Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
31
TMQ.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$5.53
Seasonality move
:
8.97%
Day range:
$5.30 - $5.90
52-week range:
$1.59 - $15.21
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
5.51x
Volume:
1M
Avg. volume:
706.5K
1-year change:
186.53%
Market cap:
$954.2M
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
-$0.36
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TMQ.TO
Trilogy Metals, Inc.
|
-- | -$0.03 | -- | -13.88% | $9.08 |
|
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IVN.TO
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.
|
$251.6M | $0.05 | 125.94% | -13.84% | $19.08 |
|
LAC.TO
Lithium Americas Corp.
|
-- | -$0.08 | -- | -43.58% | $7.41 |
|
RFR.CX
Renforth Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TECK.B.TO
Teck Resources Limited
|
$3.1B | $0.96 | 28.88% | 52.82% | $80.71 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TMQ.TO
Trilogy Metals, Inc.
|
$5.53 | $9.08 | $954.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
|
$0.22 | -- | $20.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
IVN.TO
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.
|
$13.97 | $19.08 | $19.9B | 52.07x | $0.00 | 0% | 31.28x |
|
LAC.TO
Lithium Americas Corp.
|
$6.50 | $7.41 | $2B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
RFR.CX
Renforth Resources, Inc.
|
$0.0250 | -- | $9.6M | 32.41x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
TECK.B.TO
Teck Resources Limited
|
$75.77 | $80.71 | $37.1B | 26.77x | $0.13 | 0.66% | 3.49x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TMQ.TO
Trilogy Metals, Inc.
|
0.09% | -4.747 | 0.02% | 1.56x |
|
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
|
-- | 2.213 | -- | 2.04x |
|
IVN.TO
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.
|
17.66% | 0.362 | 7.9% | 2.04x |
|
LAC.TO
Lithium Americas Corp.
|
46.01% | 3.417 | 22.44% | 3.74x |
|
RFR.CX
Renforth Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -3.404 | -- | 0.06x |
|
TECK.B.TO
Teck Resources Limited
|
27.68% | 2.539 | 29.1% | 1.72x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TMQ.TO
Trilogy Metals, Inc.
|
-- | -$4.7M | -32.63% | -32.66% | -- | -$840K |
|
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
|
-- | -$1.5M | -61.67% | -61.76% | -- | -$942.3K |
|
IVN.TO
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.
|
-$3.8M | $38.2M | 3.68% | 4.39% | 19.78% | -$222.1M |
|
LAC.TO
Lithium Americas Corp.
|
-$369.1K | -$13.4M | -30.14% | -32.83% | -- | -$231.3M |
|
RFR.CX
Renforth Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -$108.9K | -- | -- | -- | -$46K |
|
TECK.B.TO
Teck Resources Limited
|
$916M | $652M | 2.98% | 4.09% | 21.32% | $294M |
Trilogy Metals, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns TMQ.TO or BFG.CX?
Giant Mining Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s net margin of --. Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of -32.66% beat Giant Mining Corp.'s return on equity of -61.76%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TMQ.TOTrilogy Metals, Inc.-- -$0.29 $173.2M BFG.CXGiant Mining Corp.-- -$0.02 $13.1M -
What do Analysts Say About TMQ.TO or BFG.CX?
Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a consensus price target of $9.08, signalling upside risk potential of 64.16%. On the other hand Giant Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Trilogy Metals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Giant Mining Corp., analysts believe Trilogy Metals, Inc. is more attractive than Giant Mining Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TMQ.TOTrilogy Metals, Inc.3 3 0 BFG.CXGiant Mining Corp.0 0 0 -
Is TMQ.TO or BFG.CX More Risky?
Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a beta of 1.544, which suggesting that the stock is 54.417% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Giant Mining Corp. has a beta of 0.260, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.965%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TMQ.TO or BFG.CX?
Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Giant Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trilogy Metals, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Giant Mining Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TMQ.TO or BFG.CX?
Trilogy Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Giant Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$48.4M is lower than Giant Mining Corp.'s net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Giant Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trilogy Metals, Inc. is -- versus -- for Giant Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TMQ.TOTrilogy Metals, Inc.-- -- -- -$48.4M BFG.CXGiant Mining Corp.-- -- -- -$1.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns TMQ.TO or IVN.TO?
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s net margin of 28.83%. Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of -32.66% beat Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of 4.39%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TMQ.TOTrilogy Metals, Inc.-- -$0.29 $173.2M IVN.TOIvanhoe Mines Ltd.-1.96% $0.05 $9.6B -
What do Analysts Say About TMQ.TO or IVN.TO?
Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a consensus price target of $9.08, signalling upside risk potential of 64.16%. On the other hand Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $19.08 which suggests that it could grow by 36.61%. Given that Trilogy Metals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ivanhoe Mines Ltd., analysts believe Trilogy Metals, Inc. is more attractive than Ivanhoe Mines Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TMQ.TOTrilogy Metals, Inc.3 3 0 IVN.TOIvanhoe Mines Ltd.8 3 0 -
Is TMQ.TO or IVN.TO More Risky?
Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a beta of 1.544, which suggesting that the stock is 54.417% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a beta of 1.663, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.278%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TMQ.TO or IVN.TO?
Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trilogy Metals, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TMQ.TO or IVN.TO?
