RFR.CX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

37 Capital, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Renforth Resources, Inc.'s net margin of --. Renforth Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat 37 Capital, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Renforth Resources, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 700%. On the other hand 37 Capital, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Renforth Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than 37 Capital, Inc., analysts believe Renforth Resources, Inc. is more attractive than 37 Capital, Inc..

Renforth Resources, Inc. has a beta of 0.706, which suggesting that the stock is 29.447% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 37 Capital, Inc. has a beta of 0.868, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.248%.

Renforth Resources, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 37 Capital, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Renforth Resources, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 37 Capital, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Renforth Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than 37 Capital, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Renforth Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$108.9K is lower than 37 Capital, Inc.'s net income of -$46.9K. Notably, Renforth Resources, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 32.41x while 37 Capital, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Renforth Resources, Inc. is -- versus -- for 37 Capital, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pasinex Resources Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Renforth Resources, Inc.'s net margin of --. Renforth Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Pasinex Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of --.

Renforth Resources, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 700%. On the other hand Pasinex Resources Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 320%. Given that Renforth Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than Pasinex Resources Ltd., analysts believe Renforth Resources, Inc. is more attractive than Pasinex Resources Ltd..

Renforth Resources, Inc. has a beta of 0.706, which suggesting that the stock is 29.447% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pasinex Resources Ltd. has a beta of 0.919, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.102%.

Renforth Resources, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pasinex Resources Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Renforth Resources, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pasinex Resources Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Renforth Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Pasinex Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Renforth Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$108.9K is lower than Pasinex Resources Ltd.'s net income of $43K. Notably, Renforth Resources, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 32.41x while Pasinex Resources Ltd.'s PE ratio is 2.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Renforth Resources, Inc. is -- versus -- for Pasinex Resources Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Renforth Resources, Inc.'s net margin of --. Renforth Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Spark Energy Minerals, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Renforth Resources, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 700%. On the other hand Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Renforth Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than Spark Energy Minerals, Inc., analysts believe Renforth Resources, Inc. is more attractive than Spark Energy Minerals, Inc..

Renforth Resources, Inc. has a beta of 0.706, which suggesting that the stock is 29.447% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. has a beta of 1.399, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.888%.

Renforth Resources, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Renforth Resources, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Renforth Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are larger than Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Renforth Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$108.9K is higher than Spark Energy Minerals, Inc.'s net income of -$832.1K. Notably, Renforth Resources, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 32.41x while Spark Energy Minerals, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Renforth Resources, Inc. is -- versus -- for Spark Energy Minerals, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Renforth Resources, Inc.'s net margin of --. Renforth Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.'s return on equity of -10.32%.

Renforth Resources, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 700%. On the other hand St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Renforth Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp., analysts believe Renforth Resources, Inc. is more attractive than St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp..

Renforth Resources, Inc. has a beta of 0.706, which suggesting that the stock is 29.447% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. has a beta of 0.582, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.792%.

Renforth Resources, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Renforth Resources, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Renforth Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Renforth Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$108.9K is higher than St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.'s net income of -$814K. Notably, Renforth Resources, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 32.41x while St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is 15.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Renforth Resources, Inc. is -- versus 5,524.25x for St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.