RFR.CX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Giant Mining Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Renforth Resources, Inc.'s net margin of --. Renforth Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Giant Mining Corp.'s return on equity of -57.93%.

Renforth Resources, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 380%. On the other hand Giant Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Renforth Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than Giant Mining Corp., analysts believe Renforth Resources, Inc. is more attractive than Giant Mining Corp..

Renforth Resources, Inc. has a beta of 0.676, which suggesting that the stock is 32.374% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Giant Mining Corp. has a beta of 0.519, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.139%.

Renforth Resources, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Giant Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Renforth Resources, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Giant Mining Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Renforth Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Giant Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Renforth Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$108.9K is higher than Giant Mining Corp.'s net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Renforth Resources, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 32.41x while Giant Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Renforth Resources, Inc. is -- versus -- for Giant Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Granada Gold Mine, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Renforth Resources, Inc.'s net margin of --. Renforth Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Granada Gold Mine, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Renforth Resources, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 380%. On the other hand Granada Gold Mine, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Renforth Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than Granada Gold Mine, Inc., analysts believe Renforth Resources, Inc. is more attractive than Granada Gold Mine, Inc..

Renforth Resources, Inc. has a beta of 0.676, which suggesting that the stock is 32.374% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Granada Gold Mine, Inc. has a beta of 2.637, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 163.686%.

Renforth Resources, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Granada Gold Mine, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Renforth Resources, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Granada Gold Mine, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Renforth Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Granada Gold Mine, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Renforth Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$108.9K is higher than Granada Gold Mine, Inc.'s net income of -$571.9K. Notably, Renforth Resources, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 32.41x while Granada Gold Mine, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Renforth Resources, Inc. is -- versus -- for Granada Gold Mine, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Galleon Gold Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Renforth Resources, Inc.'s net margin of --. Renforth Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Galleon Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -3.89%.

Renforth Resources, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 380%. On the other hand Galleon Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $2.75 which suggests that it could grow by 175%. Given that Renforth Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than Galleon Gold Corp., analysts believe Renforth Resources, Inc. is more attractive than Galleon Gold Corp..

Renforth Resources, Inc. has a beta of 0.676, which suggesting that the stock is 32.374% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Galleon Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.771, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.134%.

Renforth Resources, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Galleon Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Renforth Resources, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Galleon Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Renforth Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Galleon Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Renforth Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$108.9K is higher than Galleon Gold Corp.'s net income of -$800.8K. Notably, Renforth Resources, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 32.41x while Galleon Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Renforth Resources, Inc. is -- versus -- for Galleon Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trailbreaker Resources Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Renforth Resources, Inc.'s net margin of --. Renforth Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Trailbreaker Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of -1.24%.

Renforth Resources, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 380%. On the other hand Trailbreaker Resources Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Renforth Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than Trailbreaker Resources Ltd., analysts believe Renforth Resources, Inc. is more attractive than Trailbreaker Resources Ltd..

Renforth Resources, Inc. has a beta of 0.676, which suggesting that the stock is 32.374% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trailbreaker Resources Ltd. has a beta of 2.736, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 173.568%.

Renforth Resources, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Trailbreaker Resources Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Renforth Resources, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Trailbreaker Resources Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Renforth Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Trailbreaker Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Renforth Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$108.9K is higher than Trailbreaker Resources Ltd.'s net income of -$112.6K. Notably, Renforth Resources, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 32.41x while Trailbreaker Resources Ltd.'s PE ratio is 41.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Renforth Resources, Inc. is -- versus 47.86x for Trailbreaker Resources Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.