Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Buy
75
MKO.V Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$8.42
Seasonality move
:
20.79%
Day range:
$8.20 - $8.64
52-week range:
$3.20 - $8.76
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
19.97x
P/S ratio:
3.82x
P/B ratio:
5.36x
Volume:
112.6K
Avg. volume:
105.2K
1-year change:
134.36%
Market cap:
$730M
Revenue:
$126.1M
EPS (TTM):
$0.42
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MKO.V
Mako Mining Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $5.65 |
|
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GGD.TO
Gogold Resources, Inc.
|
$26.6M | $0.01 | 88.21% | 366.67% | $4.00 |
|
GRSL.V
GR Silver Mining Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -100% | $0.55 |
|
HSTR.V
Heliostar Metals Ltd.
|
$34.4M | $0.01 | 75.93% | -96.55% | $5.18 |
|
SCZ.V
Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd.
|
$124.5M | -- | 8.97% | -- | $3.10 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MKO.V
Mako Mining Corp.
|
$8.39 | $5.65 | $730M | 19.97x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.82x |
|
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
|
$0.22 | -- | $20.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
GGD.TO
Gogold Resources, Inc.
|
$3.06 | $4.00 | $1.3B | 47.08x | $0.00 | 0% | 10.76x |
|
GRSL.V
GR Silver Mining Ltd.
|
$0.43 | $0.55 | $184.1M | 5.95x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
HSTR.V
Heliostar Metals Ltd.
|
$2.64 | $5.18 | $677.4M | 6.67x | $0.00 | 0% | 6.82x |
|
SCZ.V
Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd.
|
$14.12 | $3.10 | $1.3B | 12.03x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.02x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MKO.V
Mako Mining Corp.
|
5.11% | 2.470 | 1.13% | 1.52x |
|
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
|
-- | 6.710 | -- | 7.80x |
|
GGD.TO
Gogold Resources, Inc.
|
0.24% | 2.158 | 0.12% | 6.62x |
|
GRSL.V
GR Silver Mining Ltd.
|
-- | 8.475 | -- | 8.02x |
|
HSTR.V
Heliostar Metals Ltd.
|
-- | 2.743 | -- | 1.20x |
|
SCZ.V
Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd.
|
16.32% | 6.268 | 4.95% | 1.10x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MKO.V
Mako Mining Corp.
|
$9M | $5.1M | 26.44% | 28.32% | 13.32% | $1.1M |
|
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
|
-- | -$1.6M | -57.76% | -57.93% | -- | -$2.2M |
|
GGD.TO
Gogold Resources, Inc.
|
$12.3M | $7.1M | 5.48% | 5.5% | 28.56% | $3M |
|
GRSL.V
GR Silver Mining Ltd.
|
-$40.1K | -$2.8M | -67.55% | -67.55% | -- | -$2.8M |
|
HSTR.V
Heliostar Metals Ltd.
|
$10M | $5.6M | 119.84% | 122.23% | 15.07% | $6.7M |
|
SCZ.V
Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd.
|
$26.8M | $17.4M | 43.36% | 50.02% | 15.77% | $23.4M |
Mako Mining Corp. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MKO.V or BFG.CX?
Giant Mining Corp. has a net margin of 4.34% compared to Mako Mining Corp.'s net margin of --. Mako Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 28.32% beat Giant Mining Corp.'s return on equity of -57.93%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MKO.VMako Mining Corp.23.7% $0.02 $143.5M BFG.CXGiant Mining Corp.-- -$0.02 $14.6M -
What do Analysts Say About MKO.V or BFG.CX?
Mako Mining Corp. has a consensus price target of $5.65, signalling downside risk potential of -32.66%. On the other hand Giant Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mako Mining Corp. has higher upside potential than Giant Mining Corp., analysts believe Mako Mining Corp. is more attractive than Giant Mining Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MKO.VMako Mining Corp.1 0 0 BFG.CXGiant Mining Corp.0 0 0 -
Is MKO.V or BFG.CX More Risky?
