TMQ.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lithium Americas Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s net margin of --. Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.08% beat Lithium Americas Corp.'s return on equity of -32.83%.

Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a consensus price target of $8.27, signalling upside risk potential of 16.61%. On the other hand Lithium Americas Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $6.94 which suggests that it could fall by -10.74%. Given that Trilogy Metals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lithium Americas Corp., analysts believe Trilogy Metals, Inc. is more attractive than Lithium Americas Corp..

Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a beta of 1.720, which suggesting that the stock is 72.048% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lithium Americas Corp. has a beta of 1.215, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.54%.

Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lithium Americas Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trilogy Metals, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lithium Americas Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Trilogy Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lithium Americas Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$2.4M is higher than Lithium Americas Corp.'s net income of -$274.3M. Notably, Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lithium Americas Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trilogy Metals, Inc. is -- versus -- for Lithium Americas Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s net margin of --. Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.08% beat Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of -112.85%.

Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a consensus price target of $8.27, signalling upside risk potential of 16.61%. On the other hand Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -72.53%. Given that Trilogy Metals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd., analysts believe Trilogy Metals, Inc. is more attractive than Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd..

Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a beta of 1.720, which suggesting that the stock is 72.048% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 0.154, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.561%.

Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trilogy Metals, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Trilogy Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$2.4M is higher than Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$7.9M. Notably, Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trilogy Metals, Inc. is -- versus -- for Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Standard Lithium Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s net margin of --. Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.08% beat Standard Lithium Ltd.'s return on equity of -7.12%.

Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a consensus price target of $8.27, signalling upside risk potential of 16.61%. On the other hand Standard Lithium Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $6.33 which suggests that it could fall by -13.24%. Given that Trilogy Metals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Standard Lithium Ltd., analysts believe Trilogy Metals, Inc. is more attractive than Standard Lithium Ltd..

Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a beta of 1.720, which suggesting that the stock is 72.048% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Standard Lithium Ltd. has a beta of 1.791, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.1%.

Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Standard Lithium Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trilogy Metals, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Standard Lithium Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Trilogy Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Standard Lithium Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$2.4M is higher than Standard Lithium Ltd.'s net income of -$8.4M. Notably, Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Standard Lithium Ltd.'s PE ratio is 5.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trilogy Metals, Inc. is -- versus 7,872.23x for Standard Lithium Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Teck Resources Limited has a net margin of -- compared to Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s net margin of 3.93%. Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.08% beat Teck Resources Limited's return on equity of 3.02%.

Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a consensus price target of $8.27, signalling upside risk potential of 16.61%. On the other hand Teck Resources Limited has an analysts' consensus of $63.18 which suggests that it could fall by -8.28%. Given that Trilogy Metals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Teck Resources Limited, analysts believe Trilogy Metals, Inc. is more attractive than Teck Resources Limited.

Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a beta of 1.720, which suggesting that the stock is 72.048% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Teck Resources Limited has a beta of 1.501, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.07%.

Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Teck Resources Limited offers a yield of 0.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Trilogy Metals, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Teck Resources Limited pays out 79.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Teck Resources Limited's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trilogy Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Teck Resources Limited quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$2.4M is lower than Teck Resources Limited's net income of $133M. Notably, Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Teck Resources Limited's PE ratio is 28.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trilogy Metals, Inc. is -- versus 3.28x for Teck Resources Limited. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.