FL.V Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Frontier Lithium, Inc.'s net margin of 23.61%. Frontier Lithium, Inc.'s return on equity of -195.5% beat Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.52%.

Frontier Lithium, Inc. has a consensus price target of $1.85, signalling upside risk potential of 160.56%. On the other hand Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $17.90 which suggests that it could grow by 15.91%. Given that Frontier Lithium, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ivanhoe Mines Ltd., analysts believe Frontier Lithium, Inc. is more attractive than Ivanhoe Mines Ltd..

Frontier Lithium, Inc. has a beta of 0.995, which suggesting that the stock is 0.491% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a beta of 1.958, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.823%.

Frontier Lithium, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Frontier Lithium, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Frontier Lithium, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues of $178.2M. Frontier Lithium, Inc.'s net income of -$1.8M is lower than Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s net income of $42.1M. Notably, Frontier Lithium, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s PE ratio is 48.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Frontier Lithium, Inc. is -- versus 43.81x for Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Renforth Resources, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Frontier Lithium, Inc.'s net margin of --. Frontier Lithium, Inc.'s return on equity of -195.5% beat Renforth Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Frontier Lithium, Inc. has a consensus price target of $1.85, signalling upside risk potential of 160.56%. On the other hand Renforth Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 700%. Given that Renforth Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than Frontier Lithium, Inc., analysts believe Renforth Resources, Inc. is more attractive than Frontier Lithium, Inc..

Frontier Lithium, Inc. has a beta of 0.995, which suggesting that the stock is 0.491% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Renforth Resources, Inc. has a beta of 0.706, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.447%.

Frontier Lithium, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Renforth Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Frontier Lithium, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Renforth Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Frontier Lithium, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Renforth Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Frontier Lithium, Inc.'s net income of -$1.8M is lower than Renforth Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$108.9K. Notably, Frontier Lithium, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Renforth Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is 32.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Frontier Lithium, Inc. is -- versus -- for Renforth Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Frontier Lithium, Inc.'s net margin of --. Frontier Lithium, Inc.'s return on equity of -195.5% beat St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.'s return on equity of -10.32%.

Frontier Lithium, Inc. has a consensus price target of $1.85, signalling upside risk potential of 160.56%. On the other hand St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Frontier Lithium, Inc. has higher upside potential than St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp., analysts believe Frontier Lithium, Inc. is more attractive than St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp..

Frontier Lithium, Inc. has a beta of 0.995, which suggesting that the stock is 0.491% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. has a beta of 0.582, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.792%.

Frontier Lithium, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Frontier Lithium, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Frontier Lithium, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Frontier Lithium, Inc.'s net income of -$1.8M is lower than St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.'s net income of -$814K. Notably, Frontier Lithium, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is 15.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Frontier Lithium, Inc. is -- versus 5,524.25x for St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Teck Resources Limited has a net margin of -- compared to Frontier Lithium, Inc.'s net margin of 3.93%. Frontier Lithium, Inc.'s return on equity of -195.5% beat Teck Resources Limited's return on equity of 3.02%.

Frontier Lithium, Inc. has a consensus price target of $1.85, signalling upside risk potential of 160.56%. On the other hand Teck Resources Limited has an analysts' consensus of $62.94 which suggests that it could grow by 1.34%. Given that Frontier Lithium, Inc. has higher upside potential than Teck Resources Limited, analysts believe Frontier Lithium, Inc. is more attractive than Teck Resources Limited.

Frontier Lithium, Inc. has a beta of 0.995, which suggesting that the stock is 0.491% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Teck Resources Limited has a beta of 1.503, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.25%.

Frontier Lithium, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Teck Resources Limited offers a yield of 0.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Frontier Lithium, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Teck Resources Limited pays out 79.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Teck Resources Limited's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Frontier Lithium, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Teck Resources Limited quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Frontier Lithium, Inc.'s net income of -$1.8M is lower than Teck Resources Limited's net income of $133M. Notably, Frontier Lithium, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Teck Resources Limited's PE ratio is 25.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Frontier Lithium, Inc. is -- versus 2.96x for Teck Resources Limited. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.