Mako Mining Corp. has a beta of 1.366, which suggesting that the stock is 36.567% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Giant Mining Corp. has a beta of 0.535, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.55%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MKO.V or BFG.CX?
Mako Mining Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Giant Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mako Mining Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Giant Mining Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MKO.V or BFG.CX?
Mako Mining Corp. quarterly revenues are $38M, which are larger than Giant Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Mako Mining Corp.'s net income of $1.6M is higher than Giant Mining Corp.'s net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Mako Mining Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.97x while Giant Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mako Mining Corp. is 3.82x versus -- for Giant Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MKO.VMako Mining Corp.3.82x 19.97x $38M $1.6M BFG.CXGiant Mining Corp.-- -- -- -$1.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns MKO.V or GGD.TO?
Gogold Resources, Inc. has a net margin of 4.34% compared to Mako Mining Corp.'s net margin of 32.58%. Mako Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 28.32% beat Gogold Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.5%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MKO.VMako Mining Corp.23.7% $0.02 $143.5M GGD.TOGogold Resources, Inc.49.16% $0.02 $502.5M -
What do Analysts Say About MKO.V or GGD.TO?
Mako Mining Corp. has a consensus price target of $5.65, signalling downside risk potential of -32.66%. On the other hand Gogold Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 30.72%. Given that Gogold Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than Mako Mining Corp., analysts believe Gogold Resources, Inc. is more attractive than Mako Mining Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MKO.VMako Mining Corp.1 0 0 GGD.TOGogold Resources, Inc.2 0 0 -
Is MKO.V or GGD.TO More Risky?
Mako Mining Corp. has a beta of 1.366, which suggesting that the stock is 36.567% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gogold Resources, Inc. has a beta of 1.254, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.385%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MKO.V or GGD.TO?
Mako Mining Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gogold Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mako Mining Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gogold Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MKO.V or GGD.TO?
Mako Mining Corp. quarterly revenues are $38M, which are larger than Gogold Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of $24.9M. Mako Mining Corp.'s net income of $1.6M is lower than Gogold Resources, Inc.'s net income of $8.1M. Notably, Mako Mining Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.97x while Gogold Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is 47.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mako Mining Corp. is 3.82x versus 10.76x for Gogold Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MKO.VMako Mining Corp.3.82x 19.97x $38M $1.6M GGD.TOGogold Resources, Inc.10.76x 47.08x $24.9M $8.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns MKO.V or GRSL.V?
GR Silver Mining Ltd. has a net margin of 4.34% compared to Mako Mining Corp.'s net margin of --. Mako Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 28.32% beat GR Silver Mining Ltd.'s return on equity of -67.55%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MKO.VMako Mining Corp.23.7% $0.02 $143.5M GRSL.VGR Silver Mining Ltd.-- -$0.01 $19.2M -
What do Analysts Say About MKO.V or GRSL.V?
Mako Mining Corp. has a consensus price target of $5.65, signalling downside risk potential of -32.66%. On the other hand GR Silver Mining Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $0.55 which suggests that it could grow by 29.41%. Given that GR Silver Mining Ltd. has higher upside potential than Mako Mining Corp., analysts believe GR Silver Mining Ltd. is more attractive than Mako Mining Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MKO.VMako Mining Corp.1 0 0 GRSL.VGR Silver Mining Ltd.1 0 0 -
Is MKO.V or GRSL.V More Risky?
Mako Mining Corp. has a beta of 1.366, which suggesting that the stock is 36.567% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GR Silver Mining Ltd. has a beta of 3.559, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 255.895%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MKO.V or GRSL.V?
Mako Mining Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GR Silver Mining Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mako Mining Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GR Silver Mining Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MKO.V or GRSL.V?
Mako Mining Corp. quarterly revenues are $38M, which are larger than GR Silver Mining Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Mako Mining Corp.'s net income of $1.6M is higher than GR Silver Mining Ltd.'s net income of -$2.8M. Notably, Mako Mining Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.97x while GR Silver Mining Ltd.'s PE ratio is 5.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mako Mining Corp. is 3.82x versus -- for GR Silver Mining Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MKO.VMako Mining Corp.3.82x 19.97x $38M $1.6M GRSL.VGR Silver Mining Ltd.-- 5.95x -- -$2.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns MKO.V or HSTR.V?
