gold Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Itafos, Inc. has a beta of 0.951, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.947%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IAU.TO or IFOS.V?
i-80 Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Itafos, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. i-80 Gold Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Itafos, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IAU.TO or IFOS.V?
i-80 Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are $32M, which are smaller than Itafos, Inc. quarterly revenues of $210.5M. i-80 Gold Corp.'s net income of -$41.9M is lower than Itafos, Inc.'s net income of $49.9M. Notably, i-80 Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Itafos, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for i-80 Gold Corp. is 12.50x versus 0.78x for Itafos, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IAU.TOi-80 Gold Corp.12.50x -- $32M -$41.9M IFOS.VItafos, Inc.0.78x 3.40x $210.5M $49.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns IAU.TO or NG.TO?
NovaGold Resources, Inc. has a net margin of -130.76% compared to i-80 Gold Corp.'s net margin of --. i-80 Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -32.24% beat NovaGold Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -120.25%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IAU.TOi-80 Gold Corp.-53.51% -$0.05 $598.9M NG.TONovaGold Resources, Inc.-- -$0.05 $461.2M -
What do Analysts Say About IAU.TO or NG.TO?
i-80 Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of $2.14, signalling downside risk potential of -21.17%. On the other hand NovaGold Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $20.67 which suggests that it could grow by 52.41%. Given that NovaGold Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than i-80 Gold Corp., analysts believe NovaGold Resources, Inc. is more attractive than i-80 Gold Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IAU.TOi-80 Gold Corp.3 0 0 NG.TONovaGold Resources, Inc.3 0 0 -
Is IAU.TO or NG.TO More Risky?
i-80 Gold Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NovaGold Resources, Inc. has a beta of 1.467, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.68%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IAU.TO or NG.TO?
i-80 Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NovaGold Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. i-80 Gold Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NovaGold Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IAU.TO or NG.TO?
i-80 Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are $32M, which are larger than NovaGold Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. i-80 Gold Corp.'s net income of -$41.9M is lower than NovaGold Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$21.8M. Notably, i-80 Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NovaGold Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for i-80 Gold Corp. is 12.50x versus 3,120.67x for NovaGold Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IAU.TOi-80 Gold Corp.12.50x -- $32M -$41.9M NG.TONovaGold Resources, Inc.3,120.67x -- -- -$21.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns IAU.TO or SSRM.TO?
SSR Mining, Inc. has a net margin of -130.76% compared to i-80 Gold Corp.'s net margin of 14.8%. i-80 Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -32.24% beat SSR Mining, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.69%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IAU.TOi-80 Gold Corp.-53.51% -$0.05 $598.9M SSRM.TOSSR Mining, Inc.35.54% $0.41 $6.3B -
What do Analysts Say About IAU.TO or SSRM.TO?
i-80 Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of $2.14, signalling downside risk potential of -21.17%. On the other hand SSR Mining, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $24.29 which suggests that it could fall by -30.86%. Given that SSR Mining, Inc. has more downside risk than i-80 Gold Corp., analysts believe i-80 Gold Corp. is more attractive than SSR Mining, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IAU.TOi-80 Gold Corp.3 0 0 SSRM.TOSSR Mining, Inc.4 4 0 -
Is IAU.TO or SSRM.TO More Risky?
i-80 Gold Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SSR Mining, Inc. has a beta of 0.320, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.962%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IAU.TO or SSRM.TO?
i-80 Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SSR Mining, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. i-80 Gold Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SSR Mining, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IAU.TO or SSRM.TO?
i-80 Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are $32M, which are smaller than SSR Mining, Inc. quarterly revenues of $531.4M. i-80 Gold Corp.'s net income of -$41.9M is lower than SSR Mining, Inc.'s net income of $78.6M. Notably, i-80 Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SSR Mining, Inc.'s PE ratio is 24.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for i-80 Gold Corp. is 12.50x versus 3.75x for SSR Mining, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IAU.TOi-80 Gold Corp.12.50x -- $32M -$41.9M SSRM.TOSSR Mining, Inc.3.75x 24.79x $531.4M $78.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns IAU.TO or TSG.V?
TriStar Gold, Inc. has a net margin of -130.76% compared to i-80 Gold Corp.'s net margin of --. i-80 Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -32.24% beat TriStar Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.09%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IAU.TOi-80 Gold Corp.-53.51% -$0.05 $598.9M TSG.VTriStar Gold, Inc.-- -$0.00 $44.9M -
What do Analysts Say About IAU.TO or TSG.V?
i-80 Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of $2.14, signalling downside risk potential of -21.17%. On the other hand TriStar Gold, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $0.85 which suggests that it could grow by 174.97%. Given that TriStar Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than i-80 Gold Corp., analysts believe TriStar Gold, Inc. is more attractive than i-80 Gold Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IAU.TOi-80 Gold Corp.3 0 0 TSG.VTriStar Gold, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is IAU.TO or TSG.V More Risky?
i-80 Gold Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TriStar Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.562, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.8%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IAU.TO or TSG.V?
i-80 Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TriStar Gold, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. i-80 Gold Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TriStar Gold, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IAU.TO or TSG.V?
i-80 Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are $32M, which are larger than TriStar Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. i-80 Gold Corp.'s net income of -$41.9M is lower than TriStar Gold, Inc.'s net income of -$148.1K. Notably, i-80 Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TriStar Gold, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for i-80 Gold Corp. is 12.50x versus -- for TriStar Gold, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IAU.TOi-80 Gold Corp.12.50x -- $32M -$41.9M TSG.VTriStar Gold, Inc.-- -- -- -$148.1K
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Lumentum The Best Laser Stock to Buy?
Though certainly less well-known than the huge tech businesses that…
Is Planet Fitness Stock Undervalued?
Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) has had a difficult 12 months, retreating…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
53
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 30x
Alerts
Buy
84
VAL alert for Feb 10
Valaris Ltd. [VAL] is up 34.18% over the past day.
Sell
18
MNDY alert for Feb 10
monday.com Ltd. [MNDY] is down 20.77% over the past day.
Buy
69
GDXU alert for Feb 10
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is up 17.51% over the past day.
