MKO.V Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Doubleview Gold Corp. has a net margin of 4.34% compared to Mako Mining Corp.'s net margin of --. Mako Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 28.32% beat Doubleview Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -7.2%.

Mako Mining Corp. has a consensus price target of $5.65, signalling downside risk potential of -48.17%. On the other hand Doubleview Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.39 which suggests that it could fall by -48.52%. Given that Doubleview Gold Corp. has more downside risk than Mako Mining Corp., analysts believe Mako Mining Corp. is more attractive than Doubleview Gold Corp..

Mako Mining Corp. has a beta of 1.419, which suggesting that the stock is 41.891% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Doubleview Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.294, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.448%.

Mako Mining Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Doubleview Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mako Mining Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Doubleview Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mako Mining Corp. quarterly revenues are $38M, which are larger than Doubleview Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Mako Mining Corp.'s net income of $1.6M is higher than Doubleview Gold Corp.'s net income of -$618.4K. Notably, Mako Mining Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.95x while Doubleview Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mako Mining Corp. is 4.96x versus -- for Doubleview Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gogold Resources, Inc. has a net margin of 4.34% compared to Mako Mining Corp.'s net margin of 42.79%. Mako Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 28.32% beat Gogold Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.73%.

Mako Mining Corp. has a consensus price target of $5.65, signalling downside risk potential of -48.17%. On the other hand Gogold Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $5.91 which suggests that it could grow by 75.86%. Given that Gogold Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than Mako Mining Corp., analysts believe Gogold Resources, Inc. is more attractive than Mako Mining Corp..

Mako Mining Corp. has a beta of 1.419, which suggesting that the stock is 41.891% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gogold Resources, Inc. has a beta of 1.392, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.213%.

Mako Mining Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gogold Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mako Mining Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gogold Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mako Mining Corp. quarterly revenues are $38M, which are smaller than Gogold Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of $43.4M. Mako Mining Corp.'s net income of $1.6M is lower than Gogold Resources, Inc.'s net income of $18.6M. Notably, Mako Mining Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.95x while Gogold Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is 30.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mako Mining Corp. is 4.96x versus 10.69x for Gogold Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Heliostar Metals Ltd. has a net margin of 4.34% compared to Mako Mining Corp.'s net margin of 4.69%. Mako Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 28.32% beat Heliostar Metals Ltd.'s return on equity of 122.23%.

Mako Mining Corp. has a consensus price target of $5.65, signalling downside risk potential of -48.17%. On the other hand Heliostar Metals Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $5.83 which suggests that it could grow by 114.15%. Given that Heliostar Metals Ltd. has higher upside potential than Mako Mining Corp., analysts believe Heliostar Metals Ltd. is more attractive than Mako Mining Corp..

Mako Mining Corp. has a beta of 1.419, which suggesting that the stock is 41.891% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Heliostar Metals Ltd. has a beta of 1.253, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.253%.

Mako Mining Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Heliostar Metals Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mako Mining Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Heliostar Metals Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mako Mining Corp. quarterly revenues are $38M, which are larger than Heliostar Metals Ltd. quarterly revenues of $36.9M. Mako Mining Corp.'s net income of $1.6M is lower than Heliostar Metals Ltd.'s net income of $1.7M. Notably, Mako Mining Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.95x while Heliostar Metals Ltd.'s PE ratio is 6.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mako Mining Corp. is 4.96x versus 7.02x for Heliostar Metals Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. has a net margin of 4.34% compared to Mako Mining Corp.'s net margin of 20.43%. Mako Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 28.32% beat Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd.'s return on equity of 50.02%.

Mako Mining Corp. has a consensus price target of $5.65, signalling downside risk potential of -48.17%. On the other hand Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $34.20 which suggests that it could grow by 128.76%. Given that Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. has higher upside potential than Mako Mining Corp., analysts believe Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. is more attractive than Mako Mining Corp..

Mako Mining Corp. has a beta of 1.419, which suggesting that the stock is 41.891% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. has a beta of 2.371, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 137.147%.

Mako Mining Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mako Mining Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mako Mining Corp. quarterly revenues are $38M, which are smaller than Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. quarterly revenues of $110.2M. Mako Mining Corp.'s net income of $1.6M is lower than Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd.'s net income of $22.5M. Notably, Mako Mining Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.95x while Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd.'s PE ratio is 12.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mako Mining Corp. is 4.96x versus 3.19x for Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.