Heliostar Metals Ltd. has a net margin of 4.34% compared to Mako Mining Corp.'s net margin of 4.69%. Mako Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 28.32% beat Heliostar Metals Ltd.'s return on equity of 122.23%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MKO.VMako Mining Corp.23.7% $0.02 $143.5M HSTR.VHeliostar Metals Ltd.27.08% $0.01 $93.9M -
What do Analysts Say About MKO.V or HSTR.V?
Mako Mining Corp. has a consensus price target of $5.65, signalling downside risk potential of -32.66%. On the other hand Heliostar Metals Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $5.18 which suggests that it could grow by 96.21%. Given that Heliostar Metals Ltd. has higher upside potential than Mako Mining Corp., analysts believe Heliostar Metals Ltd. is more attractive than Mako Mining Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MKO.VMako Mining Corp.1 0 0 HSTR.VHeliostar Metals Ltd.2 0 0 -
Is MKO.V or HSTR.V More Risky?
Mako Mining Corp. has a beta of 1.366, which suggesting that the stock is 36.567% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Heliostar Metals Ltd. has a beta of 1.095, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.485%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MKO.V or HSTR.V?
Mako Mining Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Heliostar Metals Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mako Mining Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Heliostar Metals Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MKO.V or HSTR.V?
Mako Mining Corp. quarterly revenues are $38M, which are larger than Heliostar Metals Ltd. quarterly revenues of $36.9M. Mako Mining Corp.'s net income of $1.6M is lower than Heliostar Metals Ltd.'s net income of $1.7M. Notably, Mako Mining Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.97x while Heliostar Metals Ltd.'s PE ratio is 6.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mako Mining Corp. is 3.82x versus 6.82x for Heliostar Metals Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MKO.VMako Mining Corp.3.82x 19.97x $38M $1.6M HSTR.VHeliostar Metals Ltd.6.82x 6.67x $36.9M $1.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns MKO.V or SCZ.V?
Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. has a net margin of 4.34% compared to Mako Mining Corp.'s net margin of 20.43%. Mako Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 28.32% beat Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd.'s return on equity of 50.02%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MKO.VMako Mining Corp.23.7% $0.02 $143.5M SCZ.VSantacruz Silver Mining Ltd.24.35% $0.24 $304.7M -
What do Analysts Say About MKO.V or SCZ.V?
Mako Mining Corp. has a consensus price target of $5.65, signalling downside risk potential of -32.66%. On the other hand Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $3.10 which suggests that it could fall by -12.18%. Given that Mako Mining Corp. has more downside risk than Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd., analysts believe Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. is more attractive than Mako Mining Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MKO.VMako Mining Corp.1 0 0 SCZ.VSantacruz Silver Mining Ltd.1 0 0 -
Is MKO.V or SCZ.V More Risky?
Mako Mining Corp. has a beta of 1.366, which suggesting that the stock is 36.567% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. has a beta of 2.388, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 138.782%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MKO.V or SCZ.V?
Mako Mining Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mako Mining Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MKO.V or SCZ.V?
Mako Mining Corp. quarterly revenues are $38M, which are smaller than Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. quarterly revenues of $110.2M. Mako Mining Corp.'s net income of $1.6M is lower than Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd.'s net income of $22.5M. Notably, Mako Mining Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.97x while Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd.'s PE ratio is 12.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mako Mining Corp. is 3.82x versus 3.02x for Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MKO.VMako Mining Corp.3.82x 19.97x $38M $1.6M SCZ.VSantacruz Silver Mining Ltd.3.02x 12.03x $110.2M $22.5M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
65
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
51
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Sell
5
SMX alert for Jan 8
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 17.76% over the past day.
Buy
70
RGC alert for Jan 8
Regencell Bioscience Holdings Ltd. [RGC] is down 22.11% over the past day.
Buy
64
RVMD alert for Jan 8
Revolution Medicines, Inc. [RVMD] is up 4.21% over the past day.