Trilogy Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues of $193M. Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$48.4M is lower than Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s net income of $55.7M. Notably, Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s PE ratio is 52.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trilogy Metals, Inc. is -- versus 31.28x for Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TMQ.TOTrilogy Metals, Inc.-- -- -- -$48.4M IVN.TOIvanhoe Mines Ltd.31.28x 52.07x $193M $55.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns TMQ.TO or LAC.TO?
Lithium Americas Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s net margin of --. Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of -32.66% beat Lithium Americas Corp.'s return on equity of -32.83%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TMQ.TOTrilogy Metals, Inc.-- -$0.29 $173.2M LAC.TOLithium Americas Corp.-- -$1.14 $1.8B -
What do Analysts Say About TMQ.TO or LAC.TO?
Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a consensus price target of $9.08, signalling upside risk potential of 64.16%. On the other hand Lithium Americas Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $7.41 which suggests that it could grow by 13.99%. Given that Trilogy Metals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lithium Americas Corp., analysts believe Trilogy Metals, Inc. is more attractive than Lithium Americas Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TMQ.TOTrilogy Metals, Inc.3 3 0 LAC.TOLithium Americas Corp.2 9 0 -
Is TMQ.TO or LAC.TO More Risky?
Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a beta of 1.544, which suggesting that the stock is 54.417% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lithium Americas Corp. has a beta of 1.215, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.54%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TMQ.TO or LAC.TO?
Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lithium Americas Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trilogy Metals, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lithium Americas Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TMQ.TO or LAC.TO?
Trilogy Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lithium Americas Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$48.4M is higher than Lithium Americas Corp.'s net income of -$274.3M. Notably, Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lithium Americas Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trilogy Metals, Inc. is -- versus -- for Lithium Americas Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TMQ.TOTrilogy Metals, Inc.-- -- -- -$48.4M LAC.TOLithium Americas Corp.-- -- -- -$274.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns TMQ.TO or RFR.CX?
Renforth Resources, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s net margin of --. Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of -32.66% beat Renforth Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TMQ.TOTrilogy Metals, Inc.-- -$0.29 $173.2M RFR.CXRenforth Resources, Inc.-- -$0.00 -$680.2K -
What do Analysts Say About TMQ.TO or RFR.CX?
Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a consensus price target of $9.08, signalling upside risk potential of 64.16%. On the other hand Renforth Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 380%. Given that Renforth Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than Trilogy Metals, Inc., analysts believe Renforth Resources, Inc. is more attractive than Trilogy Metals, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TMQ.TOTrilogy Metals, Inc.3 3 0 RFR.CXRenforth Resources, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is TMQ.TO or RFR.CX More Risky?
Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a beta of 1.544, which suggesting that the stock is 54.417% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Renforth Resources, Inc. has a beta of 0.440, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.955%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TMQ.TO or RFR.CX?
Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Renforth Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trilogy Metals, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Renforth Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TMQ.TO or RFR.CX?
Trilogy Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Renforth Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$48.4M is lower than Renforth Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$108.9K. Notably, Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Renforth Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is 32.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trilogy Metals, Inc. is -- versus -- for Renforth Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TMQ.TOTrilogy Metals, Inc.-- -- -- -$48.4M RFR.CXRenforth Resources, Inc.-- 32.41x -- -$108.9K
-
Which has Higher Returns TMQ.TO or TECK.B.TO?
Teck Resources Limited has a net margin of -- compared to Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s net margin of 17.17%. Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of -32.66% beat Teck Resources Limited's return on equity of 4.09%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TMQ.TOTrilogy Metals, Inc.-- -$0.29 $173.2M TECK.B.TOTeck Resources Limited29.95% $1.11 $35.6B -
What do Analysts Say About TMQ.TO or TECK.B.TO?
Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a consensus price target of $9.08, signalling upside risk potential of 64.16%. On the other hand Teck Resources Limited has an analysts' consensus of $80.71 which suggests that it could grow by 6.51%. Given that Trilogy Metals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Teck Resources Limited, analysts believe Trilogy Metals, Inc. is more attractive than Teck Resources Limited.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TMQ.TOTrilogy Metals, Inc.3 3 0 TECK.B.TOTeck Resources Limited6 10 2 -
Is TMQ.TO or TECK.B.TO More Risky?
Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a beta of 1.544, which suggesting that the stock is 54.417% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Teck Resources Limited has a beta of 1.449, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.919%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TMQ.TO or TECK.B.TO?
Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Teck Resources Limited offers a yield of 0.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Trilogy Metals, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Teck Resources Limited pays out 17.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Teck Resources Limited's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TMQ.TO or TECK.B.TO?
Trilogy Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Teck Resources Limited quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$48.4M is lower than Teck Resources Limited's net income of $525M. Notably, Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Teck Resources Limited's PE ratio is 26.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trilogy Metals, Inc. is -- versus 3.49x for Teck Resources Limited. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TMQ.TOTrilogy Metals, Inc.-- -- -- -$48.4M TECK.B.TOTeck Resources Limited3.49x 26.77x $3.1B $525M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
34
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Sell
46
ZD alert for Mar 4
Ziff Davis, Inc. [ZD] is up 0.39% over the past day.
Buy
54
KORU alert for Mar 4
Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares [KORU] is up 4.68% over the past day.
Sell
40
PSIX alert for Mar 4
Power Solutions International, Inc. [PSIX] is up 2.81% over the past day.
