TECK.B.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Giant Mining has a net margin of -24.46% compared to Teck Resources's net margin of --. Teck Resources's return on equity of 1.7% beat Giant Mining's return on equity of --.

Teck Resources has a consensus price target of $73.62, signalling upside risk potential of 24.38%. On the other hand Giant Mining has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Teck Resources has higher upside potential than Giant Mining, analysts believe Teck Resources is more attractive than Giant Mining.

Teck Resources has a beta of 1.369, which suggesting that the stock is 36.912% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Giant Mining has a beta of 1.239, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.927%.

Teck Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.84%. Giant Mining offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Teck Resources pays 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Giant Mining pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Teck Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Teck Resources quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Giant Mining quarterly revenues of --. Teck Resources's net income of -$699M is lower than Giant Mining's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Teck Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 65.19x while Giant Mining's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Teck Resources is 1.47x versus -- for Giant Mining. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ivanhoe Mines has a net margin of -24.46% compared to Teck Resources's net margin of --. Teck Resources's return on equity of 1.7% beat Ivanhoe Mines's return on equity of --.

Teck Resources has a consensus price target of $73.62, signalling upside risk potential of 24.38%. On the other hand Ivanhoe Mines has an analysts' consensus of $23.81 which suggests that it could grow by 42.47%. Given that Ivanhoe Mines has higher upside potential than Teck Resources, analysts believe Ivanhoe Mines is more attractive than Teck Resources.

Teck Resources has a beta of 1.369, which suggesting that the stock is 36.912% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ivanhoe Mines has a beta of 1.893, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.297%.

Teck Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.84%. Ivanhoe Mines offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Teck Resources pays 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Ivanhoe Mines pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Teck Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Teck Resources quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Ivanhoe Mines quarterly revenues of --. Teck Resources's net income of -$699M is lower than Ivanhoe Mines's net income of $160.9M. Notably, Teck Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 65.19x while Ivanhoe Mines's PE ratio is 107.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Teck Resources is 1.47x versus -- for Ivanhoe Mines. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Renforth Resources has a net margin of -24.46% compared to Teck Resources's net margin of --. Teck Resources's return on equity of 1.7% beat Renforth Resources's return on equity of --.

Teck Resources has a consensus price target of $73.62, signalling upside risk potential of 24.38%. On the other hand Renforth Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1100%. Given that Renforth Resources has higher upside potential than Teck Resources, analysts believe Renforth Resources is more attractive than Teck Resources.

Teck Resources has a beta of 1.369, which suggesting that the stock is 36.912% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Renforth Resources has a beta of 0.755, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.515%.

Teck Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.84%. Renforth Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Teck Resources pays 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Renforth Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Teck Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Teck Resources quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Renforth Resources quarterly revenues of --. Teck Resources's net income of -$699M is lower than Renforth Resources's net income of -$232.3K. Notably, Teck Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 65.19x while Renforth Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Teck Resources is 1.47x versus -- for Renforth Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Winston Gold has a net margin of -24.46% compared to Teck Resources's net margin of --. Teck Resources's return on equity of 1.7% beat Winston Gold's return on equity of --.

Teck Resources has a consensus price target of $73.62, signalling upside risk potential of 24.38%. On the other hand Winston Gold has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Teck Resources has higher upside potential than Winston Gold, analysts believe Teck Resources is more attractive than Winston Gold.

Teck Resources has a beta of 1.369, which suggesting that the stock is 36.912% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Winston Gold has a beta of 0.887, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.322%.

Teck Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.84%. Winston Gold offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Teck Resources pays 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Winston Gold pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Teck Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Teck Resources quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Winston Gold quarterly revenues of --. Teck Resources's net income of -$699M is higher than Winston Gold's net income of --. Notably, Teck Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 65.19x while Winston Gold's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Teck Resources is 1.47x versus -- for Winston Gold. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.