Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?
Shares of embattled health insurance giant UnitedHealth (NYSE:UNH) plummeted by…
Sell
46
TMQ.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$6.41
Seasonality move
:
8.97%
Day range:
$6.17 - $6.49
52-week range:
$1.59 - $15.21
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
6.17x
Volume:
710.1K
Avg. volume:
668.2K
1-year change:
242.47%
Market cap:
$1.1B
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
-$0.08
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TMQ.TO
Trilogy Metals, Inc.
|
-- | -$0.01 | -- | -65.49% | $4.89 |
|
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GGO.V
Galleon Gold Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $2.75 |
|
IVN.TO
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.
|
$134.7M | $0.03 | 176.86% | -55.03% | $10.17 |
|
LAC.TO
Lithium Americas Corp.
|
-- | -$0.08 | -- | -43.58% | $7.26 |
|
RFR.CX
Renforth Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TMQ.TO
Trilogy Metals, Inc.
|
$6.37 | $4.89 | $1.1B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
|
$0.39 | -- | $37M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
GGO.V
Galleon Gold Corp.
|
$1.00 | $2.75 | $76.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
IVN.TO
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.
|
$16.81 | $10.17 | $23.9B | 52.93x | $0.00 | 0% | 47.66x |
|
LAC.TO
Lithium Americas Corp.
|
$6.37 | $7.26 | $1.9B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
RFR.CX
Renforth Resources, Inc.
|
$0.0250 | -- | $9.6M | 32.41x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TMQ.TO
Trilogy Metals, Inc.
|
0.1% | -3.757 | 0.04% | 62.66x |
|
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
|
-- | 2.493 | -- | 7.80x |
|
GGO.V
Galleon Gold Corp.
|
36.64% | 1.217 | 38.5% | 3.05x |
|
IVN.TO
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.
|
16.75% | 1.846 | 7.84% | 3.60x |
|
LAC.TO
Lithium Americas Corp.
|
46.01% | 5.226 | 22.44% | 3.74x |
|
RFR.CX
Renforth Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -1.467 | -- | 0.06x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TMQ.TO
Trilogy Metals, Inc.
|
-- | -$1.6M | -7.07% | -7.08% | -- | -$1.7M |
|
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
|
-- | -$1.6M | -57.76% | -57.93% | -- | -$2.2M |
|
GGO.V
Galleon Gold Corp.
|
-$5.4K | -$432.2K | -3.04% | -3.89% | -- | -$1.2M |
|
IVN.TO
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.
|
-$4.2M | -$24.5M | 4.78% | 5.52% | -13.72% | -$165.8M |
|
LAC.TO
Lithium Americas Corp.
|
-$369.1K | -$13.4M | -30.14% | -32.83% | -- | -$231.3M |
|
RFR.CX
Renforth Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -$108.9K | -- | -- | -- | -$46K |
Trilogy Metals, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns TMQ.TO or BFG.CX?
Giant Mining Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s net margin of --. Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.08% beat Giant Mining Corp.'s return on equity of -57.93%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TMQ.TOTrilogy Metals, Inc.-- -$0.01 $176.8M BFG.CXGiant Mining Corp.-- -$0.02 $14.6M -
What do Analysts Say About TMQ.TO or BFG.CX?
Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.89, signalling upside risk potential of 38.82%. On the other hand Giant Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Trilogy Metals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Giant Mining Corp., analysts believe Trilogy Metals, Inc. is more attractive than Giant Mining Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TMQ.TOTrilogy Metals, Inc.1 4 0 BFG.CXGiant Mining Corp.0 0 0 -
Is TMQ.TO or BFG.CX More Risky?
Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a beta of 1.700, which suggesting that the stock is 69.975% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Giant Mining Corp. has a beta of 0.519, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.139%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TMQ.TO or BFG.CX?
Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Giant Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trilogy Metals, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Giant Mining Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TMQ.TO or BFG.CX?
Trilogy Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Giant Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$2.4M is lower than Giant Mining Corp.'s net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Giant Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trilogy Metals, Inc. is -- versus -- for Giant Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TMQ.TOTrilogy Metals, Inc.-- -- -- -$2.4M BFG.CXGiant Mining Corp.-- -- -- -$1.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns TMQ.TO or GGO.V?
Galleon Gold Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s net margin of --. Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.08% beat Galleon Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -3.89%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TMQ.TOTrilogy Metals, Inc.-- -$0.01 $176.8M GGO.VGalleon Gold Corp.-- -$0.01 $42.3M -
What do Analysts Say About TMQ.TO or GGO.V?
Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.89, signalling upside risk potential of 38.82%. On the other hand Galleon Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $2.75 which suggests that it could grow by 175%. Given that Galleon Gold Corp. has higher upside potential than Trilogy Metals, Inc., analysts believe Galleon Gold Corp. is more attractive than Trilogy Metals, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TMQ.TOTrilogy Metals, Inc.1 4 0 GGO.VGalleon Gold Corp.1 0 0 -
Is TMQ.TO or GGO.V More Risky?
Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a beta of 1.700, which suggesting that the stock is 69.975% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Galleon Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.771, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.134%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TMQ.TO or GGO.V?
Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Galleon Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trilogy Metals, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Galleon Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TMQ.TO or GGO.V?
Trilogy Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Galleon Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$2.4M is lower than Galleon Gold Corp.'s net income of -$800.8K. Notably, Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Galleon Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trilogy Metals, Inc. is -- versus -- for Galleon Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TMQ.TOTrilogy Metals, Inc.-- -- -- -$2.4M GGO.VGalleon Gold Corp.-- -- -- -$800.8K
-
Which has Higher Returns TMQ.TO or IVN.TO?
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s net margin of 23.61%. Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.08% beat Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.52%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TMQ.TOTrilogy Metals, Inc.-- -$0.01 $176.8M IVN.TOIvanhoe Mines Ltd.-2.37% $0.03 $9.5B -
What do Analysts Say About TMQ.TO or IVN.TO?
Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.89, signalling upside risk potential of 38.82%. On the other hand Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $10.17 which suggests that it could fall by -39.7%. Given that Trilogy Metals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ivanhoe Mines Ltd., analysts believe Trilogy Metals, Inc. is more attractive than Ivanhoe Mines Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TMQ.TOTrilogy Metals, Inc.1 4 0 IVN.TOIvanhoe Mines Ltd.9 2 0 -
Is TMQ.TO or IVN.TO More Risky?
Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a beta of 1.700, which suggesting that the stock is 69.975% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a beta of 1.909, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.927%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TMQ.TO or IVN.TO?
Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trilogy Metals, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TMQ.TO or IVN.TO?
Trilogy Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues of $178.2M. Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$2.4M is lower than Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s net income of $42.1M. Notably, Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s PE ratio is 52.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trilogy Metals, Inc. is -- versus 47.66x for Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TMQ.TOTrilogy Metals, Inc.-- -- -- -$2.4M IVN.TOIvanhoe Mines Ltd.47.66x 52.93x $178.2M $42.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns TMQ.TO or LAC.TO?
Lithium Americas Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s net margin of --. Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.08% beat Lithium Americas Corp.'s return on equity of -32.83%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TMQ.TOTrilogy Metals, Inc.-- -$0.01 $176.8M LAC.TOLithium Americas Corp.-- -$1.14 $1.8B -
What do Analysts Say About TMQ.TO or LAC.TO?
Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.89, signalling upside risk potential of 38.82%. On the other hand Lithium Americas Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $7.26 which suggests that it could grow by 14.02%. Given that Trilogy Metals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lithium Americas Corp., analysts believe Trilogy Metals, Inc. is more attractive than Lithium Americas Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TMQ.TOTrilogy Metals, Inc.1 4 0 LAC.TOLithium Americas Corp.2 9 0 -
Is TMQ.TO or LAC.TO More Risky?
Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a beta of 1.700, which suggesting that the stock is 69.975% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lithium Americas Corp. has a beta of 1.215, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.54%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TMQ.TO or LAC.TO?
Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lithium Americas Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trilogy Metals, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lithium Americas Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TMQ.TO or LAC.TO?
Trilogy Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lithium Americas Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$2.4M is higher than Lithium Americas Corp.'s net income of -$274.3M. Notably, Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lithium Americas Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trilogy Metals, Inc. is -- versus -- for Lithium Americas Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TMQ.TOTrilogy Metals, Inc.-- -- -- -$2.4M LAC.TOLithium Americas Corp.-- -- -- -$274.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns TMQ.TO or RFR.CX?
Renforth Resources, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s net margin of --. Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.08% beat Renforth Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TMQ.TOTrilogy Metals, Inc.-- -$0.01 $176.8M RFR.CXRenforth Resources, Inc.-- -$0.00 -$680.2K -
What do Analysts Say About TMQ.TO or RFR.CX?
Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.89, signalling upside risk potential of 38.82%. On the other hand Renforth Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 380%. Given that Renforth Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than Trilogy Metals, Inc., analysts believe Renforth Resources, Inc. is more attractive than Trilogy Metals, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TMQ.TOTrilogy Metals, Inc.1 4 0 RFR.CXRenforth Resources, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is TMQ.TO or RFR.CX More Risky?
Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a beta of 1.700, which suggesting that the stock is 69.975% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Renforth Resources, Inc. has a beta of 0.676, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.374%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TMQ.TO or RFR.CX?
Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Renforth Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trilogy Metals, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Renforth Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TMQ.TO or RFR.CX?
Trilogy Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Renforth Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$2.4M is lower than Renforth Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$108.9K. Notably, Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Renforth Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is 32.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trilogy Metals, Inc. is -- versus -- for Renforth Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TMQ.TOTrilogy Metals, Inc.-- -- -- -$2.4M RFR.CXRenforth Resources, Inc.-- 32.41x -- -$108.9K
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Lumentum The Best Laser Stock to Buy?
Though certainly less well-known than the huge tech businesses that…
Is Planet Fitness Stock Undervalued?
Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) has had a difficult 12 months, retreating…
Stock Ideas
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
53
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 30x
Alerts
Sell
40
BILL alert for Feb 9
Bill Holdings, Inc. [BILL] is up 2.64% over the past day.
Buy
75
PRLB alert for Feb 9
Proto Labs, Inc. [PRLB] is down 0.54% over the past day.
Sell
30
MSTR alert for Feb 9
Strategy, Inc. [MSTR] is up 1.53% over the past day.
